Title: Chapter 3: Attraction
1Chapter 3 Attraction
- Social Psychology by Tom Gilovich, Dacher
Keltner, and Richard Nisbett
2What Influences Attraction?
- Physical Attractiveness
- Propinquity
- Similarity
3What Do We Find Attractive?
- Average Faces
- Composite faces are judged more attractive than
any individual face that comprises composite. - Symmetrical Faces
- Deviations from symmetry often occur from
exposure to diseases in uteri. - What is your good side?
- Female waist-to-hip ratio of 0.7
- Regardless of weight
4Physical Attractiveness
- Some important conclusions from research on
physical attractiveness and attraction - Though there are some features that are nearly
universally-regarded as attractive, there is
considerable variability in what individuals find
attractive - Though we tend to like those people who are
physically attractive, the reverse is also true
We find people we like more attractive than those
we dont like. - Happy couples tend to idealize each others
physical attractiveness - Physical attractiveness is less stable than we
think some less attractive young people get
better looking with age, and some great looking
young people lose their luster with age.
-
5Impact of Physical Attractiveness
- Attractive Individuals as compared to less
attractive individuals - Are more popular with members of opposite sex
- May be graded easier
- May earn more money
- May get help easier
- Are less likely to be convicted
- Receive lighter sentences if convicted
6Early Effects of Physical Attractiveness
- Attractive infants receive more affection and
attention from mothers - Attractive children are
- thought to be more intelligent and better behaved
by teachers - Held less accountable for transgressions.
- Even infants show same preference for
attractiveness
7Why Does Physical Attractiveness Have Such Impact?
a. Immediacy b. Prestige Sigall and Landy
(1973) c. Halo Effect Belief that attractive
people also possess a number of other desirable
characteristics
8Gender and the Impact of Physical Attractiveness
- Attractiveness plays more important role in
womens lives than mens lives. - Beauty functions as currency for women
- Allows greater access to
- Social mobility
- Popularity
- Dating prospects
- Marriage opportunities
9Evolutionary Theory
- Primary motive is reproductive success.
- People who make bad mate choices will have little
success. - Mate preferences should be shaped by natural
selection. - We are instinctively attracted to features
associated with reproductive success
- Parental Investment Theory
- The sex that invests more is more selective.
- Females look for mate that could
- Provide resources
- Was willing to invest resources
- Protect family
- Males look for mate that
- Had good reproductive potential
- Young and healthy
- Would be faithful
- Nuturing
10Evolution and Long-Term Mate Choice
- David Buss (1986)
- Had college students rank 13 traits on how
desirable they were in a mate. - Both attractiveness and earning capacity were
ranked lower than kindness and intelligence
11Busss Cross Cultural Study
- Looked at rankings across 36 countries
- Men ranked attractiveness higher than women
- Women ranked good financial prospect higher than
men - Women want to marry an older mate while men want
to marry younger mate
12Social Structure Theory (Eagly Wood, 1999)
- Argue that differences found by Buss can be
explained by social structure - In most countries, mean control financial
resources - Easiest way for women to access these resources
is marry a man with them - Found that as women have increased access to
resources, gender differences in importance
ratings decreased.
13Gender Differences in Jealousy
- Buss argued that men should be more jealous of
sexual infidelity than women since it is
difficult to prove paternity - Found that males were more physiologically
aroused when they imagined partner having sex
with another man compared to falling in love with
another man. - Christine Harris argued mean are more aroused by
sex and would show same pattern imagining
fidelity as infidelity.
14Gender Differences in Short-Term Mating
- Males are more interested in short-term mating
than females. - Men and women are equally interested in long-term
mating. - Males are more interested in having more sex
partners than females.
15Gender Differences in Short-Term Mating
- Men do not need to know partner very long to have
sex.
16Propinquity
- 1. Studies of
- Propinquity and
- Attraction
- Westwood West Study
- (Festinger, Schachter, Back, 1950)
- --used a Sociometric Survey - a survey that
attempts to measure the interpersonal
relationships in a group of people - --measured Functional Distance - an
architectural layouts propensity to encourage or
inhibit certain activities, like contact between
people -
17Propinquity
- Manhattan Housing Project (Nahemow Lawton,
1975) - Zajonc studies
- 2. Explanations of Propinquity Effects
- a. Availability and Propinquity
- b. Anticipating Interaction
- c. The Mere Exposure Effect
-
18Fig. 3.2
19Fig. 3.3
20Fig. 3.4
21Similarity and Attraction
- B. Similarity
- 1. Studies of Similarity and Attraction
- Whyte (1956) study of Chicago suburb layout
- Newcomb (1956, 1961)
- Bogus Stranger paradigm
-
22Fig. 3.5
23Similarity and Attraction
- 2. Dont Opposites Attract? Complementarity
- Most studies claiming to support
complementarity have been criticized on
methodological grounds - Similarity appears to be the rule, and
complementarity, the exception, in attraction - 3. Why Does Similarity Promote Attraction?
- a. Similar Others Validate Our Beliefs and
Orientations - b. Similarity Facilitates Smooth Interactions
- c. We Expect Similar Others to Like Us
- d. Similar Others Have Qualities We Like
-
24Attraction
- D. Theoretical Integration
- 1. The Reward Perspective on Interpersonal
Attraction - 2. The Social Exchange Perspective on
- Physical Attraction
-
-
-
25Study Smarter Student Website
- http//www.wwnorton.com/socialpsych
- Chapter Reviews
- Diagnostic Quizzes
- Vocabulary Flashcards
- Apply It! Exercises