Title: LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS
1LATENCY, LYSOGENY and SYMBIOSIS
2What is latency?
- a period of quiescence (restricted or no
replication or symptoms) that follows acute
infection (virus replication w/wo symptoms that
resolve) and has potential for repeat bouts of
reactivation. - host defenses are not effective (reduced or
limited) - repression of productive cycle genes
restricted gene expression - virus genome maintained intact
3Lysogeny occurs only in bacteria
- Common to all prokaryotes
- Reactivate to lytic by UV
- All dsDNA viruses
- Maintained and reproduce with cell
- Integrated or cytoplasmic
- Lysogenic conversion - new host phenotype due to
expressed genes - Superinfection immunity
- Insertional mutagenesis
- Cell wall structure
- Exotoxins
4Latency vs Lysogeny
- What cells
- What factors required
- State of the viral genome
- What genes are transcribed
- What proteins are expressed
- What are the conditions for reactivation
5Phage Lambda
- Nutrient rich medium goes
- lytic (lots of hosts)
- Nutrient poor medium goes lysogenic
- Stages in lysogeny
- Establishment
- Maintenance
- Induction
6Lambda genome
7Lytic cycle
- Transcription from two promotors
- IE products are N protein and cro protein
- N is an antiterminator for readthrough on the
left and right
8- Delayed early on right is needed for DNA
replication (O, P) - Q product can turn on late genes
- Still uses host RNA polymerase
9- Same events on Pl and Pr
- Early termination without N
- N binds to transcript (not DNA) with host factors
that read through to later termination signal
10Nut - N utilization site
- Forms structure on nascent RNA
- Binds with host proteins and RNA-P
11- Late genes made from new promotor Pr in presence
of Q
12Establishment of lysogeny
- Readthrough from Pr makes CII
- Readthrough from Pl makes CIII
- CIII stabilizes CII from host protease Hfl
- CII binds to Promotor for Repressor Establishment
(PRE) and activates CI (repressor) gene - CII also activates genes for integration
pInt
13CI binds to operators on left and right
- Or 1-3
- Or 1gtOr2gtOr3
- Or1-2 block Pr and activate PRM (promotor for
repressor maintenance) - Or3 blocks PRM
- Ol blocks Pl
14Decision depends on Right side
- If CRO reaches high concentration before CI it
binds to Or3 and blocks PRM - At high CRO blocks Pr
15Induction results from destruction of CI
- DNA damage stimulates SOS response
- RecA protease cleaves CI
- CRO beats CI
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18What evidence suggests that HSV is a latent virus?
- Can elicit HSV outgrowth by culturing neurons
with appropriate cells. - In situ hybridization
- PCR
- Why is latency a good strategy?
- Long term survival and immune escape
- Makes for an opportunistic pathogen
19HSV Lytic cycle
- Five IE genes - use host enzymes and host and
viral transcriptional activators - All IE promoters contain a common cis-acting
sequence (TAATGARAT) that reacts with VP16
tegument protein - VP16 must interact with two cellular proteins,
Oct-1 and HCF, to efficiently induce IE promoter
activity - Cell stimulated towards apoptosis but virus stops
events through several IE gene products
20HSV establishes latency in terminally
differentiated nondividing sensory neurons.
- Virus infects and replicates in epithelial
tissue, enters the neuron, travels via neuronal
flow to cell body (regional ganglion) - May have some replication
- DNA is circular episome returns via neuron
(against the flow) to epithelial surface.
21- Effective immune system resolves primary
infection and enhances establishment of latency.
Recurrences diminish with time (Booster affect?) - Reactivation triggers probably lead to permissive
conditions some host factor? or reduced immune
response. - Evidence that transmission occurs without
symptoms is there true latency? Is there some
reactivation at all times?
22Latency associated transcript - major latency
product
- 8 kb processed to stable 2 and 1.5 kb
- nontranslated RNA
- Promotor for LAT
- has neuron specific elements.
- is antisense to one of the immediate early
proteins, but can still get latency with fragment
that does not overlap. Need 5 348 bp - Is neuron IE nonpermissive cell?
- ICP4 binds and prevents LAT transcript in lytic
cycle
23- Latency is thought to be passive no viral
products are needed to maintain. - Reactivation may require transient transcription
and at least a few virions produced.This means
the signal changes the transcription factors that
are present. - Levels of virus DNA in neuron is same in LAT and
LAT- - Conclusion Lat needed for reactivation not
establishment
24- Recent evidence that LAT infection leads to
increased neurovirulence (death of neurons) - Does LAT protect cell from death during latency
establishment or recurrences thus increasing
number of infected neurons and allowing viral
reactivation?
25LAT protects neuron from apoptosis
- LAT give large number of TUNEL neurons at 7
days - TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase-mediated deoxyuridine TP nick-end
labeling) fluorescent/chromogenic label bind to
ends of DNA so fragmented DNA gets more label. - A and D uninfected
- B and E WT HSV
- C and F lat- HSV
26Protection from apoptosis inducers
- Infected three different types of cells with a
B-gal gene expression plasmid and LAT (APALAT)
or LAT- (BABE) in the presence and absence of
apoptosis inducers. - If LAT reduces apoptosis then more cells with
inducer will live and thus there will be more
bgal activity than in absence of LAT gene.
Compared to control plasmid with baculovirus
antiapoptosis gene(CplAP)
27- The three apoptosis inhibitors work at different
points in the pathway - Protein kinase
- TNF
- Topoisomerase
- Thus LAT blocks something further in the pathway
- Two other HSV genes are antiapoptotic in
productive infections.
28Apoptosis - Programmed cell death
- the death receptor-mediated pathway (Fas or TNF
receptor) - DNA damage through mitochondrial pathway
- ability of LAT to interfere with apoptosis
correlates with its ability to promote
spontaneous reactivation - LAT enhances neuronal survival because it has
antiapoptotic activity
29(No Transcript)
30The concept of viral symbiosis
- Parasitoid wasps - use insect hosts to develop
their larvae - PolyDNAviruses (PDVs) needed for success
- PDVs produced in wasp ovaries and injected into
insect with eggs - Viral gene expression in insect - products
manipulate host immune defenses - No viral replication in insect host
- Endogenous provirus integrated in wasp genome
and lost ability to be independent - May go back 70 million years ago - vertical
transmission
31First PDV genome sequenced Oct 2004
- 570,000 bp
- Composed of 30 DNA circles
- 156 coding sequences (white)
- Only 27 genome is coding
- 42 of coding DNA has no known homology
- Some known genes
- Protein tyrosine phosphatases (signal
transduction?) - Transcription factor regulators
- Immunosuppressive proteins
- Some genes look like modified host genes
32So what makes this a virus?
- Particles in insect
- DNA may have been from derived from host
- PDV DNA in wasp DNA at different regions
- May have been able to encapsidate in viral
protein - May be a virus that transferred replicative
information to wasp - Lost unneeded functions