Title: Olive Domestication
1Olive Domestication
2Olea europaea
- Family Oleaceae
- Six subspecies
- Olea europaea ssp. europaea (olives) grows in
Mediterranean Basin at the N limit of Olea range - Other 5 subspecies grow in Africa and Asia
- Olea fruit gathered 19,000 year BP in E.
Mediterranean - One of the first plants cited in early literature
- Can live 2000-3000 years
Kohler's Medizinal-Pflanzen in naturgetreuen
Abbildungen mit kurz erlauterndem Texte Atlas
zur Pharmacopoea germanica, Volume 2 (1887)
3Oleaceae phylogeny
www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/.../ Olea.europaea.ho5.jpg
Wallander, E. and V. A. Albert. 2000. Phylogeny
and classification of Oleaceae beased on rps16
and trnL-F sequences. American Journal of Botany
12 1827-1841.
4Olea europea ssp. europaea
- 2 practically indistinguishable varieties
- Olea europaea ssp. europaea var. sylvestris
wild olive, ancestor of cultivated olive. - Olea europaea ssp. europaea var. europea
cultivated olive
www.classatravel.com/ gordana/Sicily/images/Ag...
www.bestofsicily.com/ mag/art160.gif
5Olea europaea ssp. europaea var. europaea
(cultivated olive)
- Wind pollinated and diploid
- Propagated by cuttings or grafting
- Self incompatible male often sterile
- Morphologically very similar to oleaster
- 90 of olives grown
- for oil production
- healing leaf
6Ancient olive DNA in pits preservation,
amplification and sequence analysis (Elbaum et
al. 2006)
- Archeological studies verify intensive
exploitation of fruit 8000 years ago. - Developed method to select pits with high quality
DNA-Mediterranean climate is not favorable for
DNA preservation - Successfully sequences first ancient olive DNA.
7Olive Pit Collection Sites
- Kfar Samir - coast off of Haifa olive oil
extraction site (7530-6570 BP) 3 pits analyzed - Nahal Megadim - off Carmel coast 6 (6115 BP), 6
pits analyzed - Qumran hundreds of desiccated olive pits, date
palm pits found in a Byzantine layer (1430 BP)
10 pits analyzed
8Elbaum et al. only had 2 pits with high quality
DNA
- Amplified 109 bp segment from TrnT-TrnL in
chloroplast genome. Only 35 bp could be read
for these, the sequence was identical to the
database for modern O. europaea.
9Today olives are cultivated throughout the
Mediterranean Basin, as well as in CA, Argentina
Australia.
Breton et al. 2006
flickr.com/photos/ turquoise_bleue/162944624/jpg
10Using Multiple Types of Molecular Markers to
Understand Olive Phylogeography
- Catherine Breton, Guillaume Besnard, and André A.
Bervillé
Breton et al. used mitotypes, SSR and RAPD data
to gain better understanding of olive
domestication.
11Previous hypotheses on olive domestication and
distribution
- First believed that domesticated olive was
introduced to the Mediterranean Basin - More recently scientists hypothesized
- 1. The wild olive was only in E. Med.
- 2. Cultivars were derived in the East and spread
West. - 3. Wild olives in the West are all feral
escapes.
12However, Breton et al. propose
- There is an obvious genetic difference between
eastern and western oleaster populations the
western populations are not feral. - These disjunct populations, which have different
mitotypes, are the result of multiple isolated
refugia during the glaciations. - According to SSR and RAPD data, oleaster genetic
diversity is higher in the western Mediterranean
than in the East.
13However, Breton et al. propose
- 4. Generally cultivars are of eastern origin.
- 5. Olive cultivars on Corsica Sicily may have
been directly selected from ancient native
oleasters (based on MCA). - 6. O. europaea ssp. europaea arose and
diversified in Morocco, where it picked up the
MCK mitotype. - 7. At least two simultaneous domestications
occurred on opposite ends of the Basin.
14Oleaster population collections
EAST
lt1/4
The above oleasters and over 100 cultivars
15Oleaster genetic diversity is higher in the
western Mediterranean than in the East and higher
in oleaster than in cultivars
- From Table 11. 3 Distribution of Molecular in
Oleasters and Olive Cultivars -
Type of Marker Oleasters Oleasters Oleasters Cultivars
Type of Marker Total Specific to East Specific to West Cultivars
Mitotypes 3 1 2 4
RAPD 57 6 12 45
SSR 167 12 33 99
16Cultivars are generally of eastern origin.
17Some cultivars possess western-specific oleaster
RAPD bands as well as western-specific mitotypes,
suggesting that these cultivars were selected
directly from oleasters in the western
Mediterranean.
18SSR-based dendrogram showed 3 main groupings
western Med, eastern Med and Corsica/Sicily
19Pairwise estimated Variance for cultivated, wild
and ancient olives
Baldoni et al. 2006
- CVcultivated Wwild ATancient
- UMUmbria, SASardinia, SISicily
20Ancestry of oleaster
- Mitotype data show 2 mitotypes (MOM and MCK) not
found in other subspecies. The authors note that
the MCK type is very similar to MMA found in O.
e. maroccana. This supports the hypothesis that
oleaster diversified in the West. Breton et al.
suggest a southern Moroccan diversification. - Chlorotype data also show that O. e. europaea has
chlorotypes from two distinct lineages, implying
that it may be a hybrid.
21Oleaster and cultivar movement
- Three refugia
- NW Africa
- W. Med.
- Near East
Breton et. al. 2006
22Genetic diversity and gene flow between the wild
olive and the olive several Plio-Pleistocene
refuge zones in the Mediterranean basin suggested
by SSR analysis. Breton, C., Tersac, and A.
Bervillé. Journal of Biogeography (2006) 33
- 166 oleaster species and 40 cultivars were used
- Chlorotype data from 12 unlinked SSR loci
- Constructed ancestral populations (RPOP)
- Found
- Diversity of oleasters, with unique populations,
can be explained by glacial refugia.
23- Used STRUCTURE to assign each individual to one
or several RPOP (80 probability, if less then
possibly hybrid) - Seven pre-defined RPOPs
- 1. Corsica 2. Turkey 3. Sicily
- 4. Tunisia 5. Libya 6. Spain 7. Israel
24Map of RPOPs
- Figure 4 Map of the Mediterranean basin showing
the approximate locations of the seven oleaster
populations. RPOPs are circled by continuous
lines and numbered according to Table 4. Dotted
circles indicated that the two RPOPs were not
differentiated by all methods.
25Conclusions
- Distribution of oleaster diversity can be
explained by recolonization into the
Mediterranean Basin after the last glaciation. - There is gene flow between some populations due
to overlap
26Questions
- If there were at least 2 sites of olive
domestication, why do most cultivars have a high
percentage of ME1 mitotype? - Given that oleaster has more genetic diversity,
why do cultivars have an additional mitotype? - Is it likely that the mitotype presence was
biased by large sample size in West and small in
the East? - Why not use phylogenic analysis of molecular data
instead of dendrogram? - Only 1 to 2 samples of the other O. europaea
subspecies were examined. Is this sufficient?
27(No Transcript)
28Bibliography
- Baldoni. et al. 2006. Genetic structure of wild
and cultivated olives in the Central
Mediterranean Basin. Annals of Botany 98
935-942 - Breton, C., Tersac, and A. Bervillé. 2006.
Genetic diversity and gene flow between the wild
olive and the olive several Plio-Pleistocene
refuge zones in the Mediterranean basin suggested
by SSR analysis. Journal of Biogeography 33
1916-1928. - Breton, C., G. Besnard, and A. A. Bervillé.
2003. Using multiple types of molecular markers
to understand olive phylogeography. Documenting
Domestication. - Elbaum, R. et al. 2006. Ancient olive DNA in
pits preservation, amplification and sequence
analysis, Journal of Archaeological Science 33
77-88. - Wallander, E. and V. A. Albert. 2000. Phylogeny
and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and
trnL-F sequences. American Journal of Botany 12
1827-1841. - .