Title: CHAPTER 9 INTEREST GROUPS
1CHAPTER 9 INTEREST GROUPS
2The purpose of this chapter is to survey the wide
variety of interest groups or lobbies that
operate in the United States and to assess their
impact on the political system
3THEME A American Interest Groups in Comparative
Perspective
4REASONS FOR PROLIFERATION OF INTEREST GROUPS 1.
Greater number of social cleavages along income,
occupational, religious, racial and cultural
lines 2. The American constitutional system
stimulates political activity. Federalism and
separation of powers mean there are many
different centers where decisions are made.
5REASONS FOR PROLIFERATION OF INTEREST GROUPS 3.
The decline of political parties have made the
wielding of power made interest groups more
practical
6There are two kinds of interest groups -
institutional and membership. Typical of
institutional interest groups are governments,
foundations and universities. Membership groups
are supported by the activities and contributions
of individual citizens.
7Institutional interests
- Defined individuals or organizations
representing other organizations - Types
- Businesses example, General Motors
- Trade or governmental associations
- Concerns--bread-and-butter issues of concern to
their clients - Clearly defined, with homogeneous groups
- Diffuse, with diversified groups
- Other interests--governments, foundations,
universities
8Membership interests
- Americans join some groups more frequently than
people in other nations - Social, business, and so on, same rate as
elsewhere - Unions, less likely to join
- Religious or civic groups, more likely to join
- Greater sense of efficacy and duty explains the
tendency to join civic groups - Most sympathizers do not join because
- Individuals not that significant
- Benefits flow to nonmembers too
9Incentives to join
- Solidary incentives--pleasure, companionship
(League of Women Voters, AARP, NAACP, Rotary,
etc.) - Material incentives--money, things, services
(farm organizations, retired persons, etc.) - Purpose of the organization itself--public-interes
t organizations - Ideological interest groups' appeal is
controversial principles - Engage in research and bring lawsuits
10THEME B - History and Interest - Group
Formation Four factors help explain the rise of
interest groups. 1. Broad economic
developments 2. Government policy 3. Religious
and moralist movements 4. Response to Government
Actions
11Broad economic developments create new interests
- Farmers produce cash crops
- Mass production industries begin
12Government policy itself
- Created veterans' groups--wars
- Encouraged formation of Farm Bureau
- Launched Chamber of Commerce
- Favored growth of unions
13The birth of interest groups
- Periods of rapid growth
- Since 1960, 70 percent have established an office
in Washington, D.C. (K Street) - 1770s, independence groups
- 1830s and 1840s, religious, antislavery groups
- 1860s, craft unions
- 1880s and 1890s, business associations
- 1900s and 1910, most major lobbies of today
14Interest Groups and Social Movements Environmenta
l Movement The Feminist Movement The Union
Movement
15THEME C. - Bias in the Group Process and Kinds
of Organizations Whether an organizations
political positions will represent its members'
interests will be depend on at least four
factors. 1. The homogeneity of the Group 2.
People's motives for joining 3. The size of the
staff 4. The level of militancy and activity of
the membership
16Influence of the staff
- Staff has most influence if members joined for
solidary or material benefits - National Council of Churches and unions are
examples
17WHO JOINS ORGANIZATIONS THE PROBLEM OF
BIAS Organizational Membership and Social Class
18Problem of bias
- Reasons for belief in upper-class bias
- More affluent more likely to join
- Business or professional groups more numerous
better financed - Why these facts do not decide the issue
- Describe inputs but not outputs
- Business groups often divided among themselves
- Important to ask what the bias is
- Many conflicts are within upper middle class
19WELDING INFLUENCE SPENDING MONEY Sources of Funds
for Interest Groups 1. Foundation Grants 2.
Federal Grants and Contracts 3. Individual
Contributors
20Funds for interest groups
- Foundation grants
- Ford Foundation and public-interest groups
- Scaife foundations and conservative groups
- Federal grants and contracts
- National Alliance for Business and summer youth
job programs - Jesse Jackson's PUSH
- Direct mail
- Unique to modern interest groups through use of
computers - Common Cause a classic example
- Techniques
- Teaser
- Emotional arousal
- Celebrity endorsement
- Personalization of letter
21THEME D - Interest Groups in Action Interest
groups provide 1. Credible information 2. Public
Support 3. Money 4. The absence of trouble 5. The
"Revolving Door"
22THEME E - Controlling Interest Groups and
Lobbyists GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS Spending by
Political - Action Committees (PAC)
23(No Transcript)
24The Federal Regulation of Lobbying Act of 1946 A
law which required groups and individuals seeking
to influence legislation to register with the
secretary of the Senate and the clerk of the
House of Representatives. - It merely required
direct disclosure and registration standards
(quarterly financial reports - money received
and spent for lobbying)
251. It applied only to lobbyists' efforts to
influence Congress (not the executive department
branch) 2. It covered only efforts to influence
not efforts to provide information. 3. It did not
apply to contracts between lobbyists and
congressional staff members. 4. There more no
enforcement mechanisms. From 1946 to 1979 there
were only five prosecutions by the Justice
Department 5. No staff to enforce law 6.
Grassroots activity not restricted.
261995 Act provided a broader definition of
lobbying 1. Requires reports twice a year,
including client names, expenditures, issues. 2.
Still exempted grassroots mobilization. 3. No
enforcement agency established, but Justice
Department may take action. 4. Tax-exempt,
nonprofit organizations cannot receive federal
grants if they lobby.
27Money and PACs
- Money is least effective way to influence
politicians - Campaign finance reform law of 1973 had two
effects - Restricted amount interest groups can give to
candidates - Made it legal for corporations and unions to
create PACs - Rapid growth in PACs has not led to vote buying.
- More money is available on all sides
- Members of Congress take money but still decide
how to vote - Almost any organization can create a PAC.
- More than half of all PACs sponsored by
corporations - Recent increase in ideological PACs one-third
liberal, two-thirds conservative
28Money and PACs
- Ideological PACs raise more but spend less
because of cost of raising money - In 2000 unions and business organizations gave
most - Incumbents get most PAC money
- Business PACs split money between Democrats and
Republicans - Democrats get most PAC money
- PAC contributions small
29No evidence PAC money influences votes in Congress
- Most members vote their ideology
- When issue of little concern to voters, slight
correlation but may be misleading - PAC money may influence in other ways, such as
access - PAC money most likely to influence on client
politics
30Self Test
31For more information about this topic, link to
the Metropolitan Community College Political
Science Web Site http//socsci.mccneb.edu/pos/pols
cmain.htm