Migrants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Migrants

Description:

Migrants & Health Care. Donna Knapp van Bogaert. Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics. In a world of global inequalities, discrimination and brutality, are states ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: profdkanpp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Migrants


1
Migrants Health Care
  • Donna Knapp van Bogaert
  • Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics

2
  • In a world of global inequalities, discrimination
    and brutality, are states ethically obliged to
    open their boundaries as wide as is economically
    reasonable to migrants?
  • Is migration a basic human right or should the
    claims made by migrants be overridden by the
    principle of national sovereignty - that the
    moral responsibility of states is only to their
    own citizens?

3
Outline
  • (Ask why health care resources are constrained -
    questions of adequate management of healthcare
    resources.)
  • 1) Remark on migrants and national sovereignty
  • 2) Consider the ethical mandates of impartiality
    and universality
  • 3) Sketch out why medicine is a moral enterprise

4
Migration Fundamental Moral Contradiction
  • National Sovereignty versus Human Rights
  • Conflicting rights and claims by those migrating
    from a country.
  • Concerns of governments their citizens about
    the control of their borders and protection from
    both real and perceived threats.

5
Migration Coercion
  • Migration particular difficult complex issue
    because directly or indirectly, coercion is
    involved.
  • Within countries, restrictions or redistribution
    of people involves the exercise of coercion.
  • Across and between international borders coercion
    is also evident.
  • Consider- Transport negotiations, refugee
    confinement camps, border police, employment of
    illegal migrants, payments to agents, etc.
  • Coercion is always morally wrong because it shows
    no respect for persons.

6
Ethics Universality Impartiality
7
Ethics Universality Impartiality
  • Post modernism, which disrupted the fabric of
    moderninity, still has not successfully removed
    the modernist idea of universality.
  • While universal laws play themselves out in
    different venues and demands on place and agents,
    ultimate moral principles have long been regarded
    as inviolate across people.
  • The Law may vary from time to time place to
    place
  • Moral laws remain constant they are universal
    in that they apply consistently to all humans
    everywhere at any time in any place.

8
Impartiality
  • A corollary of universality, used in this way is
    (or should be) impartiality.
  • It has long been a tenet of moral philosophy that
    moral principles and moral agents ought to be
    treat people in the same way.
  • As we are human, so we are moral agents.

9
Impartiality
  • On this the two major contenders of modern moral
    theories agree
  • In the Benthamite caucus everyone counts for one,
    no one for more than one
  • Kants second formulation of the categorical
    imperative treating people as ends in
    themselves also promotes impartiality
  • Respecting the rationality personified in others
    may require us to do different things for
    different people or with different people. But
    that is not a expression of our impartial respect
    for each and every other human.
  • It is sometimes required that we treat different
    people differently but this does not equal a
    reduction in our obligation to respect the
    dignity and worth of others.

10
Universality, Impartiality Duties to Others
  • Arguably, at least, a significant characteristic
    of any moral theory is that universality and
    impartiality are embodied as basics in its moral
    code.
  • In contrast to the impartiality of general moral
    laws, we all have special duties to some people
    that we do not have to others.
  • General duties tell us how we should treat
    everyone, special duties vary from person to
    person.

11
What is a Duty?
  • A duty is an obligation to do or refrain from
    doing something
  • If we have a duty to a person-then we are bound
    to (that) person in some respect and for some
    reason.
  • We owe that person something and that person may
    hold a corresponding right or claim against us.

12
General Special Duties
  • There are some general duties" we have towards
    other humans merely because they are human.
  • Over and above that, there are also special
    duties we have towards particular individuals
    just because they stand in a special relation to
    us.
  • Amongst these are generally supposed to be
    special duties to our families and friends.
  • Because we also have roles, special duties extend
    to e.g. our students our patients.
  • Also amongst special duties we are told that we
    have special duties towards our countrymen.

13
Special Duties
  • Special duties bind particular people to
    particular other people.
  • Just how this particularism of special duties
    fits in with the universality and impartiality of
    the general law is problematical.
  • Some say that this is another branch of moral
    law.
  • Some say that it is derivative in some way from
    more general moral laws.
  • Others says that particularism marks the limits
    of our psychological capabilities for living up
    to the austere standards that the general moral
    law sets for us.

14
Special Duties psychological note
  • Questioning what we mean by special duties.
  • When we consider what type of special treatment
    is due to those who stand in a special relations
    to us, ordinarily we envision this to be
    especially good treatment.

15
Special Duties psychological note
  • We want not the ordinary, but the very best for
    our families, friends, and compatriots.
  • But if we interrogate the latter classification
    of those to whom we have special duties, we are
    obliged to admit that this is not completely
    true.
  • It may well be a matter of degree.
  • A particularist approach is interesting in that
    it has the further effect of compelling us
    reconsider the basis of our general duties to
    compatriots, with yet additional political
    consequences.

16
Particularist
  • Morally, what matters is not nationality per se.
  • What matters is instead some further feature that
    is only contingently and imperfectly associated
    with a shared nationality.
  • Such a characteristic (or characteristics) may
    sometimes be found in migrants as well as our
    fellow citizens.
  • When this dynamic is unpacked, we will find we
    have duties toward migrants that are similar in
    their moral basis, and perhaps in their strength,
    to the ties we ordinarily acknowledge toward our
    fellow citizens.

17
Non-Nationals
  • At least in some ways, we are obliged to be more
    careful not less in our treatment of non
    nationals that we are in the treatment of our own
    citizens.
  • At least some of our general duties to those
    beyond our borders and to migrants within them
    are sometimes more compelling, morally speaking,
    than to at least some of our special duties to
    our fellow citizens.

18
Moral Basis of Healthcare Practice
19
  • Medicine is not only a science, it is an art.
    Science is primarily analytic, art primarily
    synthetic. Medicine is likely to remain an art,
    however hard we may try to make it more and more
    scientific, and however much we may attempt to
    master its scientific contents. For medicine
    deals not with impersonal atoms, elements or
    plants with tropisms but with humans.
    (Ackerknecht 1982xvii)

20
Moral Basis of Healthcare Practice
  • Health care is a human activity limited by the
    human experience as finite beings.
  • Health care practice is an attempt to apply
    empirical data which may no respond favorably to
    the laws of medical science. The end of medicine,
    its justifying principle is in the final analysis
    a moral one the good of the person seeking
    help (Pellegrino Thomasma 2000).
  • Three moral groundings

21
1) Unequal Power Trust in the Patient Health
Care Professional (HCP) Relationship
  • Intrinsic nature of illness because it is
    illness is a universal phenomenon that makes
    healthcare a special activity.
  • This state engages the virtue of trust from the
    patient upon the healthcare worker.
  • Vulnerability of patient as uniquely dependent,
    anxious, and liable for exploitation.
  • Sick persons must bare their weaknesses, reveal
    intimacies of body mind.

22
2) Characteristic of Medical Knowledge
  • Healthcare knowledge is not proprietary.
  • Acquired through privilege of education.
  • Society sanctions certain invasions of privacy in
    the name of medicine e.g. dissecting bodies,
    participation in care of sick, research with
    human participants to ensure society has
    trained healthcare personnel.
  • Medical knowledge not private in the sense that
    medical knowledge is held in trust for the good
    of the sick.

23
3) Ineradicable Moral Complicity of the HCP in
Whatever Happens to the Patient.
  • Implicit moral complicity necessary for healing
    process to be achieved.
  • The HCP is therefore de facto a moral accomplice
    in whatever is done for good or ill to the
    patients.
  • The obligation to serve the patients good cannot
    be overridden by any third party such as ones
    employer, the state, fiscal policy or the law
    (Pellegrino Thomasma 200042-98).

24
Duty of Easy Rescue
  • Emergency care In the professional opinion of
    the health care clinician is immediately
    necessary.
  • Migrants should not be allowed to die or suffer
    serious harm when we are easily able to prevent
    it.

25
Post Script
  • If there are moral rights which, unlike legal
    rights, are universal timeless and, if access
    to health care is considered a human right, who
    then is considered 'human enough' to have that
    right?

26
References
  • Buchanan, A. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and
    Self-Determination Moral Foundations for
    International Law. Oxford Oxford University
    Press.
  • Colman, A M. 1991. Crowd psychology in South
    African murder trials. American Psychologist,
  • (46) 1071-1079.
  • Crush, J. Williams, V. 2001. Making up the
    Numbers Measuring "Illegal
  • Immigration" to South Africa. Migration Policy
    Brief, 3. Southern African Migration
  • Project Pretoria.
  • Harris, B. 2001. A Foreign Experience Violence,
    Crime and Xenophobia during SouthAfrica's
    transition. Braamfontein SA. Centre for the Study
    of Violence and Reconciliation Violence and
    Transition Series, (5).
  • Fortes. PAC Zoboli ELCP. 2002. A study on
    the ethics of microallocation of scarce resources
    in health care. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28
    (4).
  • Goodin, RE. 1988. What is so special about our
    fellow countrymen? Ethics, (98)663-686
  • Landau. LB. 2006. Transplants and Transients
    Idioms of Belonging and Dislocation in
    Inner-City.African Studies Review, 49 (2).
  • Noonan, J. 2007. Social Conflict and the Life
    Ground of Value. Philosophy Today, ( 51) 4.
  • Pellegrino, ED. 1979. Toward a reconstruction of
    medical morality the primacy of the act of
    profession and the fact of illness. Journal of
    Medicine and Philosophy, 3 (1) 32-56.
  • Pellegrino, ED Thomasma DC. 1993. The Virtues
    in Medical Practice. NY Oxford University Press.
  • Pellegrino ED. 1999. The Commodification of
    Medical and Health Care The Moral Consequences
    of a Paradigm Shift from a Professional to a
    Market Ethic. The Journal of Medicine and
    Philosophy , 24 (3) 243-266.

27
Thank you Donna.VanBogaert_at_wits.ac.za
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com