Literacy Inequalities: The Power to Name and Define - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Literacy Inequalities: The Power to Name and Define

Description:

... illustrate the error of ethnocentrism Buddhists relate the story of the turtle and the fish. There was once a turtle who lived in a lake with a group of fish. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: brians52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Literacy Inequalities: The Power to Name and Define


1
Literacy Inequalities The Power to Name and
Define
  • UEA Seminar Oct 1st 2008Brian V Street (Kings
    College London)

2
Contribution of Ethnographic Perspectives to
Literacy Inequalities Debate
  • What is Ethnography?
  • Ethnographic perspectives on Literacy
  • The power to name and define
  • Literacy Inequalities Debates Capabilities
  • Data Hidden Literacies in Pakistan
  • Benefits of literacy in Bangladesh
  • 3 literacies in rural Iran
  • Capabilities and Ethnography building bridges?

3
The Turtle and the Fish
  • To illustrate the error of ethnocentrism
    Buddhists relate the story of the turtle and the
    fish. There was once a turtle who lived in a lake
    with a group of fish. One day the turtle went for
    a walk on dry land. He was away from the lake for
    a few weeks. When he returned he met some of the
    fish. The fish asked him, "Mister turtle, hello!
    How are you? We have not seen you for a few
    weeks. Where have you been? The turtle said, "I
    was up on the land, I have been spending some
    time on dry land." The fish were a little puzzled
    and they said, "Up on dry land? What are you
    talking about? What is this dry land? Is it wet?"
    The turtle said "No, it is not," "Is it cool and
    refreshing?" "No it is not", "Does it have waves
    and ripples?" "No, it does not have waves and
    ripples." "Can you swim in it?" "No you can't" So
    the fish said, "it is not wet, it is not cool
    there are no waves, you cant swim in it. So this
    dry land of yours must be completely
    non-existent, just an imaginary thing, nothing
    real at all." The turtle said that "Well may be
    so" and he left the fish and went for another
    walk on dry land.
  • In another version the fish said Dont tell us
    what it isnt, tell us what it is. I cant
    said the turtle, I dont have any language to
    describe it.
  • This is the version that can help us understand
    what is involved in ethnography. If we go to
    another place, our first inclination is to
    describe it in terms of what it does not have
    that we are used to wet land, waves, for the
    fish maybe science, or coca cola for westerners
    travelling in the East religion or rice for
    Easterners travelling in Europe etc. An
    Ethnographic perspective shifts us out of this
    mind set and helps us firstly to imagine things
    that do not exist in our own world and then to
    understand them in their own terms rather than to
    see them, in our terms, just as deficits.
    Ethnography helps us untie the (k)not

4
What is Ethnography?
  • The Turtle and the Fish
  • Epistemology and Reflexivity
  • Proximity and Distance
  • Green and Bloome ethnographic perspective
  • Mitchell Case Studies

5
Ethnographic perspectives on Literacy
  • Illiteracy / Literacy
  • Ideological vs autonomous models
  • Events and Practices
  • Cultural meanings, varied thresholds

6
The Power to Name and Define eg Culture as a
Verb
  • Part of the problem that besets our current
    efforts to understand culture is the desire to
    define it, to say clearly what it is. To define
    something means to specify its meaning clearly
    enough so that things which are like it can be
    clearly distinguished from it. Clear definitions
    are an essential part of any successful science,
    or of good speech and clear thought'. (Thornton,
    198826). However, the problem is that we tend
    then to believe the categories and definitions we
    construct in an essentialist way, as though we
    had thereby found out what culture is. In fact
    'there is not much point in trying to say what
    culture is... What can be done, however, is to
    say what culture does'. For what culture does is
    precisely the work of 'defining words, ideas,
    things and groups We all live our lives in terms
    of definitions, names and categories that culture
    creates'. The job of studying culture is not of
    finding and then accepting its definitions but of
    'discovering how and what definitions are made,
    under what circumstances and for what reasons'.
    These definitions are used, change and sometimes
    fall into disuse'. Indeed, the very term
    'culture' itself, like these other ideas and
    definitions, changes its meanings and serves
    different often competing purposes at different
    times. Culture is an active process of meaning
    making and contest over definition, including its
    own definition. This, then, is what I mean by
    arguing that we should treat Culture as a verb.
    (Street, B 1993)

7
The Power to Name and Define Literacy and
Inequality
  • Similar arguments can be made with regard to the
    definitions of literacy. Those who hold an
    autonomous model of literacy, for instance,
    might claim that it is not a cultural perspective
    they are adopting but rather a natural, known
    or even objective account. When they compare
    their own literacy practices with those of, for
    instance, Indian villagers or working class
    youths in the US, they can claim that they are
    not being ethnocentric, they are not simply being
    fish demanding that everything look like it does
    from their own wet environment, but rather that
    this is how it is the others are in deficit,
    they lack literacy or proper literacy, or
    functional literacy or other labels that
    qualify the term but retain its narrow focus on
    one way of doing things. This autonomous view
    that literacy in itself, autonomously, defined
    independently of cultural context and meaning,
    will have effects, creating inequality for those
    who lack it and advantages for those who gain
    it is, of course, itself deeply ideological.
    One of the most powerful mechanisms available to
    ideology is to disguise itself (Street, 1993).
    People are rightly suspicious if someone claims
    we should define a phenomenon or act towards it
    in policy terms because it conforms to their own
    cherished customs and beliefs. But if they can
    claim that it is nothing to do with their own
    preconceptions but is instead a natural,
    objective account, then others can be encouraged
    to act upon it, to provide funds to develop this
    view, to agree policy. With respect to literacy
    this means that the power to define and name what
    counts as literacy and illiteracy also leads to
    the power to determine policy, to fund and
    develop literacy programmes in international
    contexts, to prescribe ways of teaching,
    development of educational materials, texts
    books, assessment (cf Campbell, 2008) etc.

8
  • The autonomous model of literacy is in fact an
    ideological model, precisely using the power to
    disguise its own ideology, its own ethnocentrism.
    The ideological model of literacy (Street, 1984)
    seeks to make explicit such underlying
    conceptions and assumptions. Ethnographies of
    literacy drawing upon the ideological model have
    recognised the variety and complexity of what
    counts as literacy, both for the observer and for
    the participant. From this perspective, just as
    'there is not much point in trying to say what
    culture is... What can be done, however, is to
    say what culture does', so, it may be less
    important to say what literacy is than what it
    does. Literacy, like culture, then, is an active
    process of meaning making and contest over
    definition, including its own definition. But
    international agencies and, I would argue, those
    in the Inequalities and the Capabilities
    field, try to define what literacy is, not just
    what it does, in order to be able to then say
    what are the benefits of having it and to argue
    for the deficit in the lives of those who dont
    have it. In terms of universal values, as
    Nussbaum would have it, equality depends upon
    having first defined what it is that is unequal.
    What counts as inequality in this case,
    however, depends crucially on who has the power
    to name and define what counts as literacy and
    what theoretical and conceptual frames they draw
    upon. So, from this perspective, inequality is
    not simply a given that we, as moral and
    committed reformers need to respond to, but a
    construct that needs careful analysis and
    justification. Practitioners, policy makers and
    researchers alike, then, need to address, both
    the construct of literacy and the construct of
    inequality. I will argue that if the
    Inequalities proponents were to shift perspective
    from what literacy is to what literacy does there
    may be more scope for such a questioning and for
    a meeting of the two fields that of Literacy
    Inequality and that of Ethnographies of literacy.

9
Hidden Literacies case studies from Pakistan
  • .. several of the case study respondents assert
    strongly that they are illiterate, perhaps
    because they have never been to school or adult
    literacy class. I am not educated and cannot
    read and write, says Amen the vegetable seller,
    and he repeats it I am not educated and cannot
    read and write but that does not mean that I am a
    fool and have no wisdom. Zia the plumber is
    stronger in his self-identification I told
    you, I have never been to school, so how can I
    read and write? was his answer to the
    researchers question, Can you read and write?
    He was even more assertive when challenged by
    the researcher
  • You can write very well, why did you say you
    are Jahil illiterate?
  • I do not have any certificate or paper to show
    that I am literate, which means I am illiterate.
    People who are educated like you call me
    illiterate. Educated people's decision about me
    perhaps is right, I am illiterate.
  • I said, Illiterates cannot read and write but
    you can, so you are literate.
  • He said, Bibi, I feel good. when you say I am
    literate.
  • (Rafat Nabi (forthcoming) Hidden Literacies)

10
  • Shazia the domestic servant too asserts that she
    is uneducated when asked to show something she
    had written, she replied, You are highly
    educated and I have not even attended a school,
    you will laugh at me. And Amen repeats himself,
    as so often I did not see the inside of a
    school. So people regard me as illiterate.
    Their lack of literacy skills is perceived as a
    stigma and a disadvantage. And yet they all
    write and read many things.
  • And Zia said, When people ask me, I give them
    a receipt, and I write down all the names of the
    parts which I purchased, their cost and my labour
    charges. I am no longer handicapped. I can do
    my job very well. With on-the-job practice, I am
    able to read and write.
  • Shazia read the schedule in the kitchen on which
    the family members had indicated their breakfast
    preferences and the spice container labels she
    wrote a brief message about a phone call and a
    shopping list of ingredients for a meal, and she
    kept a notebook of the items taken by the
    cleaner. But if the researcher had asked her
    what she was doing on each occasion, she would
    not have said reading or writing but simply
    preparing breakfast, answering the telephone
    or dealing with the cleaner. The literacy
    practices were so deeply embedded that they had
    become unconscious.

11
  • Likewise, the experience of Rozina, a dyer who
    learned the literacy practices necessary for her
    trade from colleagues not from a formal class,
    leads Rafat to reflect on the ways in which
    literacy programmes, including her own, have been
    defined and implemented
  • How can a literacy course be developed keeping
    the local knowledge and practices in mind? Can
    one type of literacy be effective for the entire
    nation? How can literacy courses preserve
    indigenous knowledge and transfer this knowledge
    to the next generation? Is a literacy centre
    necessary or are there other alternative ways of
    learning, as Rozina learned from her colleagues?
  • Are policy makers whole heartedly learning the
    lessons from Rozina, that literacy can go beyond
    centres and beyond primers and attendance
    registers? A profound question to ponder. Where
    does this example of social literacy fit into the
    broader literacy scenario?

12
Literacy Inequalities
  • Cf Maddox, Nussbaum, Sen
  • Inequalities approaches Returns rights
    capabilities
  • The capabilities approach is fully universal
    the capabilities in question are held to be
    important for each and every citizen, in each and
    every nation, and each is to be treated as an
    end (Nussbaum, 2006, p. 78).
  • Sen also notes the incompatibility of
    inequalities in basic capabilities with effective
    human development (Maddox, 2008,p. 189).

13
Reconciling Capabilities and Ethnographic
Perspectives
  • Maddox field work in Bangladesh two field sites
    where local people Kamrul a rickshaw driver
    and Halima a married woman - both struggle with
    poverty and attain some literacy to try to
    overcome it. In both cases they made some gains,
    such as confidence and engagement with
    shopkeepers credit systems, although they were
    both living in poverty still when he revisited
    them some years after his initial fieldwork. He
    uses this evidence to try to link ethnographic
    perspectives with the Capabilities approach.
  • For Kamrul, for instance, despite remaining
    vulnerable to accidents and ill health
    Nevertheless as a threshold of capability,
    literacy had contributed to his well being and
    that of his family. Some of the changes were
    linked to doing literacy, instrumental
    functionings and their benefits. Other benefits
    were less tangible, namely those related to
    self-confidence and social status (Maddox, 2008,
    p. 199). For Maddox, then, there may be more than
    one threshold for literacy

14
Bridging?
  • Whilst welcoming Maddoxs attempt to bridge the
    divide between the Capabilities approach and
    Ethnography, I wonder how far Nussbaum and Sen
    would be willing to make a similar move in his
    direction, to accept multiple literacies and
    multiple thresholds for instance.
  • The people Maddox describes in Bangladesh and
    those in Rafat Nabis account of Pakistan, would
    I suspect be unlikely to count in their single
    threshold definition of literacy capabilities.
  • Their accounts depend on literacy rates which are
    already pre-defined as a particular kind. The
    very local and often minimal uses of literacy
    described by Maddox and Nabi would not pass the
    tests set by agencies assessing peoples
    literacy skills.
  • As Campbell notes in Measures of Success
    (2007), the Types of Assessment Tools used in
    one size fits all standard measurements can be
    characterised as standardised, diagnostic,
    competence and performance.
  • The importance of statistically normed
    definitions of universal literacy are not at all
    the same as ethnographic accounts of the uses and
    meanings of literacy in different contexts, of
    the kind described by Maddox for Bangladesh and
    Nabi for Pakistan. If for Nussbaum adult
    literacy rates indicate the number of people who
    have (or have not) been able to achieve the
    minimum threshold of capability (p. 201), and
    Sens accounts describe the intrinsic and
    instrumental benefits of literacy, then where
    would they and others in the international field
    locate these people?

15
Questions
  • Where do Kamrul and Halima in Bangladesh or Amen
    and Zia in Pakistan figure in the debates about
    literacy inequalities?
  • Do they fit claims about literacy and its
    impact?
  • Do they have the capabilities defined by
    Nussbaum and Sen?
  • Do they pass the threshold defined for
    universal good?
  • Are the ethnographers being relativist
  • Should policy and programmes start from local
    meanings or universal definitions?
  • Does the literacy debate signal issues that need
    addressing with regard to other capabilities
    poverty, gender, power?

16
Literacy Inequalities Some References
  • Barton,D Hamilton,M (Eds.) 2000 Situated
    Literacies Reading And Writing In Context
    Routledge London
  • Barton, D, Ivanic, R, Appleby, Y, Hodge,R And
    Tusting, K 2007 Literacy, Lives And Learning
    Routledge London
  • Blommaert, J 2004 Writing As A Problem African
    Grassroots Writing, Economies Of Literacy, And
    Globalization Language In Society 33, 643-671
  • Brandt,D Clinton,K 2002 'Limits Of The Local
    Expanding Perspectives On Literacy As A Social
    Practice' In Journal Of Literacy Research Vol 34
    No 3 Pp 337-356
  • Campbell, P. 2007 Measures Of Success
    Assessment And Accountability In Adult Basic
    Education Ed. Grass Roots Press Edmonton,
    Alberta
  • Doronilla,M.L 1996 Landscapes of Literacy an
    ethnographic study of functional literacy in
    marginal Philippine communities UIE Hamburg
  • EFA 2006 Literacy for Life Global Monitoring
    Report Unesco Paris
  • Heath,S.B. 1983 Ways with Words CUP Cambridge
  • Maddox, B 2008 What good is literacy? Insights
    and Implications of the Capabilities Approach
    Journal of Human Development Vol. 9 No. 2 pp.
    185-206
  • Nussbaum, M 2006 Frontiers of Justice
    Disability, Nationality, Species Membership.
    Belknap, Harvard MA
  • Pahl,K And Rowsell, J (2006) eds Travel Notes
    from the New Literacy Studies Case Studies in
    Practice. Clevedon Multilingual Matters
  • Parkin,D (1984) 'Political Language', Annual
    Review of Anthropology, 13345-65
  • Petersen, C 2004 Report on Uppingham Seminar
    Measuring Literacy Meeting in Collision November
    2003 UppSem http//www.uppinghamseminars.org/repor
    t_2003.htm
  • Prinsloo, M Baynham, M 2008 Literacies, Global
    and Local J Benjamins Amsterdam
  • Robinson-Pant, A 2004 ed. Women, Literacy and
    Development Alternative Perspectives Routledge,
    London
  • Rogers Alan 2002 Teaching Adults Buckingham
    Open University Press
  • Rogers Alan 2004 Non-formal Education flexible
    schooling or participatory education? Dordrecht
    Kluwer and Hong Kong Hong Kong University Press
  • Rogers, A and Street, B (forthcoming)
    Practitioners As Researchers Adult Literacy
    Facilitators In Developing Societies And The
    Letter Project Studies in the Education of
    Adults
  • Sen, A.K. 2002 Rationality and Freedom Harvard
    UP Cambridge MA

17
Ethnographic Accounts of Literacy
  • Aikman,S 1999 Intercultural education and
    literacy an ethnographic study of indigenous
    knowledge and learning in the Peruvian Amazon
    Benjamins Amsterdam
  • Besnier,N 1995 Literacy, emotion and authority
    reading and writing on a Polynesian atoll
    Cambridge University Press Cambridge
  • Collins,J 1998 Understanding Tolowa Histories
    western hegemonies and Native American response
    Routledge NY
  • Doronilla,M.L 1996 Landscapes of Literacy an
    ethnographic study of funcitonal literacy in
    marginal Philippine communities UIE Hamburg
  • Hornberger,N (ed.) 1998 Language Planning from
    the Bottom up Indigenous Literacies in the
    Americas, Mouton de Gruyter Berlin
  • Kalman,J 1999 Writing on the Plaza mediated
    literacy practices among scribes and clients in
    Mexico city Hampton Press Cresskill NJ
  • King,L 1994 Roots of Identity language and
    literacy in Mexico Stanford University Press
    Stanford
  • Maddox,B 2001 Literacy and the market the
    economic uses of literacy among the peasantry in
    north-west Bangladesh in Street,B ed. Literacy
    and development ed. 2001 Routledge London pp.
    137-151
  • Nabi, R (with Rogers, A and Street, B)
    (forthcoming) Hidden Literacies ethnographic
    studies of literacy and numeracy practices in
    Pakistan.
  • Nirantar 2007 Exploring the Everyday
    ethnographic approaches to literacy and numeracy
    Delhi Nirantar/ ASPBAE http//uppinghamseminars.c
    om/page2.htm
  • Prinsloo,M Breier,M 1996 The Social Uses of
    Literacy Benjamins/Sacched
  • Robinson-Pant, A ed. 2004 Women, Literacy and
    Development Alternative Perspectives (Routledge,
    London)
  • Robinson-Pant,A 1997 Why Eat green Cucumbers at
    the Time of Dying? The Link between Womens
    Literacy and Development Unesco Hamburg
  • Rogers, A ed 2005 Urban Literacy communication,
    identity and learning in Development Contexts
    UIE Hamburg
  • Street, B, Baker, D. ,Rogers, A 2006  Adult
    teachers as researchers ethnographic approaches
    to numeracy and literacy as social practices in
    South Asia Convergence  Vol XXXIX (1) pp. 31-44
  • Wagner,D 1993 Literacy, Culture and Development
    becoming literate in Morocco Cambridge University
    Press Cambridge
  • Wagner D.A 2004 Literacy(ies), culture(s), and
    development(s) The ethnographic challenge
  • Reading Research Quarterly, 1 April 2004, vol.
    39, no. 2, pp. 234-241(8)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com