Situationism and Interactionism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Situationism and Interactionism

Description:

Situationism and Interactionism. Dr. Christine Simmonds-Moore. Overview ... Mendoza-Denton, Rodolfo; Ayduk, Ozlem; Mischel, Walter; Journal of Personality ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1492
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: christine48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Situationism and Interactionism


1
Situationism and Interactionism
  • Dr. Christine Simmonds-Moore

2
Overview
  • To what extent does an internal organising
    structure exist in personality
  • How have traits/psychodynamic theories been
    criticised?
  • Does this persist across time?
  • Does this persist across situations?
  • Introducing interactionism personality as a
    recipe

3
Mischels criticism of traits
  • In 1968, Mischel published a criticism of
    traditional personality theory
  • Psychoanalytic theory and trait theory
  • Traits fail to predict behaviour in real life
  • Situations may be more powerful than internal
    traits
  • The person-situation controversy
  • The .30 barrier
  • Inherent problems in measurement that construct
    correlations between different traits

4
Limitations to Mischels analysis
  • Personality is complex e.g., Adlerian
    inferiority complex
  • .30 is not meaningless
  • .30 correlations are also found for social
    explanations of personality

5
To what extent is personality continuous/consisten
t across time?
  • Consistency over time/longitudinal consistency
    stability
  • Assessed by computing correlation coefficients
  • Good evidence of longitudinal stability (Block
    Conley Fleeson)
  • Short term reliability, longer term variability
  • Personality changes little after age 30 (e.g.,
    Costa and MCrae, 1990)
  • Methodological considerations
  • E.g., spouse ratings versus alterations in self
    concept (C M, 1980), peer ratings versus self
    ratings (Haan, 1981)
  • Some people change a lot, others do not change at
    all
  • Patterns from childhood can often predict later
    behaviour
  • What about the influence of the ageing process?

6
To what extent is personality continuous/consisten
t across situations 1?
  • Consistency over situations consistency
  • The power of the situation is sometimes so
    strong that it overrides our inclinations
  • E.g., reactions to traumatic events, e.g, the
    sinking of the titanic
  • Culturally accepted and encouraged behaviour
  • Nazi Germany
  • But, see Blass (1991)
  • Assessed by computing correlation coefficients
  • Inconsistencies across situations
  • Hartshorne and Mays (1928) study on honesty
  • Dudycha (1936) punctuality is inconsistent
  • Bouchard et al assertiveness is inconsistent
  • Coie curiosity is inconsistent
  • Paulus and Martin - Flexibility is inconsistent
  • Currand et al Social anxiety is inconsistent

7
Dudycha, 1936
8
A wider conceptualisation of traits
  • Trait theorists defend themselves
  • Agreement that there may be inconsistency of
    overt behaviour
  • Traits might account for such inconsistencies
  • The notion of aggregation
  • a trait does not refer to a specific behaviour in
    a specific situation but rather to a class of
    behaviours averaged over a range of situations
  • Epsteins (1983) findings with wider ranges of
    behaviour and situations
  • Variability and situational specificity
  • Funder and Colvin, 1991 - People express the same
    trait differently in various situations

9
Interactionism 1
  • Interactionism is the synthesis of personologism
    and situationism
  • Neither the person OR the situation per se is
    emphasised, but rather the reciprocal interaction
    of these two factors
  • Ideas of interactionist thought can be traced
    back to Aristotle and other philosophers
  • Influenced by early psychologists, e.g., Koffka,
    Kantor and Lewin (see Ekehammar, 1974 for a
    historical perspective)
  • E.g., no biological fact may be considered as
    anything but the mutual interaction of the
    organism and the environment (Kantor, 1924)

10
Interactionism 2
  • Person x situations
  • E.g., Moos (1969) personality, time and place
  • Moderator variables
  • E.g., gender
  • Traits as genotypes
  • Individual structure of a trait (Bem and Allen,
    1974)
  • Person x mode
  • Trait relevance
  • Metatraits
  • Which types of situation minimise or maximise the
    expression of traits?
  • Selection of situations
  • Measuring the personality of situations

11
Research on interactionism
  • Empirical evidence has attempted to show that the
    person x situation variance is more than the
    relative magnitude of person or situation
    variance
  • E.g., Application to affect regulation and social
    cognition I when

12
States and traits
  • Zanes et al. (1998) have suggested that
    schizotypy may actually be better considered as a
    state as they found differences among high
    scorers on a schizotypy variable
  • Consistency ? associations with pathology
  • Inconsistency ? fluctuations in states of
    schizotypy

13
Is personality a state
  • Mulitple personality disorder
  • Dissociation, other personalities, other
    potentials
  • Recent research with dissociation
  • Traumatic experience ? spirituality
  • Sleep quality is a predictor of dissociation
  • Sleep quality is related to aggression in prison
    setting
  • Sleep length and hallucinatory experiences

14
My research in parapsychology
15
Summary of interactionist perspectives
  • Simplistic to say personality is soley due to
    internal structure or the environment
  • Personality is a complex interaction of the
    person and the situation
  • Situations bring out different elements of traits
    and internal structures
  • We often choose the situations we
    enter/experience
  • Interactions are moderated by factors such as
    gender
  • Evidence for traits persisting over time
  • Traits predict behaviours in similar but not all
    situations
  • Difficult to study complexities of these
    interactions

16
Seminar activity 1
  • In pairs or small groups, think about how you
    scored on the extraversion trait and whether you
    consider yourself to be introvert/ambivert/extrave
    rt.
  • When have you expressed the opposite trait?
  • Why have you expressed the opposite trait?

17
Seminar activity 2
  • In pairs, think of a famous persons life, rate
    the extent to which the person displays a trait
    across his or her lifetime/different situations
  • e.g., smoking cannabis and political behaviour
    I did not inhale
  • Why did the person take drugs?
  • What situation drove this behaviour?
  • Do you think this was part of his personality
    structure?
  • Can similar traits predict different behaviours?
  • From BBC online
  • Should a politician's previous life be open to
    public scrutiny? Tory leadership candidate David
    Cameron MP has refused to answer repeated
    questions over whether he has ever used drugs.
  • On the BBC's Question Time he said "We are all
    human and we err and stray.
  • "I didn't spend the early years of my life
    thinking 'I better not do anything because one
    day I might be a politician'."
  • Should politicians have private lives? Do
    politicians have a responsibility as role models?
    Should we care what a politician did when they
    were younger?

18
References and further reading
  • Chapter 10 in Friedman Schustack
  • Person Situation interactionism in
    self-encoding (Iam . . .when . . .) Implications
    for affect regulation and social information
    processing. Mendoza-Denton, Rodolfo Ayduk,
    Ozlem Mischel, Walter Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology, Vol 80(4), Apr 2001. pp.
    533-544.Cited References (82) HTML Full Text
    PDF Full Text via psycharticles
  • Interactionism in personality from a historical
    perspective. Ekehammar, Bo Psychological
    Bulletin, Vol 81(12), Dec 1974. pp.
    1026-1048.Cited References (137)   Times Cited
    in this Database(31) PDF Full Text (2212K) via
    Psycharticles
  • Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience
    experiment The role of personality, situations,
    and their interactions. Blass, Thomas Journal of
    Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 60(3), Mar
    1991. pp. 398-413.Cited References (180)   Times
    Cited in this Database(4) HTML Full Text PDF
    Full Text (2150K) via psycharticles
  • And see document for trait and interactionism
    reading on the website.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com