Review of Chapter One - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Review of Chapter One

Description:

27 amendments in over 200 years. 1st Ten Amendments made almost immediately ... Summary: Compare & Contrast. The Slavery Issue. Concerns of the Southern States ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: waynelec
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review of Chapter One


1
Review of Chapter One
  • Sources of Political Conflict?
  • Governments role in Political Conflict?
  • Tools of Government for its role?
  • Govs method to manage Political Conflict?
  • How are the two main rule types different?
  • What are the various source of structural rules?
  • What is the nature of the Rules?
  • How why do the Rules change with time?

2
Key Terms Summary
  • Material scarcity The inability of a society to
    provide its citizens with all the goods and
    services they may want or need.
  • Values Principles and beliefs embraced by
    society.
  • Legitimacy A self-imposed willingness of
    citizens to respect and obey the decisions of
    their government.
  • Coercive force The ability of a government to
    compel its citizens to obey its decisions.
  • Structural rules Rules that establish the
    organization, procedures, and powers of
    government.
  • Policy rule A decision a government institution
    reaches on a specific political question within
    its jurisdiction.

3
Chapter 2a Learning Objectives - The Constitution
  • (1). Examine the Constitution as a reflection of
    political conflict.
  • (2). Discuss impact of the Colonial Experience on
    the founding fathers.
  • (3). Summarize the shortcomings of the Articles
    of Confederation.
  • (4). Examine politics of Constitutional
    Convention its ratification.
  • (5). Analyze political philosophy of Founding
    Fathers influence.
  • (6). Examine the theoretical basis of the
    Declaration of Independence.
  • (7). Explain conflict Individual Rights vs.
    majority Democratic Rule.
  • (8). Discuss potential problem of Majority Rule
    how its moderated.

4
Introduction some general points
  • Short document compared with states
  • Oldest National constitution now in use
  • Little changed in contrasts to states
  • 27 amendments in over 200 years
  • 1st Ten Amendments made almost immediately
  • Americans hold Constitution in high regard
  • But most never read it or know whats in it

5
General points- continued
  • Constitution is a living document gt
    interpretation
  • Lays out basic structure role of key political
    actors
  • Constitution is a political documentgt not
    perfect
  • Represents political compromises made at the time
  • Written in a way to gain ratification of most
    states
  • Difficult issues side stepped or made ambiguous
  • Slavery womens rights left to future
    generations

6
Constitution as a Reflection of Political
Conflict
  • The Colonial Experience
  • previous 150 years of relative independence
  • Parliaments post French Indian War actions
  • Need to pay for war security gt new lands
  • How? gt Taxation without representation
  • King George III his appointed governors
  • Greater centralized rule from London
  • Less autonomy of Colonial Legislators

7
England's Political Situation - 1760's
King Georgess assertion of power steadily rose
The legitimacy of the English government fell
What was the impact of this change on the
Colonies?
8
Impact on Colonies
  • Growing colonial resentment toward tyranny
  • Mistrust of centralized power
  • (King located in London)
  • Manifested in Kings appointed colonial governors
  • Americans had more trust in states their
    legislature
  • Attitude gt following War for Independence
  • Shaped founding fathers attitudes toward
    government

9
Colonists saw a decentralized government, (with
its diffusion of power, as preferable to a highly
centralized government.
Decentralized Power
centralized
Centralized Power
Branch 1
VS.
The King
Power Defused
Branch 2
Branch 3
Attitude incorporated into Articles of
Confederation
10
The Articles of ConfederationKey Questions
  • What is the source of national governments
    power?
  • Type of government under Articles?
  • Inherent problem with this type of government?

11
The Articles of Confederation
  • National Government only had powers that the
    states granted it.
  • States retain their sovereignty, or supreme
    power, within their borders.
  • The National Government would only have power to
    negotiate foreign relations.
  • Articles did not provide for executive branch.

12
Foreign policy run by Federal government
States grant powers
Articles of Confederation
No Executive Branch
States retain sovereignty
13
Realities Problems of the Articles of
Confederation
  • States negotiated own trade agreement with Europe
  • States imposed their own tariffs- problem?
  • Interstate Commerce development of a National
    Economy
  • The wealthy class was unhappy with laws passed by
    state legislatures (to disadvantage of wealthy
    class).
  • What practical example demonstrated Articles
    failure weakness?

14
Shays Rebellion
  • The participants in Shays rebellion protested
    Massachusetts economic policy
  • (Property foreclosure of tax delinquent farmers)
  • Governor asked for national government to put
    down the rebellion
  • no one came.
  • This rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the
    Articles of Confederation gt result?

15
The Constitutional Convention
ISSUES AND DEBATES
  • What is the best form of government?
  • What are the interests of the people and their
    leaders?
  • How can a government be organized that best meets
    the needs of all?

16
Three Critical Disputes
  • How to allocate representation (power) in the new
    Congress
  • How to deal with the question of slavery
  • How to define the powers of the new executive
    office of presidency

17
The Answers involved
  • Compromise
  • Calculated ambiguity in wording
  • And a lot of politics during the Convention
  • (Horse Trading)

18
The Politics of the Constitutional Convention
  • Structuring representation of National
    Legislature
  • Setting agenda Virginia Plan (Madisons role)
  • Counter proposal New Jersey Plan
  • Conflicting interests big versus little states
  • Resolving conflict through compromise
  • Final outcome (compare contrast) gt

19
The Virginia Plan called for
  • Two house legislature
  • Separate executive branch
  • Separate judicial branch

What were the responsibilities of each branch?
20
Responsibilities of each branch
Judicial Branch
Legislative Branch
Executive Branch
Make the Laws
Enforces Laws
Interpret Laws
21
The Legislature under the Virginia Plan
Under this plan, voters elect the Lower House,
which, in turn, elects the Upper House
Upper House
Lower House
Voters
22
New Jersey PlanSmall States Counter-Proposal
One Housegt

Each State
Equal Number of Representatives
elects
How was the conflict between the two plans
resolved?
23
The Connecticut Compromise
Split the difference
House of Representatives
Based on Population
Two Seats per State
Senate
24
Summary Compare Contrast
New Jersey Plan
Americas Constitution
Virginia Plan
25
The Slavery Issue
  • Concerns of the Southern States
  • Economic cultural way of life
  • How was the slavery issue addressed?

26
The Three-Fifths Compromise
  • Southern states were concerned about receiving
    equal representation in Congress.
  • The North had a greater population
  • Therefore more potential power to make laws
  • The South feared that the Northern Legislators
    would outlaw slavery.
  • Northern States agreed to count slaves as
    three-fifths of a person as a compromise
  • For the purpose of counting Souths state
    population
  • To insure Souths participation in new Government

27
Debate over Presidential Powers
  • Focus of debate
  • Basic conflict over delegated powers
  • Method for resolving those conflicts
  • The Role of George Washington

28
Determining the Powers of the President
  • Some wanted a strong executive branch
  • Others wanted a weak executive
  • How was this conflict solved?
  • To solve this conflict
  • The powers delegated to the President were
    intentionally kept ambiguous (Why not a
    problem?)
  • George Washington was generally considered
    trustworthy by all
  • And largely assumed that he would be the first
    President (why?- his track record during Rev.
    War)

29
The Politics of Ratification
  • Taking sides Federalists vs. Anti-federalists
  • Defining the agenda gt advantage of being
    positive
  • Making the rules for Ratification just right
  • Why nine states? (9 out of 13 RI ¾)
  • Conventions of states vs. state legislatures
  • Legitimate Anti-Federalists issue?
  • Bill of Rights (Guaranteed individual liberties)
  • Protections against a strong central government

30
Colossus of Despotism
  • Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a
    potential tool of tyranny
  • They called it the most daring attempt to
    establish a despotic aristocracy among freemen,
    that the world has ever witnessed."
  • How did the Federalists respond?

31
The Federalists Response

Rules of Ratification
Bill of Rights
Ratification
32
The Rules for Ratification
  • Federalists decided to put the vote to special
    state conventions rather than state legislatures
  • why?
  • Federalists also decided that 9 of the 13 states
    would be required to approve the Constitution
  • rather than the unanimous approval required by
    the Articles
  • why?
  • (Where was Rhode Island?)

33
Constitution as a Reflection of the Founders
Philosophy
  • Individual Rights and Democratic Rule
  • 18th century Classical liberalism
  • Individual rights and the role of government
  • Majority rule versus Minority rights- concern?
  • Majority Tyranny The Paradox of Majority Rule
  • Individual rights trump majority preferences
  • Constant balancing act of government
  • One groups interests countering anothers
  • Role of the Federalists Papers -key authors?

34
Classical Liberalism
  • Founders embraced 18th century philosophy
  • Individuals have intrinsic value
  • Their rights are natural or inalienable
  • Their rights cannot be denied
  • Government role purpose
  • safeguard these rights
  • Government should act IAW majority desires
  • but also act to protect individuals rights
  • What document articulates this philosophy?

35
The Declaration of Independence
  • The influence of the doctrine of natural rights
    is evident in the Declaration of Independence
    (1776), which declares that people are
  • endowed by their Creator with certain
    unalienable rights, that among these are Life,
    Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
  • What are the ways these rights could be
    threatened in a Democracy and how can this be
    prevented?

36
Majority Tyranny
A situation in which the majority uses its
advantage in numbers to suppress the rights of
the minority. A major concern of the Founding
Fathers- why?
37
How to Prevent a Majority Tyranny
  • Establish rules
  • make it difficult to form a permanent electoral
    majority
  • Divide governing authority
  • Three branches of government
  • State and Federal
  • Place limits on government
  • What it can do

38
Preventing Majority Tyranny finding the balance
  • Electoral rules gt
  • Democracy vs. Republicanism
  • Indirect elections (Text Figure 2-1)
  • Fixed terms of office
  • Geographically defined representation
  • National vs. states districts (Colonial
    experience)
  • Divided Authority (horizontal separation)
  • Separation of Powers
  • (The Three Branches of government)
  • Checks Balances (Text Figure 2-2)

39
Democracy vs. Republicanism
  • Democracy
  • A form of government in which the people are the
    ultimate political authority
  • (defined broadly to include all adults or
    narrowly to exclude women or slaves, for example)
  • Republicanism
  • A system of government in which the peoples
    selected representatives run the government

40
Electoral Rules 2 Indirect Elections
  • The founders of the United States, fearing a
    permanent ruling majority, established an
    indirect form of election.
  • The founders believed that if government
    officials were insulated from the passions of the
    public, it would be easier to protect the rights
    of the minorities.
  • Direct vs. indirect election
  • (illustrated in next three slides gt)

41
Direct Elections- illustration
Under the original provisions of the
Constitution, the members of the House of
Representatives were the only government
officials that people selected directly.
V o t e r s
House of Representatives
42
Indirect Elections (Before 17th Amendment)
All other government officials were to be
selected by the states, or appointed by the
president and confirmed by the Senate.
V o t e r s
Electoral College
President
Supreme Court
State Legislatures
Senate

House of Representatives
43
Indirect Elections (After 17th Amendment)
In 1913, the passage of the 17th Amendment
allowed the people to elect directly senators,
which eliminated the states roles in choosing
senators.
Electoral College
V o t e r s
President
Supreme Court
States
Senate

House of Representatives
44
Fixed Terms of Office
  • Elections set on fixed dates help prevent
    permanent electoral majorities.
  • Elections cannot be rescheduled to take advantage
    of favorable circumstances
  • As is done in some other (Parliamentary)
    Democracies.

45
Electoral Rule 2 Staggered Elections
Representatives
2 years
President
4 years
Senators
6 years
Elections for Senators are staggered1/3 of the
Senators are up for reelection every two years.
46
Electoral Rule 3 Geographically Defined
Representation
  • The founders reasoned that by having geographic
    representation it would be difficult for any
    particular group to win a national majority gt
    for example
  • Senators are chosen by state.
  • Representatives are chosen by district.

47
Separation of Powers
  • The founders took this doctrine from Baron de
    Montesquieu.
  • The principle that each of the three powers of
    government legislative, executive, and judicial
    should be held by a separate branch of
    government.

48
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances
  • To protect against majority tyranny, the founders
    created a system based on two closely linked
    principles
  • Separation of powers divides the federal
    government into three equal branches
  • versus (know the difference!)
  • Checks and balances gives each branch powers
    that enable it to prevent the other branches from
    taking actions that it opposes.

49
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances
(examples)
50
Preventing Majority Tyranny finding the balance
(continued 2)
  • Bicameral legislature (Senate vs. House)
  • Concurrent majority - ?
  • (when is a bill ready for President to sign ?)
  • Federalism (vertical division of authority)
  • (How does Federalism divide power?)
  • (How different from horizontal division?)

51
Federalism
U.S. Constitution divides power
State Government
Federal Government
52
Preventing Majority Tyranny finding the balance
(continued 3)
  • Formal boundaries limits on government powers
  • Limits placed in original constitution
  • Habeas corpus
  • No Bills of attainder
  • No Ex post facto laws
  • Bill of Rights protections (Chapter 4)

53
Key Terms Next Class prep
  • Review Key Terms in text class notes
  • Next Class
  • Core Provisions of the Constitution
  • Three Consequences of the Constitution
  • Federalism (see also Chapter 15)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com