Levente Salat - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Levente Salat

Description:

Social-Democratic Party of Roma. 11. 96. 9. 1. Democratic Forum of Germans. 112. 2481. 186 ... It is the most stable party in the Romanian Parliament: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: rar5
Category:
Tags: levente | salat

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Levente Salat


1
Forum Minority Research Institute,
Somorja Effective Participation of Minorities in
Decision-Making in Matters Affecting Them
Conceptual questions, international documents,
case studies Minority participation Romanian
case study House of the Hungarian Culture,
Budapest May 15-16, 2008
Levente Salat Ethnocultural Diversity Resource
Center, Cluj, Romania www.edrc.ro
2
The structure of the presentation
  • 1. The context
  • 2. Theoretical premises
  • 3. The Romanian minority regime
  • 4. Assessment of the Romanian minority regime
  • 5. Conclusions

3
  • The Context

4

1.1. Ethnic structure of Romania in 2002



5

1.2. The main ethnic communities of the country
in 2002

  • The 87 ethnic groups in Europe form 337
    communities officially recognized by the state on
    the territory of which they live.
  • The largest number of recognized communities is
    to be found in Russia (45), followed by Ukraine
    (23) and Romania (20).
  • In Romania, recognition has two aspects of the
    census and political representation in the
    Romanian Parliament.
  • In 2002, the total population of Romania was
    21,680,974 out which 10.53 belonged to one of
    the following minorities



6
1.3. The ethnodemographic evolution in
Transylvania 1918-2002

7
1.4. The ethnodemographic evolution in Cluj
1910-2002

8
1.5. Types of minority communities in Romania
9
1.6. Post-1989 political performance of
Romania Freedom House, 2007
10
  • Theoretical premises

11
2.1. Theoretical premises
  • Types of ethnic politics
  • Integrative demands focus on the changed role of
    the group within existing institutions, the
    target is to expand policy outputs, without
    institutional change
  • Particularistic demands for distinct treatment
    which yield institutional change necessary within
    the political entity (constitutional change,
    autonomy, federalism)
  • Disintegrative the legitimacy of the
    multinational political entity is challenged by
    groups seeking external self-determination
  • M. Keating, 1996

12

2.2. Theoretical premises
  • Aspects of representation
  • Authorization the constituency is a cohesive
    group with a single will which can convey the
    representative a mandate, based on which the
    representative can act in the name of the
    represented
  • Accountability the representative is expected to
    account for the policy outcomes of the
    representation
  • Types of representation
  • Interests whatever is necessary or desirable in
    order to realize the ends of the agent (material
    resources, cultural expression, political
    influence, economic decision-making, etc.)
  • Opinions principles, values, priorities which
    condition the agents judgment on what policies
    should deliver
  • Perspectives assumptions, experiences produced
    by structural social position, with which
    reasoning begins, rather than conclusions are
    drawn
  • I. M. Young, 2000

13
2.3. Theoretical premises
  • Forms of representation
  • Descriptive/substantive
  • Descriptive, or mirror representation (large
    number of minority members in legislature)
  • Substantive representation (role-call votes that
    address minority issues)
  • Active/passive
  • Passive representation (the descriptive aspect
    prevails, the effect of representation is
    ignored, representation is an end in itself)
  • Active representation (purposeful action taken by
    the representative on behalf of those
    represented, on the bases of common values that
    result from common origin)
  • H. Pitkin, 1967, K. J. Meier, 1993

14
2.4. Theoretical premises
  • Full and effective participation of minorities,
  • as stipulated in Article 15 of the FCNM
  • State construction
  • the right of members of ethnic, religious and
    linguistic minorities to participate in the
    definition of the economic, social and political
    system of the State and the democratic process
  • the way in which the state is constructed should
    not result in the disenfranchisement of minority
    communities
  • Executive representation
  • members of ethnic and national minorities should
    be able to exercise public functions at all
    levels of the State, in adequate numbers
  • territorial and functional layering of the
    entitlements is necessary in territories or
    policy areas (culture, education, language,
    media) of special concern for the minorities
  • Equal chances
  • members of minority communities should enjoy the
    full range of cultural social and economic
    benefits of the State, both by public and private
    agencies.
  • M. Weller, 2004

15
2.5. Theoretical premises
  • From the two aspects of representation, the
    authorization is usually stronger than the
    accountability checks
  • When minority representation is mainly
    descriptive, the tendency is that there will be
    fewer total members of the legislative who
    support policy initiatives that the minority
    representatives promote
  • The minority representation tends to become
    passive and representation remains an end in
    itself, without delivering the expected outcomes,
    especially in terms of participation in the state
    construction or in the executive.

16
  • The Romanian minority regime

17
3.1. The Romanian minority regime
  • International legal documents
  • Relevant domestic legislation
  • State institutions in charge with minority and
    interethnic issues

18

3.2. International legal documents



19


3.3. Domestic legal system general overview
  • For the time being, Romania has an extensive,
    however, slightly incoherent legal system
    relevant to the situation of ethnic, religious
    and linguistic minorities.
  • The Ethocultural Diversity Resource Center, in
    partnership with the Research Institute on Ethnic
    and National Minorities of the Hungarian Academy
    of Science has compiled a database containing 176
    legal documents including the Constitution,
    laws, governmental decisions, decrees,
    ordinances, etc with at least some relevance to
    the situation of ethnic minorities.
  • The database is available at http//www.edrc.ro/pr
    ojects.jsp?project_id53


20

3.4. Domestic legal system most import legal
instruments
  • Legal instruments facilitating political
    participation
  • Law on the elections for the Chamber of deputies
    and the Senate (29. 09. 2004)
  • Law on the election of local administrative
    authorities (29. 03. 2004)
  • Language rights
  • Romanian Constitution (31. 10. 2003)
  • Law on local public administration (23. 04. 2001)
  • Law regarding the organization of the judiciary
    (28. 06. 2004)
  • Law on the Status of Policemen (24. 06. 2002)
  • Law on the Status of Civil Servants (republished
    22. 03. 2004)
  • Educational rights
  • Law on Education (23. 06. 1999 amended in 2003)
  • Property restitution
  • Law on the approval of the GD 112/1998 on the
    restitution of premises that belonged to the
    communities (organizations, religious cults) of
    national minorities in Romania (17. 04. 2002)
  • Access to mass media
  • Audiovisual Law (22. 07. 2002)
  • Antidiscrimination
  • Law on the approval of GD 137/2000 on preventing
    and punishing all forms of discrimination (31.
    01. 2002)
  • Legal instruments aiming to improve the situation
    of Roma
  • Decision on the approval of the Government
    Strategy for Improving the Conditions of Roma
    (16. 05. 2001)


21

3.5. Domestic legal system consequences of the
laws facilitating political participation (2004
elections)


22

3.6. Relevant institutions
  • The Governmental Department for Inter-Ethnic
    Relations
  • Created according to GD 13/2001
  • Subordinated to the Prime Minister and
    coordinated by the General Secretariat of the
    Government
  • Lead by a Secretary of State, includes
    under-secretariats in charge with Hungarian,
    German and Roma minorities
  • Promotes and develops programs aiming at
    guaranteeing, preserving, expressing, ethnic,
    cultural, linguistic and religious identity of
    persons belonging to national minorities.
  • Council of National Minorities
  • An advisory body of the Government, functioning
    in accordance with GD 589/2001, coordinated by
    the Department for Inter-Ethnic Relations
  • It comprises 19 member organizations,
    representing 20 national minorities
  • Its main functions are to facilitate the contact
    between the Government and the organizations of
    national minorities, by forwarding proposals to
    the Government, and by channeling the state
    subsidies provided for minority organizations (in
    2004 its overall budget was 240 billion ROL,
    which equaled approximately to 7 million EUR).
  • National Council for Combating Discrimination
  • It carries out its activities on the basis of the
    GO 137/2000 regarding the prevention and
    sanctioning of all forms of discrimination, and
    GD 1194/2001 regarding the organization and
    functioning of the council
  • Its activity is coordinated by a Steering Board,
    with 7 members nominated by the ministries with
    attribution in the filed and approved by the
    Prime Minister
  • In 2003 it received 436 petitions, out of which
    283 were resolved, in 2004, 269 petitions were
    received, 189 resolved.
  • National Agency for the Roma
  • Created in 2005, on the basis of the Law on the
    approval of the EO of the Government 78/2004
  • Coordinated by the General Secretariat of the
    Government
  • It is in charge with coordinating, monitoring and
    evaluating the implementation of the Governments
    Strategy for Improving the Conditions of Roma.


23
  • Assessment of the Romanian
  • minority regime

24

4.1. General assessment of the Romanian minority
regime
  • The Romanian minority regime provides different
    results for the three different types of
    minorities in Romania
  • A successful accommodation for small minorities
    (below 62.000 members)
  • Through political participation
  • Education in mother tongue
  • Cultural subsidies
  • A comprehensive, though largely inefficient
    protective measures for the Roma community
  • Antidiscrimination
  • Positive discrimination in access to tertiary
    education
  • Governmental strategy for the improvement of the
    condition of Roma
  • Extensive political, educational and linguistic
    rights provided for the Hungarian minority, which
    fall short, however, as compared to the
    expectations of the members of the community
  • Representation in the Parliament and local public
    administration
  • Participation in the Government
  • Extended primary and secondary education system,
    fair access to tertiary education
  • Language rights in the public administration,
    judiciary, police
  • State funded cultural institutions
  • Access to mass media


25
4.2. Assessment of the minority representation 1
26
4.3. Assessment of the minority representation 2
27

4.4. The paradox of ethnic politics
  • The political organization of the Hungarian
    minority in Romania (UDMR/RMDSZ) has an
    outstanding record in the Romanian post-1989
    party system
  • It is the most stable party in the Romanian
    Parliament
  • It is the only political organizations which has
    been for three consecutive mandates on the side
    of the power
  • 1996-2000 member of the governing coalition
  • 2000-2004 member of the majority in the
    parliament
  • 2004- member of the governing
    coalition
  • In spite of this unique performance, the major
    political objectives of the Hungarian minority
    could not be achieved.


28
  • Conclusions

29
Conclusion
  • The more aspects and dimensions of representation
    we consider, the less evident is what counts for
    effective minority representation
  • Romania offers an interesting example of full and
    effective minority representation which falls
    short, however, if efficiency is considered, too.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com