SAS No. 112 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

SAS No. 112

Description:

Those Charged with Governance ... However, those charged with governance in many Ohio ... Those charged with governance also include community school sponsors. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: ohg
Category:
Tags: sas | charged | with

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SAS No. 112


1
SAS No. 112 114 Communicating Internal
Control Related Matters Required Communications
to Those Charged with Governance
  • Presented by Auditor of State
  • Fred Kruse, Chief Auditor AA Division

2
SAS No. 112
  • In response to many questions from the field, we
    issued ADAM 2007-07
  • We sent this ADAM to registered IPA firms
  • In this session, we will reiterate the basic
    concepts
  • We will also share some clarifications we now
    incorporate into our understanding of SAS 112

3
Old Versus New
4
Question 1  Does a control deficiency exist, and
is the likelihood of a misstatement resulting
from the deficiency more than remote? 
  • Considerations  A control deficiency exists, and
    the likelihood of a misstatement is normally more
    than remote if any of the following occurs 
  •  

5
Question 1  Does a control deficiency exist, and
is the likelihood of a misstatement resulting
from the deficiency more than remote? (cont.)
  • We find one or more misstatements (regardless of
    amount). (A misstatement suggests one of the
    following exist.) We would deem the likelihood
    more than remote.
  • If a necessary control is inadequately designed
    or nonexistent.
  • A control is adequately designed, but the auditor
    finds one or more control operating failures,
    regardless of whether we find misstatements due
    to control failures.
  • Also SAS 112 19 and the SAS 112 App describe
    other indicators of significant deficiencies or
    material weaknesses. For example, restatements
    to correct material misstatements from
    previously-audited statements are prima facie
    evidence of a material weakness.
  • If based on the above Considerations, we
    determine a control deficiency exists and the
    likelihood of misstatement is more than remote,
    proceed to Question 2. 

6

Question 2 Is the amount of the misstatement
that occurred (or that could have occurred, if
related to a control failure) more than
inconsequential?
  • Considerations 
  • The amount is more than inconsequential (e.g.
    more than 20 of financial statement materiality)
    if any of the following occurs
  • An actual or projected misstatement from a
    substantive procedure is more than 20 of overall
    financial statement materiality
  • A nonexistent or inadequately-designed control
    could potentially lead to a misstatement of more
    than 20 of overall financial statement
    materiality.
  • The potential misstatement is the entire
    transaction type or balance for which no control
    existed.

7
Question 2 Is the amount of the misstatement
that occurred (or that could have occurred, if
related to a control failure) more than
inconsequential?
  • Considerations (cont.)
  • A control operating failure rate (projected or
    otherwise) could potentially lead to a
    misstatement of more than 20 of overall
    financial statement materiality. 
  • The potential misstatement would be the
    transaction type or balance subject to the
    control, multiplied by the projected control
    failure rate.
  • A significant deficiency exists (subject to the
    qualitative and other judgmental considerations
    Part 2 describes). Proceed to Question 3

8
Question 3 Is a misstatement amount that
occurred (or what could have occurred, if related
to a control failure) material?
  • Considerations 
  • The significant deficiency is also a material
    weakness if any of the following occurs
  • An actual or projected misstatement from a
    substantive procedure is material to a financial
    statement
  • A nonexistent or inadequately-designed control
    could potentially lead to a material misstatement
  • The potential misstatement is the entire
    transaction type or balance for which no control
    existed
  • A control operating failure rate (projected or
    otherwise) could potentially lead to a material
    misstatement. 
  • The potential misstatement would be the
    transaction type or balance subject to the
    control, multiplied by the projected control
    failure rate

9
Qualitative Considerations
  • During the audit period, the fiscal officer posts
    a state-levied license tax to a property and
    other local taxes receipts code.
  • Assume the amount is more than inconsequential,
    but less than material.
  • Is this a significant deficiency?
  • Maybe not because
  • Total receipts are unaffected.
  • The change in fund cash balance for the year is
    unaffected.
  • Beginning and ending fund cash balances are
    unaffected.
  • The misposting is not material noncompliance

10
Other Issues
  • Are noncompliance findings significant
    deficiencies?
  • Yes, if they meet the definition and threshold of
    a significant deficiency / material weakness
  • But ----- See the following slides!

11
Noncompliance Example
  • Is purchasing an unauthorized investment a SAS
    112 control deficiency?
  • Assume the entity disclosed the investment type
    properly, including the GASB requirements to
    disclose authorized investments and
    finance-related noncompliance
  • This is not a SAS 112 control deficiency because
    in this example, it did not create a misstatement

12
Noncompliance Example
  • Is overspending appropriations a SAS 112 control
    deficiency? After all, budgets are a critical
    control
  • Assume the budget presentation presented /
    disclosed the over expenditure
  • This is not a SAS 112 control deficiency, because
    the violation did not contribute to a misstatement

13
Noncompliance Example
  • What if an entity posts interest earnings to the
    wrong funds?
  • Assume the entity presented the statements for
    audit with the misposting
  • A control deficiency exists, because a
    misstatement occurred and controls either did not
    exist or failed to prevent it

14
Clarification Controls over Financial Reporting
  • Regarding compilations The auditee need not
    possess the ability to perform or re-perform the
    compilation, but must have properly designed and
    effectively operating controls to prevent or
    detect misstatements in the compilation.
  • Controls would include hiring qualified
    accountants to compile the statements
  • Reviewing and discussing the accountants
    results, etc.
  • Applying the Yellow Book safeguards is also a
    control
  • It provides another review by a person presumably
    familiar with the entitys financial activities
  • Because the compiler and internal reviewer have
    different areas of expertise, they both have
    important roles to play and we believe it is
    important that the compiler clearly inform the
    auditee of their role in the compilation
  • Otherwise, auditee will likely assume they have
    transferred all responsibility to compiler.
  • For example, auditee personnel may have knowledge
    of subsequent events they should share with
    compiler

15
Clarification What is a misstatement? Seems
obvious, but
  • It is not a misstatement if it relates to an
    account for which a compiler has not completed
    their compilation work!
  • Including their supervisory reviews
  • It is (arguably) not a misstatement if it arises
    from estimates when the auditor has more recent
    info than the compiler had at the time they
    compiled
  • Though AU 560.03 (subsequent events) requires
    using the most recent available info

16
Clarification
  • We asked the AICPA
  • To what statements / reports does SAS 112 apply?
  • Their response
  • SAS 112 applies to internal controls over
    financial reporting
  • Therefore applies to all information in basic
    statements
  • RSI, because GASB deems it necessary to
    supplement the statements
  • Supplemental information
  • Remember it often derives from the basic
    statements
  • (Continued on next slide!)

17
Clarification
  • Stat tables, per Cod 2800.102
  • Statistical tables present comparative data for
    several periods of timeoften ten years or
    moreor contain data from sources other than the
    accounting records. Examples of such
    nonaccounting information are assessed valuations
    and tax rates, economic and population data, and
    the legal debt margin.
  • Question Do you think SAS 112 applies to CAFR
    stat tables?

18
Clarification Testing Compensating Controls
  • 14 of SAS 112 inferred auditors must test the
    operating effectiveness of compensating controls
    in order to avoid classifying the deficiency as
    significant or material
  • But per paragraph 14 of the proposed SAS
  • The auditor is not required to consider the
    effects of compensating controls for the purpose
    of communicating significant deficiencies or
    material weaknesses, however
  • If the auditor decides to consider the effects of
    compensating controls to avoid reporting a
    control deficiency
  • Evaluate the sufficiency of the design of the
    compensating controls, and
  • Determine whether the compensating controls were
    implemented.

19
All this might not matter for long because a
draft SAS
  • Would redefine significant deficiency ?
  • As a control deficiency(ies) less severe than a
    material weakness, yet important enough to merit
    attention by those charged with governance!
  • The intent of the new SAS is to align this
    definition with
  • SSAE Internal Control Examinations . . .
  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
    definition
  • Proposed revision to international auditing
    standards

20
SAS 114The Auditors Communication With Those
Charged With Governance
  • Effective for years beginning on or after
    December 15, 2006
  • Replaces SAS 61, Communications to Audit
    Committees
  • We have followed SAS 61 since 1988
  • If governments had no audit committee, we deemed
    the governing body the de facto committee
  • We discussed this in ADAM 2008-001
  • We sent this to IPAs

21
Those Charged with Governance
  • In the governmental environment, those charged
    with governance include the governing /
    legislative body.
  • However, those charged with governance in many
    Ohio local governments lack oversight authority
    over financial reporting when the CFO is publicly
    elected.
  • Nevertheless, we will communicate all SAS 114
    matters to the governing board
  • Mayors, school superintendents, etc. are part of
    management for SAS 114 purposes.
  • Those charged with governance also include
    community school sponsors.
  • The permanent file should document who we deem to
    fall within this definition, to help assure we
    communicate the required information to them.

22
Required Communications
  • The auditors responsibilities under Generally
    Accepted Auditing Standards
  • Included in our engagement letters
  • The planned scope and timing of the audit
  • We communicate both the above before commencing
    fieldwork

23
Qualitative aspects of the entitys significant
accounting practices
  • This has been an SEC / SAS 90 requirement for a
    number of years, but did not previously apply to
    government audits.
  • We believe this is primarily aimed at principles
    related to controversial or emerging areas
  • Changes in principles that may be designed to
    enhance reported earnings
  • Maybe not much applicability to general purpose
    governments

24
Accounting Estimates Disclosures
  • Consider discussing material, subjective
    estimates and the adequacy of info available to
    form them
  • Such as landfill closure / postclosure
    liabilities
  • BWC insurance claims
  • We contract this audit to an IPA
  • Other humongous, subjective estimates
  • Disclosures of interest might be those
  • Required by new principles
  • Of some controversy, if any

25
Significant difficulties, if any, encountered
during the audit
  • This requirement was also in SAS 61
  • Would include delays in receiving required
    information
  • An unnecessarily brief time management imposes to
    complete the audit
  • Unavailable information

26
Uncorrected Misstatements
  • SAS 61 as amended had a similar requirement
  • We share a copy of our unadjusted differences
    with the auditee
  • AOS also communicates material corrected
    misstatements to help those charged with
    governance in assessing the quality of the
    accounting function

27
Disagreements with Management
  • SAS 61 as amended had a similar requirement
  • Relates to disagreements regarding
  • Accounting principles
  • Methods of compiling estimates
  • Disclosures
  • Wording of our opinion
  • Does not include matters resolved or based on
    incomplete information

28
Other Communications
  • Copy of representation letter
  • Representation letters are an ancient requirement
  • Managements consultations with other accountants
  • The concern is opinion shopping
  • We do not believe this applies to routine
    requests to another accountant for assistance
  • Other significant issues we discussed with
    management

29
Questions???
  • Questions may be sent via email to
  • Fred Kruse at frkuse_at_auditorstate.oh.us

30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com