Title: GREYCOURT
1Institute for Private InvestorsOpen
ArchitectureThe Question or the
Answer?Gregory Friedman, Chief Investment
OfficerGreycourt Co., Inc.June 2005
2Institute for Private Investors
The Open Architecture Spectrum
- Will the real open architecture firms please
stand up? - Pure open architecture No product, no revenue
from anything other than client fees - Semi-pure Open architecture Allows use of
Internally developed funds of funds products - Semi-closed architecture Sharing manager fees
internal products with some outside managers - Closed architecture Internal products only
No consistent definition of open architecture
3Institute for Private Investors
The Open Architecture Spectrum
- Will the real open architecture firms please
stand up? - Consultants
- Multi-family offices
- Outsourced CIOs
- Managers-of-managers
- Wrap account programs
- Private trust companies
Many different models
4Institute for Private Investors
Open Architecture is Not a Panacea
- There are bad open architecture firms
- Smart people versus unconflicted people
- Cookie-cutter approaches in a custom world
- Retailing the work of research analysts
- Giving institutional advice to private clients
Hard to build a good open architecture firm
5Institute for Private Investors
How Is Open Architecture Working Out?
- The jury is still out on some larger firms, e.g.
- AMA/SunTrust
- Ayco/Goldman
- CTC/US Trust/Schwab
- In-house OA units at banks, trust companies
(e.g., Stolper/Hawthorn-PNC/Veritable - Wilmington Trust/Balantine
- Wirehouse consulting units
Firms are trying many different combinations
6Institute for Private Investors
How Is Open Architecture Working Out?
- The jury is still out on some boutique firms,
e.g. - Ashbridge
- Greycourt
- Lydian
- Monticello
- Offit Hall
- Spruce
This is where the real action is
7Institute for Private Investors
How Is Open Architecture Working Out?
- The jury has brought in some death verdicts,
e.g. - Greystone/Morgan Stanley
- myCFO/Harris (BofM)
- OffitBank/Wachovia
- Winter Capital/Citigroup
Merging open architecture boutiques with
traditional firms is fraught with challenges
8Institute for Private Investors
What Is the Competitive Threat?
- The competitive landscape is evolving
- Traditional wealth management firms still hold
huge market share of legacy business - BUT
- Open architecture firms are winning a huge share
of new business, roughly 85
This is why traditional firms are worried
Source Cagemini
9Institute for Private Investors
What Is the Competitive Threat?
- The OA client base is very desirable
- _at_ 20 Forbes 400 families
- _at_ 20 families with less than 40 million
- _at_ 60 in-between the core of the business is the
centimillionaire next door - Clients in 25 states and 5 countries a global
business
This is why the traditional firms are worried
Greycourt client base breakdown
10Institute for Private Investors
What Is the Competitive Threat?
- OA is eating the traditional firms lunch
- OA market share at 1/99 0
- OA market share at 1/05 35
- OA market share at 1/09 80
This is why the traditional firms are worried
Source Capgemini Source Greycourt
11Institute for Private Investors
Strengths of the Open Architecture Platform
- Competitive strengths of open architecture firms
- Low embedded cost structures
- Focus on best investment practices
- Avoid style rotation, fickle investor tastes
- Market is moving to them
- Improving profit margins
- Benefit from big firm talent drain
Newer business models tend to be more efficient
12Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
- Competitive challenges for open architecture
firms - Lack global research capabilities
- Typically lower profit margins
- Questions about scalability
- Typically weak management
- Problems developing young talent
Open architecture isnt perfect
13Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
- Disadvantages of pure open architecture
- Its very difficult to pull off
- Its especially difficult to evolve into OA
from another platform - Its a management challenge in an industry
notably lacking in management - Can you make money doing it?
A botched open architecture launch leaves no room
for recovery
14Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
- Disadvantages of pure open architecture
- Investment management is increasingly a commodity
item - Extra layer of fees
- Far from where the rubber meets the road
Client skepticism about experience, intellectual
capital
15Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
Alternative assets conflicts vs. capabilities
Everybody wants hedge fund exposure
16Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
Persistent low-return environment
Who will prosper in a low-return world?
17Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
- The OA toolbox What OA firms need to prevail in
the intense competition - Very senior client advisors
- Deep family advisory experience
- Demonstrated intellectual leadership
Without these you will be an also-ran or a
regional player
18Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
- The OA toolbox What OA firms need to advise VHNW
clients - After-tax approach to asset allocation
- Dynamic asset allocation
- Credible selection of best-in-class, tax-aware
managers - Accurate, timely performance reporting
These are the bare minimum
19Institute for Private Investors
Challenges Associated with Open Architecture
- The best OA firms try to avoid soft services
- They bleed profitability
- They rarely add value that families will pay for
- To the extent that they do add value, you cant
compete with specialists
Are you operating a business or a lifestyle
partnership?
20Institute for Private Investors
Introducing Open Architecture Into a Traditional
Wealth Management Environment
Culture always defeats strategy
Sales-oriented cultures dont mix well with open
architecture
21Institute for Private Investors
Introducing Open Architecture Into a Traditional
Wealth Management Environment
High embedded costs eliminate strategic options
Many financial firms have priced themselves out
of the OA market
22Institute for Private Investors
Introducing Open Architecture Into a Traditional
Wealth Management Environment
Fear of disintermediation
How to keep the OA guys away from the clients?
23Institute for Private Investors
What Does the Future Hold?
- The most likely outcome larger firms will find a
way to integrate OA - Build HNW assets
- Develop trusted relationships with substantial
families - Use OA-developed knowledge to design new products
- Diversify the revenue stream
The best of all possible worlds?
24Institute for Private Investors
What Does the Future Hold?
- Consolidation
- Consolidation
- Consolidation
The make decision has often failed, leaving
only the buy decision
25Institute for Private Investors
Contact Information
Gregory Friedman Chief Investment
Officer Greycourt Co., Inc. (503) 226-0470 Fax
503-226-0471 gfriedman_at_greycourt.com www.greycourt
.com