Strategic Thinking

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Strategic Thinking

Description:

STRATEGIC THINKING IMBA Managerial Economics Jack Wu * 2 * 5 Nash equilibrium: for both parties, raise price is dominated by discount . but discounting is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: jackwu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Strategic Thinking


1
Strategic Thinking
  • IMBA Managerial Economics
  • Jack Wu

2
Coke vs. Pepsi, 1999
Nov. 16 Coca-Cola raised price 7 Nov. 22
Pepsi raised price 6.9 Coke and Pepsi will
move now from price-based competition to
marketing-based competition, Andrew Conway,
Morgan Stanley
3
Competitive Dilemma
What should Coke do?
4
Strategic Situations
  • parties actively consider the interactions with
    one another in making decisions
  • game theory -- set of ideas and principles to
    guide strategic thinking
  • simultaneous actions strategic form
  • sequential actions extensive form

5
Dominated Strategy
  • generates worse consequences than another
    strategy, regardless of the choices of the other
    parties
  • never use dominated strategy

6
Nash Equilibrium
  • Given that the other players choose their Nash
    equilibrium strategies, each party prefers its
    own Nash equilibrium strategy
  • No one is willing to deviate unilaterally from a
    Nash equilibrium

7
Solving for Nash Equilibrium
  • eliminate dominated strategies, then check
    remaining cells
  • arrow technique

8
Coke and Pepsi Game
  • Nash equilibrium for both parties, raise
    price is dominated by discount.
  • but discounting is bad for both -- if only they
    could agree somehow to raise price.
  • Coke and Pepsi stuck in this situation for four
    years until November 1999.

9
Radio Formats
Merkur Merkur
Lite AC no change
Jupiter Hot AC J 60, M 40 J 60, M 40
Jupiter no change J 70, M 30 J 50, M 50
10
Radio Formats
  • For Merkur, Lite AC is dominated by no
    change so consider only no change,
  • assuming Merkur chooses no change, Jupiter
    should choose Hot AC.
  • Repeat using arrow technique.

11
Out of Nash Equilibrium
  • What if another player doesnt play Nash
    equilibrium strategy?
  • Nash equilibrium strategy may not be best
  • still dont use dominated strategy

12
WHERE TO ADVERTISE?
No Nash equilibrium in pure strategies
13
Randomized Strategies
  • choose among pure strategies according to
    probabilities
  • must be unpredictable
  • Example retail market random discount
  • Example where to advertise
  • _ We.com ½ NBA and ½ NHL
  • _ Competitor.com ½ NBA and ½ NHL

14
Evening News
15
Coordination and Competition
  • Prime time for news is 80pm second best is
    730pm
  • since audience is limited, get maximum
    viewership if two channels schedule at different
    times.
  • Question which station gets 80pm? Situation
    has elements of
  • coordination -- avoiding same time slot
  • competition -- getting the 80pm slot

16
Zero/Positive Sum
  • zero-sum games pure competition -- one party
    better off only if other is worse off
  • positive-sum games coordination -- both can be
    better off or both worse off
  • co-opetition competition and coordination

17
Adopting Database Software
Sol Sol
IBM Oracle
Venus IBM V 1.5, S 1.5 V 1, S 1
Venus Oracle V 1, S 1 V 1.5, S 1.5
18
Focal Point
  • Nash equilibrium
  • multiple Nash equilibria

19
Sequencing
  • Game in extensive form sequence of moves
  • nodes
  • branches
  • outcomes

20
Extensive Form Equilibrium
  • backward induction
  • final nodes ? intermediate nodes ? initial node

21
TV News Sequential Moves
TVB, ATV

4, 3
730
800
ATV
2.5, 2.5
800
TVB
1, 1
730
730
ATV
800
3, 4
22
Strategic Move
  • Action to influence beliefs or actions of other
    parties in a favorable way
  • credibility
  • first mover advantage
  • second mover advantage

23
Examples
  • Examples
  • Evening TV news -- both stations want to move
    first which one can?
  • Use strategic move, eg, contracts with
    advertisers to deliver news at 8pm.
  • Famous Chinese general after crossing a river,
    burnt his ships -- strategic move to force
    soldiers to fight harder.
  • Issue Is the move credible? Will it convince
    the other players?
  • Advantage doesnt always go to first mover
  • In war, better to see opponents move, and then
    take action, eg is enemy moving south or north?
  • new product category -- let competitor test the
    market and educate the customers

24
Lithographer

Make more prints
Buy
Litho
Make prints
consumer
Do not
Do not
Litho
(1) serial number (2) destroying the plate (3)
other solution?
Do not
25
Conditional Strategic Moves
  • threats
  • promises

26
MORGAN STANLEYSHAREHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
  • If any party acquires 15 or more of companys
    shares, other shareholders get right to buy
    additional shares at 50 discount.
  • Impact on hostile bidder?

27
Shareholder Rights Plan
  • This shareholder rights plan is a threat to
    potential bidders
  • most hostile bidders begin with small stake
  • with shareholder rights plan, if bidder acquires
    more than 15, then rights triggered, and bidder
    will be diluted.
  • Nickname poison pill.
  • Actually works against shareholder rights -- by
    entrenching existing management.

28
Poison Pill
Hilda loses on initial stake cost of takeover
rises

activates rights
acquires 100,000 shares
Sharon
Hilda

does not
doesnt bid
29
Strike

Lose current wage and possibly gain in future wage
strike
reject union demand
Union
do not
Maintain current wage
Employer

accept
Why are strikes rare in American professional
football?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)