Title: Memory Errors and Memory Gaps
1Memory Errors and Memory Gaps
2List of words
- Put your pencils down. Listen to the following
list, and try to remember as many words as you
can.
3(No Transcript)
4Example Instructions
- When you score your results, do nothing to your
correct answers, but carefully mark those answers
which are wrong.
5Memory Task (a)
- Nancy arrived at the cocktail party. She looked
around the room to see who was there. She went
to talk with her professor. She felt she had to
talk to him but was a little nervous about just
what to say. A group of people started to play
charades. Nancy went over and had some
refreshments. After a while she decided shed
had enough and left the party.
6Memory Task (b)
- Identical but added
- Nancy woke up feeling sick again and wondered if
she really was pregnant. How would she tell the
professor she was seeing? - Propositional memory recalled
- The professor had gotten Nancy pregnant.
7Example Memory Task
8Memory Task
- Meaningful context helped understanding, promoted
recall - Meaningful context also resulted in 3 times as
many intrusion errors
9Memory Tasks
- Where were you
- September 11?
- During OJs low speed chase?
- When they tore down the Berlin Wall?
- Name 5 people in your 1st grade class
- Were they also in your classes from 2-5 and
beyond? - What is the first thing you can remember?
10List of words read earlier
- Were the following on the list?
- 1. pie
- 2. pencil
- 3. sweet
- 4. horn
11List of words read earlier
- Were the following on the list?
- 1. pie Y
- 2. pencil N
- 3. sweet N
- 4. horn N
- Did you think sweet was on the list? Why?
12Roediger McDermott
- People commonly remembered
- - sweet on list about foods
- - sleep on list about beds, naps, etc.
-
- gt These are the roots of the lists
13Professors office
- List the items that you saw in the professors
office shown earlier
14Professors office
- Brewer Treyens
- 29/30 correctly remembered desk and chair
- 8/30 remembered bulletin board
- 9/30 remembered books on shelves -- not there!
15(No Transcript)
16Which sentence did I give you?
- 1. When you score your results, do nothing to
correct your answers, but carefully mark those
answers which are wrong. - 2. When you score your results, do nothing to
correct your answers, but mark carefully those
answers which are wrong. - 3. When you score your results, do nothing to
your correct answers, but carefully mark those
answers which are wrong. - 4. When you score your results, do nothing to
your correct answers, but mark carefully those
answers which are wrong.
17Wanner (1968)
- Better at specifics when warned. Memory for
contents uniformly high - We extract meaning, not exact wording
18Memory for Visual Information
- Mandler Richey (1977)
- Detail relating to meaning recalled better than
unrelated detail (e.g., blackboard vs. dress
style) - Gersbacher (1985)
- After 10 minutes subjects couldnt tell the
difference between original and mirror reversed
picture - Detail is forgotten rapidly, semantic information
remains
19Propositional Representations
- Abstract away all surface characteristics
- Reduce meaning to primitive unit of meaning
- E.g., the dog chased the cat -gt Chased (dog, cat)
20Memory Accuracy and Confidence
- Often little relation between confidence of
memory and accuracy - Confidence hinges on familiarity (or the
availability principle) - Things which are consistent with your
expectations are more likely to be falsely
recalled.
21Summary so far
- Often bring memory in line with our other
knowledge and beliefs - Memory errors
- can be large (things that arent there)
- often undetectable
22Sources of Memory Errors
- General Knowledge
- Sally put the vase on the table and it broke.
What broke? - Inferences guide perceptions
- Schematic Knowledge
- Offices have books, tables, chairs
- Results in source confusion, memory
reconstruction - Schemas and Attention
- Only remember unusual details (pig in restaurant,
not menus)
23Autobiographical Memory
24Autobiographical Memory
- Includes memories of sense of self
- How does this affect recall?
- Contains emotionally charged memories
- How will emotion affect recall?
25Self Reference Effect
- you best remember
- things you said
- adjectives that apply to you
- names of places youve visited
- Why?
- attention
- reconstruction using self-schema
26Biases in Episodic Memory
- Self perception affect
- Am I stable / Have I changed a lot?
- Recall of past events modified to fit self
perception - Biased Retrieval
- recall memories consistent with desired traits
27Emotional Memories
- Clearest, most vivid memories
- Trigger amygdala, consolidation of memory
- Emotion may also focus attention (e.g., weapon
focus in crime)
28Flashbulb Memory
- Extraordinary clarity of event
- remember as though it was yesterday
- where they where
- what they were doing
- whom they were with
- Often large scale errors in recall, despite
confidence of recall. Best if event important to
them.
29Traumatic Memory
- War-time atrocities, sexual assault
- How accurate is recall (e.g., during trial)?
- Will painful memories fade?
30Traumatic Memory
- Some events remembered for many years (even
enhanced), others fade. - Emotion impacting consolidation?
- Repressed memory / memory recovery?
- no good evidence of repression
- need considerable assistance of therapist
(convinced problems linked to childhood abuse)
31Childhood Amnesia
- Name your Kindergarten, 1st Grade teachers.
- What is the first thing you can remember?
- Earliest memories usually around 3.5 years
32Child Hood Amnesia
33Source of Childhood Amnesia?
- Freud repression (anxiety ridden memory
forgotten) - Children spend little time consolidating memories
-- reviewing them, summarizing them
34Long, Long Term Remembering
- Where were you
- During OJ verdict?
- During Woodstock reunion?
- During last major earthquake in California?
35Very little forgetting in long term
36Memory for Cognitive Psychology
- Conway, Cohen Stanhope (1991)
- lt3 years Some forgetting of names, specific
concepts - gt3 years very little subsequent forgetting
37Permastore
- Lasting memories result of
- strong initial learning
- further use of memory (e.g., algebra calculus)
- rehearsal
- (5 sec exposure increases recall 60)
38Advantages of Forgetting
- Makes memories retrievable (not too much
interference) - Reduces memory to useful facts (details on board
vs. clothing on instructor) - Reveals general relations between events
(abstract thoughts)
39Summary
- Memory for details fade quickly
- General Knowledge, Schemas, and Attention affect
retention - General knowledge held for very long time (e.g.,
50 years), begins around 4 years of age - Forgetting may help to focus memory on relevant
details
40Source Memory
- Hypothesis 1 Loftus claims that LTM is
malleable. You can have synthetic memories of
things that never happened. - Against usual claim LTM is permanent
41Source Memory
- Study 1
- New information can be added to an old memory.
- - Subjects saw a 3 min. film of an automobile
accident (3 mins). - - Then all Ss filled out a questionnaire on
what they had seen. The questionnaire had about
30 items. One question was critical.
42Source Memory
- Control Group How fast was the white car going?
- Experimental How fast was the white car going
when it passed the barn? - (There was no barn in the movie.)
43Source Memory
- 20 mins later they answered more questions
- Was there a barn in the movie?
- Control Group 3 Yes
- (Had heard How fast was the white car going?)
-
- Experimental Group 17 Yes
- (Had heard How fast was the white car going when
it passed the barn?)
44Source Memory
- Study 2
- Does the timing of the misleading information
matter? -
- Experiment (Same with barn)
- event------------------------------------test
- misleading
- info.
45Source Memory
- 1. Without any misleading info.,
- - performance with 20 min retention interval
90. - After 1 week, 50. - 2. Misleading info. - more effective after long
interval, - - just before test.
46Two hypotheses
- Â Original information must be weak to be
overwritten. - Â Old information is not overwritten, but new
information is more retrievable.
47Source Memory
- Study 3 Can new information actually change
information? - - Subjects were shown a series of 30 slides
showing a red Datsun coming to an intersection,
turning right, and hitting a pedestrian. - - Group 1 a Stop sign at intersection
- - Group 2 a Yield sign at intersection
48Source Memory
- 20 item questionnaire-
- 17 Did another car pass the red Datsun while
it was at the Yield/Stop sign?
49Source Memory
- - 20 min intervening activity
- - 2 alternative SLIDE RECOGNITION test.
-
- Selected correct slide when the misleading info
was - Consistent 71 selected correct
- Inconsistent 41 selected correct.
50Source Memory
- Study 4. You do not have to actually present
misleading information. - 1. Show film of accident.
- 2. Questionnaire contained item
- How fast were the two cars going when
they______(into) each other? - smashed (40.8), collided (39.3), bumped (38.1)
- hit (34.0), contacted (31.8)
51Source Memory
- Study 5a. Memories can 'BLEND' together
- Slides of a green car driving past an accident
and not stopping. - Questionnaire 10 "Did the blue car that drove
past the accident have a ski rack? -
- Test Pick out the color from a color wheel
from purple to yellow.
52Source Memory
- Study 5b. How can you keep people from being
mislead? - Same as above but recalled event immediately
after viewing slides and before misleading info. -
- --gt Much less of an effect.
- Why?
- 1. Green memory gets stronger, but still some
blending - 2. Commitment to green lets one reject blue info.
53Source Memory
- Hypothesis 1 Loftus claims that LTM is
malleable. You can have synthetic memories of
things that never happened. -
- Alternative Hypothesis Both real and misleading
information is stored. The original memory is
not changed, but sometimes the misleading
information is retrieved.