Successful Management Strategies of Health and Safety (HS) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Successful Management Strategies of Health and Safety (HS)

Description:

Successful Management Strategies of Health and Safety (HS) An Overview on Recent Findings Bernhard Zimolong & Gabriele Elke Ruhr University Bochum, Germany – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Kaes6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Successful Management Strategies of Health and Safety (HS)


1
Successful Management Strategies of Health and
Safety (HS) An Overview on Recent Findings
Bernhard Zimolong Gabriele Elke Ruhr University
Bochum, Germany Bernhard.Zimolong_at_rub.de
1. Human resource systems 2. Leadership 3.
Health and Safety Climate 4. Intervention
study on management strategies 5. References
Zimolong, B., Elke, G. (2006). Occupational
health and safety management. In G. Salvendy
(Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics
(pp. 673-707). New York Wiley.
Bernhard.Zimolong_at_rub.de
2
Human Resource Management Levels and Forms
Top Management

Human Resources
Middle Management
First-line Management
Teams
CULTURE
Interactive Leadership (transactional and
transformational)
Substitutes for Leadership (Structure and
Culture)
3
Human resource management
  • Human resource management covers all processes
    serving to reach organization objectives, which
    aim to control human resources of an
    organization.
  • Personnel systems cover such activities as
    personnel planning, recruitment, placement,
    development, performance appraisal, training, and
    competency assessment, counseling and guiding of
    individuals and groups, payment concepts,
    back-to-work programs and rehabilitation at the
    workplace.
  • Behavior control by personnel systems has its
    origins in the operant perspective of role
    behavior and the attendant ABC framework
    (antecedents-behavior-consequences Stajkovic
    Luthans, 1997 2003). Mainly antecedents, i.e.
    goal setting and training, and consequences, i.e.
    feedback, incentives, and social recognition,
    have been studied. Antecedents have mostly been
    used in combination with positive consequences of
    some kind (Geller 2001).
  • Financial rewards The results of the
    meta-analysis of Stajkovic and Luthans (2003)
    shows that combined reinforcement effects of
    money, feedback and social recognition produced
    the strongest increase of performance of 45 (d
    1,88). The effects of the individual reinforcers
    on task performance was 23 (d .68) for money,
    17 (d .51) for social recognition and 10 (d
    .29) for feedback.
  • Behavior programs usually combine the outlined
    methods. The implementation of such programs into
    practice changed safety behavior successfully on
    individual and group level. A meta-analysis of
    Krause, Seymour und Sloa (1999) yielded an
    accident reduction of 26 after one and 69 after
    five years due to the introduction of behavior
    programs.
  • Overviews Sulzer-Azaroff, Harris and McCann
    (1994), Komaki, Coombs, Redding Schepman (2000)
    Zimolong Elke (2005)

4
Study on Human Resource Systems Sample
profile 18 production sites of 16 companies from
chemical industry, Zimolong Elke, 2001
GAMAGS Study
5
Study on the Use of Human Resource Systems (HS)
Zimolong Elke, 2001
6
Study on the use of controlling systems (Human
Resource Systems)
Performance appraisal
Zimolong Elke, 2001
7
Interactive leadership, participation, involvement
  • The results of the predominantly operant
    perspective of leadership research (Komaki, 1998,
    Stajkovic Luthans, 2003) and goal setting
    research (Locke Latham 2002) reveals two
    primary attributes of effective leadership
    performance based monitoring and timely
    communication of consequences. Effective group
    leaders continually set goals, support and
    qualify their employees by feedback and trainings
    and provide social and/or material incentives.
    Effective supervisors monitor work in progress,
    particularly through work sampling (i.e. direct
    observation) and act accordingly
  • Zohar (2002a) and Zohar and Luria (2003) analyzed
    in their intervention studies direct leadership
    behavior on different hierarchical levels.
    Despite the relatively high autonomy of
    supervisors at work, expectations of their
    immediate superiors and the upper management and
    top management very strongly affect their
    behavior.
  • Participation and involvement are widely seen as
    important principles (Spector, 1986). Many
    studies particularly from Scandinavia
    demonstrated that participative leadership
    behavior and participative behavior programs
    entailed credible improvements of safety
    performance in the team. In a study by Laitinen,
    Saari and Kuusela (1997) housekeeping and
    ergonomic workplace design were improved as well
    as frequency of injuries and absenteeism were
    reduced by goal setting, performance appraisal,
    participation of the employees and support of the
    management. Likewise, Simard and Marchand
    (1994,1997) examined the importance of
    cooperative relationship between managers and
    their teams. O'Dea and Flin (2001) showed a
    positive relationship between participative
    leadership and the perceived responsibility for
    workplace safety.

8
Study on interactive leadership Zimolong Stapp,
2001
Monitoring
Transactional Leadership
4
3,8
Feedback
Goal setting
3,6
3,4
3,2
3
Participation
Motivation
Transformational Leadership
p lt .001
Leading by Model
9
Influence of hierachical levels, situational
contingencies
  • The upper management controls occupational safety
    through the influence on structures and processes
    of the organizations (Zohar, 2003a). Mearns,
    Whitaker and Flin (2003) identified successful
    leadership behavior for the upper management.
    They postulate that for the upper management
    personal attendance in occupational safety
    meetings and in walk-abouts, as well as emphasis
    of occupational safety in the informal and formal
    communication with managers and the workforce are
    important practices of safety-oriented
    leadership.
  • Zohar and Luria (2003) demonstrated that control
    of leadership behavior by the upper management
    led to both an improved safety-specific
    leadership and to safer behavior of the
    employees. In addition, the leadership behavior
    of the upper management affects occupational
    safety on the shop floor through an improved
    safety climate (Guldenmund, 2000 Zohar, 2003b).
  • Leadership depends crucially on the fit between
    leadership style and the situational
    contingencies (Fiedler Chemers, 1982 House,
    1996). Leadership styles e.g. a participative or
    transformational leadership, which are frequently
    recommended in the literature do not fit into
    every organization or anytime. Leadership needs
    to be flexible because it depends on
    organizational culture, structures and
    objectives, which are subjects to constant
    change. Successful leadership varies depending on
    organizational conditions. An important
    contextual factor for the leadership form is
    according to Zohar (2003a) and Hofmann and
    Morgeson (2004) primarily the standardization of
    work processes.

10
HS- Climate and interactive leadership
(mediating mechanisms)
  • A meta-analysis conducted by Wagner and Gooding
    (1987) examined the effects of participation in
    the process of decision-making on performance.
    Authors found only low effect sizes. The
    advantages of employee participation in
    decision-making seems to originate more from a
    cognitive gain than from an increase of
    commitment (Locke, Alavi Wagner, 1997).
  • Several studies indicate that safety culture or
    safety climate play a crucial role as a mediator
    between leadership and improved safety
    performance (Zohar, 2003a Hoffmann Morgeson,
    2004). Personnel leadership behavior is a
    significant determinant of safety climate, which
    in turn affects the accident rates (Hoffmann
    Morgeson, 2004 Zohar, 2003a, 2003b). Zohar
    (2002b) also demonstrated a complete mediation of
    leadership influence on accident rates by safety
    climate.
  • Zimolong Stapp (2001) demonstrated a complete
    mediation of leadership influence on health
    complaints, particularly on back pain complaints
    by health and safety climate.
  • Hofmann and Morgeson (1999) examined the effect
    of relationship quality between leaders and
    members (LMX, Leader Member Exchange, Graen
    Uhl-Bien, 1995). Leadership behavior had no
    direct influence on the number of accidents but
    was mediated by safety communication and safety
    commitment in the examined 49 dyads. Morgeson and
    Gerras (2003) demonstrated that safety climate
    moderates the relationship between LMX and the
    extended role definition on group level.
    High-quality LMX relationships resulted in
    expanded safety role definitions when there was a
    positive safety climate. Under less positive
    safety climate there was no such expansion. Only
    if a high-quality LMX was coupled with a strong
    safety climate, the role definition of the
    soldiers included next to performance also safety
    obligations.

11
Mediation of the influence of leadership on
health complaints and back pain complaints by HS
climate
GAMAGS Study
Standardized beta coefficients Zimolong Stapp,
2001
12
Study on HS climate weak and strong HS norms
and frequency of back pain complaints
Zimolong Stapp, 2001
Frequency of Back Pain Complaints
Weak Norms
Strong Norms
Norms p .000 Age x N p .072
Age Classes
13
Intervention study on human resource management
in a industry-battery plant
Elke Zimolong, 2006
  • Implementation of HRM in two companies (A and B)
    with 1000 employees each
  • Start in the two departments A 1 and B 1 with
    about 1000 employees,

Vorstand
Sparte A
Sparte X
Sparte Y
Sparte B
  • Start in department A 2
  • 12 months later

Vertrieb
Controlling
Vertrieb
Controlling
Company A
Company B
Top Management
Standort X
General Manager
Personal und
Soziales






Werksarzt
Middle Management
Functional Managers
Fertigung
Logistik
Fertigung
Logistik
DEPARTMENTS First-line Managers
A1
A 2
A 3
B
B 1
Supervisors
A 11
A 12
A 13
A 21
A 22
A 23
A 31
A 32
A 33
A 34
B
B
B
B
14
Intervention Study Prospective Cohort Design
Department Intervention
Intervention HRM
HMS A 1
X X B 1
X A 2
X
Test Test
Test O1
O2 O3 O1
O2 O1 O2
Pretest
Posttest1 Posttest 2

Pretest Posttest1
t 1
t2 t 3
15
Intervention Study Changes in Departments A1 and
A2
HS Knowledge
Performance Intention
HS Culture (norms)
Commitment
HS Information

Change Pretest - Posttest
16
Intervention Study Changes of Leadership in
Departments A1 and A2
Leading by
Model
Motivation
Goal setting
Control
Feedback
Change Pretest - Posttest
17
Intervention Study Development of Absenteeism
and Accidents
Goal -2 points Lost work days
HRM and capacity explain 24 of the variance of
the ill-health lost workday development
Goal -50 Accidents
HRM and capacity explain 32 of the variance
of the accident development
T2
T3
T6
T4
T1
T5
Start
A2
18
Conclusion
  • Strong need for studies on
  • Substitutes for interactive (personal) leadership
    (Kerr Jermier, 1978)
  • Human resource systems, rules, instructions,
    norms and values (culture, climate)
  • Multi-level analysis teams, middle and upper
    management
  • Intervention studies prospective cohort studies
  • Joint approach to health and safety

19
References 1
Elke, G., Zimolong, B. (2005). Eine
Interventionsstudie zum Einfluss des Human
Resource Mangements im betrieblichen Arbeits- und
Gesundheitsschutz. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und
Organisationspsychologie, 49(3), 1-14. Barling,
J., Loughlin, C. Kelloway, E. K. (2002).
Development and test of a model linking
safety-specific transformational leadership and
occupational safety. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 87, 488-496. Beckmann, J., Zimolong,
B., Stapp, M. Elke, G. (2001).
Personalmanagement erfolgreicher Betriebe. In B.
Zimolong (Hrsg.), Management des Arbeits- und
Gesundheitsschutzes - Die erfolgreichen
Strategien der Unternehmen (S. 49-81). Wiesbaden
Gabler. Graen, G. B. Uhl-Bien, M. (1995).
Relationship-based approach to leadership
Development of leader-member exchange (LMX)
theory of leadership over 25 years Applying a
multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership
Quarterly, 6, 219-247. Guldenmund, F. W. (2000).
The nature of safety culture A review of theory
and research. Safety Science, 34,
215-257. Hofmann, D. A. Morgeson, F. P. (1999).
Safety-related behavior as a social exchange The
role of perceived organizational support and
leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 84, 286-296. Hofmann, D. A.
Morgeson, F. P. (2004). The role of leadership in
safety. In M. R. Frone J. Barling (Eds.), The
psychology of workplace safety (pp. 159-180).
Washington APA. Hofmann, D. A., Morgeson, F. P
Gerras, S. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of
the relationship between leader-member exchange
and content specific citizenship Safety climate
as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88
(1), 170-178. House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal
theory of leadership Lessons, legacy, and a
reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7,
323-352. Komaki, J. L. (1998). Leadership from an
operant perspective. Routledge New York. Komaki,
J. L., Coombs, T., Redding, T. P. Schepman, S.
(2000). A rich and rigorous examination of
applied behavior analysis research in the world
of work. In C. L. Cooper I. T. Robertson
(Eds.), International Review of Industrial an
Organizational Psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 265-367).
Cichester Wiley. Krause, T. R., Seymour, K. J.
Sloat, K. C. M. (1999). Long-term evaluation of a
behavior-based method for improving safety
performance A meta-analysis of 73 interrupted
time-series replications. Safety Science, 32,
1-18. Laitinen, H., Saari, J. Kuusela, J.
(1997). Initiating an innovative change process
for improved working conditions and ergonomics
with participation and performance feedback A
case study in an engineering workshop. Industrial
Ergonomics, 19, 299-305.

20
References 2
Locke, E. A., Alavi M. Wagner, J. (1997).
Participation in decision-making An information
exchange perspective. In G. Ferris (Ed.),
Research in personnel and human resources
management (Vol. 15, pp. 293-331). Greenwich JAI
Press. Locke, E. A. Latham, G. P. (2002).
Building a practically useful theory of goal
setting and task motivation. American
Psychologist, 57, 705-717. McAfee, R. B. Winn,
A. R. (1989). The use of incentives/feedback to
enhance work place safety A critique of the
literature. Journal of Safety Research, 20,
7-19. Mearns, K., Whitaker, S. M. Flin, R.
(2003). Safety climate, safety management
practice and safety performance in offshore
environments. Safety Science, 41, 641-680. ODea,
A. Flin, R. (2001). Site managers, supervisors,
and safety in the offshore oil and gas industry.
Safety Science, 37, 39-57. Sagie, A. (1994).
Participative decision making and performance A
moderator analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral
Science, 30(2), 227-246. Simard, M. Marchand,
A. (1997). Workgroups propensity to comply with
safety rules The influence of micro-macro
organisation factors. Ergonomics, 40,
172-188. Spector, P. E. (1986). Perceived control
by employees A meta-analysis of studies
concerning autonomy and participation at work.
Human Relations, 39 (11), 1005-1016. Stajkovic,
A. D. Luthans, F. (1997). A meta-analysis of
the effects of organization behavior modification
on task performance. Academy of Management
Journal, 40, 1122-1149. Stajkovic, A. D.
Luthans, F. (2003). Behavioral management and
task performance in organizations Conceptual
background, meta-analysis, and test of
alternative models. Personnel Psychology, 56,
155-194. Sulzer-Azaroff, B., Harris, T. C.
McCann, K. B. (1994). Beyond training
Organizational performance management techniques.
Occupational Medicine, 9, 321-339. Wagner, J.
Gooding, R. (1987). Effects of societal trends on
participation research. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 32, 241-262. Zimolong, B. (Hrsg.)
(2001). Management des Arbeits- und
Gesundheitsschutzes - Die erfolgreichen
Strategien der Unternehmen. (Management of
Health and Safety Successful strategies of
enterprises). Wiesbaden Gabler. Zimolong B,
Stapp M. (2001). Psychosoziale Gesundheitsförderun
g. (psychosocial health promotion). In B Zimolong
(Hrsg.) Management des Arbeits- und
Gesundheitsschutzes - Die erfolgreichen
Strategien der Unternehmen, (Management of
Health and Safety Successful strategies of
enterprises) (S. 141-69). Wiesbaden
Gabler Zimolong, B., Elke, G. (2006).
Occupational health and safety management. In G.
Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors and
Ergonomics (pp. 673-707). New York Wiley.

21
References 3

Zohar, D. (2002a). Modifying supervisory
practices to improve subunit safety A
leadership-based intervention model. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 87, 156-163. Zohar, D.
(2002b). The effects of leadership dimensions,
safety climate, and assigned priorities on minor
injuries in work groups. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 23, 75-92. Zohar, D.
(2003a). The influence of leadership and climate
on occupational health and safety. In D. A.
Hofmann L. E. Tetrick (Eds). Health and safety
in organizations A multi-level perspective (pp.
201-230). San Francisco Jossey-Bass. Zohar, D.
(2003b). Safety climate Conceptual and
measurement issues. In J. C. Quick L. E.
Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health
psychology (pp. 123-142). Washington American
Psychological Association. Zohar, D. Luria, G.
(2003). The use of supervisory practices as
leverage to improve safety behavior A
cross-level intervention model. Journal of Safety
Research, 34, 567-577. Zohar, D. Luria, G.
(2004). Climate as a social-cognitive
construction of supervisory safety practices
scripts as proxy of behavior patterns. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 89, 322-333.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com