Title: Mount Royal College
1- Mount Royal College
- Faculty Learning Community on Blended Learning
- Blended Classroom and eLearning Practice
Conference -
- Robyn Ayles, John Blenkinsopp, Jennifer Pettit,
Todd Nickle, Pam Van Bakel, Norm Vaughan
2Overview
- 1) Terminology
- 2) Rationale
- 3) Program outcomes
- 4) Program sessions
- 5) Project examples
- 6) Blended learning principles
- 7) Next steps
3Blended Learning
- The goal of a hybrid (blended) course is to
combine the best features of in-class teaching
with the best features of online experiences to
promote active learning, self directed learning
opportunities for students and a reduction of
seat time. - (Garnham Kaleta, 2002)
4Communities of Practice
- A group of people who share an interest in a
domain of human endeavour and engage in a process
of collective learning that creates bonds between
them. - A community of practice has three primary
characteristics - Joint enterprise means that everyone in the
community is working towards a common goal, such
as creating an instructional design product, or
simply learning how to become a great repair
person. - Mutual engagement implies that each persons
actions and ideas are equally valued and judged
within the community. - Shared repertoire suggests that members of the
community have similar experiences and
interactions in the learning and development
process. - (Wenger, 1998, p.2)
5Faculty Learning Community on Blended Learning
(August, 2003 to April, 2004)
- The Three P Drivers
- Purpose The successful redesign and
implementation of 12 undergraduate credit courses
in a blended learning format for the fall 2004 or
winter 2005 semester. - Process series of biweekly face to face
sessions (discussion and computer lab) combined
with facilitated online activities between
sessions - Product intended outcome of the community is
that all members will have a fully functional
Blackboard course site, combined with the
necessary teaching and educational technology
skills and experience, to support a blended mode
of delivery in the fall 2004 or winter 2005
semester
6Faculty Participants
- Lorne Armstrong Social Work Disability Studies
- Robyn Ayles Theatre Speech
- John Blenkinsopp Advanced Specialty Health
Studies - Mitch Clark Social Work Disability Studies
- Terry Field Communication Studies
- Janice Meeking Chem, Bio Env. Sci
- Todd Nickle Chem, Bio Env. Sci
- Jennifer Pettit Humanities
- Elaine Schow Undergraduate Nursing Studies
- Brian Sevick Chem, Bio Env. Sci
- Marie Tremblay Chem, Bio Env. Sci
- Pam Van Bakel Earth Sciences
7FLC on Blended Learning Program Outcomes
Teaching Strategies
Curriculum Design
Teaching excellence and innovation in support
of student learning
Educational Technology Integration
8FLC on Blended Learning Program Outcomes
- Curriculum Design
- A curriculum redesign plan of an existing credit
undergraduate course for blended learning. This
plan involves the - Formulation of a blended course vision and
learning outcomes - Development of a course syllabus
- Development of online learning activities (in
modular format) which integrate with the
face-to-face sessions of the course - Creation of assignments based on the identified
learning outcomes - Development of a course assessment plan based on
the identified learning outcomes - Assembling of a grading criteria for the course
based on the identified learning outcomes and the
course assessment strategy - Development of a set of student interaction
protocols (for email, discussions) to be followed
in the course - Draft of specific tactics for developing a
learning community in the course - Devising a strategy for implementing learning
support in the course
9FLC on Blended Learning Program Outcomes
- Teaching Strategies
- The acquisition of effective face to face and
online teaching skills strategies such as - Facilitating online discussions
- Stimulating online communication
- Managing group work
- Assessing online work
- Directing students to appropriate support
personal and/or resource documentation for time
management and study skills
10FLC on Blended Learning Program Outcomes
- Educational Technology Integration
- The acquisition of educational technology skills
such as - Managing a Blackboard course web site by being
able to successfully manipulate the following
features - Course Content - Adding and revising course
content (announcements, course information,
course documents, linking to external resources
such as digital learning objects) - User management - Enrolling, listing and removing
students into the course site and group areas - Tools Communication and collaboration features,
digital drop box, course calendar - Assessment Features online testing and survey
tools, online grade book and course statistics - Site design and functionality Adding and
editing navigational buttons - Trouble shooting basic student technology issues
- Login and password problems
- Directing students to proper support personal
and/or resource documentation for hardware
(computer), software (applications and plug-ins)
and connectivity (Internet service provider)
issues
11Fall 2003 Semester - Sessions
- Focus on Course Redesign
- Identifying key learning outcomes
- Designing integrated face-to-face and online
learning activities - Developing a course assessment strategy
- Creating a learning centered course syllabus and
redesign plan - Developing a course module prototype
- Leveraging the use of digital learning object
repositories - Faculty outcomes completed course redesign
plan, course syllabus (objectives, assignments,
assessment plan, grading criteria) and a
functional Blackboard shell with one prototype
module
12Winter 2004 Semester - Sessions
- Focus on Course Development Teaching Strategies
- Developing your own digital learning objects
- Advanced Blackboard Tools
- Facilitating online learning
- Integrating face to face and online activities
- Learner support strategies
- Piloting and course evaluation strategies
- Faculty outcomes - a redesigned course, a
Blackboard web site, and the necessary teaching
educational technology strategies and skills to
create a successful blended learning environment
for their students in the fall 2004 semester.
13FLC on Blended Learning Blackboard Site
14Robyn Ayles THEA1105 Theatre Production
Practicum
15John Blenkinsopp ACCN4453 Emergency Management
of the Acutely Ill and Injured Part A
16Todd NickleBIOL3311 Principles of Genetics
17Jennifer PettitHIST2217 America 1607 to 1865
18Pam Van BakelGEOG3331 Mapping GIS
19Our Guiding Blended Learning Principles
- Student engagement
- Create an environment where students are engaged
and motivated to take responsibility for their
own learning inside and outside of class - Student-to-student interaction
- Use the technology to empower more student to
student interaction and peer mentoring
opportunities get the students to do the work
and share their ideas with each other dont
underestimate the power of peer pressure in group
work to keep everyone focused, on track and
responsible for their own learning - Avoid the course and a half syndrome
- For every new thing you introduce in your
existing course you have to give something up
20Our Guiding Blended Learning Principles
- Use technology to automate repetitive processes
- Develop online assessments and use the online
grade book for low mark and /or self-assessment
activities - Focus on developing learning/assessment
activities for your students - Make use of existing learning objects (e.g.
textbooks) rather than trying to develop your own
content focus on assessment activities rather
than on generating content - Course organization
- Important to remember to retain flexibility
within your course structure every student and
class of students is unique and you need to be
able to adjust for this uniqueness but you also
need a clear game plan and structure
21Next Steps
- Funding from Alberta Learning
- Target the 20 high enrollment courses at MRC for
blended delivery - Course redesign will be facilitated via a FLC on
Blended Learning model 2004 to 2005
22Questions, Comments, Discussion
23Resources
- Garnham, C. and Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction
to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology
Today, 8 (6). http//www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/gar
nham.htm - Garrison, D.R. Anderson, T. (2003).
E-Learning in the 21st Century A Framework for
Research and Practice. London RoutledgeFalmer. - Garrison, D. R., Kanuka, H. and Hawes, D. (2002).
Blended Learning Archetypes for More Effective
Undergraduate Learning Experiences. University of
Calgary Learning Commons. http//commons.ucalgary
.ca/lcportal/documents/BlendedLearning_2.pdf - Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.
(2000). Critical thinking in a text-based
environment Computer conferencing in higher
education. Internet and Higher Education, 11(2),
1-14. http//www.atl.ualberta.ca/cmc/CTinTextEnvFi
nal.pdf - Glazer, E. (2001). Learning in communities. In M.
Orey (ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning
teaching, and technology. http//itstudio.coe.uga.
edu/ebook/LearningCommunities.htm
24Resources
- Novak, Gregor (1999). Just-in-Time Teaching.
http//webphysics.iupui.edu/jitt/what.html/ - Portland State University (2001). Classroom
Assessment Techniques Examples. - http//www.oaa.pdx.edu/CAE/cat.html
- Twigg, C.A. (2003). Improving Learning and
Reducing Costs Lessons Learned from Round 1 of
the Pew Grant Program in Course Redesign.
http//www.center.rpi.edu/PewGrant/Rd1intro.html - University of Wisconsin _at_ Milwaukee (2002).
Hybrid Course Website. http//www.uwm.edu/Dept/LTC
/hybrid.html/ - Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice.
Cambridge Cambridge Cambridge University Press.