Title: 3 Governing Society: We Know Who You Are
13Governing SocietyWe Know Who You Are
2Controlling the Behavior of Others
- One of the key differences between realists and
idealists is the way they view human nature - Idealists tend to believe that humans are
basically good and care for others - Consequently, governments and their leaders
should be judged by these ideals - Realists tend to believe that human beings care
only about maximizing their own self-interests
and they expect no more from their leaders
3Controlling the Behavior of Others
- The study of how governments need to control
indidividuals is a realist approach - When examining politics, this perspective asks
- Who benefits?
- How do they benefit?
- The answers to these two questions will usually
provide a solid first step toward unraveling the
political puzzle - Often, the best line is
- Show me the power.
4Controlling the Behavior of Others
- Regardless of the type of government they head,
it can be argued that all leaders try to maximize
their self-interests - What individual benefits might leaders pursue?
- Power
- Wealth
- Prestige
- The goals might be selfish or altruistic but the
concept of leadership benefits is a powerful
explanatory tool
5Leadership Benefits
- The greater the benefits to be gained from the
leadership position, - the more willing people are to take risks to take
over a leadership position, - and the greater lengths leaders will go to to
hold on to it
6The Panopticon
- One of the fundamental mechanisms leaders use to
control large populations is based on the concept
of the panopticon - This is based on an 18th c. prison design by
Jeremy Bentham - The prisoners could be watched at any time
but they never know when
they are being watched
7The Panopticon
- The only way to avoid punishment is to police
their own actions and serve as their own guards - Michel Foucault noted that the panoptic control
of a few guards over hundreds of prisoners is
similar to how governments control large
populations
8The Panopticon
- Think of they way traffic laws are enforced
- The vast majority of times there are no police to
be seen - However, there always could be a police officer
around any bend in the road - Through self-policing, a few hundred policemen
can control thousands of drivers - Leaders use this same concept to prevent revolt
and maintain control
9Collective Action, Revolution, and the Use of
Force
- Government is essentially an institutionalized
mechanism for collective action - Revolutions are collective actions with the aim
of tearing down and replacing the current
government
10Collective Action, Revolution, and the Use of
Force
- Those at the top of the existing social
hierarchies are driven by self-interest to
actively oppose any collective effort to
overthrow the system. - They will employ a variety of techniques to
prevent revolutionary groups from forming
11Atomization
- When people are isolated they are kept from
forming a group that could threaten a leaders
hold on power - At the most extreme, you would want to prevent
anyone from forming any kind of personal bond - The two most important mechanisms leaders use to
accomplish this are - peer policing
- preference falsification
12Atomization Peer Policing
- Peer policing is having people police each other
- Leaders need to encourage citizens to engage in
peer policing against potential revolutionaries - Leaders might make it a crime to not report
someone elses efforts to form a revolutionary
group - This works particularly well if people believe
that government agents will test individuals
willingness to turn in others
13Atomization Peer Policing
- Governments and their leaders can handle
individual isolated revolutionary actions, but
mass action may overwhelm the governments
policing and enforcement mechanisms - Peer policing happens in democracies as well as
in totalitarian states
14Atomization Preference Falsification
- Preference falsification is hiding they way you
truly feel while publicly expressing what those
in power want to hear from you - As long as peoples true feelings are hidden, how
can potential revolutionaries even know if there
are others who share their view?
15Limits on Forceful Control
- The level of force leaders must use to maintain
control is related to the level of
dissatisfaction - When dissatisfaction is low, less force is
necessary - When dissatisfaction with unresolved problems
becomes high enough, desperation may overcome
fear and force may no longer be enough - When pushed too far, people will stand up to a
bully
16Legitimacy and Government Control
- Instead of relying on force, threats, and
punishments, leaders can maintain control by
pursuing legitimacy - Legitimacy is the voluntary acceptance of
government - Pursuing a path of legitimacy can be an expensive
long-term proposition - It is generally far cheaper in the short-term to
use force
17Legitimacy and Government Control
- There are many ways that governments can achieve
or lose legitimacy - stay in power a long time,
- get the blessing of a legitimate past leader,
- convince people that God sent the leaders to rule
- win popular elections
- Electoral democracies institutionalize revolt by
giving citizens the power to keep or replace the
government
18Legitimacy and Conflict Within Groups
- After World War I, researchers believed that
conflict was something horrible, and that
conflict should be eradicated - Georg Simmel and later Lewis Coser pointed out
that the complete elimination of conflicts could
be equally bad because conflict serves
constructive functions
19Legitimacy and Conflict Within Groups
- When engaged in a conflict with another group,
self-identification with the group increases and
support for the leadership increases - Intra-group conflict (conflict within the group)
can serve as a safety valve for letting off
frustration
20Cross-cutting Cleavages
- If there are a variety of conflicts, divisions
over them do not always coincide - People who disagree on one issue may agree on
others - This prevents society from dividing sharply over
a single issue - People will be less hostile toward others on one
issue if they agree on others
21Conflict as a Source of Legitimacy
- Such conflicts facilitate the resolution of the
underlying cause of disagreement the resolution
of small issues can keep them from growing into
large ones - They also provide a foundation for developing
compromises - Resolving conflict within the group enhances the
publics willingness to voluntarily accept the
group and its structures - This enhances the legitimacy of the group and its
leaders
22Totalitarianism
- Totalitarianism Ideology that espouses the
complete political, economic, and social control
of people and institutions by a dictatorial,
single-party regime. - Have we always had Totalitarianism?
- No, this a 20th Century phenomenon why?
- Technology creates the communication and
transportation necessary to manage all aspects of
life - Also, growth of ideology as a means of organizing
a society
23Popular Totalitarianism?
- Why would people allow totalitarianism?
- Their ideological justification comes from the
state acting on behalf of the people - Organize the economy so that all have their needs
met - Totalitarian regimes are generally popular (at
least at the beginning)
24Economic Freedom
- Why might a government want to limit economic
freedoms? - Prevent Exploitation
- How might this affect the economy of a
totalitarian regime? - Command Economies are not very efficient
- If limit economic freedoms, must limit political
freedoms as well (Maoist China) - However, can limit political freedom without
limiting economic freedom (China today)
25Social Freedoms
- What kinds of social freedoms might be limited in
a totalitarian government? - enjoy the privacy of your home
- practice the religion of your choice
- believing what you wish
- Why might a government want to limit these
freedoms? - How do they threaten the governments ability to
rule?
26Limited Government
- You are watching television when an "alien" form
appears on the screen. The alien states that all
of earth and its inhabitants are now under the
control of aliens. The alien informs you that all
forms of communication have been taken over. - The alien continues with this statement
"Americans believe rights are important. The
United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights
guarantee many rights. As aliens, we are going to
take away all of your rights except for one."
27Which Right Will You Keep?
- Petition the Government
- Have a Lawyer
- Freedom of Speech
- Freedom of Religion
- Peaceably Assemble
- Freedom of the Press
- Bear Arms
- Trial By Jury
- A Speedy and Public Trial
- Freedom from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
28Milgram Experiment
- Milgram puts out a newspaper advertisement
offering male Americans around the vicinity of
Yale University to participate in a psychology
experiment about memory and learning. Upon
arriving at Yale, the participant is introduced
to a tall, sharp and stern looking experimenter
(Milgram) wearing a white lab coat. The
participant is also introduced to a friendly
co-participant. Milgram explains that the
experiment investigates punishment in learning,
and that one will be the "teacher", and one will
be the "learner." Rigged lots are drawn to
determine roles.
29Milgram Experiment
- The learner is strapped to a chair, and his arm
is dotted with electrodes. Milgram instructs the
teacher to read out word pairs from a list, such
as "clear" goes with "air", or "dictionary" goes
with "red". Afterwards, when the teacher says a
word, the learner must regurgitate the other word
that goes with the teacher's word. If the learner
recalls the correct word, we move to the next
word pair. Otherwise, he is given a voltage
shock. These shocks increase in amplitude as more
mistakes are made. However, Milgram says that "no
permanent tissue damage will occur. Shocks
start at 15 volts, and grow in 15 volt
increments.
30Milgram Experiment
- The shock generator has 30 switches, each labeled
with a voltage ranging from 15 through 450 volts,
and a verbal rating, ranging from "slight shock"
to "danger severe shock". The final two switches
are labeled "XXX".
31Milgram Experiment
The learner responds in the following manner to
the shocks
32Milgram Experiment
As the participant perceives the learner's pain,
his conscience kicks in, and he begins to object
to continuing the experiment. Milgram responds
to these objections in the following way
Question What percentage of participants would
deliver the full 450 volts?
33Milgram Experiment
- Milgram's results were alarming. Of the 40
teachers he surveyed (the learners were
confederates of Milgram and were unharmed), 68
of them ended up delivering the full 450 volt
treatment. 15 of the 40 ended up convulsing with
epilepetic laughter. Participants went
temporarily mad and started tearing their hair
out. Most amusingly, Milgram actually believed
that the aforementioned experimental setup was
the CONTROL case! He did not anticipate that
subjects would conform at all in these conditions.
34Huxley v. Orwell
- Check out this comic adaptation of the
introduction to Neil Postmans Amusing Ourselves
to Death - Can you think of contemporary examples of both a
Huxleyan and an Orwellian world? - With which should we be more concerned?
- How about examples from The Cuckoos Nest?