INNOVATION A 21st Century Imperative - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 86
About This Presentation
Title:

INNOVATION A 21st Century Imperative

Description:

... Senator Pete Domenici, and Senator Lamar Alexander will join to announce the ... Senator Lamar Alexander. WHAT: Press conference on the America COMPETES Act ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:123
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 87
Provided by: charle81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INNOVATION A 21st Century Imperative


1
INNOVATIONA 21st Century Imperative
  • Charles M. Vest
  • President Emeritus, MIT
  • NERCOMP
  • Worcester, MA
  • March 20, 2006

2
Innovate or Abdicate-Sam Palmisano, CEO, IBM
3
Every morning in Africa a gazelle wakes up.It
knows it must outrun the fastest lion or it will
be killed.Every morning in Africa a lion wakes
up.It knows it must outrun the slowest
gazelleor it will starve.
4
It doesnt matter whether youre a lion or a
gazelle- when the sun comes up, youdbetter be
running.-Richard Hodgetts
5
(No Transcript)
6
Why Everyone is in a Hurry.
7
21st Century Competition Requires Fast Innovation
  • In todays competitive environment, many
    companies set goals for 20-40 of their business
    to come from products developed within the last
    2-4 years.
  • The specific goal and speed depends on the
    product sector.

8
Something to Think About
  • Goldman Sachs analysts estimate that in about a
    decade 80 of the worlds middle-income consumers
    will live in nations outside the currently
    industrialized world.

9
Just 15 Years Ago
  • No World Wide Web
  • No pervasive cell phones or wireless devices
  • No sequenced human genome
  • No carbon nanotubes
  • No dot-com phenomenon

10
Four Facts Three Consequences One
Principle And an Irony
11
Four Facts
  • People everywhere are smart and capable.
  • Science and Technology advance relentlessly.
  • Globalization is a dominating reality.
  • The Internet and World Wide Web are democratizing
    forces.

12
Three Consequences
  • Individuals must innovate.
  • Companies must innovate.
  • Nations and regions must innovate

13
One Principle Competition drives Excellence and
innovation.
  • Competition among universities
  • For the best students, faculty, research, and
    scholarship
  • Merit-based awarding of research grants
  • Competition among companies
  • To create new markets
  • To get to market first
  • To gain market share

14
An Irony
  • In the 21st century Cooperation and
  • Competition reinforce each other.

15
Americas Comparative Advantage
  • A Strong ST Base
  • Coupled to a Free Economy
  • Built on a Base of Democracy
  • In a Diverse Population.

16
Americas Innovation System from 1945-2005 A
Brief history
17
U.S. Science Policy since 1945
  • It began with a letter from President Roosevelt
    to Vannevar Bush.
  • Roosevelt asked how the U.S. science community
    could work in peacetime to secure the nations
    economic vitality, health, and security.

18
The Bush ReportScience the Endless
FrontierPrimary Recommendations
  • Universities should be the primary national Basic
    Research Infrastructure.
  • Federal dollars do double duty
  • Procure research results
  • Educate the next generation
  • Award research grants based on competitive
    merit.
  • Establish a National Science Foundation.

19
The Bush Reports Economic Development
Assumptions
  • Linear Basic Research --? Applied Research
    --? Product Development --? Market Products
    and Services
  • Laisser-faire Do basic research in
    universities and leave its commercialization to
    chance and market forces.

20
What EmergedThe U.S. Innovation System
  • Government, Academia, and Industry working
    together to
  • Create new knowledge and technology through
    RESEARCH
  • EDUCATE young men and women to create and
    understand the new knowledge and technology and
  • Move it to the MARKETPLACE as new products,
    processes and services.

21
The Vannevar Bush Modelis an Enormous Success
  • Economists broadly agree that more than 50 of
    U.S. economic growth during the last 60 years was
    due to technological innovation.
  • Much of the technological innovation came from
    our research universities.

22
Or, if you prefer a longer-term view
Everything we know about history, technology, and
economic theory tells us that an increase of this
magnitude would not have been possible in the
absence of technological change. --Paul Romer
23
University Innovations(Sole or Dominant Role)
  • Computing
  • Laser
  • Internet
  • GPS (fundamentals)
  • Numerical Controlled Machines
  • WWW (organization)
  • Financial Engineering
  • Genetic Revolution
  • Modern Medicine
  • Etc.

24
From 1945 - 1985
  • American research universities, public and
    private, grew to excel.
  • American companies dominated
  • Large corporations dominated- especially mass
    production.
  • Corporations developed massive central research
    laboratories
  • Attracted outstanding university graduates
  • Conducted outstanding pure and applied research
  • Contributed to the commons of ST knowledge

25
Tectonic Shifts in the 1980s and 1990s
  • Japanese companies suddenly dominated
    manufacturing and U.S. manufacturing companies
    could not compete.
  • Quality
  • Throughput
  • Product cycle times
  • American entrepreneurship expanded explosively,
    driven by
  • Information technology from microprocessors
  • The Internet
  • Biotechnology

26
U.S. Corporations Responded
  • Painful, basic transformations
  • Downsizing
  • Process Management
  • Quality Control
  • RD merged with product development
  • Many American companies emerged strong and
    globally competitive.
  • But the U.S. innovation system had changed.

27
The Japanese Total Quality Movement was the
Major Innovation of the 1980s.It changed
everything.
Comment
28
Evolution of U.S. Corporate Innovation and RD
  • 1970s Central Corporate Research Labs
  • 1980s RD Absorbed and Transformed into Product
    Development
  • 1990s Purchase High-Tech Startups to acquire
    Innovation

29
Evolution of U.S. University Research
  • Basic Scientific Research remains the core, but
  • 1970sThe Engineering Science Revolution
  • 1980s Design, Manufacturing, Computer Science,
    Joint Management/Engineering
  • 1990s Life Science, Interdisciplinary, More work
    in Pasteurs Quadrant

30
U. S. Innovation
  • In any event, Long-Term Basic Research is the Key
    to our Future.
  • But, things are changing.

31
A New Century
  • 20th Century
  • Physics, Electronics, and High-Speed
    Communications and Transportation
  • 21st Century
  • Biology and Information,
  • but also Energy, Water, and Sustainability

32
21st Century Change
Science Engineering Research Interdependent,
Interdisciplinary, Pasteurs Quadrant
33
Interdependent
  • Science now depends on technology.
  • Technology now depends on science.

34
Interdisciplinary
  • The Genetic Revolution in medicine and
    agriculture is an integration or fusion of
    Biology, Combinatorial Mathematics, Robotics and
    Automation, Microfabrication, and
    Clinically-Based Medical Insight.
  • Nanotechnolgy is a rapidly evolving integration
    or fusion of technologies and science that
    involves almost every discipline.
  • Synthetic Biology is an amazing melding of Life
    and Information sciences.

35
RD is increasingly performed in Pasteurs
Quadrant
Research is inspired by Consideration of use?
No
Yes
Pure Basic Research (Bohr)
Use-inspired Basic Research (Pasteur)
Quest for Fundamental Understanding?
Yes
Pure Applied Research (Edison)
No
Adapted from Pasteurs Quadrant Basic Science
and Technological Innovation, Donald E. Stokes
1997
36
RD is increasingly performed in Pasteurs
Quadrant
Research is inspired by Consideration of use?
No
Yes
Pure Basic Research (Bohr)
Use-inspired Basic Research (Pasteur)
Quest for Fundamental Understanding?
Yes
Former University Presidents (Vest)
Pure Applied Research (Edison)
No
Adapted from Pasteurs Quadrant Basic Science
and Technological Innovation, Donald E. Stokes
1997
37
Good News This is the Most Exciting Era Ever
for Science and Technology.
38
What We See Today.
  • Exponential advances in
  • Knowledge
  • Instrumentation
  • Communication
  • Computation
  • These create huge possibilities.
  • Students are crossing disciplinary boundaries in
    unprecedented ways.

39
Engineering Frontiers of this Exciting Era
Macro Energy Environment Manufacturing Communicati
ons Logistics
Bio Info Nano
40
Engineering Frontiers
Macro Energy Environment Manufacturing Communicati
ons Logistics
Bio Info Nano
Smaller and Smaller Faster and Faster More and
More Complex
41
Engineering Frontiers
Macro Energy Environment Manufacturing Communicati
ons Logistics
Bio Info Nano
Larger and Larger More and More Complex Great
Societal Importance
42
Frontiers and Synergies
Natural Science
Macro Energy Environment Manufacturing Communicati
ons Logistics
Nano Bio Info
Science and Engineering Are Merging.
43
Frontiers and Synergies
These engineering systems need social science,
management, and humanities / communications.
Macro Energy Environment Manufacturing Communicati
ons Logistics
Nano Bio Info
Social Science
44
Frontiers and SynergiesMust be reflected in
university education.
Natural Science
Macro Energy Environment Manufacturing Communicati
ons Logistics
Nano Bio Info
Social Science
45
21st Century ChangeWhere the expertise is and
will be.
46
Where the Expertise is
Source Competitiveness Index 2007, Council on
Competitiveness, Washington, DC
47
Where the Expertise will be
48
First Engineering Degrees(China Rises.)
China
Japan
US
Source Science and Engineering Indicators 2006,
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
49
21st Century ChangeThe Rise of RD and
Innovation in the Service SectorEspecially in
North America
50
What we produce is changing. (The Information
Age) U.S. Employment by Sector History and
Projection
Source Stuart Feldman, IBM Research,
Presentation at Carnegie-Mellon University, 29
June, 2005
51
Source IBM Research http//www.research.ibm.com
/ssme/
52
Source Science and Engineering Indicators 2004,
National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
53
21st Century ChangeInnovation is
Global.Investments in RD
54
(No Transcript)
55
U.S. RDOn Top / Losing Share
  • The U.S. leads in RD investments
  • The U.S. is among the leaders of the pack in
    RD/GDP.
  • However, our global share declined in every
    category from 1986 to 2003.
  • Domestic RD -9 New U.S. Patents -2
  • Sci. Publications -8 Sci. Researchers -8
  • SE BS Degrees -10 New SE PhDs -30

Source Competitiveness Index, Council on
Competitiveness Nov. 2006
56
Location and Innovation
A Debate
57
Location Does Not Matter.
  • The World is Flat -- Tom Friedman
  • In 1989 the Berlin Wall came down, and
    Microsofts Windows went up.
  • 1.5 trillion worth of optical fiber connects the
    world.
  • Globalization has accidentally made Beijing,
    Bangalore, and Bethesda next door neighbors.
  • Many jobs are now just a mouse click away from
    anywhere..

58
Location Does Matter.
  • The power of regional innovation clusters
  • Proximity of small companies and corporate labs
    to universities
  • Venture capital tends to converge.

59
Both are correct. But in any event,
  • Globalization is the new reality.
  • Collaborative innovation - locally or globally -
    is the trend.

60
GLOBALIZATION Our Reality and Opportunity
61
Life today isnt simple.
  • Sony and Toshiba
  • Excel at Computer
  • Games
  • IBM excels at
  • sophisticated chips.

62
Life today isnt simple.
  • Sony and Toshiba
  • Excel at Computer
  • Games
  • IBM excels at
  • sophisticated chips.

IBM, Sony, and Toshiba Develop Cell
Processors In Austin, TX
63
Life today isnt simple.
  • Sony and Toshiba
  • Excel at Computer
  • Games
  • IBM excels at
  • sophisticated chips.

IBM, Sony, and Toshiba Develop Cell
Processors In Austin, TX
Los Alamos orders Largest Supercomputer Based on
these chips
64
So New Innovation Models Emerge
65
For exampleHarry Chesbrough (Harvard Business
school)
  • Open Innovation
  • Companies today must integrate the best ideas, no
    matter where they originate.
  • In other countries
  • In other companies or laboratories
  • Even in competing organizations.
  • New, dynamic business models are needed for an
    open, connected world.
  • Licensing
  • Partnering
  • Joint Venturing

66
OrSam Palmisano(CEO, IBM)
  • The Globally Integrated Enterprise
  • Supercedes the multinational corporation
  • Driven by globally shared technologies and
    standards built on global IT
  • Focus shifted from products to production
  • New borderless strategy, management, and
    operations for integrated production and value
    delivery.

67
But people are concerned byManufacturing
Migration
  • From the U.S.
  • To Taiwan
  • To Korea
  • To China
  • To Viet Nam
  • An Inevitable Migration?

68
Inevitable or not, this is serious business.
  • Between 2000 and 2003, foreign firms built 60,000
    manufacturing plants in China.
  • In 2004 chemical companies closed 70 facilities
    in the U.S. and have tagged 40 more for
    shutdown.
  • 120 major chemical plants are under construction.
  • One is in the U.S.
  • 50 are in China.

Source Palmisano, Foreign Affaiirs (May/June
2006) Rising Above the Gathering Storm
69
Or consider American IT manufacturing jobs
  • 400,000 jobs were lost from Jan. 2000 - Dec.
    2002.
  • Overall U.S. manufacturing declined 6 1997-2001,
    but computer manufacturing declined 20 .

Source George Scalese, PCAST, 2003
70
Industry, RD, and Innovation are Migrating and
Morphing. Why?
  • Economics and Wage Rates
  • The Internet and World Wide Web
  • Tax and Trade Policies
  • But also

71
Industry, RD, and Innovation are Migrating and
Morphing. Why?
  • Economics and Wage Rates
  • The Internet and World Wide Web
  • Tax and Trade Policies
  • But also Speed and Complexity

72
To Summarize
  • The U.S. is the most innovative nation on the
    planet.
  • We have the best research universities.
  • We are king of the hill in RD.
  • We have comparative advantages
  • Strong ST base
  • Free-market economy
  • Democracy and freedom
  • Diverse society.

73
To Summarize
  • The U.S. is the most innovative nation on the
    planet.
  • We have the best research universities.
  • We are king of the hill in RD.
  • We have comparative advantages
  • Strong ST base
  • Free-market economy
  • Democracy and freedom
  • Diverse society.
  • But, we cannot be complacent.

74
Securing the Future
  • Building a Base for U.S. Competitiveness and
    Innovation

75
In the Beginning was
76
(No Transcript)
77
And there was light
78
(No Transcript)
79
NII Agenda
  • TALENT
  • INVESTMENT
  • INFRASTRUCTURE

80
(No Transcript)
81
Recommendations of the Augustine Committee
  • Ten Thousand Teachers, Ten Million Minds
  • Sowing the Seeds
  • Best and Brightest
  • Incentives for Innovation

82
And Then a Miracle Happened
83
?
?
Council
Academies
President
84
MEDIA ADVISORY March 5, 2007 SENATE
LEADERS TO ANNOUNCE NEW COMPETITIVENESS
LEGISLATION Washington, DCMonday at 200 p.m.,
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate
Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, Senator Jeff
Bingaman, Senator Ted Stevens, Senator Joe
Lieberman, Senator Pete Domenici, and Senator
Lamar Alexander will join to announce the
introduction of the America COMPETES Act. This
new bipartisan legislation will make our country
more competitive in the global marketplace by
significantly increasing federal research
investment and strengthening educational
opportunities in science, technology, engineering
and math for students of all ages. WHO Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid Senate Republican
Leader Mitch McConnell Senator Jeff
Bingaman Senator Ted Stevens Senator Joe
Lieberman Senator Pete Domenici Senator Lamar
Alexander WHAT Press conference on the
America COMPETES Act WHEN Monday, March 5, 200
p.m. WHERE Mansfield Room, S-207, U.S. Capitol
85
Securing the Future
Building a Base for U.S. Competitiveness
and Innovation
It may actually come to pass.
86
Thank you.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com