Visual Tool for Literature Exploration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Visual Tool for Literature Exploration

Description:

Dogpile. InfoSpace, Inc. ... Dogpile. Vivisimo. Carnegie Mellon University 2000. Award-winning search technology 'clustering' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Flo2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Visual Tool for Literature Exploration


1
Visual Tool for Literature Exploration
  • Tingting Jiang
  • November 14, 2006

2
Outline
  • Literature Exploration
  • Visualization Overview
  • Visualization Applications
  • Term Project

3
Literature Exploration
  • Traditional activities in literature exploration
  • Collecting
  • Categorizing
  • Reading
  • Evaluating
  • Writing

4
Literature Exploration Cont
  • Collecting Literature Search
  • 1. Identifying resources
  • Databases, PittCat, E-journals
  • Internet
  • 2. Developing search strategies
  • Keywords or phrases
  • Broaden, narrow, or modify

5
Literature Exploration Cont
  • Product of literature exploration literature
    review
  • A literature review is a summary of
    previous research on a topic.

6
Literature Exploration Cont
  • Questions to be answered in a literature review
  • 1. What is known about the subject?
  • 2. Are there any gaps in the knowledge of
    the subject?
  • 3. Have areas of further study been
    identified by other researchers that you may want
    to consider?
  • 4. Who are the significant research
    personalities in this area?
  • 5. Is there consensus about the topic?
  • 6. What aspects have generated significant
    debate on the topic?

7
Literature Exploration Cont
  • Questions to be answered in a literature review
  • 7. What methods or problems were identified
    by others studying in the field and how might
    they impact your research?
  • 8. What is the most productive methodology
    for your research based on the literature you
    have reviewed?
  • 9. What is the current status of research in
    this area?
  • 10. What sources of information or data were
    identified that might be useful to you?

8
Visualization Overview
  • Information visualization
  • - The use of computer-supported, interactive,
    visual representations of abstract data to
    amplify cognition
  • Knowledge visualization
  • - The use of visual representations to
    transfer knowledge between at least two persons

9
Knowledge Visualization
  • Purposes
  • Reduce visual search time
  • Comprehend large amounts of data
  • Better understand complex data
  • Identify key ideas, researchers, changes
    in a filed Knowledge transfer/Scholarly
    communication

10
Visual Representations
  • Graphs (quantitative)
  • Tables (words, numbers)
  • Maps (spatial)
  • Time charts (temporal)
  • Network charts (node link)
  • Diagrams (structure process)
  • Icons
  • Photos

11
Visualization Techniques
  • Rearrangement
  • A graphic is no longer drawn once for
    all it is constructed and reconstructed
    (manipulated) until all the relationships which
    lie within it have been perceived

12
Rearrangement Examples
  • Table Lens

13
Visualization Techniques Cont
  • Presentation
  • Focus Context (Fisheye) researchers
    concentration on a problem can probably be
    enhanced if irrelevant detail are removed

14
Presentation Examples
  • Perspective Wall
  • Hyperbolic Tree (http//nsdl.org/browse/index.php)

15
Visualization Techniques Cont
  • Interaction
  • Overview
  • Zoom
  • Filter
  • Details-on-demand
  • Relate
  • History
  • Extract

16
Visualization Applications
  • Dogpile (http//www.dogpile.com/)
  • Vivisimo (http//vivisimo.com/)
  • Clusty (http//clusty.com/)
  • Grokker (http//www.grokker.com/)
  • Mooter (http//www.mooter.com/)
  • KartOO (http//www.kartoo.com/)
  • ujiko (http//www.ujiko.com/)
  • KwMap (http//www.kwmap.net/)
  • TouchGraph (http//www.touchgraph.com/)
  • RefViz (http//www.refviz.com/)

17
Dogpile
  • InfoSpace, Inc.
  • Metasearch engine Google, Yahoo! Search, MSN,
    Ask.com, About, MIVA, LookSmart and more
  • Relevancy
  • Metasearch technology ensuring best results top
    the list
  • Missing Pieces visualization (disappear?)

18
Dogpile
19
Vivisimo
  • Carnegie Mellon University 2000
  • Award-winning search technology clustering
  • Pre-retrieval Tagging vs. post-retrieval
    Clustering

20
Clusty
  • Vivisimo 2004 Pittsburgh
  • Metasearch engine Ask.com, MSN, Wikipedia, etc.
  • Clusters
  • Discover unexpected relationships between items
  • Tree expand, contract

21
Grokker
  • Groxis Inc.
  • Metasearch engine Yahoo!, Wikipedia, Amazon
    Books
  • Clusters
  • Results grouped in topics rather than presented
    in a linear list where some results might be
    missed
  • Outline View (tree) as well as Map View
    (interactive)

22
Grokker
23
Mooter
  • Mooter Media 2003
  • Clusters
  • Node-link diagrams all the clusters separated on
    multiple pages

24
KartOO
  • KartOO S.A.
  • Metasearch engine
  • Related topics help refine search
  • Interactive cartographic maps one search
    generates several maps
  • Lots of cool visual tricks not as relevant as
    expected

25
ujiko
  • KartOO S.A.
  • Sets of themes help improve search
  • Interactive visualization
  • Customizable search engine users decide the
    relevance of results
  • The more you use it, the more functions it is
    able to offer

26
KwMap
  • KwMap.Net
  • Keyword search engine
  • Refine search keywords related keywords and
    keywords variantions
  • Two axes
  • Results - websites

27
TouchGraph
  • TouchGraph LLC
  • Visualizations of associative networks
  • Amazon browser, Google browser, and LiveJournal
    browser
  • Interactive node-link diagrams
  • Clusters

28
RefViz
  • OmniViz Inc.
  • A text analysis and visualization software
    application designed to retrieve, analyze,
    organize, and facilitate the comprehension of the
    huge amounts of literature
  • Galaxy Matrix visualizations

29
RefViz - Galaxy
  • Groups and references

30
RefViz - Matrix
  • Groups and concepts

31
Summary
  • Relevance vs. clustering
  • Clusters classification vs. categorization
  • Results content vs. sources
  • Types textual vs. multimedia
  • Keywords automatically vs. manually
  • Browsing vs. searching
  • Visualization features

32
Term Project
  • Goal developing a new scheme for literature
    visualization (prototype or Web based system)
  • Follow-up research developing a Web based tool
    for the whole process of literature exploration,
    not just collecting

33
Term Project
  • Pre-visualization processing
  • Classification schemes subjected to change
  • Literature resources
  • Collaborative human reading
  • Filtering, tagging, and submitting to
    semi-hierarchy

34
Term Project
  • Visualization highlights
  • Complementary visualization views
    semi-hierarchical, time, and region
  • Tag-oriented
  • Tag to knowledge fraction mapping
  • Browsing as well as searching
  • Rearrangement, Presentation, and Interaction
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com