Colour Calibration of RGB Images - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Colour Calibration of RGB Images

Description:

Advantages and disadvantages of different colour calibration methodes. Contents ... 25 photographers. 2200 images. 780 different objects. price 14. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: bernha9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Colour Calibration of RGB Images


1
Colour Calibration of RGB Images
  • Advantages and disadvantages of different colour
    calibration methodes

2
Contents
  • Field Stars Calibration
  • G2 Star Calibration
  • Procedure
  • Disadvantages
  • B-V Calibration
  • Workflow
  • Experiences
  • Alternative Methodes
  • Summary

3
Why Colour Calibration?
  • Atmosphere
  • Zenith distance
  • Transparency
  • Telescope
  • Filters
  • Camera

4
White Balance
  • Average of field stars white
  • Sunlight white
  • Stars with sun-like spectral type (G2)
  • Stars with sun-like photometry (B-V)

5
Contents
  • Field Stars Calibration
  • G2 Star Calibration
  • Procedure
  • Disadvantages
  • B-V Calibration
  • Workflow
  • Experiences
  • Alternative Methodes
  • Summary

6
Field Stars Calibration
  • Assumption
  • Average colour of bright field stars is white
  • Advantages
  • Easy (e.g. AIP4Win)
  • Independent of atmospheric extinction
  • Works fine for galaxy fields
  • Disadvantages
  • Open star clusters
  • Interstellar extinction
  • Bright nebulae

7
Contents
  • Field Stars Calibration
  • G2 Star Calibration
  • Procedure
  • Disadvantages
  • B-V Calibration
  • Workflow
  • Experiences
  • Alternative Methodes
  • Summary

8
Extinction
9
Extinction
10
Workflow G2 Star Calibration
Measurement of bright G2 star
Exposure of object in specific altitude
Calculate extinction
RGB weights in zenith
Corrected RGB- weights
11
When does the G2 calibration fail?
Measurement of bright G2 star
Exposure of object in specific altitude
Calculate extinction
RGB weights in zenith
Corrected RGB- weights
  • No measurement of a G2 star
  • Very low altitude of the object
  • Bad transparency (clouds, fog,..)

12
Object exposures for G2 star calibration
  • Idea Search for not saturated G2 stars
  • Two problems
  • Spectral type of faint stars is often unknown
  • Reddening of G2 strars by interstellar dust.

13
Contents
  • Field Stars Calibration
  • G2 Star Calibration
  • Procedure
  • Disadvantages
  • B-V Calibration
  • Workflow
  • Experiences
  • Alternative Methodes
  • Summary

14
B-V Calibration
  • Idea Peter Riepe Harald Tomsik
  • VdS Journal 2526
  • Calibration uses the object image
  • Instead of spectral type -gt photometry
  • Comprehensive photometric data of faint stars
  • Johnson-Cousins UBVRI filter system.

15
UBVRI Filter
  • U Ultraviolet
  • B Blue
  • V Visual (Green)
  • R Red
  • I Infrared

16
Colour Index
  • difference of the brightness measured through
    two different filters
  • e.g B-V, V-R

Sp. type Colour B-V mag
Spica B1 Blue -0.23
Deneb A2 Blue-White 0.09
Sun G2 White 0.65
Betelgeuse M0 Orange-Red 1.50
17
HR Diagram
18
(No Transcript)
19
Idea
  • Colour index of a G2 star without interstellar
    extinction
  • B-V0.65 mag
  • V-R0.36 mag
  • Search for white stars inside the image field
  • Not saturated
  • 0.6 mag lt B-V lt 0.7 mag
  • 0.2 mag lt V-R lt 0.6 mag
  • Measurement of the brightness of selected white
    stars in Red, Green and Blue.

20
B-V Workflow
  • Preprocessing
  • Dark, Flat
  • Registration
  • Averaged R, G and B image
  • Aladin B-V steps
  • Load DSS image
  • Load photometric catalogue
  • Load filter
  • Measure brightness of selected stars

21
Step1 Load DSS image
DSS Digitized Sky Survey Aladin
http//aladin.u-strasbg.fr/aladin.gml
22
Step1 DSS
23
Step2 Load Photometric Catalogue
NOMAD1 Naval Observatory Merged Astrometric
Dataset Advantage 100 sky coverage Disadvantage
Accuracy
24
Step3 Load Filter
  • Select white stars
  • 0.6 lt B-V lt 0.7
  • 0.2 lt V-R lt 0.6
  • Save Wolfgang Pirachers filter on your local disk

25
Step3 Filter
26
Step3 Filter
27
Aladin - Filter
28
Step4 Measurement
  • Aperture photometry of standard image processing
    software (e.g. AstroArt)
  • Result 3 ADU values (R,G and B)
  • Example
  • Red 48298 / Green 56917 / Blue 51635
  • -gt Green and Blue are too bright
  • -gt Red 1,00 / Green 0,85 / Blue 0,94.

29
Experiences with B-V
  • Methode is laborious
  • NOMAD1 catalogue
  • Inhomogeneous
  • Is based partly on plate scans
  • The fainter the reference stars, the more
    unreliable
  • -gt at least 5 stars are necessary (outliers)
  • The blue weight is often too high
  • Average between G2 and B-V.

30
Contents
  • Field Stars Calibration
  • G2 Star Calibration
  • Procedure
  • Disadvantages
  • B-V Calibration
  • Workflow
  • Experiences
  • Alternative Methodes
  • Summary

31
Alternative Methodes
  • Regim by Andreas Rörig
  • Up to 5 stars manual selection
  • Theli by Mischa Schirmer
  • LINUX software
  • Astrometric registration
  • Fully automated B-V methode Usage of a big
    number of stars, which are found by the software
    (Vizier data base).
  • SDSS
  • Much better photometric data
  • Filter system ugriz (u-g1.43mag g-r0.44mag)
  • At the moment far away from full sky coverage.

32
Summary
  • New catalogues
  • In several years much better catalogues compared
    with NOMAD1
  • Fully automated B-V methode is possible
  • E.g. Theli
  • B-V methode as standard
  • The B-V calibration works in all thinkable
    situations (bad transparency, Milky Way
    fields,..), provided that the used catalogue is
    enough accurate.
  • Best procedure at the moment
  • Combination of G2 and B-V

33
CCD-DVD Observatory Gahberg
  • 25 photographers
  • 2200 images
  • 780 different objects
  • price 14.-

34
Thank you very much for your attention!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com