Accessibility and the Web: Not Mutually Exclusive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Accessibility and the Web: Not Mutually Exclusive

Description:

Improving provision for disabled people in further and higher education through technology ... Janet Jackson's latest CD from www.target.com. Information retrieval: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: LAW362
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accessibility and the Web: Not Mutually Exclusive


1
Accessibility and the Web Not Mutually Exclusive
  • Simon Ball
  • JISC TechDis Service
  • Email Helpdesk_at_techdis.ac.uk
  • Web www.techdis.ac.uk

2
TechDis Who
  • Improving provision for disabled people in
    further and higher education through technology
  • Funded by JISC the Joint Information Systems
    Committee

3
TechDis What
  • Primary function is Technology and how it can be
    used to support disabled students and staff
  • Also part of the wider disability agenda
  • Social Models vs Medical Models
  • A safe environment

4
TechDis How
  • Advice resource helpdesk_at_techdis.ac.uk
  • Databases Assistive Technology, Connections,
    Knowledge
  • Research PDAs, VLEs etc
  • Workshops Monthly in York, also Standalone JCALT
    Workshop Packs
  • Publications www.ferl.org.uk/display.cfm?page557
  • www.techdis.ac.uk/accessallareas/AAA.pdf
  • www.techdis.ac.uk/pdf/curricula.pdf

5
Why? The Legislation!
  • Aside from ethical and good practice reasons for
    making learning and teaching accessible, we are
    now required to do so by law
  • Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA)
  • Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Act
    2001 (SENDA)
  • European Legislation

6
European Legislation
  • eEurope Action Plan 2002
  • Obligation under Amsterdam Treaty (Declaration
    22)
  • Resolution in February 2003 on embedding WAI (web
    accessibility) guidelines into practice across
    all sectors

7
DDA 1995
  • Disability Discrimination Act 1995
  • Entire Act at www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1995/199505
    0.htm
  • Part 1 Defines Disability
  • Part 2 Outlaws discrimination in Employment
  • Part 3 Outlaws discrimination in Other Areas
    (Service Provision)
  • Education not included

8
SENDA 2001
  • Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001
  • Entire Act at www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/200100
    10.htm
  • Effectively a replacement Part 4 of the DDA
  • All services provided wholly or mainly for
    students are covered, including learning
    materials and assessment
  • The institution is responsible for ensuring the
    accessibility of any products or services it
    procures

9
Definition of Disability
  • A person has a disability for the purposes of
    this Act if he has a physical or mental
    impairment which has a substantial and long-term
    adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal
    day-to-day activities.

10
What DDA/SENDA Says
  • Not treat a disabled person less favourably for
    a reason relating to their disability
  • Required to make reasonable adjustments if a
    disabled person would otherwise be placed at a
    substantial disadvantage
  • Adjustments should be anticipatory
  • Applies to all admissions, enrolments and other
    student services which includes assessment and
    web-based materials

11
Accessibility and Usability
  • Accessibility can be easily and conveniently
    approached, entered, and used by people with
    disabilities (US National Parks)
  • Design-For-All can be easily and conveniently
    approached, entered, and used by everybody,
    thereby rendering accessibility redundant (in an
    ideal world)

12
What questions should we be asking about
accessibility?
  • What does accessibility mean?
  • equality or equivalence?
  • What are the design issues?
  • for all or for special cases
  • Does new technology have a role?
  • enabler or new barrier?

13
WAI Guidelines (accessibility of web / e-learning
materials)
  • World Wide Web Consortiums Web Accessibility
    Initiative
  • www.W3.org/WAI
  • Gathering of world experts in Web and
    Accessibility
  • Produce best practice guidelines on various
    subjects
  • Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
  • www.techdis.ac.uk/seven
  • User Agent Accessibility Guidelines
  • Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines

14
NN Group Quantitative Research
  • Involved 60 people, all familiar with using the
    Internet, and where applicable all experienced at
    using the assistive devices employed
  • 20 screen reader users
  • 20 screen magnifier users
  • 20 people using no assistive technology
  • All were set four simple tasks, and given 20
    minutes per task to complete them

15
NN Group Quantitative Research Tasks
  • Fact-finding
  • find the average temperature in Dallas (no site
    specified)
  • Buy online
  • Janet Jacksons latest CD from www.target.com
  • Information retrieval
  • take a bus in Chicago www.transitchicago.com
  • Compare and contrast
  • find a specific kind of mutual fund on
    www.schwab.com

16
NN Group Major findings
  • Participants who used no assistive technology
    were
  • about six times more successful at completing
    tasks than people using screen readers
  • three times more successful than people using
    screen magnifiers
  • There was also a very close relationship between
    success and satisfaction

17
NN Group Completion Statistics
  • No assistive technology users
  • 7/10 completed, 1/10 ran out of time, 2/10 gave
    up
  • Screen magnifier users
  • 2/10 completed, 4/10 ran out of time, 4/10 gave
    up
  • Screen reader users
  • 1/10 completed, 5/10 ran out of time, 4/10 gave up

18
VLE Study Findings
  • Learners using no AT spent 2 or 3 times more time
    Doing than AT users
  • Screen reader users spent as much time Using and
    Accessing as Doing
  • AT users needed more prompting
  • www.techdis.ac.uk/resources/VLE002.html

19
Mencap Research
  • 11 users with learning difficulties reviewed 30
    popular web sites in August 2001. Users had
    varying levels of familiarity with the Internet
  • Asked to give scores on visual appeal, clarity,
    navigation, is it obvious whats being provided,
    help and contact details, is language
    understandable and readable, presence of graphics
    / audio to aid understanding

20
Text-Only Sites
  • Remember EQUIVALENCE!
  • A text-only version may NOT be equivalent to the
    Full Monty
  • RNIBs See It Right Award went to Tescos
    access site. Oh dear..
  • For actual websites, have a look at Betsie (but
    ask her first) www.bbc.co.uk/education/betsie

21
Language
  • Stating the obvious?
  • A learner with dyslexia or whose first language
    is BSL may not be able to interpret easily
    unnecessarily flowery or verbose academic
    language.
  • Just another unnecessary barrier see the effect
    yourselves.

22
What do these examples teach us?
  • Clarity of language
  • Brevity if possible
  • Think about the range of students experiencing
    the assessment and consider the options for best
    achieving the intended outcomes

23
Technology and Disabilities Some common
issues(Medical Model can sometimes be useful!)
  • Physical / Mobility Impairments
  • Deaf / Hard Of Hearing
  • Blind / Visual Impairments
  • Dyslexia / Cognitive Difficulties
  • Its all Common Sense! Most accessibility
    features benefit all users. But specific
    adjustments are contextual.

24
Physical / Mobility Impairments 1
  • Principal Issue 1 Navigation
  • Many users cannot use a mouse
  • Can every aspect of the material be negotiated
    using the TAB key?
  • Can boxes/options be checked using a combination
    of the TAB key and a single other keystroke (e.g.
    users of head wands or switches)?
  • Are drop-down menus accessible?

25
Physical / Mobility Impairments 2
  • Principal Issue 2 Keyboard Dexterity
  • Many users can hit only one key at a time no
    simultaneous combinations should be required in
    navigation
  • If a key is mis-hit is there an easy and obvious
    way to backtrack and correct?

26
Deaf / Hard Of Hearing 1
  • Principal Issue 1 Audio Content
  • All audio content must have a text commentary in
    the form of subtitles or a signing avatar (or
    signing video).
  • A text-based alternative question is adequate, as
    long as the same piece of knowledge is being
    tested with equal rigour. The omission of audio
    features should not mean the deaf student
    experiences less interesting material

27
Deaf / Hard Of Hearing 2
  • Principal Issue 2 Language
  • English is often the second language of deaf
    people, the first being BSL - British Sign
    Language (or ASL, ISG etc)
  • Questions should be worded using clear,
    understandable language so as to ensure it is
    obvious what is required of the student.
  • Applies equally to overseas students

28
Blind / Visual Impairments 1
  • Principal Issue 1 Screen Magnifiers
  • Magnify part of screen up to 16 times e.g.
    Zoomtext
  • Never use text in graphic form (pixelation)
  • Do complex graphics and images make sense at
    increased magnification?

29
Blind / Visual Impairments 2
  • Principal Issue 2 Screen Readers
  • Speak out what is on screen e.g. Jaws
  • Some speak only what is typed, some read only
    HTML, great variety of tools.
  • All read in linear fashion

30
Blind / Visual Impairments 3
  • Does the text and the navigation make sense when
    read aloud?
  • Do text options occur before check boxes?
  • Do tables make sense when read linearly
    row-by-row?
  • Do links and navigation aids make sense?
  • Do images have full text descriptions?

31
Blind / Visual Impairments 4
  • Principal Issue 3 Colour
  • Do not use colour alone to convey meaning.
  • Remember many people cannot distinguish green
    from red
  • Avoid garish colours (think of lime green text
    magnified 16 times!)

32
Dyslexia / Cognitive Difficulties 1
  • Many issues regarding presentation and wording of
    information
  • If possible allow user to select text attributes
  • If not possible, select neutral attributes
  • Sans serif fonts (e.g. Arial, Comic Sans,
    Verdana)
  • Light text on dark background or vice versa
    (yellow on black is popular)
  • 12 pt. (120 ) Font minimum size
  • 1.5 (150 ) line spacing

33
Dyslexia / Cognitive Difficulties 2
  • Clear wording is vital
  • No trick questions (no too similar options)
  • Is it obvious how to progress and what is being
    tested?

34
Some technology tips
  • When designing multiple choice questions, try to
    avoid overly complex possible answers
  • If using graphics, ensure that high quality
    recorded descriptions are available for each
    graphic used and that text does not become
    pixelated when magnified
  • Make transition times between questions
    adjustable to allow for different student needs
    (but bear in mind that extra time may make the
    total exam burden more onerous)

35
More tips
  • Take account of keyboard rather than mouse
    navigation in considering ease of movement
    between questions
  • Be up to speed on assistive technology and what
    it can do
  • Be sure of what you are testing- knowledge or
    physical effort
  • Be aware of the special needs of those
    participating in synchronous discussions

36
TechDis CBA Resource
  • General resources for CBA www.techdis.ac.uk/cba/
  • FAQs and discussion of issues
  • www.techdis.ac.uk/cba/forum.html
  • Email for contributions to question and answer
    board
  • cba_at_techdis.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com