Intracellular Protein Degradation- The lysosome and Ubiquitin Proteasome System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Intracellular Protein Degradation- The lysosome and Ubiquitin Proteasome System

Description:

Intracellular Protein Degradation- The lysosome and Ubiquitin Proteasome System Scott Wilson Department Neurobiology 5-5573 Wilson_at_nrc.uab.edu – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1546
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: microbioU9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intracellular Protein Degradation- The lysosome and Ubiquitin Proteasome System


1
Intracellular Protein Degradation- The
lysosome and Ubiquitin Proteasome System
  • Scott Wilson
  • Department Neurobiology
  • 5-5573
  • Wilson_at_nrc.uab.edu

2
Outline
  • Sites of proteolysis
  • Gastrointestinal tract
  • Circulatory system
  • Intracellular proteolysis
  • Lysosome
  • Biogenesis and function
  • Degradation of extracellular material
  • Degradation of intracelluar components by
    autophagy
  • Ubiquitin proteasome pathway
  • Components
  • Ubiquitin and UBLs
  • Ubiquitin conjugating enzymes
  • Ubiquitin deconjugating enzymes
  • The proteasome- generation and activity

3
  • Gastrointestinal tract
  • Destruction of antigenicity
  • Controlled but no specificity- everything that
    enters gut is proteolyzed
  • Production of energy
  • Remember that destruction of proteins is an
    energy producing process (exergonic)
  • Circulatory system
  • Blood coagulation
  • Conversion of prothrombin to thrombin which
    converts fibrinogen to fibrin and a blood clot is
    formed.
  • Process is highly controlled (?1-antitrypsin
    deficiency)

4
The questionIs there turnover of cellular
constituents? Or is food intact a function
primarily for energy-providing (fuel for a car),
that is independent from the structural and
functional proteins of the body?
Studies on ?-galactosidase in E. coli indicated
that there was no conclusive evidence that
proteins within cells are in a dynamic state and
that they are likely to be stable and static
Without metabolic labels (ex. 35S cysteine or 3H
leucine) the problem of determining protein
stability was not approachable
5
How do you tag proteins to study protein
dynamics?
  • 1939 Rittenburg and Urey succeeded in generating
    radiolabeled Nitrogen (15N)
  • Schoenheimer found that following administration
    of 15N-labeled tyrosine to rats, they found that
    only 50 of the label was found in excretions.
    Where was the rest?
  • The label was found incorporated in body proteins!

6
  • Therefore the proteins of the body are in a
    dynamic state of synthesis and degradation!
  • It is thought that we are degrading and
    resynthesizing 3-5 of our cellular proteins
    daily.
  • Paradigm that cellular processes are controlled
    mainly by only transcription and translation must
    be changed.

7
Why are proteins degraded?
  • Quality control
  • Proteins become denature/misfolded/damaged
  • Elevated temperatures (37C)
  • Proteins being synthesized are folded incorrectly
  • Regulation of biological pathways
  • Cell cycle
  • Receptor mediated endocytosis
  • Synaptic remodeling

8
Now that we know proteins are in a dynamic
state in cells.
  • How are proteins degraded within cells?
  • Is protein degradation regulated?
  • Selective?
  • Compartmentalized?

9
The discovery of the lysosome
  • De Duve discover the lysosome in the 1950s
  • Vacuolar structure that contains hydrolytic
    enzymes that are optimal at acidic pH.
  • Latency of of enzymatic activity- researcher
    found that hydrolyase fractionated from rat liver
    were more active after they were stored in the
    refrigerator for several days?
  • The latency was due to the slow breakdown of the
    lysosomal membrane which protected the cells from
    the destructive forces of the acid hydrolyases.
  • This compartmentalization of the peptidases by a
    membrane protects cellular components from
    inappropriate degradation.

10
Generation of a functional lysosome
  • Lysosomal proteases belong to the aspartic,
    cysteine, or serine proteinase families of
    hydrolytic enzymes.
  • contain about 40 types of hydrolytic enzymes,
    including proteases, nucleases, glycosidases,
    lipases, phospholipases, phosphatases, and
    sulfatases. All are acid hydrolyase that have
    optimal activity at pH 5.0

11
Sorting acid hydrolyases to the lysosome is
accomplished by post-translation modification
  • Soluble lysosomal enzymes are synthesized as
    N-glycoslyated precursors in the ER and
    trafficked to the Golgi
  • mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) groups are added to
    the hydrolyases
  • The M6P groups are recognized by transmembrane
    M6P receptor proteins, which are present in the
    trans Golgi network
  • M6P receptors release hydrolyases when pH is
    below 6.0 and the M6P is removed

12
Lysosomes use an H ATPase pump in the membrane
to generate acidic pH
13
Overview of lysosomal trafficking
14
Proteases in the lysosome
  • Cysteine protease- cathepsins A, B
  • Aspartate protease- cathepsin D
  • Zinc protease-?
  • Activation of protease by removal of inhibitory
    segment- conversion of proprotein to protein

15
Pathways into the Lysosomal/vacuolar System
1
3
2
4
4
16
Model of the mechanism for multivesicular
endosome formation
17
How do proteins get into the lysosome for
degradation?
  • Microautophagy- cytoplasm is segregated into
    membrane -bound compartments and are then fused
    to lysosome
  • Maroautophagy- entire organelles such as
    mitochondria, ER and other large cytoplamic
    entities are engulfed and then fused with the
    lysosome

18
Autophagy pathway
19
Problems that still remain
  • Proteins vary greatly in their stability - from
    minutes to days!
  • Rates of protein degradation of specific proteins
    changes with physiological conditions (nutrients
    and hormones)
  • How could this happen by microautophagy
  • Lysosomal inhibitors have differential affects on
    different populations of protein
  • If lysosomal proteases degrade proteins in an
    exergonic manner, how could you explain evidence
    that the proteolytic machinery required energy?

20
Still more data suggesting another pathway for
degradation of intracellular proteins
  • Poole et al were studying the mode of action
    anti-malaria drugs
  • Chloroquine and other lysosomotropic (weak bases)
    block the activity of lysosomal proteases by
    neutralizing the low pH of the lysosome.
  • Treat macrophages labeled with 3H-leucine with
    chloroquine and then feed them protein extracts
    that were labeled with 14C-leucine
  • This allowed them to monitor the stability of
    phagocytosed extracellular and intracellular
    proteins when the lysosome is blocked

21
What did they find?
  • Lysosomotropic drugs only affected the stability
    of the engulfed extracellular proteins and not
    the intracellular proteins.
  • This indicated that there must be a second
    pathway for the degradation of intracellular
    proteins and that the lysosome was the primary
    site of degradation of internalized extracellular
    proteins

22
The search for a new proteolytic pathway
  • The new pathway must explain several things-
  • Requirement for metabolic energy
  • ATP depletion inhibits proteolysis
  • Why do you need ATP?
  • Need phosphorylation of substrates or enzymes?
  • Remember proteolysis is exergonic
  • Differential stability of intracellular proteins
  • Example- RNA polymerase I t1/2 1.5 hrs
  • RNA polymerase II t1/2 12 hrs
  • How stability of proteins can change under
    different environmental conditions

23
Cell-free proteolytic system
  • Rabbit reticulocyte lysates
  • Made from red blood cells (terminally
    differentiated and do not have lysosomes)
  • New that for different hemoglobinopathies, the
    blood cells attempt to rid themselves of abnormal
    hemoglobins and therefore must have a proteolytic
    system that was not lysosomal based.
  • Found that reticulate lysates were capable of
    degrading proteins in an ATP dependent manner

24
A new paradigm for proteolysis
  • Biochemical characterization of reticulate
    lysates
  • Divided the lysates into two fractions (DEAE
    cellulose, anion exchange resin) Flow thru and
    high salt eluate
  • Each fraction did not have proteolytic activity
    on its own.
  • Combination of fraction I and II reconstituted
    proteolysis
  • Previous work indicated that only a substrate and
    protease were need for degradation.
  • This was very important in that it suggested that
    there was not a single protease that mediated
    degradation.
  • This new system need a substrate, protease and
    something else
  • Activator?

25
Characterization of fractions I and II
  • Analysis of Fraction I
  • Found that fraction I contained only a single
    factor that was heat sensitive and required ATP
  • This factor was termed APF-1 for ATP-dependent
    proteolysis factor
  • Critical finding was that APF-1 can be covalently
    attached to a target substrate

26
APF-1 is shifted to high molecular mass compounds
following addition of ATP to the fraction I.
125I labeled fractions following gel-filtration
chromatography
27
SDS PAGE analysis of samples run on
gel-filtration
  • Lane 1- Fraction II 125I- APF (no ATP)
  • Lane 2- Fraction II 125I-AFP ATP
  • Lane 3- Fraction II 125I-AFP ATP unlabeled
    lysosome as substrate
  • Lane 4 5 - Increasing conc of lysosome
  • Lane 6- Fraction II 125I-lysosome (no ATP)
    unlabeled APF
  • Lane 7- Same as lane 6 ATP

These experiments demonstrate that APF is
covalently attached to substrate (explains the
requirement of ATP) Multiple APF-1s can be
added to a substrate
28
What is APF-1 ?
  • Amino acid analysis and its known molecular mass
    indicated that APF-1 is ubiquitin.
  • Ubiquitin is a 76 aa protein found only in
    eukaryotes
  • The covalent attachment of ubiquitin to a
    substrate stimulates its proteolysis (but by
    what?)
  • Ubiquitin is covalently attached to a substrate
    by is C-terminal glycine to the ?-NH2 group of an
    internal lysine of the substrate

29
Studies of fraction II defined the ubiquitin
conjugation machinery
30
Substrate recognition
N-end rule On average, a protein's half-life
correlates with its N-terminal residue.
Proteins with N-terminal Met, Ser, Ala, Thr, or
Gly have half lives greater than 20
hours. ?Proteins with N-terminal Phe, Leu, Asp,
Lys, or Arg have half lives of 3 min or less.
31
What about the protease?
  • Previous studies demonstrated that the activity
    of the protease was ATP dependent (not just
    ubiquitination requires ATP)
  • What is it composed of?
  • Where is it located?
  • How is it selective toward ubiquitinated
    proteins?
  • Why does it need ATP?

32
Structure of the 26S proteasome
  • Tanaka et al discovered a high-molecular mass
    protease that degraded ubiquitinated lysozyme but
    not untagged lysozyme
  • Required ATP for activity
  • Protease was later called the 26S proteasome
  • Similar multi-subunit proteases found in
    prokaryotes

33
Subunits of the 26S proteasome
  • 19S regulatory particle- composed of
    approximately 20 different proteins
  • 20S core particle- composed of 14 different
    subunits (?1-7 and ?1-7)

34
19S Regulatory particle (RP)
  • Recognition and binding of ubiquitinated proteins
  • Unfolding of ubiquitinated substrate to enter 20S
    mediated by AAA ATPases (ATP dependent)
  • Removal of ubiquitin side chains to allow entry
    into 20S ( lumen 1.3 nm) by deubiquitinating
    enzymes
  • Activation/opening of 20S lumen

35
20S Core Particle (CP)
  • Contains the endopeptidase activity
  • The alpha subunits function is to control the
    opening and closing of the 20S gate (interacts
    with 19S)
  • The beta subunits ?1, ?2 and ?5 contain the
    endopeptidase activity of the proteasome.
  • Proteins are not degraded into amino acids but
    into short peptides ( very important for immune
    surveillance).

36
The UPS is enormous!
  • The genes of the UPS constitutes 5 of the
    genome
  • E1s- 1-2 activating enzymes
  • E2s- 10-20 conjugating enzymes
  • E3s- 500-800 ubiquitin ligase- drives
    specificity
  • DUBs- 100 ubiquitin specific proteases-
    regulators of pathway

37
Pathways controlled by regulated proteolysis
38
Diseases of the lysosome and UPS pathways
  • Lysosomal
  • Neimann Pick Disease- ataxia, brain degeneration
    and spasticity.
  • Krabbe Disease- hypertonia, seizures, deafness
    and paralysis
  • Tay-Sachs Disease- cognitive disorder, deafness,
    paralysis

39
Ubiquitin-dependent regulation of Ubp6
Hanna, J et al Cell 12799-111 2006
40
Ubiquitin-dependent regulation of Ubp6 levels
Hanna, J et al Cell 12799-111 2006
41
Altered proteasome content in yeast expressing
Ubp6C118A
Hanna, J et al Cell 12799-111 2006
42
Cellular responses to ubiquitin deficiency and
proteasomal stress
Hanna, J et al Cell 12799-111 2006
43
Proteasome inhibition increases Usp14
ubiquitin-hydrolase activity
Usp14
Uch37
Borodovsky, A et al EMBO J. 205187-96 2001
44
The proteasomal DUB Usp14 impairs protein
degradation
Lee, BH et al Nature 467179-84 2010
45
Decrease steady-state levels of aggregate prone
proteins in the absence of Usp14
Lee, BH et al Nature 467179-84 2010
46
Proteasome activity can be modulated by Uch37,
Rpn11 and Usp14
Proteasomal DUB functions in yeast 1) Rpn11-
cleaves near base of chain to
remove ubiquitin chains en bloc
2) Usp14 - recycling of residual
ubiquitin conjugates from proteins
entering the proteasome,
ubiquitin chain editing and regulation of
proteasome activity 3)
Uch37- ubiquitin chain editing
Mouse models 1- Rpn11-
unknown but likely lethal 2-
Usp14- KO embryonic lethal (E14)
hypomorphic allele viable
3- Uch37 unknown


47
Ubiquitin is not the only small peptide to be
covalently attached to proteins and or lipids
  • SUMO 1/2
  • Nedd8
  • ISG15
  • ATG8
  • FAT10
  • Not thought to target proteins for destruction
  • Each is thought to have its own conjugation and
    deconjugation system

48
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com