Title: 4. MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND NEW PATTERNS OF MEDIA OWNERSHIP
14. MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND NEW PATTERNS OF MEDIA
OWNERSHIP
- Dr Beata Klimkiewicz
- Jagiellonian University
- Kraków, Poland
2NUMBER OF NATIONAL DAILIES
3PRACTICES RESULTING FROM CONCENTRATION
- replacement of serious journalism with
infotainment - saving costs of journalistic production by
cumulative recycling, duplicating mainstream
content formats - targeting majority audiences
4DEVELOPMENT OF BROADCASTING MARKETS
- significant change in quantity of TV channels
broadcasting terrestrially and via satellite and
cable took place in the last seven years - thematic, mostly foreign owned TV channels
appeared on the market (including Discovery
channels, MTV, Animal Planet, Le Cinema, HBO,
Eurosport, RTL and others) and digital platforms
were established - these developments have not challenged the
positions of principal television players in CE
countries
5TELEVISION AUDIENCE SHARES Poland
6PRIVATE PLAYERS
- national terrestrial commercial channels Polsat,
TVN, TV4 - Catholic channels TV Trwam, TN Puls
- seven private local TV stations
- two digital platforms Cyfra, Polsat Cyfrowy
- 600 cable operators
7TELEVISION AUDIENCE SHARES Czech Republic and
Slovakia
8VIEWERS CHOICE
- the range and offer of national private TV
channels in the Central European Member States is
remote from being fully diverse - main private terrestrial TV channels are
predominantly oriented on entertainment - news, education and other related genres comprise
a small portion of programming, that does not
surpass 10 of the total programming offer
9MEDIA CONCENTRATION REGULATORY DILEMMAS
- anti-concentration provisions enshrined both in
media and competition laws tackle a small scope
of the problem - a limited scope of other regulatory measures
(reservation of broadcasting frequencies,
requirement of independent and original
programming, subsidies)
10MEDIA PLURALISM REGULATORY MEASURES
11LIBERAL APPROACH
- the liberal approach towards concentration of
media ownership - exceptions recent judgements of the Polish
Office of Competition and Consumer Protection
which charged the publisher Polskapresse with
penalties amounting to 100,000 as the company
failed twice to notify the intention of
concentration on the market of regional daily
newspapers - anti-concentration provisions have neither
prevented media companies from establishing
dominant positions (Polskapresse and Orkla) nor
did they limit cross media ownership
12REGULATORY FAILURES RYWINGATE
- 2002 Draft Amendment to the Broadcasting Act
- limits on cross media ownership
- Agora was offered to pay a bribe amounting to
17.4 millions of US dollars to the group in
power - disclosure investigation by the Sejm
Investigative Committee - consequences resignation of Millers government
- cross media ownership remained unregulated
-
13THE MIDDLE-SIZE MARKET POLAND
- more prominent presence of domestic media groups
- Agora control over larger circulations
- small media companies still continue to merge
with powerful owners - 2000 25 mergers took place on the press market
in Poland (7 of all mergers on the press market
in Europe ) - 2001 31 mergers (8 of all mergers on the press
market in Europe )
14SMALL MARKETS
- more significantly affected by media
concentration and domination of transnational
media conglomerates - Hungarian daily newspaper market Ringier, Axel
Springer and WAZ - Slovak newspaper market VGP and Ringier
- Czech newspaper market Ringier and
Rheinisch-Bergische Verlagsgesellschaft - Baltic countries Bonnier, Orkla and Shibsted
15MONOMEDIA CONCENTRATION
- refers to integrating ownership within a single
sector of activity - most predominantly used by transnational foreign
media companies opting for thematic
specialisation - Ringier in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and
Hungary national tabloid daily newspapers
similar in its format and copying the same style
of journalism - H. Bauer in Poland a number of magazines
belonging to the same thematic category 10
womans magazines, 8 TV guides, 6 computer
magazines, 4 youth magazines, etc.
16CROSS MEDIA OWNERSHIP
17MEDIA CONCENTRATION ON REGIONAL MARKETS
- monopolies the Czech Republic (Verlagsgruppe
Passau VGP) and Slovakia (Petit Press) - duopolies Poland (Orkla Press and Polskapresse),
Hungary (WAZ and Axel Springer) - a dominant position in regions, closing down or
merging competing newspapers - cooperation of competitors
18TRANSNATIONAL MEDIA CONCENTRATION
- refers to ownership of media companies in several
countries, to media companies distributing their
products in many countries - ownership in the print press sector in old EU
Member States remains predominantly national - in Central European new Member States it is
largely dominated by transnational foreign groups
19LARGEST TRANSNATIONAL OWNERS
- AXEL SPRINGERtabloids in Poland and Hungary,
regional dailies in Hungary, magazines in Poland
- RINGIER tabloids in the Czech Republic, Hungary
and Slovakia - VGP regional dailies in the Czech Republic,
Slovakia and Poland - WAZ national dailies in Bulgaria, Croatia,
Macedonia, Romania, regional dailies in Hungary - BONNIER dailies in Estonia and Latvia, tabloid
in Poland, - ORKLA national daily in Poland, regional
dailies in Poland and Lithuania
- CME - the Czech Republic (Nova), Slovakia
(Markíza), Slovenia (Pop TV, Kanal A) and Romania
(PRO TV) - BERTELSMANN - Hungary (RTL Klub)
- SBS Hungary (TV2)
- UPC - cable networks in Poland, Slovakia, Czech
Republic and other countries
20INCREASED LINKS BETWEEN SECTORS
- co-operation in sharing of costs and services by
competing media and owners (Orkla and
Polskapresse in Poland TV stations NOVA and
PRIMA in the Czech Republic) - agreements made to benefit from cross-sectoral
provision and cross-ownership of disparate
service providers (ITI, Holding FM in Poland, ARJ
in Slovakia)
21CONCLUSIONS
- press landscapes have been continuously affected
by decline and consolidation of newspapers - regional press markets achieved a structure of
monopolies or duopolies - national markets have been divided between few
strong transnational publishers (H. Bauer, Axel
Springer in Poland, Ringier in the Czech Republic
and Slovakia) - media concentrations affecting media pluralism
have been addressed by national policy responses
in a very limited extent - reasons for having a coherent set of principles
on protection of media pluralism and limits on
media concentrations both at the national and EU
level - different regulatory means may be used for
different purposes, but the objective should be
one securing media pluralism as one of the
basic conditions for sustaining democratic
communication structures within the European
public sphere - an individuals full rights of European
citizenship are indivisible from his/her access
to the media, to plurality of themes and voices,
variety of viewpoints, values and representations