Title: ATS CENTRE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS
1ATS CENTRE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS
- Technical, Economical and Operational Assessment
of an ATM Concept Achievable from the year 2005
2Resume what is covered
Flow Capacity Management
Tactical
Local Traffic Management
Strategic
Time Horizon
Central Planning Agency
Multi-Centre
Centre
Multi-Sector
Sector
Geographical area Horizon
CENTRE PLANNING
En-Route Metering
Multi-Sector planning
EN ROUTE PLANNING
EXECUTIVE CONTROL OPERATION
Free routing
Partial delegation
3Main issues
- ATS Centre planning and operations will be
characterised by an improvement in the Local
Tactical Planning activities. - Main objectives are
- To closed the gap between the Flow and Capacity
planning ( at strategic and tactical level) and
real time operation. - To pave the way towards more autonomous aircraft
4Practical implementation
En-Route Planning involves
Local Tactical Planning encompasses En-Route
Planning and Terminal Area Sequencing operations
En-Route Metering Multi-Sector Planning (MSP).
Arrival manager Departure manager
Terminal area sequencing involves
Evolution towards more autonomous operation
involve the consideration of partial delegation
of responsibility to the aircraft and the free
routing implementation
5En-Route Planning principles
- En-Route Planning acts on the basis of the agreed
DOP. - It will act as a bridge between Flow and
Capacity management, and Tactical Air Traffic
Control. - Time horizon is up to two hours in advance.
- Two enabling functions are required
- En-Route Metering and Multisector planning
6Operational Procedure Summary
- Ensure flexibility allowing optimal use of human
resources and abilities. - Will prevent overload situations for human actors
(controller, pilots) - Planning ahead and solving potential conflicts
well in advance. - DOPs demand/capacity accuracy expected 90.
- En-route planning works on the basis of the DOP
with more accurate data, shorter time horizon and
smaller area of responsibility - De-centralised mode of operations
- Needs computer support by tools able to predict
en route air traffic , as well as workload in
different scenarios
7En-Route Metering principles
- Function implemented through a possible ATS
centre planners that - Identifies future traffic overload and congestion
situations, with a time horizon of at least 2
hours through an automated traffic analyser - Does not take tactical actions if overload or
congestion is not found - Determines optimum solutions varying from change
acceptance rates, change routes, etc... - Negotiates solutions with planers affecting the
situation through automatic negotiations tools
and aeronautical network - Distributes changes to stakeholders
- Could work in streams of aircraft rather than
individual aircraft
8En-Route Metering Assessment Support
- Sector overloads are removed, so maximum flow
initially planned has been effectively managed
without stress in the system - If function is implemented and there is
confidence on the removal of sector overloading
maximums, the declared capacity figures will be
increased as effective real flow figures are
recognised - Wide number of sectors suffer today of peak flows
over the declared capacity (gt10 of the declared
capacity) - Control of overload will facilitate to adopt this
figures as normal operating conditions.
9Multi-sector Planning Principles
- Function implemented through a number of
Multisector planner positions that - Detects conflicts with 1 hour horizon through a
MTCD - Finds solutions to the conflicts detected with
the assistance of a conflict resolution advisor. - Decides on the solution to be taken , and
distributes to the stakeholders. - It could also deal whit individual trajectory
change request, assess and negotiate them. - In addition to the above task could also perform
the tasks of the individual sector planning
controllers (inter -sector co-ordination).
10Quantified benefits from implementation of
advanced new generation CWP
Tactical Planners Workload IMPROVEMENT
Capacity gain
Tactical WL decrease by 30 (consistent with
SRATM project results) Planer WL decrease by 10
Around 10 or 15 of capacity gain saturated
sectors
11MSP Results illustration
Tactical WL
Planning WL
Planning WL is reduced to something marginal
without Tactical working conditions degradation
No significant gain is due to MSP actuation
12Quantified benefits from MSP
- Marginal improvement in Workload/Capacity at
tactical level. - Conflicts detected at planning level by MSP or
Planner controllers - Marginal gain provided by resolution of conflicts
in previous sectors - If datalink capacity is provided to the MSP
additional gains can be achieved, but
responsibility issues MUST be clarified - If MTCD assumes the conflict search planning
task, - Planer workload is reduced enough to justify
Planner Controller integration - Remaining marginal workload is minimal and no
significant Tactical workload decrease will be
achieved - Real gain from MSP is the possible integration
of Planner Controller positions
13En-Route Planning potential changes and overall
benefits
- En route metering on, at least centre level will
fill the gap between ATFM and ATC and support
gate-to-gate operations - Multisector planning will be a new function in
ATC - By the use of MTCD controllers will be able to
plan traffic and to solve potential conflicts. - Multisector planning and MTCD will permit the
change from reactive to pro-active ATC.
14First steps towards a fully autonomous aircraft
operation
- Partial delegation of responsibility to suitably
equipped aircraft - airborne conflict detection and resolution tools
- depends on availability of technical enablers
(e.g. CDTI) - System supported monitoring to reduce controller
workload - Free Routing implementation
15Technical feasibility
- VDL Mode 2 progressive from 2001 (about 50
equipage in 2010) - ATN router and ODIAC applications progressive
from 2003 (25 to 50 equipage in 2010) - ADS-B progressive from 2007/2008 equipped
depending on incentive / mandate choice
16Practical implementation of partial delegation of
responsibility separation to the aircraft
On-route station keeping application
In track separation conflicts
CONTROLLER delegates separation control
responsibility to PILOT
Controllers Workload DECREASES
(Just monitor)
Establishment of ASAS CONTRACT
Controllers Workload INCREASES
17Quantified benefits of partial delegation of
responsibility separation to the aircraft
- WL decrease is dependant on the numbers of
aircraft equipped and on the route structure. - STK Implementation provides the pilot with data
in order to help him to manage the relative
movement between his and other aircraft when
close proximity situation occurs. - An STK Contract is necessary to be established
between pilot and controller. - The level of complexity implied by the
establishment of this contract will directly
affect on the gain obtained with STK
Implementation.
Free Routing
18Open questions to the Forum
CITY, DD/MM/YY
- Can any real capacity increase be derived from
en-route metering? - Can the route structure be adapted to provide the
flexibility required by en-route metering? - What should be the characteristics of the MSP?
- Can the MSP substitute the planner controller
role? - Can we envisage partial responsibility delegation
to the aircraft for the near term ?
This document is the property of TORCH 2005 and
may not be copied or communicated without written
consent
TORCH WPX
DOCUMENT CODE
- 18 -