Mobility - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Mobility

Description:

Washington Group Meeting, Kampala, Uganda, Oct. 9-13. Part I: Discussion of Response Patterns. Washington Group Meeting, Kampala, Uganda, Oct. 9-13. Mobility ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: nchs7
Category:
Tags: mobility | uganda

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mobility


1
Mobility
  • Barbara M. Altman
  • Disability Statistics Consultant

2
Part I Discussion of Response Patterns
3
Mobility Questions
  • Washington Group Question
  • Do you have difficulty walking or climbing
    steps?
  • No, No difficulty
  • Yes, Some difficulty
  • Yes, A lot of difficulty
  • Cannot do at all
  • Extended Questions - Aids
  • Do you use any kind of equipment, such as a
    wheelchair, walker, or cane to help you get
    around? /Yes/No

4
Extended Questions
  • Problem Walking
  • Do you have difficulty going outside of your
    home?
  • Cant do at all
  • A lot of difficulty
  • Some difficulty
  • No difficulty
  • Do you have difficulty walking a long distance
    such as a kilometer (or a mile)?
  • No difficulty
  • Some difficulty
  • A lot of difficulty
  • Cant do at all

5
More Extended Questions
  • Problems Step, Stand, Sit, Stoop, Walk short
    distance
  • By yourself and not using aids, do you have any
    difficulty.
  • Walking for a quarter of a mile (about 2-3
    blocks)?
  • Walking up ten steps without resting?
  • Standing or being on your feet for about two
    hours?
  • Sitting for about two hours?
  • Stooping, crouching or kneeling?
  • Answers
  • Yes
  • No

6
Non Problematic Patterns
7
Problematic Patterns
8
Other/Borderline Patterns
9
Country Examples
  • Examples from three countries who did cognitive
    testing
  • Lesotho
  • India
  • South Africa

10
Part II Combined Test Results
11
Special Aspects of Non Problem Patterns
  • D No disability on WG question, but indication
    of a split between answering about going outside
    or having a problem walking distances. Can this
    be a cultural orientation problem?
  • Viet Nam have 10 with D pattern, most are related
    to going outside
  • Gambia has 7 with D pattern, most are related to
    some or a lot of difficulty walking long
    distances

12
Special Aspects of Non Problem Patterns
  • E No indication of disability on WG question,
    but indicators of problem with walking steps,
    standing, sitting, stooping or walking ¼ mile.
  • Responses predominantly indicate that person has
    difficulty standing for 2 hours. Since WG
    question asks about walking or climbing steps
    connection is not really direct.
  • Argentina had 6 respondents with this pattern,
    two who mentioned difficulty climbing steps. Is
    this a possible problem with translation of or,
    an problem with an interviewer or inattention.

13
Special Aspects of Non Problem Patterns
  • F Indication of a disability on the WG question
    associated with positive responses to the walking
    steps, standing, sitting, stooping or walking ¼
    mile questions.
  • In this instance the positive response is to the
    indicator of difficulty walking stairs which
    would be consistent with the WG question.

14
Special Aspects of Non Problem Patterns
  • G In this instance the pattern is a positive
    response to the WG question and a positive
    response on the problem walking distances or
    getting outside the home.
  • This has a smaller number and the pattern seems
    to be more associated with walking long
    distances.
  • Compared with D pattern which occurs more
    frequently we seem to be more likely not to
    capture on the WG question. Cultural orientations
    may play a role?

15
Reconciling Contradictory Patterns
  • D WG Question No Walking Yes
    G WG Question Yes Walking Yes
  • D pattern represented in 47 responses
    G pattern represented in 15 responses
  • D pattern more common, need to examine the
    characteristics of the two patterns to assess if
    this is related to age (G may reflect older
    group).
  • Also need to examine difference in these two
    responses by countries since in some places
    walking long distances is more commonplace.

16
Problematic Patterns
  • H WG question positive, no other positive
    responses to extended questions.
  • Pattern only found in 20 respondents, 7
    countries.
  • Raises question of other limitations such as
    vision problems or self help. Need to look at
    those relationships.
  • Cross limitation should also be examined for some
    other patterns we cant explain

17
Problematic Patterns continued
  • I Most commonly occurring problem pattern (48).
    No to WG question, but yes to functioning
    questions.
  • No immediate explanation that explains the
    pattern, however, most of the patterns reflect
    just some difficulty (lowest level) in walking
    long distances and problems with sitting,
    stooping or standing, not directly related to
    walking.
  • Only 5 have a more serious pattern

18
Problematic Patterns continued
  • J No to WG question, yes in all the other areas.
    Only 10 responses in this pattern, 6 of these in
    Mexico, 8 in SA.
  • Would seem that a positive answer to using an aid
    would be directly related to a positive answer on
    WG question.
  • May demonstrate a form of cultural sensitivity or
    stigma.
  • K Yes to WG question, yes to Aid. I dont find
    that a problem pattern (3).

19
Borderline Patterns
  • M and N Yes on WG seems to be supported by yes
    on Aids questions and in one of the other
    functioning sections (22).
  • L, O and P No on WG question but all with yes
    on use of an Aid and one other area (16). Almost
    all of these patterns found in Argentina,
    Paraguay, Mexico and India. May be another
    indication of the effect of stigma.

20
Discussion of Problematic Responses
  • Only approximately 10 of responses are
    problematic. We dont know how this translates
    into a random sample situation. Need field test
    results.
  • Also need further analysis to see if there is an
    age, gender or overlapping effects (other
    limitation statuses). Some evidence might
    indicate the effects of stigmatizing status.
  • Need to examine response rates when burden is not
    a problem.
  • I interpret these results as very encouraging and
    would expect that we wont change this element at
    all.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com