Title: Identifying capacity development priorities for oceans
1Identifying capacity development priorities for
oceans
- UNESCO/IOC Capacity Development
- GEO Capacity-building Committee 6th Meeting
- Hannover, Germany, 13-14 February 2008
Joannès Berque IOC Capacity development section
j.berque_at_unesco.org
2IOC Capacity Development key guiding principle
self-driven
- Letting the beneficiary institute drive the
cooperation - Institute main driver from conception to
implementation ownership of activities - Work with ministries or institute directors that
answer regularly to ministries relevance to
national priorities - Performance to be measured on ownership,
relevance, sustainability and then impact,
effectiveness, etc. - Based on success/failures of decades of
international cooperation (at IOC and in other
fields than marine sciences)
3IOC Self-driven capacity development
implementation
- Work at level of organisations
- IOC has long experience training individual
scientists - Complemented with cooperation at the level of
organisations - environment is essential for trained scientist to
apply skills - no sustainability of acquired skills without
institute support to the scientists coming back - Implementation started 2 years ago (Sida funds)
- 100 institutes - directors or senior scientists
- 75 countries (Africa, LAC, SE Asia)
- The sunset clause obsolete ourselves
- from capacity development to catalysing
collaboration between peers wherever they reside
4One challenge Global systems needs vs. local
priorities in ocean sciences
- Developing countries marine science priorities
typically - Concern many more countries
- Address local scale (100m-100km)
- Use small computers, small bandwidths, and small
budgets - Target outputs for immediate, visible
applications to urgent issues fisheries,
erosion, pollution, economic development in
coastal zone
- Global system science priorities
- Are driven by 10 countries
- Address large scale (1000km) deep ocean,
mid-basin - Need large computers, large bandwidths, large
budgets - Target outputs are publications in blue-water
oceanography periodicals - Societal benefits often indirect or long-term
5Global system needs vs. local priorities in
capacity development
- Global system requires capacity-building for
- Launching maintaining Argo floats
- In-situ validations
- New sensors validation applications
- Continuous collection of data in standard format
and provision of these data to global systems
- Developing countries expressed priorities in
building technical skills for - Local, issue-based measurements
- old sensors applications SSTs
- coastal modelling
- Affordable internet bandwidth
Address the global needs through the local needs
First develop capacity to solve local urgent
problems Then the contribution to global science
comes
6Determining priorities for capacity-development
Urgent technical training and infrastructure
Ministries
Regional workshop for directors
Required services and products for national
priorities
Longer term Higher education Networking
Directors View for the longer term Growth of
the institute
Priorities for a new regional project
Training and infrastructure needed to develop
products or services
Or use previous similar process output e.g.
NEPAD priorities
Scientists
Proposal-writing workshop
7Earth observations for what? Issue-based vs.
tool-based approach
- 1 Identify an issue in the
- coastal zone
- Government drive for addressing
- with national experts
- of high national priority
2 Determine the science needed for national
Expert to propose solutions
3 Corresponding CD in earth observations,
modelling, data management
Output, Results
Evaluation
Caveat of international but isolated club of old
friends promoting a tool that has lost its
relevance
8Self-driven CD schematic
Coastal modelling workshop field trip, Maputo
Institute priorities
Technical workshops Often request is on
modelling, GIS, remote sens Project scientists
attend
Leadership development workshops for directors
Innovative, good feedback, catalysed change
process
Bid-writing and team-building workshops Project
leaders attend Know-how to compete for
international funds
National priorities Institute growth plans
Competitive Proposal to funding agencies
Directors workshops
Institutes earn funds for their projects
Conceived by them, within institute growth plan
9(No Transcript)
10Summarising
- Self-driven - foreign-driven
- Local needs global needs
- Issue-based - tool-based
11(No Transcript)
12Proposal-writing workshops increasing flow of
funds to nationally-conceived projects
- Motivation
- Much of the HR of many institutes in developing
countries work on foreign-conceived projects
implications for ownership, relevance and
sustainability - Large proportion of funds for marine/environmental
science in the South are channelled back to the
donor-country institutes - Many reasons for this, one is few competitive
proposals from developing countries it takes
practice to write and submit proposals - Enhance the know-how to compete for international
funds - Hire a proposal-writing consultant with
excellent fund-raising record - Conduct workshops to transfer this know-how to
project leaders - Another output a bankable project proposal based
on priorities determined by institute directors
Accra bid development
Mombassa bid-writing
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Proposal-writing workshops implementation
- Process was begun in Eastern Africa, replicated
in Western Africa and Latin America the
Caribbean (First bid submission in the next few
months!! - Critical factors
- Directors must be involved from conception
- Team-building between project leaders is
essential - Timeframe 1-2 years after directors express
their priorities - An approach applicable to COAST-MAP-IO ???
- Obtain much needed additional funds
- COAST-MAP-IO may be a great platform to conceive
and develop projects with strong regional
ownership - Could ensure sustainability of benefits of the
project in for the safety from marine hazards in
the region