Title: Social Cognition
1Lecture 3
2Social Cognition Outline
- Introduction
- Controlled and Automatic Processing
- Ironic Processing
- Schemas
- Advantages and disadvantages
- Perseverance
- Self-fulfilling prophecy
- Mental Shortcuts Heuristics
- Representativeness
- Availability
- Anchoring and adjustment
- Simulation
3Controlled and Automatic Processing
- Automatic processing
- Thinking that is nonconscious, unintentional,
involuntary, and effortless - Controlled processing
- Thinking that is conscious, intentional,
voluntary and effortful - Beware of the Overconfidence Barrier!
4Ironic processing
- Attempts to suppress thoughts may lead to
hyper-accessibility of those thoughts - For the next minute, do not think of a white bear.
5Schemas
- What is a schema?
- A schema is an organized configuration of
knowledge, based on past experience, that we use
to interpret our current experience. - Related concepts include prototypes, stereotypes,
and scripts
6Schemas (Continued) Advantages and
Disadvantages of Schematic Processing
- Advantages
- Helps us to remember and organize information
- Helps to interpret and evaluate new and/or
ambiguous information - Speeds up processing time
- Disadvantages
- May be overly accepting of information that fits
a schema but it is not correct - May lead to inaccurate expectancies
7Schemas (Continued)
- Perseverance effect
- Social beliefs persist even when contrary
evidence is presented - See Ross, Lepper, Hubbard, 1975
8Schemas (Continued)
- Self-fulfilling prophecy
- A person has an expectation about what another
person is like - Influences how the first person acts towards the
second person - The second person behaves consistently with the
first persons expectation
9Schemas (Continued)
- Self-Fulfilling Prophecy (Rosenthal Jacobson,
1968) - Random assignment to groups
- Experimental group was designated spurters or
bloomers - At the end of the school year, bloomers
outperformed peers in the control group.
10Mental Shortcuts Cognitive Heuristics (Tversky
Kahneman, 1973 1974 1982)
- The Representativeness Heuristic
- -- the tendency to judge membership in a group
by how well a particular instance matches a
prototype or representative example of the group - Related phenomena
- 1. Base-rate fallacy
- tendency to ignore relevant statistical
information about the average frequency, and
instead be influenced by distinctive features of
the case at hand. - 2. Gamblers fallacy
- The failure to recognize the independence of
unconnected chance events.
11Mental Shortcuts (Continued)
- The Availability Heuristic- using the ease of
remembering examples or the amount of information
you can quickly remember as a guide to making an
inference. - Related phenomena
- 1. False consensus bias
- The tendency to overestimate the number of other
people who are similar to us - 2. Priming effect
- The influence of earlier experience on
subsequent impressions or thought
12Mental Shortcuts (Continued)
- The Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic
- - the process of estimating some value by
starting with some initial value and then
adjusting it to the new instance. - Related phenomena
- 1. Framing effect
- The tendency to let the way in which information
is presented affect the judgment we make. - 2. Contrast effect
- If given a contrast, tend to exaggerate
characteristics of the object in the opposite
direction.
13Mental Shortcuts (Continued)
- The Simulation Heuristic
- - the ease with which you can imagine a
particular scenario with a particular ending. - Related phenomena
- 1. Counterfactual Thinking
- The creation of alternatives realities to what
actually occurred.
14Counterfactual Thinking What might have been
- Upward counterfactuals
- Imagined outcomes that are better than reality
- Downward counterfactuals
- Imagined outcomes that are worse than reality
15Causal Attributions
- Causal attribution theories are a group of
theories that describe how people explain why a
given behaviour occurred.
16Causal Attributions
- Heider (1958)
- Internal attribution
- An attribution to a personal characteristic of an
actor (e.g., ability, mood, personality, etc.) - External attribution
- An attribution to a situational factor, outside
the actor (e.g., luck, task, etc.)
17Causal Attributions
- Correspondent Inference Theory (Jones Davis,
1965) - Choice
- Expectedness
- Effects
18Causal Attributions
- Covariation Model (Kelley, 1967)
- Consensus
- Information about the extent to which other
people behave the same way as the actor does
toward the same stimulus - Distinctiveness
- Information about the extent to which one
particular actor behaves the same way to
different stimuli - Consistency
- Information about the extent of which the
behaviour between one actor and one stimulus is
the same across time and circumstances.
19Causal AttributionsKelleys Covariation Model
Consensus
Distinctiveness
Consistency
Attribution
Internal (Personal) Attribution The stranger
caused the behaviour
High The stranger always raves about this film
Low The stranger raves about many other films
Low Others do not rave about the film
The stranger raves about the film
External (Stimulus) Attribution The film
caused the behaviour
High The stranger always raves about this film.
High The stranger does not rave about many
other films
High Others rave about the film
20Causal Attributions
- The Fundamental Attribution Error (Heider, 1958)
- The tendency to focus on the role of personal
causes and underestimate the impact of situations
on other peoples behaviours.
21Causal Attributions
22Causal Attributions
23Causal Attributions
- The Actor/Observer Bias
- The tendency to attribute our own behaviour to
situational causes and the behaviour of others to
personal factors.
24Causal Attributions
- Self-Serving Bias
- Explanations for ones successes credit internal,
dispositional factors and explanations for
failures blame external, situational factors.
25Causal Attributions
- Defensive Attributions
- Help us to avoid feelings of vulnerability and
morality - Unrealistic Optimism
- The belief that good things are more likely to
happen to oneself than to peers and bad things
are more likely to happen to peers than to
oneself. - Belief in a Just World
- The belief that people get what they deserve in
life, such that good things happen to good people
and bad things happen to bad people.