Protocol Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Protocol Development

Description:

... Compliance. Wilma Hoffman, Director. Linda Walters-Page, Protocol Specialist. Ellen Aiken , Protocol Specialist. Kathryn Okrent, Protocol Specialist ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:171
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: rtog
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Protocol Development


1
  • Protocol Development Regulatory Compliance
  • Wilma Hoffman, Director
  • Linda Walters-Page, Protocol Specialist
  • Ellen Aiken , Protocol Specialist
  • Kathryn Okrent, Protocol Specialist
  • Joseph Kopaczynski Protocol Specialist
  • Georgette Koslosky Protocol Specialist
  • Marcella Moore, Canadian Regulatory Compliance
    Associate
  • Marie DAmico, Regulatory Compliance Associate
  • Rose Ball, Administrative Assistant
  • Sharon Allen, Randomization Secretary/Pathology

2
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
3
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
  • The Nuremberg Code
  • Code stating certain basic principles that must
    be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical,
    and legal concepts for the protection of
    patients.
  • Three pivotal principles of the Nuremberg Code
    that laid down conditions for ethical research
  • Consent obtained from the research subject
  • Conduct animal experiments first
  • Supervise the research

4
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
  • The Declaration of Helsinki
  • Statement 1 It is the mission of the medical
    doctor to safeguard the health of the people
  • Statement 2 The health of my patient will be
    my first consideration

5
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
  • The Belmont Report
  • Published on September 30, 1978
  • Distinguishes between medical research and
    practice and develops the basic principles that
    should govern research with human subjects.
    Based on prior ethical violations.

6
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
  • The Belmont Report
  • Three quintessential requirements
  • Respect for persons
  • Beneficence
  • Justice

7
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
  • The Belmont Report
  • Application of Principles
  • Informed Consent
  • Selection of human research subjects
  • Is it fair?
  • Is it unbiased?

8
Why are These Regulations Important?
  • To ensure the welfare and protection of the human
    research subject.
  • To ensure the integrity and reliability of data
    submitted in support of a marketing application.
  • To ensure that clinical research is conducted in
    a consistent and uniform manner.
  • To remember that history can repeat itself.

9
Assurance
  • Institutional Assurances of Protection for Human
    Subjects
  • Institutions contract with the Department of
    Health and Human Services
  • Institution stipulates it will abide by 21CFR56
  • Federal Wide Assurance (FWA)

10
Assurance
  • Institution submits application
  • http//ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov
  • Receives notification of approval from OHRP
  • Forward notification to CTSU

11
Institutional Review Boards
  • Institutions IRB
  • Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) It is
    Sponsored by the NCI. It was established the
    fall of 2002.
  • Primary Goals of the CIRB
  • To improve access to clinical trials
  • To enhance the protection of research
    participants
  • To collaborate more effectively with local IRBs
  • To reduce the administrative burdens

12
Institutional Review Boards
  • Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) A
    major benefit for participating local IRBs will
    be the reduction in review workload while still
    retaining its authority to accept or reject a
    "facilitated review" on a protocol-by-protocol
    basis.
  • Phase III trials are available now. Likewise, due
    to the "facilitated review" process, patients and
    investigators will benefit from the resulting
    rapid opening and greater availability of new
    trials- and it is FREE!

13
Institutional Review Boards
  • FDA Requirements
  • IRB approvals must occur within 365 days of the
    last approval.
  • Meaning the protocol must be reviewed and
    approved (progress reports and all) by the IRB
    within 364 days of the last meeting.
  • The meeting date of the IRB is the approval date.
    Back dating/forward dating is not allowed.

14
Institutional Review Boards
  • Standard IRB Approval Requirements
  • Example
  • Initial approval - August 1, 2000
  • 1st renewal - July 8, 2001
  • When is the 2nd renewal required?
  • The IRB meeting must be on or before July 8,
    2002.
  • The IRB cannot convene on September 9th and state
    that the approval spans back to July 8th and
    expires the following July.
  • Nor can the IRB convene on June 6th and state the
    renewal covers the next 12 months from July 8th.

15
Institutional Review Boards
  • Anniversary IRB Approval Requirements
  • An anniversary approval differs slightly from the
    standard approval. The guidelines below must be
    strictly followed
  • A reapproval must occur with in 30 days of the
    anniversary date.
  • If the reapproval date is greater than 30 days
    anniversary date it will be scored as a MAJOR
    deficiency at audit.
  • If the reapproval date one day over the
    anniversary date it will be scored as a MAJOR
    deficiency at audit.
  • Once the anniversary date is exceeded as above
    the anniversary date is NO LONGER VALID. The
    reapproval will then revert to the standard
    approval and must be approved with in 365 days of
    the last approval.

16
Institutional Review Boards
  • Anniversary IRB Approval Requirements
  • Example
  • Initial approval - August 1, 2000
  • When is the 1st renewal required?
  • The IRB meeting must occur between July 7, 2002
    and August 1, 2002.
  • July 15th would be acceptable
  • If any subsequent approval occurs after August
    2nd, this would be scored as a MAJOR deficiency
    and the anniversary date would no longer be
    valid.
  • PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LETTERS, FROM YOUR IRB, MUST
    STATE THE INITIAL APPROVAL OF THE PROTOCOL FOR
    VERIFICATION OF THE ANNIVERSARY DATE.

17
Institutional Review Boards
  • Members serving on the IRB committee
  • Committee must have a least 5 members, cannot
    consist of entirely men, women or one profession
  • Sufficiently qualified (FWA, OHRP Training)
  • 1 scientific, 1 non-scientific (clergy, community
    member)
  • No member with a conflict of interest
  • May invite additional guest with specialties
  • Background have to be identified (CVs)

18
Institutional Review Boards
  • Valid IRB meeting
  • In order for the IRB meeting to be valid a
    quorum must meet. Meaning that 51 of the voting
    IRB members must attend the meeting.

19
Institutional Review Boards
  • IRB Letters must contain the following
    information
  • Must state the date of the IRB meeting
  • Explain what is being reviewed
  • Initial Approval
  • Annual Approval
  • Protocol amendment to include the amendment
    number
  • Adverse Event
  • Safety Report

20
Institutional Review Boards
  • IRB Letters must contain the following
    information
  • State if the protocol is Approved.
  • If the IRB required modifications, the letter
    must state that the protocol is approved,
    contingent on changes or modifications.
  • After changes or modifications are completed, as
    required by the IRB, the IRB Chairperson may do
    an expedited review of the changes. This
    expedited review is at the discretion of your
    IRB.
  • State the type of review
  • Expedited Approval
  • Full Board Approval

21
Institutional Review Boards
  • RTOG Requirements
  • Name and address and chairperson
  • Common Rule Form (310)
  • Institution approval letter
  • CTSU Requirements
  • All United States sites must send documents to
    CTSU
  • All Canadian sites still send documents to RTOG

22
Institutional Review Boards
  • Maintain copies of all reports submitted to the
    IRB and reports of all actions by the IRB
  • Prior approval
  • Protocol
  • Modifications to the protocol/amendments, addenda
  • Subject consent
  • Patient/subject recruitment materials
  • Investigator Brochures
  • All correspondence

23
Institutional Review Boards
  • 3 Types of Review (21 CFR 56 and 45 CFR 46)
  • Full Review
  • Expedited
  • Exempt

24
Institutional Review Boards
  • Full Review
  • When is a full board approval required?
  • First time approval
  • Active studies with patients on treatment
  • Medical devices
  • When there is a risk involved. (Increase or
    additional risk)
  • Change in treatment.
  • Amendment with more than minimum risk

25
Institutional Review Boards
  • Expedited Review
  • Minimal risk
  • Minor changes in previously approved research
  • Generally, if study is closed to group accrual,
    or no patients are on treatment, an annual review
    can be approved by expedited review.
  • Reason for expedited review must be noted on
    approval
  • The IRB always has the right to require Full
    Board approval.

26
Institutional Review Boards
  • Exempt Review
  • Some examples are collection of blood samples
    from healthy/non-pregnant adults, sputum, nail
    clippings, non-invasive procedures.

27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
HIPAA
  • The privacy provisions of the federal law, the
    Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
    Act of 1996 (HIPAA), apply to health information
    created or maintained by health care providers
    who engage in certain electronic transactions,
    health plans, and health care clearinghouses.
  • The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is the
    Departmental component responsible for
    implementing and enforcing the privacy
    regulation.

30
HIPAA
  • Who must comply with these new HIPAA privacy
    standards?
  • Health care providers who conduct certain
    financial and administrative transactions
    electronically.

31
HIPAA
  • What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do?
  • The HIPAA Privacy Rule for the first time
    creates national standards to protect
    individuals medical records and other personal
    health information.

32
HIPAA
  • HIPPA websites
  • http//www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/
  • http//privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/
  • Please see RTOGs website for the Groups
    position on HIPAA guidance in research.

33
Informed Consent
  • Purpose
  • Informed consent is one of the primary ethical
    principles governing human subject research.
  • Informed consent assures that prospective
    research subjects will understand the nature of
    the research and can knowledgeably and
    voluntarily decide whether or not to participate

34
Informed Consent
  • General Requirements
  • NCI template used New June 1, 2004
  • Must contain all required elements
  • May add to consent but information should never
    be deleted from the consent
  • If changes (deletions) are made to the consent,
    the IRB must document why these changes were made
    to the consent. This information, along with the
    changes to the consent must be forwarded to RTOG
    HQ. This information must also be available in
    your IRB folders for future audits.

35
Informed Consent
  • Non-English Speaking Patients
  • To meet 21 CFR 50.20 requirements the IRB must
    have a fully translated informed consent document
    prepared in the participants native language and
    assure that the translation is accurate.
  • A translator may be used to facilitate the
    conversation between the research subject and the
    person conducting the consent interview.

36
Informed Consent
  • Illiterate English-Speaking Patients
  • A person who speaks and understands English, but
    does not read and write, can be enrolled in a
    study by "making their mark" on the consent
    document, when consistent with applicable state
    law.
  • A person who can understand and comprehend spoken
    English, but is physically unable to talk or
    write, can be entered into a study if they are
    competent and able to indicate approval or
    disapproval by other means.

37
Informed Consent
  • The Consent Process
  • The subject/representative must enter the date of
    signature on the consent document, to verify that
    consent was obtained before the subject began
    participation in the study.
  • If consent is obtained the same day the study
    begins, the subject's medical records must have
    document that consent was obtained prior to
    randomization.
  • A copy of the consent document must be provided
    to the subject and the original signed consent
    document should be retained in the study records.

38
Special Requirements
  • Some studies may have specific additional
    requirements that are needed before patient
    registration
  • Examples Ethics Certification, Pharmacy
    Registration, Advanced Technology Radiation
    Therapy Credentialing
  • The protocol will outline exactly what is needed

39
Investigational New Drugs
  • Sponsor Responsibility 21CRF312
  • Investigator New Drug (IND) application
  • Select Investigators
  • Accountability and Usage
  • Toxicity Reporting
  • NCI, ACR, RTOG, Corporate Sponsor
  • Accountable to the FDA

40
Investigational New Drugs
  • PI Responsibility
  • Form 1572 Statement of Investigator, outlines
    responsibilities
  • Maintain careful records
  • Storage of drugs
  • Return or disposal of unused drugs in accordance
    with FDA procedures and protocol instructions

41
NCI - IND
  • Must have current NCI CTEP Investigator Number to
    receive drug covered by an IND
  • Numbers are issued by the Pharmaceutical
    Management Branch of the NCI
  • Current FDA Form 1572, Supplemental Investigator
    Data Form (IDF), Financial Disclosure Form, and
    CV on file with PMB

42
Drug Accountability
  • Record of
  • Receipt
  • Use of NCI supplied agents
  • Disposition
  • If terminated, suspended, discontinued, or
    completed, PI will return unused supplies to the
    Sponsor or dispose the drug as arranged with the
    sponsor

43
Drug Accountability Record
Drug Accountability
44
Drug Accountability
  •  The following information must be recorded on
    the DARF
  • Date the agent left the Control pharmacy or
    satellite pharmacy
  • Where the medication came from or is going to.
    I.e. from the NCI or to Patient (initials,
    patient or case number)
  • Dose to the Patient, if applicable. If agent is
    received from the NCI no information would be
    expected.
  • Amount dispensed to the patient.
  • Amount remaining in stock.
  • Manufacturer and lot number.
  • The recorders initials.  

45
Drug Accountability
  • The institution must use the NCI supplied agent.
  • If a commercial agent is used, the institution
    must reimburse the patient and/or the insurance
    company.
  • The consent states this is supplied FREE of
    charge to the patient.

46
Drug Accountability
  • NEVER ever use white-out on the DARF forms or
    any study documents. This will constitute a
    major deficiency at the time of audit.

47
How To Order Drug
Clinical Drug Request
48
Drug Returns
49
Records Retention
  • Custody and Access
  • Retained for Specified Time
  • Individual state and HIPAA regulations may apply

50
Resources
  • RTOG Web site www.rtog.org
  • OHRP Web site http//ohrp.dhhs.gov
  • NCI Web site http//ctep.info.nih.gov
  • Investigators handbook
  • Forms
  • FDA Web site
  • www.fda.gov
  • FDA regarding informed consent
  • www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/informedconsent.htmlp
  • Cancer Trials Support Unit http//www.ctsu.org
  • Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB)
  • http//www.ncicirb.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com