ISG Agenda

1
ISG Agenda

• Welcome/Introductions
• Organization Briefings (5-15 minutes/briefing)
• ITEA-Erik Kjonnerod
• State Department Resource Management-David Becker
• Institute for Defense Analyses-Scott Feil
• Humanitarian Information Unit-Doug Nash
• Training Transformation TIM2 Hank Richmond
• Discussion

2
Interagency Planning Proposals to Increase
Foreign Affairs Collaboration
Presentation to Interagency Transformation,
Education and After Action Review David C.
Becker, Office of Strategic and Performance
Planning [phone] BeckerDC_at_State.gov June
28, 2005
3
Objective is to explore State proposed approaches
for increased interagency collaboration

• Interagency Scenario-Based Planning
• Collaborative development of future-oriented
  interagency strategies using scenario planning
  techniques
• Global Affairs Dashboard
• Planning and performance information integrated
  across agencies to support better decision-making
  
• Pilot State/DOD Strategic Planning Working Group
• Mechanism to address long-term planning and
  transformational issues improving the networks

4
In addition to USAID, we have discussed increased
coordination with other USG partners

• Department of Defense
• Department of the Treasury
• Department of Commerce
• Department of Homeland Security
• Department of Justice
• Central Intelligence Agency
• Department of Health and Human Services
• Department of Education
• Department of Energy
• Department of Labor
• Department of Agriculture
• Department of Interior

• Millennium Challenge Corp.
• Environmental Protection Agency
• Trade and Development Agency
• U.S Trade Representative
• Export-Import Bank
• Overseas Private Investment Corporation
• African Development Foundation
• Inter-American Foundation
• National Endowment for Democracy
• Peace Corps
• Institute of Peace

5
A new way to look at our business linkages of
strategic goals and objectives give new insights
6
State is leading/proposing three specific
interagency efforts to improve strategic planning
collaboration

• Project Horizon
• Scenario-based interagency strategic planning
• Global Affairs Dashboard
• Sharing of data to better inform resource and
  policy decisions
• State/DOD Strategic Planning Working Group
• A pilot effort to further align defense and
  diplomacy

7
Project Horizon
8
Project Horizon will bring together USG global
affairs agencies for joint, scenario-based
planning

• Purpose
• A unified, repeatable planning process that would
  support both interagency and intra-agency
  planning
• Participants
• Will bring USG senior executives, planners, and
  policy experts together with academics and
  private sector participants

• Results
• Interagency strategies and solutions
  stress-tested for robustness
• Individual agencies can then customize and use
  the scenarios to conduct their own internal
  planning

The effort would enable USG global affairs
agencies to plan jointly for the horizon of
threats and opportunities facing our nation
9
Project Horizon participants will include a range
of USG organizations with global responsibilities

• Tier 1
• Confirmed
• Department of State
• Department of Agriculture
• Department of Commerce
• Department of Defense
• Department of Energy
• Department of Homeland Security
• Intelligence Community
• USAID
• Deciding
• HHS
• Justice
• Treasury

• Tier 2
• Confirmed
• Millennium Challenge Corporation
• Department of Labor
• ITEA
• Deciding
• Department of Education
• Department of Transportation
• Environmental Protection Agency
• Inter-American Foundation

10
Scenario-based planning is highly inclusive,
future-oriented and focused on prioritizing
strategies

• Scenario-Based Strategic Planning
• A methodology by which organizations develop and
  test strategies using a systematically created
  range of alternative futures or scenarios
• Scenarios are detailed descriptions of operating
  environments that organizations might face 5 to
  25 years in the future

• The National Intelligence Councils recent
  Mapping the Global Future report provides
  examples of scenarios
• Davos World, Pax Americana, A New Caliphate,
  Cycle of Fear
• A recognized best-practice
• Private Sector Royal Dutch Shell, Ford,
  Deloitte, and Merrill Lynch
• Public Sector US Coast Guard, DoD, Intelligence
  Community

11
Scenario planning generates strategies for the
present based on analysis of the future

• This approach avoids the incrementalism of
  traditional annual planning

Where can we be next year?
GOAL
GOAL
Versus
What should we do?
And the next?
Where we
Where we
are now
are now
TIME
TIME
Keeping Ahead
Incrementalism
Scenario Planning
Annual Planning
12
Testing strategies provides a systematic basis
for prioritizing among the associated investments
Linear planning assumes a future
Most Likely Future
Today
MasterPlan
Scenario planning uses a range of potential
futures
Alternative Futures
Core Strategies Viable Across the Range of
Potential Futures
Today
13
Project Timeline
14
Global Affairs Dashboard
15
Dashboard provides access to planning,
performance, and resource data by bureau,
mission, and goal
Pilot/Prototype System and Data For Discussion
Purposes Only
16
Department View provides high-level enterprise
resource, performance, and PART data
Pilot/Prototype System and Data For Discussion
Purposes Only
17
Towards an Interagency Global Affairs Dashboard

• Purpose
• Create an integrated, accessible repository of
  the activities of global affairs agencies to
  enhance operational and strategic planning
  coordination across USG
• For strategic planners seeking to understand the
  goals and programs of other agencies to inform
  their planning
• For operational staff seeking support in specific
  countries or goal areas
• For senior executives seeking to the leverage the
  experience and expertise of USG agencies in a
  given regional or strategic area
• Approach
• For participating agencies, capture select
  information by country
• Programs
• Associated Strategic Goal Linkages
• Associated Key Contacts
• Secure, role-based access to data for all
  participating agencies

18
State/DOD Strategic Planning Working Group
19
The National Security Strategy is based on three
pillars Development, Diplomacy, and Defense

• Current State/USAID coordination addresses
  Diplomacy and Development
• Improved State/DOD coordination is needed to
  address Defense

Development
Diplomacy
Defense

• Phase 1 De-conflicting
• Ad hoc coordination as needed
• Phase 2 Coordinating
• Joint State/USAID Strategic Plan
• Common strategic planning framework
• Joint Policy Council
• Joint Management Council
• Phase 3 Unity of Effort
• Phase 4 Creating Coherence

• Phase 1 De-conflicting
• Ad hoc coordination as needed
• Phase 2 Coordinating
• Enhanced State/DOD Coordination
• State/DOD Strategic Planning Working Group
• Mutual input to respective Strategic Plans
• Phase 3 Unity of Effort
• Phase 4 Creating Coherence

Current Activities
Proposed Activities
20
A Pilot Strategic Planning Working Group would
further align diplomacy and defense

• Current State/DOD planning is focused on
  short-term issues
• Ongoing security cooperation (PM)
• Post conflict reconstruction and stabilization
  (S/CRS)
• Limited mission and bureau planning coordination
  
• State/DOD Strategic Planning Group would focus on
  longer-term strategic and performance planning
  issues
• Joint review of strategic goal alignment and
  identification of program areas needing increased
  regional or functional coordination
• Participation in developing respective Strategic
  Plans
• Formalize planning coordination via
  Mission/Bureau Performance Plans and Theater
  Security Cooperation plans
• Develop common or complementary performance
  indicators
• Determine scope and process to share planning
  data
• Review benefits of broader State/DOD Joint
  Coordination Council

21
Return to Agenda Slide
22
Think Spatially!USG Interagency Community
Training Exercise and Technical
DemonstrationSeptember 20-22, 2005National
Defense University, Washington, DCIn-Progress
Review 217 June 2005
23
Exercise Objectives

• To increase understanding of the value of
  collecting and sharing data across the various
  phases of humanitarian relief, reconstruction and
  stabilization continuum
• To demonstrate technologies, methods and
  standards for collection, analysis and
  dissemination of data and derived products
• Key Supporting Tasks
• Collect and share standardized HA/DR and SR
  data
• Demonstrate best practices in information
  management
• Allow hands-on use of information
  communications technology
• (ICT) in the field in a collaborative
  information environment
• Develop information analysis and GIS products
  in the field
• Field testing of draft ICT Primer

24
Exercise Schedule

• Day 1 Set-up Day Setting up of Humanitarian
  Assistance Coordination Center (HACC) tent,
  equipment and wireless network by HIU and invited
  participants (OFDA, UN, NGOs, DoD, HIU)
• Day 2 Exercise Day Other participants invited
  for Day 2 to participate in exercise in data
  collection and analysis as part of the HACC
  (Hands-on training)
• Day 3 Observation day Strategically invited
  senior level officials invited to observe
  progress of exercise as part of NDU CTNSP
  Workshop series.

25
Exercise Map of Costa Verde

Colombo
Puerto Mojito
North Costa Verde
San Felipe
South Costa Verde
Naranja
HACC
Escambia
Freelandia
26
Sample of GIS COP Product
27
Exercise Concept
Response Cell Exercise Control
Field Team 2
Field Team 1
Field Team 3
HACC
WiFi Network and Internet

• Several teams will roam to collect data and
  information using a variety of tools
• Teams will transmit results to HACC using a
  variety of means (cell phone,
• INMARSAT, VSAT etc.)
• Reps inside HACC will share information using
  best IM practices with others and
• use data to build variety of analytical graphic
  products using GIS and other tools
• Teams will communicate with home offices using
  collaborative tools such as
• IWS via VSAT

28
Questions?
29
Return to Agenda Slide
30
TIM2 Task Force
TIM2 Update for ITEA Interagency
Steering Group June 28, 2005
31
TIM2 Task Force Current Activities

• Expanding agencies and organizations
  participating in TIM2 effort
• Developing approach/plan to address interagency
  coordination/cooperation with senior USG agencies
  officials
• Investigating technical challenges and solutions
  for permitting Interagency Community
  communications and collaboration
• Coordinating with DOS and USG agencies partners
  on Strategic Planning collaboration
• Synchronizing supporting capabilities and tasks
  for Homeland Security and Homeland Defense with
  DHS, as well as ensuring better alignment for
  conducting operations with Federal, State, and
  Local agencies

32
TIM2 Near-Term Way Ahead

• UJTL-UTL Synchronization working group meetings
  w/DHS
• Strategic Planning collaboration with DOS/USAID
  (June 8) and with other USG Agencies (mid-Sept
  TBD) both at FMCS Headquarters
• TIM2 Media Outreach via various publications
  (starting summer 2005)
• Development of approach and plan to take
  Interagency Coordination and Cooperation issue to
  senior leadership across USG Agencies
• Coordination within DoD of proposed Capabilities
  and Tasks for addition to or revision within UJTL
  and vetting with Interagency Community partners
  for subsequent introduction into JTS (beginning
  August)
• Coordination of TIM2 initiatives with all
  supporting T2 Capability Offices
• Work with Joint Staff J-7, JFCOM, and Services on
  education and training requirements and
  implementation plans to prepare for Joint
  operations with Interagency Community partners

33
TIM2 Calendar of Events

• Development of approach and plan to take
  Interagency coordination and cooperation to
  senior leadership across USG Agencies and to DC
  (June 29)
• TIM2 DoD SG (July 7(T)) and TIM2 USG Agencies SG
  (July 21 (T))
• UJTL-UTL Synchronization sub-working group
  meeting w/ DHS (August TBD)
• Introduction into Joint Training System of
  proposed Capabilities and Tasks for addition to
  or revision within UJTL (beginning August 2-3 at
  JFCOM)
• State/USAID Joint Strategic Plan FY 06-11 draft
  review and collaboration (by invitation) with
  other USG Agencies at FMCS Headquarters (Sept
  14/15)
• TIM2 DoD ESG (Sept20(T)) and TIM2 USG Agencies
  ESG (Sept 27 (T))
• Work with Joint Staff J-7, JFCOM and Services in
  education and training requirements and
  implementation plans to prepare for Joint
  operations with Interagency Community Partners
  (October TBD)

34
TIM2 Task Force Issues

• Establishment of functioning Interagency
  coordination process for USG
• OSD policy (directive) on Interagency Operations
• Interagency Team Building
• Technical Challenges
• Need for long-term, future vision with a
  strategic perspective

35
TIM2 Missions

• Colonel Pat Kelly
• 703-614-4535
• Patrick.kelly_at_osd.mil
• Hank Richmond
• 703-575-2817
• Hrichmond_at_alionscience.com
• Richard Keller
• 703-575-2885
• Rkeller_at_alionscience.com
• Jack Coyne
• 703-575-3284
• Jjcoyne_at_alionscience.com
• Jane Miller Floyd
• 202-685-2634
• Floydj_at_ndu.edu

• Current, mandated role from DoD Training
  Transformation plans Develop capabilities and
  tasks for conducting broader, more inclusive
  Joint operations with interagency community
  partners
• Broader, longer-term implied role Contribute
  to overall synchronization of homeland and
  national security preparation and operations in
  conjunction with U.S. Government Agencies and
  other participants in the Interagency Community