Control Infection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 75
About This Presentation
Title:

Control Infection

Description:

Control Infection Prevent Infection ! Microbiology for ICPs Robert Berg, CIC, MT(ASCP), MBA CLS & Microbiologist from 1975 Lab Manager from 1982 MBA 1997 Infection ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:571
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: apicsierr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Control Infection


1
WASH
  • Control Infection

Prevent Infection !
2
Microbiology for ICPs
  • Robert Berg, CIC, MT(ASCP), MBA
  • CLS Microbiologist from 1975
  • Lab Manager from 1982
  • MBA 1997
  • Infection Control from 2000
  • CIC in 2002

3
Objectives
  • The participant will be able to
  • describe the reliability of sputum culture
    results by using the gram stain
  • describe the Factors that can adversely affect
    reliable Micro results
  • compare viral vs bacterial Meningitis
  • describe the laboratory markers for HBV, HAV,
    and HCV

4
Definitions
  • WBC white blood cells
  • PMN polymorphonuclear leukocytes
  • Polys polymorphonuclear leukocytes
  • Segs segmented neutrophils
  • Neuts segmented neutrophils
  • Lymphs/mononuclears lymphocytes

5
(No Transcript)
6
Clinical Microbiology
  • Clinical Goal
  • Whats growing
  • What antibiotic can I use (either by
    predictive value of the bug name or by Sensi
    result)
  • Epi Surveillance Goal
  • Give me the full name and Sensi pattern so I can
    determine if I have a cluster or not

7
Robs Rule of Thumb 1
  • Laboratory Tests Not 100
  • Interpret all results accordingly !!
  • (include clinical conditions in interpretation)

8
Robs Rule of Thumb 2
  • Just because a bug is growing does not mean its
    causing diseasecolonized??
  • For normally sterile body sites, this indeed may
    be an infection
  • Interpret all cultures knowing what would
    typically/normally grow in that site

9
Variables to Reliable ResultsPre-Analytical
Factors
  • Specimen Collection
  • Proper site selected for collection
  • Proper collection technique/method
  • Swab, needle/syringe, sterile collection, etc
  • Collected onto correct swab and transported on
    correct media
  • Sterile container needed (sputum, stool, fluids,
    etc)
  • Specimen Transport
  • Temperature
  • Time

10
Variables to Reliable ResultsPre-Analytical
Factors
  • Time delay in set-up onto media and into
    incubator
  • Correct media (type and freshness, was it stored
    correctly)

11
Variables to Reliable ResultsAnalytical Factors
  • Quality of media
  • Incubator temp, humidity, CO2 level
  • Length of time of incubation
  • Technology used by lab (instrumentation)
  • Skill of Micro Staff

12
Variables to Reliable ResultsPost-Analytical
Factors
  • Computerization
  • Prompt and accurate printing of results
  • Time it takes results to get to the chart
  • Accurate interpretation of results by Doc
  • Time it takes physician to review and act on
    results

13
(No Transcript)
14
Inoculate MIC/ID plates and put into incubator
15
Put into analyzer to read reactions
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Gram Negatives Can be Hard to See
23
(No Transcript)
24
Gram Stains
  • Helpful in guiding initial empiric therapy
  • Helpful in evaluating quality of culture result
  • Does not improve patient outcome if the results
    dont get to the physician ASAP

25
Sputum Gram Stains Include
  • SEC (squamous epithelial cells)
  • WBC
  • Bacteria

26
Sputum Gram Stain ScreenSEC
  • lt10/lpf excellent specimen, no appreciable oral
    contamination
  • 10-25/lfp equivocal, but accept the spec.
  • gt25/lpf reject due to unacceptable levels of
    oral contamination

27
Sputum Gram Stain ScreenWBC
  • lt10/lpf no infection
  • Or not much of a response due to
    immunosuppression, PCP, Mycoplasma, viral, etc)
  • 10-25/lpf equivocal
  • gt25/lpf infection is evident (Purulent)

28
Sputum Gram Stain Mixed oropharynx flora
  • Gram neg rods
  • Small hemophilus
  • Gram pos cocci
  • Clusters staph
  • Short chains strep, GBS, others
  • Long chains strep, GAS, others
  • Gram pos rods
  • Diphtheroids
  • Lactobacillus
  • Yeast

29
Lower Respiratory Cultures
  • Sputum BW often contaminated with oral flora
  • Protected brush not contaminated with oral
    flora recommended to do a semi-quantitative
    method put brush into 1.0mL TSI broth vortex
    inoculate agar with urine loop reported as
    number of CFU/ml
  • Tracheal aspirates often shows colonizers

30
Lower Respiratory CulturesCommon Pathogens
  • Strep pneumo primarily CAP uncommon as HAP
    aminoglycosides can select for S. pneumo
  • H. flu primarily CAP
  • Moraxella (Branhamella) catarhallis most often
    CAP, but can be hospital acquired
  • Staph aureus CAP and hosp acquired must be
    recognized quickly ?mortality

31
Lower Respiratory CulturesCommon Pathogens
  • Pseudo aerugenosa often vent or ICU related
  • Mycoplasma CAP
  • Steno maltophilia Vent or ICU related
  • Yeast not usually the infecting organism unless
    it is ?70 of all the organisms present and oral
    contamination can be ruled out

32
Lower Respiratory Cultures
  • Aspiration pna
  • Can expect mix of organisms including anaerobes
  • Cover with clinda gent
  • Water-borne organisms commonly implicated in
    nosocomial pna PSA, K. pneumo, Acinitobacter, S.
    maltophilia, Enterobacter

33
(No Transcript)
34
CSF Cultures
  • Source often from URI flora
  • Meningitis due to GNR or Staph usually due to
    predisposing factors such as trauma
  • Adult Strep pneumo (gram pos cocci in
    pairsneed to know if in pairs, clusters, chains.
  • Strep pneumo generates ?WBC response

35
Onset of Symptoms Person presents to MD for
medical evaluation and Lumbar Puncture (LP)
Bacterial Viral
Cloudy Clear Elevated
Protein Normal or Elevated Protein Decreased
Glucose Normal Glucose WBC Positive
Neutrophils Presence of organisms
36
Viral vs Bacterial
  • Relatively common but rarely serious
  • Recovery is usually complete (West Nile?)
  • Active illness seldom exceeds 10 days
  • Rash is usually not present
  • Enteroviruses, Echoviruses, Coxsackieviruses,
    Arboviruses
  • Half or more of cases have no cause identified

37
Precautions
  • Droplet Precautions for the first 24 hours after
    effective antibiotic therapy
  • Routine cleaning agents and disinfection
    practices
  • Viral Fecal-Oral transmission

38
Robs Observations
  • Bacterial ?Glucose ?Protein
  • Viral ?Glucose ?Protein
  • (Or equivocal)
  • Strep pneumo lots/lots of WBC
  • H. flu and Meningococcus can be hard to see in
    gram stain

39
Meningococcal Disease
40
(No Transcript)
41
Parini, Sue, RN, CIC, BS, MA. Nursing
Management, Aug 2002. The Meningitis
Mind-bender
42
CSF Case
43
CSF Case
44
CSF Case
45
S-SSI
  • Not usually anaerobes
  • Generally skin flora but not necessarily so
  • Can also be gnr

46
D-SSI O-SSI
  • Consider anaerobes and aerobes
  • Anaerobic examples
  • B. frag
  • Clostridium
  • Peptostreptococcus
  • Propionibacterium (septic arthritis,
    endocarditis, suture sites for craniotimy)
  • Aerobic Examples
  • Staph
  • Strep
  • GNR

47
Blood Cultures
  • Two bottles per draw (aerobic anaerobic)
  • Bacteremia in Adults small numbers (?30/mL) of
    bacteria ? gram stain false negative (except in
    neonates)
  • Can be monomicrobic
  • or polymicrobic (any intra-abdominal event eg
    ruptured appx, bowel surgery, intestinal
    perforation)

48
Blood CulturesTiming of the Draws
  • No need to coordinate blood draws with fever
    spiking.
  • Best chance of getting positive culture is 2.5
    hrs to 30 min prior to fever spike.
  • Mayo Clinic determined that in most cases, 3 sets
    are sufficient. Other sources suggest that for
    endocarditis, 2 sets yield 95 efficiency. 3
    sets do not yield significantly more value
  • Never obtain only one set of BC

49
Blood CulturesTiming of the Draws
  • To R/O bacteremia
  • pt mildly febrile 2-3 BC collected at 15 min to
    1 hr intervals
  • Patient critically septic
  • overriding concern is to get abx on board ASAP
    ? 2 BC taken one right after the other,
    different sites, is recommended
  • Dont let clerical needs delay the collection of
    the BC nor let it delay initiation of abx

50
Contaminants???
  • Coag neg staph
  • Diphtheroids
  • Bacillus
  • Proprionibacteria
  • Viridans strep
  • Aerococcus
  • Micrococcus

51
Blood Culture Drawn from Line
52
Urine Cultures
  • E.coli 80. Proteus, Klebs, Enterobacter,
    Pseudo, Gardnerella
  • MRSA, Enterococcus, Staph sapro
  • Infection status leukocyte esterase and/or
    nitrite can be helpful
  • ?WBC w/ negative cultures may be chlamydia or GC.

53
Urine Cultures
  • Colony count not always reliable indicator of
    infection (due to collection and transport
    issues, hydration status of patient, etc).
  • RT colony count doubles every 20 min
  • Max 2 hr at RT
  • Max 24 hr at 2-8?C

54

55
Bowel Flora
  • Normal mix of bacterial flora keeps numbers of
    yeast, C.diff, and other potential pathogens in
    check
  • With altered flora
  • yeast can proliferate
  • C. diff can proliferate
  • Pseudomonas can proliferate
  • VRE can proliferate
  • Etc, etc, etc

56
ESBL
  • Cephalosporins were developed to combat emergence
    of ?-Lactamase producing GNR
  • Soon, there was Resistance to 3rd generation
    Cephalosporins (eg cefotaxime, ceftazidime,
    ceftriaxone) and Monobactams (eg aztreonam)
  • Sensitive to Cephamycins (cefoxitin, cefotetan,
    cefmetazole) and carbapenems (eg meropenem,
    imipenem)

57
ESBL
  • Drug of choice for ESBL Carbapenems (mero,
    dori, imi, erta)
  • Carbapenemase breaks down all Penicillins,
    Cephalosporins, Carbapenems
  • Carbapenems the last resort for gram negative
    infections. Most potent ß-lactam class against
    almost all Enterobacteriaceae
  • Carbapenemase-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

58
Antibiotics Associated with CDI
59
When Micro Dept Reports
  • Mixed oropharynx flora
  • Mixed fecal flora
  • Mixed vaginal flora
  • Mixed skin flora

60
What Would You Do With Unfamiliar Organisms ??
  • Gymnoascaceae imperfecti
  • Strep bovis

61
Hepatitis
62
Hepatitis
  • HAV
  • HAV, total current or past HAV
  • HAV, IgM definitive dx of current HAV infection
  • HBV
  • HbsAg current or chronic HBV
  • HbsAb recovery or immunity to HBV
  • Anti-Hbc current or previous HBV infection
  • Anti-Hbc IgM recent acute infection. If also
    HbsAg ? then its current acute infection.
    Distinguishes Acute vs Chronic infection

63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
Hepatitis C
  • Anti-HCV
  • Presence of antibodies to the virus, indicating
    exposure to HCV. Active vs Chronic vs
    Resolved???  
  • HCV RIBA
  • Confirmatory test of antibodies to the
    virustells if HCV was true positive (present or
    past is unanswered)

66
Hepatitis C
  • HCV-RNA
  • Positive result Active Infection. Also used
    for test of cure.
  • Viral Load HCV
  • Measure the number of viral RNA particles in
    blood. Viral load tests used before and during
    treatment to help determine response to treatment
     

67
Hepatitis C
  • Viral genotyping
  • Used to determine the HCV genotype
  • There are 6 major types of HCV the most common
    (genotype 1) is less likely to respond to
    treatment than genotypes 2 or 3 and usually
    requires longer therapy (48 weeks, versus 24
    weeks for genotype 2 or 3). Genotyping is often
    ordered before treatment is started to give an
    idea of the likelihood of success and how long
    treatment may be needed.

68
Case 1
  • ETT sputum collected upon admission
  • Gram Stain
  • gt25 wbc/lpf, lt10 sec/lpf
  • 3 gram pos rods (these were really gram pos
    cocci in pairs)
  • Results Strep pneumo, PCN-susceptible
  • Comment on this report

69
Case 1 discussion
  • Probably erroneous gram stain this could have
    misled the doctor in initial tx
  • CAP
  • PCN ok to use

70
Case 2
  • Expectorated Sputum
  • Gram Stain
  • gt25 wbc/lpf
  • gt25 sec/lpf
  • 3 mixed flora
  • Culture
  • 3 mixed oropharynx flora
  • What conclusions can be drawn?
  • What if the bacteria turned out to be MRSA rather
    than 3 mixed flora

71
Case 3
  • Source Peritoneal Absc/Perirectal Absc
  • Results Strep anginosus group
  • E. coli
  • Citrobacter freundii
  • B. frag

72
Case 4Wound, superficial, toe
  • Results 3 diphtheroids
  • 2 B. frag
  • 3 Klebs oxytoca
  • 3 Alcaligenes spp
  • 3 Staph aureus
  • 3 Enterococcus faecium
  • This is typical picture of Diabetic Foot Ulcer

73
Case 5
  • Source Wound, foot
  • Gram stain 1 WBC
  • 2 gnr
  • 2 gpr
  • Results Proteus mirabilis
  • What were the gpr?? Why werent they recovered??

74
Case 6
  • Growth of organism isolated from broth subculture
    only

75
  • Lets Discuss Your Cases??
  • Questions??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com