Title: What is a metapopulation? And why should I care?
1What is a metapopulation? And why should I care?
- Hugh Possingham and friends
2How to manage a metapopulationProblem 1
- Michael Westphal (UC Berkeley),
- Drew Tyre (U Nebraska), Scott Field (UQ)
- Can we make metapopulation theory useful?
3Specifically how to reconstruct habitat for a
small metapopulation
- Part of general problem of optimal landscape
design the dynamics of how to reconstruct
landscapes - Minimising the extinction probability of one part
of the Mount Lofty Ranges Emu-wren population. - Metapopulation dynamics based on Stochastoc Patch
Occupancy Model (SPOM) of Day and Possingham
(1995) - Optimisation using Stochastic Dynamic Programming
(SDP) see Possingham (1996)
4The Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia
5MLR Southern Emu Wren
- Small passerine (Australian malurid)
- Very weak flyer
- Restricted to swamps/fens
- Listed as Critically Endangered subspecies
- About 450 left hard to see or hear
- Has a recovery team (flagship)
6The Cleland Gully Metapopulation basically
isolated Figure shows options Where should we
revegetate now, and in the future? Does it
depend on the state of the metapopulation?
7Stochastic Patch Occupancy Model(Day and
Possingham, 1995)
State at time, t, (0,1,0,0,1,0)
Intermediate states
Extinction process
(0,1,0,0,1,0)
(0,1,0,0,0,0)
(0,0,0,0,1,0)
Colonization process
State at time, t1, (0,1,1,0,1,0)
Plus fire
8The SPOM
- A lot of population states, 2n, where n is the
number of patches. The transition matrix is 2n
by 2n in size (128 by 128 in this case). - A chain binomial model SPOM has recolonisation
and local extinction where functional forms and
parameterization follow Moilanen and Hanski - Overall transition matrix, a combination of
extinction and recolonization, depends on the
landscape state, a consequence of past
restoration activities
9Decision theory steps
- Set objective (minimize extinction prob)
- Define state variables (population and landscape
states) and control variables (options for
restoration) - Describe state dynamics the SPOM
- Set constraints (one action per 5 years)
- Solve in this case SDP
10Control options (one per 5 years, about 1ha
reveg) E5 largest patch bigger, can do 6
times E2 most connected patch bigger, 6
times C5 connect largest patch C2 connect
patches1,2,3 E7 make new patch DN do nothing
11Management trajectories1 only largest patch
occupied
C5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E7
DN
12Management trajectories2 all patches occupied
E5
E5
E2
E2
C5
C2
E5
E2
E5
E5
E7
DN
E5
E5
13Take home message
- Metapopulation state matters
- Actions justifiable but no clear sweeping
generalisation, no simple rule of thumb! - Previous work has assumed that landscape and
population dynamics are uncoupled. This paper
represents the first spatially explicit optimal
landscape design for a threatened species.
14Other issues
- Computational problems
- Problems, models and algorithms what are they?
15Optimal translocation strategiesProblem 2
Brigitte Tenhumberg, Drew Tyre (U Nebraska),
Katriona Shea (Penn State)
- Consider the Arabian Oryx Oryx leucoryx if we
know how many are in the wild, and in a zoo, and
we know birth and death rates in the zoo and the
wild, how many should we translocate to or from
the wild to maximise persistence of the wild
population
16Oryx problem
Growth rate R 0.85 Capacity 50
Growth rate R 1.3 Capacity 20
??
Zoo Population
Wild Population
17Result base parameters
R release, mainly when population in zoo is
near capacity C capture, mainly when zoo
population small, capture entire wild population
when this would roughly fill the zoo
18If zoo growth rate changes, results change but
for a new species we wont know R in the zoo
Enter active adaptive management, Management
with a plan for learning
19Metapopulaton dynamics in a dynamic landscape
- What do mussels, Leadbeaters possum and annual
herbs have in common? Empirical conversations
over a long time
20Eradicate, Exploit, Conserve
Decision Theory
Pure Ecological Theory