FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE

Description:

'strangely' requires only a single state/event which it ... to $5000 for his season football tickets while others said theirs brought only ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:215
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: arav57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE


1
FROM SENTENCE STRUCTURE TO IMMEDIATE DISCOURSE
STRUCTURE ANNOTATION OF DISCOURSE
CONNECTIVES AND THEIR ARGUMENTS Aravind K.
Joshi University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
USA IIT, Powai, Mumbai, December 30 2005

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Transition from sentence to immediate discourse
  • Dependencies in discourse structure
  • Penn Discourse Treebank (PDTB)
  • Some properties of discourse connectives
  • Some examples from PDTB
  • Some aspects of annotation guidelines
  • Semantics of discourse connectives
  • Assigning roles to the arguments
  • Attributions of arguments and connectives
  • Summary

3
Transition from sentence to immediate discourse
  • How much information can be packaged in a
    sentence?
  • When does a transition from a sentence to
    discourse happen?
  • Are there any general principles?
  • Beyond some conventions of style are there
    any linguistic principles to this transition?

4
Transition from sentence to immediate discourse
  • Sentences are made up of clauses
  • Clause Predicate (Verb)
    Arguments, Adjuncts
  • Dependency structure
  • Connectives
  • Composition operations
  • Extend dependency structures to discourse
  • Extend the same composition operations to
    discourse
  • Extend the sentence level parser to discourse

5
Transition from sentence to immediate discourse
  • At the sentence level
  • Predicates have as their arguments --
    NPs -- NPs and clauses --
    Clauses
  • Discourse connectives can be treated as higher
    order predicates taking only clauses as their
    arguments

6
Sentence Structure and Discourse Structure
  • At the sentence level
  • Structural composition and associated
    semantic composition
  • Anaphoric links
  • Other inferences
  • At the discourse level
  • Structural composition and associated
    semantic composition
  • Anaphoric links
  • Other inferences
  • Conventionally, work in discourse structure does
    not consider and therefore, allow such a
    decomposition

7
Dependencies in discourse structure
  • Discourse connectives as predicates taking
    clausal arguments
  • The dependencies between the predicate and
    their arguments can be stretched

Nested Dependencies
On the one hand, Fred likes beans. Not only does
he eat them for dinner. But he also eats them for
breakfast and snacks. On the other hand, hes
allergic to them.
8
Dependencies in discourse structure
  • Dependencies can be stretched by nesting
  • Crossed dependencies do not seem to be possible
  • Is this cross-linguistically valid?
  • Apparent crossing dependencies are resolved by
    treating one argument of a discourse connective
    as anaphoric

Webber, Joshi, Stone, and Knott. 2003. Anaphora
and discoursestructure. Computational
Linguistics, 29545-587.
9
Crossed dependencies
True crossed dependencies do not seem to be
possible
On the one hand, Fred likes beans. Not only does
he eat them for dinner. But he also eats them for
breakfast and snacks. On the other hand, hes
allergic to them.

On the one hand, Fred likes beans. Not only does
he eat them for dinner. On the other hand, hes
allergic to them. But he also eats them for
breakfast and snacks
In this sense, discourse structure may be simpler
than sentencestructure, even cross-linguistically
?
10
Dependencies in discourse structure
(a) John loves Barolo. (b) So he ordered three
cases of the 97. (c) But he had to cancel the
order (d) Because then he discovered he was
broke. because gets its arguments from (c) and
(d) then gets its arguments from (b) and
(d), thus crossing the connection between (c) and
(d) associated with because
Apparent crossing dependency Treat the argument
from (b) for then as anaphoric
11
  • Penn Discourse Treebank PDTB
  • Annotate discourse connectives and their
    argument structure for the Penn Treebank
    corpus PDTB
  • Independent of the specifics of the discourse
    lexicalized TAG (DLTAG)

People Aravind Joshi Eleni
Miltsakaki, Rashmi Prasad
Annotators Collaborator Bonnie Webber (Edinburgh
University)
12
  • PDTB
  • Discourse connectives such as -- and, or,
    but, because, since, while, when, however,
    instead, although, also, for example, then, so
    that, insofar as, nonetheless, , Empty
    Connectives
  • -- Subordinate conjunctions, Coordinate
    conjunctions,
  • Adverbial connectives, Implicit
    connectives
  • -- Discourse connectives take clauses as their
    arguments
  • and express relations between clauses,
    i.e., relations
  • between propositions, events, situations,
  • associated with the clauses

13
  • Towards computing a class of inferences
    associated with discourse connectives, hence
    relevant to complex NLP tasks IE, MT, QA
  • Towards discourse structure - discourse
    understanding
  • Research Strategy
  • Not shallow vs deep syntactic processing
  • Not shallow vs deep semantic processing
  • But
  • Deeper and deeper shallow processing

14
  • Some properties of discourse connectives
  • Discourse connectives have argument structure
    (analogous to verbs and their argument structure)
    as in the Propbank. However, there are
    crucial differences
  • arity of connectives is fixed, they are binary
    (some apparent exceptions)
  • One argument is in the same sentence in which
    the connective appears. The other argument may
    or may not be in the same sentence. It can be
    in the preceding or following discourse
  • Harder to annotate the extent of an argument
  • one of the arguments can be anaphoric
  • Very little is known about the semantics of
    discourse connectives

15
What is being annotated
?
  • Relation Connective--explicit or implicit
  • Arguments Arg1, Arg2
  • Attributions of arguments
  • Attribution of relation
  • Sense of the connective
  • Supplementary material

16
Some Examples from PDTB
Subordinate because The federal government
suspended sales of U.S. savings Bonds because
Congress hasnt lifted the ceiling on
government debt.
  • Both arguments are in the same sentence

Subordinate although Although started in 1965,
Wedtech didnt really get Rolling until 1975
(when Mr. Neuberger discovered the Federal
Governments Section 8(A) minority
business Program).
  • Both arguments are in the same sentence, one
    argument has
  • possible supplementary material in ( )

17
Adverbial however Both Newsweek and U.S. News
have been gaining circulation in recent years
without heavy use of electronicgiveaways to
subscribers, such as telephone or
watches. However, none of the big three
weeklies recordedcirculation gains recently.
  • The two arguments are in different sentences

18
Adverbial for example The computers were crude
by todays standards. Apple II owners, for
example, had to use their televisionsets as
screens and stored data on audiocassetts.
The computers were crude by todays
standards. Apple II owners, for example, had to
use their televisionsets as screens and stored
data on audiocassetts.
  • An argument can be a discontiguous string
  • Problems with aligning arguments with Penn
    Treebank constituents

19
Discourse adverbials as anaphors Instead
John wanted to eat a pear. Instead he ate an
apple. John will not eat fruit. Instead, he eats
only candy bars and potato chips. John ate an
apple. Instead he wanted a pear.
Antecedent of instead salient but unchosen
orunrealized alternative -- anaphoric
argument of insteadLicensing environment modal
context, negation,
20
Adverbial still Some senior advisors argue
that with further fights overa capital-gains tax
cut and a budget-reduction bill Mr.Bush already
has enough pending confrontations withcongress.
They prefer to put off the line-item veto
untilat least next year. Still, Mr. Bush and
some other aides are strongly drawnto the idea
of trying out a line-item veto.
ARG1 Some senior congress. They prefernext
year ARG2 Mr. Busha line-item veto
ARG1 has two sentences
21
Adverbial also On the Big Board, Crawford
Co., Atlanta, (CFD)begins trading today.
Crawford evaluates health careplans, manages
medical and disability aspects of
workerscompensation injuries and is involved in
claims adjustments for insurance
companies. Also, beginning trading today on the
Big Board are ElPaso Refinery Limited
Partnership, El Paso, Texas, (ELP)and Franklin
Multi-Income Trust, San Mateo, Calif., (FMI).
  • The sentence (in green) after the left argument
    of also can be regarded as a kind of
    adjunct of the left argument
  • Discourse connectives have a fixed arity (2).

22
Empty connective EMPTY
El Paso owns and operates a petroleum
refinery. EMPTY whereas Franklin is a
closed-end managementinvestment company.
  • whereas is the connective that one annotator
    thought best described the relation expressed
    by the empty connective
  • Analogous to the empty relation in a noun-noun
    compound at the sentence level

23
Empty connective
Individuals close to the situation believe Ford
officialswill seek a meeting this week with Sir
John to outlinetheir proposal for a full bid.
ltCONSEQUENTLYgtAny discussion with Ford could
postpone the Jaguar-GM deal, headed for
completion within the next two weeks.
24
Empty connectives
But now the companies are getting into
troublebecause they undertook a record expansion
programwhile they were raising prices sharply.
ltCONSEQUENTLY/AS A RESULTgt Third-quarter
profits fell at several companies.
Disagreement on selected connective but
agreementover class
25
Empty connectives
British government restrictions prevent any
singleshareholder from going beyond 15 before
the end of1990 without government permission.
ltBECAUSE/HOWEVERgt The British government, which
ownedJaguar until 1984, still holds a
controlling goldenshare in the company.
Disagreement over connective and also the classes
they belong
26
Attributions of arguments and relations
Advocates said the 90-cent-an hour rise to 4.25
an hourby April 1991, is too small for the
working poor, whileopponents argued that the
increase will still hurt small Businesses and
cost many thousands of jobs.
Relation Connective- while Arg1 Advocates
saidpoor Arg2 opponents jobs Attributions
Relation WA (writer attribution) Arg 1
WA Arg 2 WA
27
Attributions of arguments and relations
Factory orders and construction outlays were
largelyflat in September, while purchasing
agents saidmanufacturing shrank further in
October.
Relation Connective- while Arg1 Factory orders
September Arg2 manufacturing shrank in
October Attributions Relation WA Arg1 WA Arg2
SA (speaker attribution)
28
How many discourse connectives in PTB? Types
about 253 (Subordinating 32, Coordinating 4,
Adverbial/Anaphoric 217) Tokens about
23,620 (Subordinating 7011, Coordinating 6169,
Adverbial/Anaphoric 10,440) Empty connectives
Tokens about 20,000
Types ?? Total Tokens 43,620
29
Annotation Guidelines some comments
  • What counts as a discourse connective? -- in
    general, discourse connectives convey a
    relation between states, events,
    situations, etc.
  • as a result is a discourse connective
  • But in
  • Strangely, conventional wisdom inside the Beltway
    regards these transfer payments as
  • strangely requires only a single state/event
    which it classifies in the set of strange
    events. Hence, it is nota discourse connective
  • What counts as an argument?

30
Annotation Guidelines some comments
  • How far does an argument extend?
  • Although started in 1965, Wedtech didnt
    really getrolling until 1975 (when Mr.
    Neuberger discovered theFederal Governments
    Section 8 minority business
  • Program).
  • Proper partial overlap

ARG1 Wedtech didnt really 1975 ARG2 started
in 1965 SUP2 when Mr. Neuberger Program
31
Multiple annotations
  • In the standard annotation paradigm only one
    annotation is selected
  • At the discourse level multiple annotations
    cannot be completely avoided

Big bear doesnt care for disposable diapers,
which arent biodegradable. Yet parents demand
them.
Big bear doesnt care for disposable diapers,
which arent biodegradable. Yet parents
demand them.
32
  • Assigning roles to the arguments
  • For verbs
  • In terms of general roles such as agent, theme,
    goal, instrument,
  • In terms of word specific roles
  • He wouldnt accept anything of value from those
    he was writing aboutREL accept Arg0 acceptor
  • Arg1 thing accepted Arg2 accepted-from
  • Prague Dependency Treebank (PDB) (1998, 2001),
    Framenet (2000, 2002),
  • Propbank (2002, 2003)

33
  • Assigning roles to the arguments of a
    connective
  • In terms of general roles-- ???
  • In terms of connective specific roles

34
Roles of arguments of if (conditional) if
(hypothetical) If John studies hard he will pass
the examination REL if (hypothetical) ARG0
(Truth condition) circumstances
which make ARG1 true ARG1 (Assertion)
expresses assertion
35
Roles of arguments of if (relevance
conditional) if (relevance) If you are
thirsty, there is beer in the fridge REL if
(relevance conditional) ARG0 (Relevance
condition) circumstances in which
ARG1 is relevant ARG1 (Assertion)
expresses assertion
36
Roles of arguments of if (factual
conditional) if (factual) If Bill is so
unhappy here, he should leave REL if (factual
conditional) ARG0 (Factual condition)
someone other than the speaker believes that
ARG0 is true and ARG0 justifies
ARG1 ARG1 (Conditional assertion)
expresses assertion
37
Some possible new senses for if
It will be at their peril if Americans allow
another happening like the degrading Bork
confirmation circus
ARG1 it will peril ARG2 Americans circus
ARG 1 makes reference to ARG 2
If here is not hypothetical conditional but it is
just a way of making an assertion, much like
hypothetical relevance conditional but not quite
like it.
38
Some possible new senses for if
Dont leave home without the American Express
card if youd really rather have a Buick.
If here is more like the hypothetical
relevanceconditional but not quite like it.
39
Some possible senses for while
Under Chapter 11, a company operates under
protectionfrom creditors lawsuits while it
works out a planto pay its debts.
ARG1 Under lawsuits ARG2 it works
debts Con while Sense Temporal
Some will likely be offered severance package
while others will be transferred to overseas
operations.
Sense Concessive
40
Some possible senses for while
Each company remains independent while
working together to market and sell their
products.
Sense Temporal/Concessive
While the insurance index fell 3.56 to 528.56,
the Nasdaq bank index fell 5.00 to 432.61.
Sense ? Compare but no real contrast
41
Some possible senses for since, when,
  • Senses for since Temporal, Causal,
    Temporal/Causal
  • Senses for when Temporal, Causal, Temporal/Causal

42
Since
  • Temporal (T)
  • She hasnt played any music since the earthquake
    hit.
  • Causal (C)
  • Since the budget measures cash flow, a new 1
    direct loan is treated as a 1 expenditure.
  • Temporal/Causal (T/C)
  • and domestic car sales have plunged 19 since
    the Big Three ended many of their programs Sept
    30.

43
While
  • Temporal (T)
  • A nurse contracted the virus while injecting an
    AIDS patient
  • Concession (Con)
  • The basket product, while it has got off to a
    slow start, is being supported by some firms.
  • Opposition (Opp)
  • one ex-player claims he received 4000 to 5000
    for his season football tickets while others said
    theirs brought only a few hundred dollars.

44
When
  • Temporal
  • The San Francisco earthquake hit when resources
    in the field already were stretched
  • Temporal/Causal
  • When the Trinity Repertory Theatre named Anne
    Bogart as its artistic director last spring, the
    nations theatrical cognoscenti arched a
    collective eyebrow

45
Summary
  • Expected date of release April 2006
  • -- all explicit connectives (adjudicated)
  • -- all implicit connectives but only about
    50 adjudicated
  • -- some annotation senses
  • All connectives, all senses, and some
    experimental results December 2006

46
Summary
  • Boundary between sentence and discourse
  • Flexible
  • Discourse connectives sit at this boundary
  • Similarities and differences between
    sentence structure and local discourse structure
  • Properties of discourse connectives
  • Arguments of connectives, a-rity is 2
  • Extent of the arguments and their semantics
  • Annotations of attributions
  • -- Mismatch between syntax and discourse
  • Sense annotationnew opportunities
  • Multiple annotations-- implications
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com