Title: Protocol Development
1- Protocol Development Regulatory Compliance
- Wilma Hoffman, Director
- Linda Walters-Page, Protocol Specialist
- Ellen Aiken , Protocol Specialist
- Kathryn Okrent, Protocol Specialist
- Joseph Kopaczynski Protocol Specialist
- Georgette Koslosky Protocol Specialist
- Marcella Moore, Canadian Regulatory Compliance
Associate - Marie DAmico, Regulatory Compliance Associate
-
- Rose Ball, Administrative Assistant
- Sharon Allen, Randomization Secretary/Pathology
-
2REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
3HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
- The Nuremberg Code
- Code stating certain basic principles that must
be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical,
and legal concepts for the protection of
patients. - Three pivotal principles of the Nuremberg Code
that laid down conditions for ethical research - Consent obtained from the research subject
- Conduct animal experiments first
- Supervise the research
4HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
- The Declaration of Helsinki
- Statement 1 It is the mission of the medical
doctor to safeguard the health of the people - Statement 2 The health of my patient will be
my first consideration
5HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
- The Belmont Report
- Published on September 30, 1978
- Distinguishes between medical research and
practice and develops the basic principles that
should govern research with human subjects.
Based on prior ethical violations.
6HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
- The Belmont Report
- Three quintessential requirements
- Respect for persons
- Beneficence
- Justice
7HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF INFORMED CONSENT
- The Belmont Report
- Application of Principles
- Informed Consent
- Selection of human research subjects
- Is it fair?
- Is it unbiased?
8Why are These Regulations Important?
- To ensure the welfare and protection of the human
research subject. - To ensure the integrity and reliability of data
submitted in support of a marketing application. - To ensure that clinical research is conducted in
a consistent and uniform manner. - To remember that history can repeat itself.
9Assurance
- Institutional Assurances of Protection for Human
Subjects - Institutions contract with the Department of
Health and Human Services - Institution stipulates it will abide by 21CFR56
- Federal Wide Assurance (FWA)
10Assurance
- Institution submits application
- http//ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov
- Receives notification of approval from OHRP
- Forward notification to CTSU
11Institutional Review Boards
- Institutions IRB
- Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) It is
Sponsored by the NCI. It was established the
fall of 2002. - Primary Goals of the CIRB
- To improve access to clinical trials
- To enhance the protection of research
participants - To collaborate more effectively with local IRBs
- To reduce the administrative burdens
12Institutional Review Boards
- Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) A
major benefit for participating local IRBs will
be the reduction in review workload while still
retaining its authority to accept or reject a
"facilitated review" on a protocol-by-protocol
basis. - Phase III trials are available now. Likewise, due
to the "facilitated review" process, patients and
investigators will benefit from the resulting
rapid opening and greater availability of new
trials- and it is FREE!
13Institutional Review Boards
- FDA Requirements
- IRB approvals must occur within 365 days of the
last approval. - Meaning the protocol must be reviewed and
approved (progress reports and all) by the IRB
within 364 days of the last meeting. - The meeting date of the IRB is the approval date.
Back dating/forward dating is not allowed.
14Institutional Review Boards
- Standard IRB Approval Requirements
- Example
- Initial approval - August 1, 2000
- 1st renewal - July 8, 2001
- When is the 2nd renewal required?
- The IRB meeting must be on or before July 8,
2002. - The IRB cannot convene on September 9th and state
that the approval spans back to July 8th and
expires the following July. - Nor can the IRB convene on June 6th and state the
renewal covers the next 12 months from July 8th.
15Institutional Review Boards
- Anniversary IRB Approval Requirements
- An anniversary approval differs slightly from the
standard approval. The guidelines below must be
strictly followed - A reapproval must occur with in 30 days of the
anniversary date. - If the reapproval date is greater than 30 days
anniversary date it will be scored as a MAJOR
deficiency at audit. - If the reapproval date one day over the
anniversary date it will be scored as a MAJOR
deficiency at audit. - Once the anniversary date is exceeded as above
the anniversary date is NO LONGER VALID. The
reapproval will then revert to the standard
approval and must be approved with in 365 days of
the last approval.
16Institutional Review Boards
- Anniversary IRB Approval Requirements
- Example
- Initial approval - August 1, 2000
- When is the 1st renewal required?
- The IRB meeting must occur between July 7, 2002
and August 1, 2002. - July 15th would be acceptable
- If any subsequent approval occurs after August
2nd, this would be scored as a MAJOR deficiency
and the anniversary date would no longer be
valid. - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LETTERS, FROM YOUR IRB, MUST
STATE THE INITIAL APPROVAL OF THE PROTOCOL FOR
VERIFICATION OF THE ANNIVERSARY DATE.
17Institutional Review Boards
- Members serving on the IRB committee
- Committee must have a least 5 members, cannot
consist of entirely men, women or one profession - Sufficiently qualified (FWA, OHRP Training)
- 1 scientific, 1 non-scientific (clergy, community
member) - No member with a conflict of interest
- May invite additional guest with specialties
- Background have to be identified (CVs)
18Institutional Review Boards
- Valid IRB meeting
-
- In order for the IRB meeting to be valid a
quorum must meet. Meaning that 51 of the voting
IRB members must attend the meeting.
19Institutional Review Boards
- IRB Letters must contain the following
information - Must state the date of the IRB meeting
- Explain what is being reviewed
- Initial Approval
- Annual Approval
- Protocol amendment to include the amendment
number - Adverse Event
- Safety Report
-
20Institutional Review Boards
- IRB Letters must contain the following
information - State if the protocol is Approved.
- If the IRB required modifications, the letter
must state that the protocol is approved,
contingent on changes or modifications. - After changes or modifications are completed, as
required by the IRB, the IRB Chairperson may do
an expedited review of the changes. This
expedited review is at the discretion of your
IRB. - State the type of review
- Expedited Approval
- Full Board Approval
-
21Institutional Review Boards
- RTOG Requirements
- Name and address and chairperson
- Common Rule Form (310)
- Institution approval letter
- CTSU Requirements
- All United States sites must send documents to
CTSU - All Canadian sites still send documents to RTOG
22Institutional Review Boards
- Maintain copies of all reports submitted to the
IRB and reports of all actions by the IRB - Prior approval
- Protocol
- Modifications to the protocol/amendments, addenda
- Subject consent
- Patient/subject recruitment materials
- Investigator Brochures
- All correspondence
23Institutional Review Boards
- 3 Types of Review (21 CFR 56 and 45 CFR 46)
- Full Review
- Expedited
- Exempt
24Institutional Review Boards
- Full Review
- When is a full board approval required?
- First time approval
- Active studies with patients on treatment
- Medical devices
- When there is a risk involved. (Increase or
additional risk) - Change in treatment.
- Amendment with more than minimum risk
25Institutional Review Boards
- Expedited Review
- Minimal risk
- Minor changes in previously approved research
- Generally, if study is closed to group accrual,
or no patients are on treatment, an annual review
can be approved by expedited review. - Reason for expedited review must be noted on
approval - The IRB always has the right to require Full
Board approval.
26Institutional Review Boards
- Exempt Review
- Some examples are collection of blood samples
from healthy/non-pregnant adults, sputum, nail
clippings, non-invasive procedures.
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29HIPAA
- The privacy provisions of the federal law, the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
Act of 1996 (HIPAA), apply to health information
created or maintained by health care providers
who engage in certain electronic transactions,
health plans, and health care clearinghouses. - The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is the
Departmental component responsible for
implementing and enforcing the privacy
regulation.
30HIPAA
- Who must comply with these new HIPAA privacy
standards? - Health care providers who conduct certain
financial and administrative transactions
electronically.
31HIPAA
- What does the HIPAA Privacy Rule do?
- The HIPAA Privacy Rule for the first time
creates national standards to protect
individuals medical records and other personal
health information.
32HIPAA
- HIPPA websites
- http//www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa/
- http//privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/
- Please see RTOGs website for the Groups
position on HIPAA guidance in research.
33Informed Consent
- Purpose
- Informed consent is one of the primary ethical
principles governing human subject research. - Informed consent assures that prospective
research subjects will understand the nature of
the research and can knowledgeably and
voluntarily decide whether or not to participate
34Informed Consent
- General Requirements
- NCI template used New June 1, 2004
- Must contain all required elements
- May add to consent but information should never
be deleted from the consent - If changes (deletions) are made to the consent,
the IRB must document why these changes were made
to the consent. This information, along with the
changes to the consent must be forwarded to RTOG
HQ. This information must also be available in
your IRB folders for future audits.
35Informed Consent
- Non-English Speaking Patients
- To meet 21 CFR 50.20 requirements the IRB must
have a fully translated informed consent document
prepared in the participants native language and
assure that the translation is accurate. - A translator may be used to facilitate the
conversation between the research subject and the
person conducting the consent interview.
36Informed Consent
- Illiterate English-Speaking Patients
- A person who speaks and understands English, but
does not read and write, can be enrolled in a
study by "making their mark" on the consent
document, when consistent with applicable state
law. - A person who can understand and comprehend spoken
English, but is physically unable to talk or
write, can be entered into a study if they are
competent and able to indicate approval or
disapproval by other means.
37Informed Consent
- The Consent Process
- The subject/representative must enter the date of
signature on the consent document, to verify that
consent was obtained before the subject began
participation in the study. - If consent is obtained the same day the study
begins, the subject's medical records must have
document that consent was obtained prior to
randomization. - A copy of the consent document must be provided
to the subject and the original signed consent
document should be retained in the study records.
38Special Requirements
- Some studies may have specific additional
requirements that are needed before patient
registration - Examples Ethics Certification, Pharmacy
Registration, Advanced Technology Radiation
Therapy Credentialing - The protocol will outline exactly what is needed
39Investigational New Drugs
- Sponsor Responsibility 21CRF312
- Investigator New Drug (IND) application
- Select Investigators
- Accountability and Usage
- Toxicity Reporting
- NCI, ACR, RTOG, Corporate Sponsor
- Accountable to the FDA
40Investigational New Drugs
- PI Responsibility
- Form 1572 Statement of Investigator, outlines
responsibilities - Maintain careful records
- Storage of drugs
- Return or disposal of unused drugs in accordance
with FDA procedures and protocol instructions
41NCI - IND
- Must have current NCI CTEP Investigator Number to
receive drug covered by an IND - Numbers are issued by the Pharmaceutical
Management Branch of the NCI - Current FDA Form 1572, Supplemental Investigator
Data Form (IDF), Financial Disclosure Form, and
CV on file with PMB
42Drug Accountability
- Record of
- Receipt
- Use of NCI supplied agents
- Disposition
- If terminated, suspended, discontinued, or
completed, PI will return unused supplies to the
Sponsor or dispose the drug as arranged with the
sponsor
43Drug Accountability Record
Drug Accountability
44Drug Accountability
- The following information must be recorded on
the DARF - Date the agent left the Control pharmacy or
satellite pharmacy - Where the medication came from or is going to.
I.e. from the NCI or to Patient (initials,
patient or case number) - Dose to the Patient, if applicable. If agent is
received from the NCI no information would be
expected. - Amount dispensed to the patient.
- Amount remaining in stock.
- Manufacturer and lot number.
- The recorders initials.
45Drug Accountability
- The institution must use the NCI supplied agent.
- If a commercial agent is used, the institution
must reimburse the patient and/or the insurance
company. - The consent states this is supplied FREE of
charge to the patient.
46Drug Accountability
- NEVER ever use white-out on the DARF forms or
any study documents. This will constitute a
major deficiency at the time of audit.
47How To Order Drug
Clinical Drug Request
48Drug Returns
49Records Retention
- Custody and Access
- Retained for Specified Time
- Individual state and HIPAA regulations may apply
50Resources
- RTOG Web site www.rtog.org
- OHRP Web site http//ohrp.dhhs.gov
- NCI Web site http//ctep.info.nih.gov
- Investigators handbook
- Forms
- FDA Web site
- www.fda.gov
- FDA regarding informed consent
- www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/informedconsent.htmlp
- Cancer Trials Support Unit http//www.ctsu.org
- Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB)
- http//www.ncicirb.org