Title: Research Design and Behavioral Analysis
1Research Design and Behavioral Analysis
2Research methods
- Correlation Research used to determine if there
is a relationship between two variables - Least amount of experimental control
- Cannot be used to state cause and effect
relationships
3Research methods (cont.)
- Experiment provides most confidence in
determining cause and effect relationships.
Manipulate the independent variable to see if
changes occur in the dependent variable (measure) - Amphetamine study as an example
4Research methods (cont)
- Quasi-experiment similar to an experiment
except the independent variable (IV) cannot be
manipulated - IV is usually a subject variable
- Subjects are assigned to groups for particular
reason (gender, age, ethnic group, etc.) - Lack of random assignment reduces confidence in
cause and effect statement - Modification of Amphetamine study as an example
5Research methods (cont.)
- The experimental design preferred in
psychopharmacological research most control and
confidence in cause and effect - Measures are usually behavioral changes that the
drug was intended to cause and physical changes
(side effects) - Side effects not always bad many drugs designed
for one purpose, but later found to be useful for
another because of unexpected actions
6Experimental designs
- All experiments begin with a control group and
one or more experimental groups. The two
principle experimental designs differ in how
subjects are assigned to the groups
7Within-subjects design
- Only one group of subjects involved
- All subjects receive all levels of treatment.
They act as their own control and experimental
group(s). Test before giving the drug
baseline, then give the drug and measure any
changes - Advantages
- Need fewer subjects
- You know groups are equal because they are the
same subjects - Disadvantages
- Carry over effects measuring independent
variable to get baseline may change subjects in
some way - Many times it requires more time delays between
treatments
8Between-subjects design
- Different subjects are randomly assigned to
different groups. Groups are assumed to be equal
because each subject had an equal chance of being
assigned to any group - Advantages
- No carry-over effects
- Quick
- Disadvantages
- More variability groups may not be equal by
chance - More subjects required and you may not have many
9Statistical analysis
- Inferential statistics what is the probability
that the difference between groups is the result
of chance variations? - Within subjects design What is the probability
that the difference in the baseline measure and
the experimental trials was the result of chance? - Between groups What is the probability that the
difference between the control group and
experimental group(s) was due to chance? - Convention says to use probability of 1 or 5 out
of 100 (Plt.01 or Plt.05) - With drug research using a P lt .01 is preferred
10Validity
- Internal validity How valid is our measurement?
Are we measuring what we say we are measuring? - External validity How confident are we that we
can generalize our results from our sample to a
whole population? Is our sample truly
representative of our population? Could it be
biased?
11Important issues with validity
- 1. Within groups variability the average of the
subjects in the experimental group performed
differently than the average of the subjects in
the control group, but perhaps a sub-group of the
subjects did not show a difference in
performance. - Example older subjects were very different, but
younger subjects showed no change. Your study
showed it worked for all subjects when it only
affected older subjects
12Important issues with validity (cont.)
- 2. Use of a drug with a population not included
in any of the samples used in the experiment. - Examples
- 1. women excluded from testing hypertension
drugs because of fluctuating hormones. These
drugs used to treat hypertension in women. - 2. Prozac used to treat children when only
tested on adults
13Important issues with validity (cont.)
- Placebo a pill or injection that has no
medicinal value, but causes changes because of
peoples expectations - Placebo effect if people given something that
is suppose to help them, it may have an effect
when in reality the drug had no effect. Has to
be controlled by having the control group receive
a placebo while experiment group receives
experimental drug
14Important issues with validity (cont.)
- Hawthorne Effect people will sometimes improve
because they get attention and feel that others
are trying to help even if the drug they are
given has no effect itself
15Experimenter bias
- A Person testing their drug has a strong desire
for drug testing to be successful - They know what the desired effect is suppose to
be - They may see the desired effect in the
experimental group, and not see it in the control
receiving the placebo because they know which
group is which
16Solution to experimenter bias
- Use of multiple naïve observers who have no
expectations about the which subjects should show
a change - Use of double-blind techniques. Subjects are
unaware if they are receiving the placebo or test
drug (single-blind), and the experimenter is
unaware of who was assigned to get the placebo
and who is receiving the test drug.
17Three group design
- Most frequently used drug testing design
- 1. experimental groups receives test drug
- 2. control group 1 receives placebo
- 3. control group 2 receives drug with known
effects - Allows 3 different comparisons
- 1. placebo to established drug was test
sensitive enough to detect an effect - 2. placebo to experimental drug was there an
effect - 3. established drug and experimental drug is
new drug more effect or have fewer side effects
18Dependent measures in psychopharmacological
research
- Changes in observed behavior decrease in
aggressive behaviors, decreased eating, etc. - Changes in human performance cognitive and
motor tests - Self-report by subjects pain medication, on a
scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being very little and 10
being excruciating how do you rate your level of
pain?
19Dependent measures in psychopharmacological
research
- Electroencephalogram (EEG)
- Measure level of arousal of the cortex small
fast waves indicate higher levels of arousal than
large slow waves - Measure REM sleep deprivation of REM sleep has
similar effect to total sleep deprivation. A
side effect of some drugs is a disruption of REM
sleep
20Dependent measures in psychopharmacological
research
- Perceptual measures
- Sensory difference thresholds how different do
two stimuli have to before you are able to detect
a difference Does a drug make you more or less
sensitive to these differences? - Critical frequency of fusion How fast does a
light have to flicker on and off before you see
it as a continuous light
21Dependent measures in psychopharmacological
research (cont.)
- Cognitive tests
- Motor tests sobriety test
- Combination driving tests
22Measuring performance in nonhumans
- Drug effects on the performance on operant
conditioning and different schedules of
reinforcement - Avoidance escape tasks animals learn to avoid
an unpleasant stimuli or they learn to escape an
unpleasant stimuli they cant avoid - Anxiety reducing drugs decrease avoidance
behavior but not escape behavior
23Measuring performance in nonhumans
- Use of punishment anything that decreases
magnitude or frequency of a behavior. Does the
drug decrease the effectiveness of punishment.
Sedatives do amphetamines do not - Drug discrimination paradigm teach animal to
discriminate between the effects of a placebo and
the effects of a particular drug - Used to determine if a new drug has a similar
effect as an older drug - Also if the two drugs have the same effect on the
actions of neurotransmitters
24Drug development and testing
- Major issue with psychoactive drugs
- 1. we know most mental disorders involve
biochemical imbalances - 2. we know that psychoactive drugs operate on
the effect of neurotransmitter systems - 3. we do not know exactly what the specific
biochemical imbalance is in most disorders so it
is difficult to know what drug will work with
what disorder - This results in extensive testing with nonhumans
- This results in extensive testing with nonhumans
25Nonhuman testing
- Purpose
- Identification of exactly which neurotransmitter
system or systems the drug effects and identifies
possible side effects - Identification of effective versus toxic dosages
based upon body weight looking for drugs with
the largest difference between the two - Obviously interspecies differences a problem
26Human testing
- Purpose
- Identify short-term and long-term effects in
humans - Detailed analysis of aversive effects never
ending unless drug is discontinued