Title: SAS No. 112
1SAS No. 112 114 Communicating Internal
Control Related Matters Required Communications
to Those Charged with Governance
- Presented by Auditor of State
- Fred Kruse, Chief Auditor AA Division
2SAS No. 112
- In response to many questions from the field, we
issued ADAM 2007-07 - We sent this ADAM to registered IPA firms
- In this session, we will reiterate the basic
concepts - We will also share some clarifications we now
incorporate into our understanding of SAS 112
3Old Versus New
4Question 1 Does a control deficiency exist, and
is the likelihood of a misstatement resulting
from the deficiency more than remote?
- Considerations A control deficiency exists, and
the likelihood of a misstatement is normally more
than remote if any of the following occurs -
5Question 1 Does a control deficiency exist, and
is the likelihood of a misstatement resulting
from the deficiency more than remote? (cont.)
- We find one or more misstatements (regardless of
amount). (A misstatement suggests one of the
following exist.) We would deem the likelihood
more than remote. - If a necessary control is inadequately designed
or nonexistent. - A control is adequately designed, but the auditor
finds one or more control operating failures,
regardless of whether we find misstatements due
to control failures. - Also SAS 112 19 and the SAS 112 App describe
other indicators of significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses. For example, restatements
to correct material misstatements from
previously-audited statements are prima facie
evidence of a material weakness. - If based on the above Considerations, we
determine a control deficiency exists and the
likelihood of misstatement is more than remote,
proceed to Question 2.
6Question 2 Is the amount of the misstatement
that occurred (or that could have occurred, if
related to a control failure) more than
inconsequential?
- Considerations
- The amount is more than inconsequential (e.g.
more than 20 of financial statement materiality)
if any of the following occurs - An actual or projected misstatement from a
substantive procedure is more than 20 of overall
financial statement materiality - A nonexistent or inadequately-designed control
could potentially lead to a misstatement of more
than 20 of overall financial statement
materiality. - The potential misstatement is the entire
transaction type or balance for which no control
existed.
7Question 2 Is the amount of the misstatement
that occurred (or that could have occurred, if
related to a control failure) more than
inconsequential?
- Considerations (cont.)
- A control operating failure rate (projected or
otherwise) could potentially lead to a
misstatement of more than 20 of overall
financial statement materiality. - The potential misstatement would be the
transaction type or balance subject to the
control, multiplied by the projected control
failure rate. - A significant deficiency exists (subject to the
qualitative and other judgmental considerations
Part 2 describes). Proceed to Question 3
8Question 3 Is a misstatement amount that
occurred (or what could have occurred, if related
to a control failure) material?
- Considerations
- The significant deficiency is also a material
weakness if any of the following occurs - An actual or projected misstatement from a
substantive procedure is material to a financial
statement - A nonexistent or inadequately-designed control
could potentially lead to a material misstatement - The potential misstatement is the entire
transaction type or balance for which no control
existed - A control operating failure rate (projected or
otherwise) could potentially lead to a material
misstatement. - The potential misstatement would be the
transaction type or balance subject to the
control, multiplied by the projected control
failure rate
9Qualitative Considerations
- During the audit period, the fiscal officer posts
a state-levied license tax to a property and
other local taxes receipts code. - Assume the amount is more than inconsequential,
but less than material. - Is this a significant deficiency?
- Maybe not because
- Total receipts are unaffected.
- The change in fund cash balance for the year is
unaffected. - Beginning and ending fund cash balances are
unaffected. - The misposting is not material noncompliance
10Other Issues
- Are noncompliance findings significant
deficiencies? - Yes, if they meet the definition and threshold of
a significant deficiency / material weakness - But ----- See the following slides!
11Noncompliance Example
- Is purchasing an unauthorized investment a SAS
112 control deficiency? - Assume the entity disclosed the investment type
properly, including the GASB requirements to
disclose authorized investments and
finance-related noncompliance - This is not a SAS 112 control deficiency because
in this example, it did not create a misstatement
12Noncompliance Example
- Is overspending appropriations a SAS 112 control
deficiency? After all, budgets are a critical
control - Assume the budget presentation presented /
disclosed the over expenditure - This is not a SAS 112 control deficiency, because
the violation did not contribute to a misstatement
13Noncompliance Example
- What if an entity posts interest earnings to the
wrong funds? - Assume the entity presented the statements for
audit with the misposting - A control deficiency exists, because a
misstatement occurred and controls either did not
exist or failed to prevent it
14Clarification Controls over Financial Reporting
- Regarding compilations The auditee need not
possess the ability to perform or re-perform the
compilation, but must have properly designed and
effectively operating controls to prevent or
detect misstatements in the compilation. - Controls would include hiring qualified
accountants to compile the statements - Reviewing and discussing the accountants
results, etc. - Applying the Yellow Book safeguards is also a
control - It provides another review by a person presumably
familiar with the entitys financial activities - Because the compiler and internal reviewer have
different areas of expertise, they both have
important roles to play and we believe it is
important that the compiler clearly inform the
auditee of their role in the compilation - Otherwise, auditee will likely assume they have
transferred all responsibility to compiler. - For example, auditee personnel may have knowledge
of subsequent events they should share with
compiler
15Clarification What is a misstatement? Seems
obvious, but
- It is not a misstatement if it relates to an
account for which a compiler has not completed
their compilation work! - Including their supervisory reviews
- It is (arguably) not a misstatement if it arises
from estimates when the auditor has more recent
info than the compiler had at the time they
compiled - Though AU 560.03 (subsequent events) requires
using the most recent available info
16Clarification
- We asked the AICPA
- To what statements / reports does SAS 112 apply?
- Their response
- SAS 112 applies to internal controls over
financial reporting - Therefore applies to all information in basic
statements - RSI, because GASB deems it necessary to
supplement the statements - Supplemental information
- Remember it often derives from the basic
statements - (Continued on next slide!)
17Clarification
- Stat tables, per Cod 2800.102
- Statistical tables present comparative data for
several periods of timeoften ten years or
moreor contain data from sources other than the
accounting records. Examples of such
nonaccounting information are assessed valuations
and tax rates, economic and population data, and
the legal debt margin. - Question Do you think SAS 112 applies to CAFR
stat tables?
18 Clarification Testing Compensating Controls
- 14 of SAS 112 inferred auditors must test the
operating effectiveness of compensating controls
in order to avoid classifying the deficiency as
significant or material - But per paragraph 14 of the proposed SAS
- The auditor is not required to consider the
effects of compensating controls for the purpose
of communicating significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses, however - If the auditor decides to consider the effects of
compensating controls to avoid reporting a
control deficiency - Evaluate the sufficiency of the design of the
compensating controls, and - Determine whether the compensating controls were
implemented.
19All this might not matter for long because a
draft SAS
- Would redefine significant deficiency ?
- As a control deficiency(ies) less severe than a
material weakness, yet important enough to merit
attention by those charged with governance! - The intent of the new SAS is to align this
definition with - SSAE Internal Control Examinations . . .
- Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
definition - Proposed revision to international auditing
standards
20SAS 114The Auditors Communication With Those
Charged With Governance
- Effective for years beginning on or after
December 15, 2006 - Replaces SAS 61, Communications to Audit
Committees - We have followed SAS 61 since 1988
- If governments had no audit committee, we deemed
the governing body the de facto committee - We discussed this in ADAM 2008-001
- We sent this to IPAs
21Those Charged with Governance
- In the governmental environment, those charged
with governance include the governing /
legislative body. - However, those charged with governance in many
Ohio local governments lack oversight authority
over financial reporting when the CFO is publicly
elected. - Nevertheless, we will communicate all SAS 114
matters to the governing board - Mayors, school superintendents, etc. are part of
management for SAS 114 purposes. - Those charged with governance also include
community school sponsors. - The permanent file should document who we deem to
fall within this definition, to help assure we
communicate the required information to them.
22Required Communications
- The auditors responsibilities under Generally
Accepted Auditing Standards - Included in our engagement letters
- The planned scope and timing of the audit
- We communicate both the above before commencing
fieldwork
23Qualitative aspects of the entitys significant
accounting practices
- This has been an SEC / SAS 90 requirement for a
number of years, but did not previously apply to
government audits. - We believe this is primarily aimed at principles
related to controversial or emerging areas - Changes in principles that may be designed to
enhance reported earnings - Maybe not much applicability to general purpose
governments
24Accounting Estimates Disclosures
- Consider discussing material, subjective
estimates and the adequacy of info available to
form them - Such as landfill closure / postclosure
liabilities - BWC insurance claims
- We contract this audit to an IPA
- Other humongous, subjective estimates
- Disclosures of interest might be those
- Required by new principles
- Of some controversy, if any
25Significant difficulties, if any, encountered
during the audit
- This requirement was also in SAS 61
- Would include delays in receiving required
information - An unnecessarily brief time management imposes to
complete the audit - Unavailable information
26Uncorrected Misstatements
- SAS 61 as amended had a similar requirement
- We share a copy of our unadjusted differences
with the auditee - AOS also communicates material corrected
misstatements to help those charged with
governance in assessing the quality of the
accounting function
27Disagreements with Management
- SAS 61 as amended had a similar requirement
- Relates to disagreements regarding
- Accounting principles
- Methods of compiling estimates
- Disclosures
- Wording of our opinion
- Does not include matters resolved or based on
incomplete information
28Other Communications
- Copy of representation letter
- Representation letters are an ancient requirement
- Managements consultations with other accountants
- The concern is opinion shopping
- We do not believe this applies to routine
requests to another accountant for assistance - Other significant issues we discussed with
management
29Questions???
- Questions may be sent via email to
- Fred Kruse at frkuse_at_auditorstate.oh.us
30(No Transcript)