: Challenges and Opportunities Teaching Users to "Cite it Right" - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

: Challenges and Opportunities Teaching Users to "Cite it Right"

Description:

Create bibliographies. Insert in-text citations using Word ... The quality and accuracy of your bibliography can make or break your essay. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: cecile4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: : Challenges and Opportunities Teaching Users to "Cite it Right"


1
Challenges and
Opportunities Teaching Users to "Cite it Right"
  • Cecile Farnum and Dana Thomas
  • Ryerson University Library

2
Agenda
  • What is RefWorks?
  • ACRL Standards
  • Impact on library instruction
  • Challenges and opportunities
  • RW instruction _at_ Ryerson and beyond
  • Future Directions
  • Discussion

3
ACRL Standards
  • The information literate student
  • defines and articulates the need for information.
  • accesses needed information effectively and
    efficiently.
  • evaluates information and its sources critically
    and incorporates selected information into his or
    her knowledge base and value system.
  • uses information effectively to accomplish a
    specific purpose.
  • understands many of the ethical, legal and
    socio-economic issues surrounding information and
    information technology

4
Components of Library Instruction
  • Typically involves the tried and true topics
  • Boolean logic
  • Catalogue
  • Databases
  • Peer Review
  • Live demo or hands-on
  • Referral to service points
  • (ACRL Standards 1-3)

5
The Forgotten Ones What about standards 4 and 5?
  • Often considered to be outside of the library
    realm why?
  • Length of library instruction
  • Expertise?
  • Someone elses responsibility
  • faculty
  • writing centre,
  • initiative of individual student

6
Academic Integrity (AI) what is it?
  • A set of values which promote honesty and genuine
    learning in education
  • We hear about the donts of AI cheating,
    plagiarism, paper mills, copy and paste culture
  • Intentional vs. unintentional violations of AI

7
Current Climate of AI
  • Prevention vs. punishment model
  • teachable moments
  • Turnitin.com as a teaching-learning tool stay
    tuned!
  • Promotion of AI on campus posters, tutorials,
    websites
  • It takes a village approach collaboration is
    key to building a culture of AI

8
RefWorks What is it?
  • Web-based, bibliographic citation manager
  • Interfacing between library catalogues and
    licensed databases
  • Users can collect and organize bibliographic
    citations
  • Create bibliographies
  • Insert in-text citations using Word

9
RefWorks touches on (and blurs) the lines between
  • Traditional library instruction
  • Library
  • Writing support proper citation
  • Writing Centre/Peer tutors
  • Academic integrity anti-plagiarism
  • Faculty/Writing Centre/AI Office
  • Software skills Word and Write N Cite
  • Technology support

10
Sohow does this impact LI and librarian roles?
  • Teaching RefWorks requires knowledge of citation
    styles
  • Inclusion of paraphrasing exercises and examples
    in instruction
  • Troubleshooting with students on APA style
  • Faculty request instruction on proper citation
    style
  • Librarian / Writing Support?

11
RefWorks _at_ Ryerson and Beyond
  • Drop-in workshops primary mode of RefWorks
    library instruction
  • No prerequisite knowledge of citation styles is
    required
  • Most frequently offered as a single session, or
    as a pair of basic and advanced sessions

12
RefWorks Drop-in Session
  • The quality and accuracy of your bibliography can
    make or break your essay. The rule of thumb is
    this If youve used any type of information
    while researching your paper (for example, books,
    journal articles, web sites, interviews) you MUST
    give credit to the author or source of that
    information in your bibliography. Failure to do
    so may be considered plagiarism a violation of
    the Student Code of Academic Conduct. that can
    result in failure in the course, or a
    Disciplinary Notice on your record. Learn how to
    manage your research and create excellent
    bibliographies using RefWorks, a powerful online
    tool that will help ensure that youve cited all
    your sources the right way.

13
Challenges
  • Skills vary among participants
  • Database searching and navigation skills
  • Technical skills Im not very good with
    computers
  • Citation and bibliography experience
  • Familiarity with library resources in general

14
Challenges (continued)
  • Needs and expectations vary among participants
  • Expectation to cover citation as main emphasis of
    the session
  • Expectation that RefWorks is 100 automatic i.e.
    no editing or citation knowledge required
  • Advanced users may be bored with portions that
    are review of databases and citation style rules

15
Special Challenges for the Net Gen
  • Comfort with technology
  • Expectation of immediacy
  • Evaluation of information is difficult
  • Distinguishing between different types of online
    resources
  • Unfamiliar with print equivalents of online
    resources
  • Attention span and multi-tasking
  • Unfamiliar with rationale for citation
  • Postmodern collage as norm
  • Technical ease of copying content from digital

16
Challenges for the Librarian
  • Time is limited
  • Difficult to know how much context is required
    for any given group
  • Difficult to sell RefWorks to students who have
    never had to follow a citation style
  • Technical requirements for successful
    demonstrations
  • Product is updated

17
Missed Opportunities in Drop-in Format
  • Teachable moments Boolean logic, database
    selection, citation guidance, paraphrasing
    exercises, evaluating information, anatomy of
    citations, academic integrity
  • Advanced features go unnoticed?
  • Session cannot be customized to suit participant
    needs

18
Steps Taken beyond Drop-in
  • Formation of a RefWorks teaching team
  • ACS102 Learning and Development Strategies
  • RW links included in academic integrity website
  • Sessions for
  • subject librarians library staff
  • faculty research assistants
  • Instructional videos (Camtasia) online

19
Inspiration from other institutions
  • RefWorks, Writing and Word Instruction (see notes
    for descriptions)
  • University of Guelph, Ontario Canada
  • Claremont McKenna College, Claremont CA USA
  • Many others offering 90 minute sessions and 2
    part sessions for basic and advanced features.

20
Opportunities Identified
  • Partnerships
  • Writing centre
  • Academic links
  • Faculty
  • Additional instruction options
  • Advanced Sessions
  • Citation sessions as prerequisite
  • RefWorks for theses
  • Virtual instruction/webcasts
  • RefWorks options for faculty

21
Future Directions
  • Shared online instructional materials integrating
    citation, RefWorks, paraphrasing etc.
  • Integration of RefWorks materials within course
    management software
  • Blog/wiki format for RefWorks support to
    facilitate peer-to-peer knowledge sharing about
    RefWorks
  • MOST IMPORTANTLY extend knowledge about
    RefWorks beyond the library to create multiple
    pathways into RefWorks

22
Discussion Questions
  • How do you approach RefWorks instruction at your
    institution?
  • What kind of feedback are you getting?
  • Whats working? Not working?
  • Are you collaborating with any groups outside
    library staff re RefWorks promotion and support?

23
References Recommended Reading
  • Auer, N. J., Krupar, E. M. Mouse click
    plagiarism The role of technology in plagiarism
    and the librarian's role in combating it. Library
    Trends, 49, 415.
  • Bronshteyn, K., Baladad, R. (2006).
    Perspectives on librarians as writing
    instructors Using paraphrasing exercises to
    teach beginning information literacy students.
    The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(5),
    533-536.
  • Grimes, D. J., Boening, C. H. (2001). Worries
    with the web A look at student use of web
    resources. College Research Libraries, 62(1),
    11-23.
  • Lampert, L. D. (2004). Integrating
    discipline-based anti-plagiarism instruction into
    the information literacy curriculum. Reference
    Services Review, 32(4), 347-355.
  • Oblinger, D., Oblinger, J. (2006). Is it age or
    IT First steps toward understanding the net
    generation. CSLA Journal, 29(2), 8-16.
  • Sheridan, J. (1992). WAC and libraries A look at
    the literature. Journal of Academic
    Librarianship, 18(2), 90-94.
  • Swartz, P. S., Carlisle, B. A., Uyeki, E. C.
    (2007). Libraries and student affairs Partners
    for student success. Reference Services Review,
    35(1), 109-122.
  • Wood, G., Warnken, P. (2004). MANAGING
    TECHNOLOGY academic original sin Plagiarism, the
    internet, and librarians. Journal of Academic
    Librarianship, 30(3), 237-242.
  • Check REFSHARE SITE for updated readings and
    resources

24
Thank you!
  • Cecile Farnum cfarnum_at_ryerson.ca
  • Dana Thomas d1thomas_at_ryerson.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com