Title: Mitochondrial Analysis From Hair Examinations to DNA Sequencing
1Mitochondrial Analysis From Hair Examinations to
DNA Sequencing
- State of Connecticut
- Forensic Laboratory
2Trace Evidence
- Trace evidence items or debris found in the
process of investigating a crime - Generally small in size, may be transferred when
physical contact occurs between two individuals
or an individual and an object. - Hairs a commonly encountered example of trace
evidence.
3Hair
- A biological outgrowth from the skin of mammals.
- Three areas of a hair Root, Shaft, Tip
- Three cross-sectional regions of a hair Cuticle,
Cortex, Medulla
4Hair Evidence
- Found in many crimes, submitted to the
laboratory. - Can include homicides, hit and runs, sexual
assaults, kidnappings, burglaries, etc. - Can associate a suspect to a victim, weapon
and/or a crime scene.
5Why Is Hair Good Evidence?
- Abundant the average person has 100,000 hair
follicles on their head alone - Easily transferable the average person loses 100
hairs per day - Considerable variability comparing body area
alone, human hair can be from the head, pubic,
anal, eye, nose, ear, underarm, leg, arm, chest,
trunk, or beard area, not including the fine hair
covering the entire body except on a persons
palms and soles. - Durable hairs have been recovered from mummies
dating back 2,000 years
6Steps of Analysis
- Hairs are collected from evidence submitted
- Hairs are identified and preserved onto glass
microscope slides - Hairs are examined both macroscopically and
microscopically - If a known standard exists, hairs are compared
- A report containing all the results of the
comparison is written - Examiner testifies in a court of law to the
results written in the report.
7Processing
- Type of evidence submitted is anything on which a
hair could possibly be found includes clothing,
letters, guns, knives, bomb devices, bedding, car
parts, furniture, carpets, flooring, tape, etc. - Hairs are collected by either scraping, picking,
taping or vacuuming.
- Hairs are identified from the
- collected debris and mounted onto glass
microscope slides
8Examination
- Macroscopic characteristics of hair length,
coloration, shaft shape, and texture. - Microscopic characteristics of hair include
- The hair shaft (optical cross section, diameter
variation, tip appearance, buckling, artifacts,
other) - The cuticle (thickness, appearance, color,
damage) - The cortex color, pigment granule size, pigment
granule shape, pigment granule distribution,
pigment granule density, cortical inclusions,
cortical fusi (size, distribution, and density),
ovoid bodies (size, distribution, and density),
cortical texture - The medulla (color, thickness, texture,
continuity pattern, abnormalities) - The hair root (condition, color, tissue, cortical
fusi)
9Results
- A qualified hair examiner can provide the
following information - from a hair examination and comparison
- 1. Whether there is hair(s) recovered from the
item(s) submitted. - 2. What the racial origin of the hair is
(Caucasian-type, Negroid-type, Mongoloid-type) - 3. The area of the body that the hair came from
(head, pubic, body) - 4. The nature of the hairs removal from the
body - 5. Whether the hair has been artificially
treated - 6. Whether there has been damage done to the
hair - 7. Whether there are similarities and/or
differences between the questioned hair and known
sample. - How much information an examiner can provide
depends upon the suitability of the hair.
10Hair Examination Conclusions
- A hair examiner can conclude the following
- 1. The questioned hair exhibits similar
characteristics (no significant differences are
present) to the known sample. Thus, the source
of the known sample cannot be excluded as being
the source of the questioned hair. - 2. The questioned hair exhibits dissimilar
characteristics to the known sample. Thus, the
source of the known sample can be excluded as
being the source of the questioned hair. - 3. The questioned hair exhibits both
similarities and differences to the known sample.
Thus, no conclusion can be reached as to whether
the questioned hair can or cannot be excluded as
coming from the same source as the known sample. - 4. The known hairs are insufficient or
unsuitable for comparison purposes. - 5. The questioned hair(s) are insufficient or
unsuitable for comparison purposes.
11Further Testing A Complement To Forensic Hair
Examinations
- Hair examinations can not identify a specific
individual - Results can be supplemented by performing other
independent analyses - Further testing will not change conclusions
stated by the hair examiner - Can provide alternative and additional
information about the hair Further testing is
deemed suitable and/or probative based upon - If the hair root has tissue attached, Nuclear DNA
analysis - If there is no tissue and/or root, Mitochondrial
DNA analysis
Nuclear DNA
Mitochondrial DNA
12Mitochondrial DNA Analysis
- Mitochondria are considered the powerhouse of
the cell - Where the energy to run cellular functions (ATP)
is made - Has its own DNA (mtDNA)
13Nuclear DNA vs. Mitochondrial DNA
- NUCLEAR DNA
- Linear
- 2 Copies per cell
- Very large (3 billion base pairs)
- Inherited from both parents
- Unique to the individual (except identical twins)
- MITOCHONDRIAL DNA
- Circular
- Thousands of copies per cell
- Small (Just over 16,000 base pairs)
- Inherited only from the mother
- Not unique
14When Would We Use Mitochondrial DNA?
- Hairs missing the Root
- Old Bones, Teeth
- Missing persons cases
- Mass Disasters
- Since mitochondrial DNA has a high copy number,
it is more resistant to degradation
15Why Isnt Mitochondrial DNA Unique?
Mother
All Yellow Same mtDNA type as Mother
Female
Male
16How Is Mitochondrial Testing Done
- Extraction of DNA from sample
- Amplification of extracted DNA, to make many
exact copies of the DNA we extracted - Quantitation of amplified DNA, to determine how
much DNA is there - Determine the sequence of two specific regions of
the mitochondrial genome
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Now What?
- Compare sequences of questioned items to known
sequences - Are they different?
Case 1 Case 2 Questioned GCATATTGCGCCTA
GCATATTGCGCCTA Known GCACATTACGTCTA
GCATATTGCGCCTA EXCLUSION CANNOT
EXCLUDE
This is a simplification, the regions
scrutinized are larger, and analysis is far more
complicated. This is meant to assist in a very
basic understanding.
20And Last
- Compare the attained sequence with the
Mitochondrial CODIS Database - How many times does the sequence weve attained
appear in the database - From that number, we can estimate the frequency
of that sequence in the general population
21Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
- Tsar Nicholas II Romanov
- Did we find Anastasia?
- NO
- Anna Alexander claimed to be the missing child of
Nicholas Romanov - Her mitochondrial DNA did not match those of
unearthed bones, or of maternal relative Philip
of Edinburg
22Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
- Tennessee Vs. Ware
- First case in US where mitochondrial testing was
introduced. - September, 1996
- Murder case in which the only evidence found was
red hairs in throat of victim and on the victims
bed - Paul Ware could not be excluded as the source of
the hairs.
23Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
- Connecticut Vs. Pappas
- Robbery, first CT case in which mitochondrial DNA
analysis was allowed in the courts - Mitochondrial DNA analysis on two head hairs from
sweatshirt found on train tracks adjacent to
where some of the robbed money was located - The defendant could not be excluded as the source
of the questioned hair sample - Case appealed up to CT Supreme Court, who ruled
that this type of testing is acceptable
24Interesting Forensic Casework Involving
Mitochondrial DNA
- Connecticut Vs. Torres
- Murder/Sexual Assault, verdict March, 2002
- Amount of DNA recovered not sufficient for
nuclear DNA testing - Mitochondrial profile from semen matched that of
the suspect - For more detail on this case, click here to see
description from the laboratorys trace section,
who had a major contribution to the outcome.