Client Centred Couples Counselling. 4C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Client Centred Couples Counselling. 4C

Description:

The first, whom we shall term the client, is in a state of incongruence, being ... to the conflict between the self symbolisation and the clients experience of the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: all144
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Client Centred Couples Counselling. 4C


1
  • Client Centred Couples Counselling. 4C
  • Allan Turner. MBACP. (Snr Accrd)
  • Kate Stubbings. MBACP. (Accrd)

2
  • 1       Two people in psychological contact.
  •   Three people in psychological contact.

3
  • 2
  • The first, whom we shall term the client, is in a
    state of incongruence, being vulnerable or
    anxious.
  • The couple, whom we shall term the clients, are
    in a state of incongruence, being vulnerable or
    anxious.

4
  • In this statement Rogers is referring to the
    conflict between the self symbolisation and the
    clients experience of the world.
  • The threat that if the experience were
    actually symbolised in awareness, the self
    concept would no longer be a consistent Gestalt,
    the conditions of worth would be violated, and
    the needed self regard would be frustrated. A
    state of anxiety would exist.
  • (Rogers, 1959 cited Kirschenbaum and Henderson,
    1989)

5
  • 3
  • The second person, whom we shall term the
    therapist, is congruent or integrated in the
    relationship.
  • The third person, whom we shall term the
    therapist, is congruent or integrated in the
    relationship.

6
  • 4
  •      The therapist experiences unconditional
    positive regard for the client.
  • The therapist experiences unconditional positive
    regard for the clients.

7
  • Dont take sides.
  • Dont judge who is really right, and really
    wrong.
  • Assume that each client is doing their best.
  • Either, or both, may play to the audience. You
    will be the audience!

8
  • 5
  • The therapist experiences an empathic
    understanding of the clients frame of reference
    and endeavours to communicate this experience to
    the client.
  • The therapist experiences an empathic
    understanding of both of the contradictory
    clients frames of reference and endeavours to
    communicate this experience to both clients,
    valuing both equally.

9
  • 6
  •      The communication to the client of the
    therapists empathic understanding and
    unconditional positive regard is, to a minimal
    degree, perceived.
  • The communication to the clients of the
    therapists empathic understanding and
    unconditional positive regard equally to both
    clients is, to a minimal degree, perceived.

10
  • The theoretical and application principles
    involved.

11
  • 1. We offer client-centred therapy to couples and
    believe that the underlying client-centred theory
    is the same as that offered to individuals. There
    is nothing fundamentally different, although
    application detail differs.

12
  • 2. We assume that each individual has their own
    actualising tendency, but that the couple does
    not have one.
  • The whole is no greater than the sum of its
    parts.
  • We dont think of a couple as an entity in
    itself, but an aggregate of individuals.

13
  • 3. We do not assume any diagnosis on the part of
    the individuals, or within the relationship, as
    the reason for seeking therapy,
  • although, in practice THEY often arrive with a
    diagnosis about each other.
  • We are entering into a therapeutic relationship
    with the two individuals simultaneously.

14
  • 4. We do not systematically take a history,
    although this often emerges from them.

15
  • 5. We think of the work as being on a
    bi-individual level, meaning that we intend to
    engage with each person in an accepting, valuing,
    empathic manner.
  • We intend to receive each individuals
    experiences, feelings, intentions, wishes, and
    meanings in and of themselves.

16
  • 6. We understand each to be in interaction with
    the others presence, including the counsellor.
  • We do not deny, or diminish, that each person is
    a part of a couple. However, we do not let that
    information distract or encumber us as we stay
    present for each individual to the best of our
    ability.
  • We do whatever feels appropriate and necessary
    to protect our own ability to remain accepting
    and empathically present to each person, both as
    an individual and in the relationship.

17
  • 7. We have no goals or agenda, whilst realising
    that the clients have goals or agendas, which may
    shift over time and are often mutually excluding.
  • We are not invested in keeping the couple
    together or in separating them.
  • Thus we have no goal beyond our intention to
    create a safe place where views and feelings can
    be expressed, experienced and understood.

18
  • 8. We do not simply switch between the clients,
    listening to each in turn (although at times that
    might occur).
  • We seldom make an effort to regulate the use of
    time or evenly distribute the time.
  • When it is necessary we see this as a matter for
    therapists congruence, balance and judgment.

19
  • 9. We may sometimes explain our empathetic
    understanding of one partner to the other.
  • We feel free to ask questions to clarify our
    understanding concerning individual subjective
    and interactional experiences.
  • We talk freely, as we might to our friends, or
    each other, deliberately avoiding a stilted,
    controlled counsellor way of communicating.

20
  • 10. We have a tendency to self-represent in terms
    of explaining why we are saying things, this
    tendency is much greater than when working with
    individual clients.
  • At times we might sift through and acknowledge
    the various communications that are being
    verbally or nonverbally expressed.
  • Its like thinking out loud.

21
  • 11. The complexity of the situation increases the
    risk of a client feeling disregarded, not valued
    or not understood, whether by their partner or
    the counsellor.
  • It helps to correcting possible
    misunderstandings if we share our intentions,
    understanding and thought processes.

22
  • 12. We never make process statements about the
    couple.Such statements are resented by the
    clients and paint the counsellor as the expert.

23
  • 13. Our closeness with the couple often feels as
    if we have joined with them and become a
    threesome.
  • However, we also protect our right to act
    independently - interrupting or noting that they
    do not share the same views or understandings.
  • We intend to be very close to the couple, but
    seldom closer than they are to each other.

24
C
C
T
CC gt CT
25
  • 14. We believe that empathy has a special place
    and power in client-centred couple counselling.

W
M
T
26
  • 15. We usually accept any existing power
    relationships,
  • meaning that we seldom confront any existing
    hierarchy or individual dominance or patterns of
    communication or behaviour. (This would also
    relate to children, or other people not present).

27
  • If it feels particularly difficult we might say
    something like I think I would be hurt if that
    were said to me.

28
  • 16. We do not direct the structure of individual
    sessions or the therapy as a whole.
  • We do not say who can speak when,
  • see them individually first
  • or use any other directive formula.
  • If such devices are suggested by the clients we
    will consider them, but not always agree to them.

29
  • 17. To clarify concepts further
  • We do not think of a couple as being incongruent
    because we do not believe that the couple has an
    Actualising Tendency.
  • We think a couple can have a Formative Tendency,
    but since they have presented for couples
    counselling it may not be present!

30
  • There are some ideas and concepts that some
    therapists use that we do not use at all.
  • We do not think about therapeutic stages.
  • We do not deliberately teach empathic
    understanding, or any special response style to
    clients
  • although we acknowledge that this is sometimes
    the consequence of our work.

31
  • Things we dont do.
  • have a goal of equalising power within the
    couple.
  • look for, or express, hidden meanings,
  • although we may sometimes comment on, and
    clarify, poor communication.

32
  • Things we dont do.
  • Respond to the couple as a whole. The whole is
    simply the sum of the parts!

33
  • Tag counselling.
  • Eddy Moira have been married for 10 years.
  • They have two children aged 8 6.
  • Both feel that they have been drifting apart over
    the last couple of years.
  • Moira has suggested that they come for
    counselling. Eddy didnt think that things were
    that bad, but has agreed to come.

34
  • Each has a secret (or two) which might come out
    in the counselling.
  • Two groups to dream up a secret or two whilst we
    get the furniture ready.
  • We need a man!

35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com