Title: Optional lesson objective to address
1Optional lesson objective - to address Reliabilit
y, Maintainability, Supportability, and Safety
Expectations - You will understand the issues
(benefits and penalties) associated with UAV
supportability and safety.
2Why Consider Supportability?
- Operations Support and Safety are Key Cost
Drivers for the Overall UAV System - Operations Support (OS) Represent the Largest
Percentage of the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) - Reliability Maintainability Attributes of the
Air Vehicle Drive Support Manpower - - Affordability Issues Due to High Attrition
Rates Constrain UAV Market Penetration (Military
and Civilian) - OS and Safety Issues Need to be Seriously
Addressed During Pre-Concept Design - It is Not Something That Can be Delayed
- You Get What You Pay For
3Definitions
- Reliability
- The probability that an item can perform its
intended function for a specified interval under
stated conditions. - Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) (ususally in
terms of flight hours) - Failure Rate (failures per unit time)
- Probability (expressed as a decimal or
percentage) - Tasks and Responsibilities During Pre-Conceptual
Design - Allocations
- Predictions
- Functional Failure Modes Effects Analysis
- Design Reviews
- Trade Studies
- For purposes of this course, a discussion of
the reliability issues and your proposed approach
will suffice
4Definitions
- Maintainability
- The measure of the ability of an item to be
retained or restored to a specified condition
when maintenance is performed by personnel having
specified skill levels, using prescribed
procedures and resources, at each prescribed
level of maintenance and repair. - Mean Time to Repair average of repair times
- Maintenance Manhours Per Flight Hour
- Crew Size Average number of individuals
required to accomplish the maintenance action - Tasks and Responsibilities During Pre-Conceptual
Design - Allocations
- Predictions
- Time Line Analyses (Combat Turns, etc.)
- Design Reviews
- Trade Studies
- For purposes of this course, a discussion of
maintainability issues and your proposed approach
will suffice
5Definitions
- Supportability
- The degree to which system design characteristics
and planned logistics resources, including
manpower, meet system requirements. - Direct Maintenance Manpower per Aircraft
- Logistics Footprint ( transport aircraft sorties
to deploy squadrons support equipment, manpower
and spares) - Mission Capable Rate
- Not Mission Capable Supply (NMCS) Rate
- Tasks and Responsibilities During Pre-Conceptual
Design - Define Support (Maintenance Supply) Concept
- Estimate Manpower Sortie Generation Rates
- Define Deployment Concept Predict Logistics
Footprint - Trade Studies
- Requirements for this course underlined
6Support Locations
Main Base
Forward Base
Emergency Base
7Support Concept
8What Kinds of RM Analyses Are Expected in
Pre-Conceptual Design?
Acquisition Life Cycle Phases
OTE
Concept Technology Development
System Development Demonstration
Operations Support
Production Deployment
RM Data Sources Techniques
Parametric Estimates
Supplier Predictions
- Weight
- Parts Count
- Surface Area
- Duty Cycle
- Sortie Length
Component Tests
Integration Tests
- Part Stress
- Environ Mod Sim
- Thermal Surveys
- FMEA/FMECA
- PHM Mod Sim
- Virtual Human MS
Flight Test
- Durability Tests
- Growth Tests
- Qual Tests
Field Data
- M Demos
- Surges
- Environmental Extremes
- Military Maintainers
- End Users Maintainers
- Production Configuration
RM Predictions Fidelity Increase with Design
Fidelity
9What Is It About UAVs That Affects Supportability?
- Micro, Mini, or Larger?
- Proximity to Ground
- Interface with Loading Equipment
- Access to Daily Servicing Points
- Engine Removal
- Transportation / Deployment Considerations
- Hangar Space
- Refueling Times / Turnaround Times
- Storage vs. Flying
- Deployment Timelines
- Optempo
- Crew Sizes
- Weapons
- Self-Sufficiency
- Contractor Logistics Support Considerations
- Infrastructure
Size
CONOPS
Basing
10What Is It About UAVs That Affects Supportability?
Endurance
- Airframe Life
- Inspection Criteria
- Consumables
- Redunancy / Mission Reliability
- Autonomous Refueling vs. Sizing for Range
- Deployment of Ground Stations
- LOS vs. BLOS Comms
- Mission Planning for Satellite Coverage
- Coordination with ATC
- Coordination with Ground Crews
- Design for Testability
- How Much Redundancy Can You Afford?
- How Much Safety Analysis Can You Afford?
- Approach to Support
Ground Segment
Cost / Fleet Size
11Air Vehicle Eliminates Man-Rated Systems
Man-Rated Systems Are Eliminated
- Crew Station
- Instruments
- Cockpit Structure / Boarding Ladders
- Canopy
- Ejection Seat / Escape Provisions
- Throttle/Control Stick/Rudder Pedal
- Control Panels
- Crew Station Environmental Controls
- Heating/Cooling
- Pressurization
- Defog
- Oxygen System
- LOX or OBOGS
- Regulator
- Emergency/Survival Equipment
- OS Cost Reduction of 8 in Personnel Alone!
- No Egress Shop
- Eliminate Survival Skill
- Smaller, Less Costly ECS
- No LOX Consumables
- Less Support Equipment
12Crew Station Benefits
- Equipment Moved Into Ground Control Station
- Flight Instruments / Information
- Displays
- Data Recording
- Reduced Environmental Qualification Testing
- No High g Testing Required
- Reduced Vibration Requirement (Maybe)
- No High Altitude Testing
- Increased Reliability
- Some Equipment 2-5 Times More Reliable
- Less Manpower Required for Maintenance
- Cheaper to Implement Redundancy
13Weapons Loading / Engine Removal
- Proximity to Ground For Most UCAVs Complicates
Weapons Loading - Innovative Loading Schemes Can Mitigate
Restricted Access - Consider Hoists Alternate Lifting Devices
- X-45 Demo Uses Weapons Dolly and Ejectors Mounted
on Weapon - Robotic Loading May Help
- Considered By Navy for Ships
- Engine Removal Also Challenging
- Drop Down or Lift Out?
- Existing SE Sufficient?
14Deployment and Transportation
- Storable UAVs Can Be Airlifted in Individual
Storage Containers - USAF UCAV Concept is to Deploy via C-17 (See Demo
Below) - Autonomous Aerial Refueling and/or Rearming May
Allow Self-Ferry
15Endurance Benefits
- Pilot Physical Limitations Limit Effective Sortie
Length - Endurance UAV Sortie Durations May Approach 48-60
Hours! - Ground Operators Can Work in Shifts
- UAVs Have Potential to Remain Aloft Indefinitely
- Requires Autonomous Refueling Technology
- 4 to 5 UCAVs Can Displace 24 Manned Fighters in
24-Hour CAP - Longer Sorties Mean Less Wear and Tear
- Cycle-Related Fatigue and Duty Cycles Reduced
- 80 of Fighter Failures are Constant on a
Per-Sortie Basis - Maintenance Manhours Per Flight Hour Reduction
- Knee in Curve at Approximately 24 Hour Sortie
Length
This Study Assumed A Similar Level of
Maintainability
16Long Endurance MeansFewer Sorties Per Flight Hour
- Assumes 80 of Failures are Constant on a Per
Sortie Basis - Manpower Eventually Reduces to a Constant to
Retain a Minimum Number of Personnel of Each
Specialty for All Shifts
MFTBM1 - Mean Flight Time Between Maintenance
(Inherent) MMH/FH - Maintenance Manhours Per
Flight Hour
This Study Assumed A Similar Level of
Maintainability
17Endurance Benefits
- Pilot Physical Limitations Limit Effective Sortie
Length - Endurance UAV Sortie Durations May Approach 48-60
Hours! - Ground Operators Can Work in Shifts
- UAVs Have Potential to Remain Aloft Indefinitely
- Requires Autonomous Refueling Technology
- Longer Sorties Mean Less Wear and Tear
- Cycle-Related Fatigue and Duty Cycles Reduced
- 80 of Fighter Failures are Constant on a
Per-Sortie Basis - Maintenance Manhours Per Flight Hour Reduction
- Knee in Curve at Approximately 24 Hour Sortie
Length
18Ground Handling Options
- Preprogrammed Routes Using dGPS
- Accurate, Hands-Off
- Requires Site Survey, Detailed Mission Planning
- Likely Requires Deconflicted Ops with Other
Aircraft - Remote Control By Ground Crew
- Good Ground Situational Awareness
- Adds Complexity to Air Vehicle Design
- Remote Control By Ground Operator
- Good Ground Situational Awareness
- Minimal Impact on Manpower
- Hardware Intensive
- Needs On-Board Camera
19Redundancy Considerations
- Redundancy Exists for 3 Reasons
- Safety
- Survivability
- Mission Reliability
- Consider Life Cycle Cost Sensitivities
- Maintenance Savings vs. Increased Loss of
Aircraft - Consider Mission Reliability Requirements
- For Flight Critical Systems (failure crash)
- Generally required to fail operational/fail safe
(at a minimum) - Triplex Redundancy is Most Cost-Effective on
/Flight Hour Basis - Extremely High Reliability (gt10,000 hrs MTBF) or
Extremely Low Cost (lt1000/Channel) Are Required
for Dual Redundancy to Be Cost Effective - For Mission Critical Systems (mission fails or
degraded) - Generally required to fail operational (albeit
degraded) - Typically back-up most mission critical systems
(radios, GPS, etc) -
20Redundancy Cost Trades
Module Cost/Channel 18,400 Average Repair
Cost 6000 Average Sortie Duration 4 .5
Hours UAV Unit Cost 10 Million Critical Failure
Rate 1/3 of MTBF
Trade Studies Will Determine Level of Redundancy
21Training Concept
- Manned Aircraft Pilots Maintain Proficiency By
Flying - Require Minimum of 30 Flight Hours/Month
- Most Flight Hours In Lifetime are for Training
- UAV/UCAV Operator Interface Is Unique
- Actual vs. Simulated Flight Similar
- Keep UCAV In Storage Until War
- Reduced Spares/Consumables
- Reduced OS Costs
- Note this ConOps is changing
- as we speak
22Next Subject
- Review of RMS Functions
- UAV UCAV RMS Considerations
- Supportability Attributes
- Subsystem Considerations
- Manpower
- OS Cost
- UAV Safety Lessons Learned
23UAV and Drone Experience
Mishaps Per 100,000 Flight Hours Fighter
4.5 Manned QF-106 Drones 130 Unmanned QF-106
Drones 70 Pioneer UAV 167 Hunter
UAV 140 Predator UAV 27
Class A Cumulative Mishap Rate, 1997 Loss Rate
(non-combat)
- Primary Cause of Drone Mishaps is Old Age and
Structural Integrity - Primary Causes of UAV Mishaps
- Non-Aviation Qualified Parts (Pioneer Hunter)
- Inadequate Emergency Procedures Training / Lack
of Concurrency - Lack of Redundancy in Flight Critical Systems
- Inadequate Testing Configuration Control
24Attrition Cost Comparison
Lower Unit Cost Does Not Necessarily Mean Lower
Life Cycle Cost! and theres a reason!
Losses Per 100K Flt. Hrs. 5.0 7.0 167 27
Cost Per Vehicle 25-50M 200K 1.0M 3.0M
Typical Fighter General Aviation Low Cost
UAV High Cost UAV
Global Hawk Goal is 10 per 100K Flight Hours
25UAV Lessons Learned
- Carefully Weigh Risk When Considering Redundancy
- Establish Acceptable Mission Reliability Goals
- Trade Cost of Redundancy vs. Reduced Attrition
- Affordability is Usually Achieved at Higher Risk
- Recognize UAV/UCAV Mishap Rates Will Probably
Exceed Manned
Tactical Aircraft Mishap Rates - As a Minimum, Consider Redundancy for
- Data Links
- Flight Controls
- Propulsion System Controls
- Utilize Mil-Spec or Commercial Aviation-Grade
Parts - Already Qualified for Operating Environment
(Temperature, Altitude, Vibration, EMI, etc.) - Better Reliability
- May Obviate Need for Expensive Qualification
Testing - Expensive for a Reason
26UAV Lessons Learned
- Use Qualified Test Pilot During Testing
- Understands Aerodynamics Engineering
- First Responsibility is to Save Aircraft
- Trained to React to Unexpected Events
- Place Increased Emphasis on Operator-Vehicle
Interface - Provide Adequate Fault Annunciation to Operator
- Must Be Immediately Recognized
- Should Indicate Appropriate Operator Response
- Consider Operator Workload In Emergency
Conditions - Consider Operator Skill Level (Pilot, Novice,
etc.) - Segregate Houskeeping Maintenance Functions
from Flight Ops Functions - Train Emergency Procedures! (Especially for
Flight Test) - Adequately Test Hardware Prior to First Flight
- End-to-End Comms Loop (Including AV Antenna
Multipath) - Hardware-In-the-Loop Testing is Critical
27UAV Lessons Learned
- Software Configuration Control
- Hazard Analysis Should Include Software Hazards
- A Software Change is a Configuration Change!
- Utilize Software-In-The-Loop Testing
- Automate Repetitive Functions to Alleviate
Operator Fatigue and Improve Safety - Plan Adequate Schedule for Software Test
28How to Achieve Reliability
- Simplification Fewer parts means less things to
fail - Standardization Quality and tolerances all
match - Stress/Strength Derating Particularly for
avionics - Function Isolation Improved mission reliability
- Packaging Design Hermeticity, vibration
isolation, etc. - Redundancy Judicious use!
- Producibility and Tolerance Evaluation Quality
issue - Local Environment Evaluation Avoid hot spots
- Sensitivities Trade studies
- Drift and Degradation Design for it or test for
it - Development Test, test, test
- Reliability Design Checklists Lessons learned
29Empirical Analysis of Reliability Trends
Historical Trend
10.0
7-9
5.0
3.0
EW 30Klb
EW 20Klb
MFHBF (Inherent )
1.0
- TREND Reliability Doubles Every 15 Years
- Newer Technologies
- Improved Manufacturing Processes (Quality)
- Increased Emphasis on Design for RMS
0.1
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
Year of Initial Production Delivery
30UAV maintenance personnel
Parametric Data Shows Manpower Requirements are a
Function of Aircraft Speed, Weight (EW Wpay)
and Type
- UAV Comparison
- - Global Hawk fits overall manpower parametric
- - Predator falls well outside other aircraft
norms - Use this parametric to estimate maintenance
manpower required for your design projects
Predator
Global Hawk
31Intermission