MRP vs. Advanced Supply Chain Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

MRP vs. Advanced Supply Chain Planning

Description:

Lead times are always variable and dependant on other jobs on factory floor ... Accurately models the stochastic nature of a manufacturing plant ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2736
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: carrie47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MRP vs. Advanced Supply Chain Planning


1
MRP vs. Advanced Supply Chain Planning
  • NCOAUG
  • March 3, 2003
  • Presenter
  • Dan Vanden Brink

2
Outline
  • Review MRP/MRP II
  • Review JIT/Toyota Production System
  • Advanced Production System
  • Constraint Based
  • Linear Programming
  • Simulation Based

3
Advanced Planning and Scheduling
  • Current Planning Techniques
  • MRP/MRP II
  • Toyota Production System
  • Problems with Current Systems
  • Constraint Based Planning Systems
  • Linear Programming Based System
  • Simulation based planning
  • The Future...

4
MRP
  • Developed as an offshoot of Financial and
    Inventory Transaction Software
  • Bill of Material Driven
  • Lead Time Based Calculations
  • Push System
  • Time Buckets

5
MRP
6
MRP Problems
  • Capacity Infeasibility
  • Long Lead Times
  • Lead Times Fixed
  • Planners cover themselves with long lead times
  • Schedule Instability

7
System Instability - Example
  • Reduction in demand actually switches a feasible
    MRP run into an infeasible run
  • Reduce demand in period 2 from 24 to 23
  • Fixed Order Period Lot Sizing of 5 periods
  • One unit of A requires one unit of B
  • A has a lead time of 2 periods
  • B has a lead time of 4 periods

8
System Instability - Example
9
System Instability - Example
10
MRP II
  • Reduces Problems seen in MRP
  • Capacity
  • Rough Cut Capacity Planning
  • Capacity Resource Planning
  • Time Fences

11
Capacity Requirements Planning
12
Pros of MRP (II)
  • Easy to use/understand
  • Many packages available
  • Workforce well training in the Mechanics of MRP
  • Excellent at aggregating Material Requirements

13
Cons of MRP (II)
  • Reduces, but does not eliminate problems seen in
    MRP
  • Still assumes fixed lead times
  • Capacity Planning does not offer solution or
    feasible production plan
  • Not interactive - no what-if planning is
    possible
  • Long processing time

14
Cons w/ MRP (II)
  • Lead time assumption
  • Lead times are always variable and dependant on
    other jobs on factory floor
  • Planners increase lead times to insure that
    product is available
  • Increased lead times increases inventory and WIP
  • Increased / Inventory / WIP clogs production and
    increases actual lead times

15
Toyota Production System
  • Developed by Taiichi Ohno in 1950s for Toyota
  • System wide approach, not just scheduling
  • Just in time material/production
  • Autonomation
  • Automated
  • Foolproof

16
TPS Goals
  • Reduce variability
  • Zero Defects
  • Zero Surging
  • Zero Set Ups
  • Zero Breakdowns
  • Zero Handling
  • Zero Lead Time
  • Zero Lot Size
  • Results in Inventory

17
TPS Goals
  • Capacity Buffers also required for Zero
    Inventories

18
TPS vs. MRP
19
Pros of JIT/TPS
  • Complete System Improvements
  • Scheduling only one aspect of TPS
  • Improvements in Quality
  • Improvements in Machine Uptime
  • Improvements in Morale
  • No large IT system required
  • Data integrity for inventory and BOMs not as
    important

20
Problems with TPS
  • Does not deal well with volatility in
  • Demand - MPS must be level loaded within 10
  • Diverse Product Line
  • Short Product Life Cycle
  • Requires Capacity Slack, Not meant for industries
    with high fixed capacity costs.
  • A COMPLETE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM NOT JUST A
    SCHEDULING TOOL

21
Advance Production Scheduling Systems
  • Eliminates many of the shortcomings of MRP II
    without the limitations of TPS
  • Interactive
  • Variable lead times
  • Capacity constrained schedules
  • Feasible Schedule
  • Made possible with advances in computer power
  • Memory Resident

22
Types of APS
  • Constraint based scheduling
  • Based on E. Goldratts book The Goal.
  • Linear Programming
  • Simulation

23
Advantages to all APS Systems
  • Fast (Generally)
  • Less than 10 of the time required to run MRP
  • What if analysis
  • Better solution than MRP
  • Better user interfaces (generally)
  • Better access to data
  • Minimize trade off between capacity, inventory
    and customer service

24
Advantages to all APS Systems
25
Constraint Based Scheduling
  • Offers feasible schedule by using Gantt chart
    like production plans
  • Recommends alternatives to eliminate production
    constraints
  • Schedules inventory to come in only when needed
  • Uses proprietary heuristics to develop solutions

26
Solver Technologies Heuristics
  • Using Heuristics
  • Rules are defined that limit or constrain the
    domain of possible solutions
  • Examples of limits modeled through heuristics
  • Preferred Routings
  • Batch Sizes
  • Minimum Run Lengths
  • Load Line 1,
  • Then Line 3

27
Iterations
  • When an algorithm runs through a series of
    solutions and chooses one, the cycle of steps is
    one ITERATION
  • Generally, you must run many iterations to solve
    a whole planning or scheduling problem
  • Search
  • Find
  • Implement

28
How Does It Solve?
  • Algorithms
  • Algorithms are steps the software goes through to
    find and solve problems.
  • Example
  • 1. Find Problems Forecasts, Orders, Safety
    Stocks...
  • 2. Prioritize Problems Fulfill Orders, then
    Forecast, then Safety Stock
  • 3. Pick a Problem to solve 1 Order due tomorrow
  • 4. Determine possible solutions is inventory
    available, or should production be scheduled?
    Line 1 or Line 2?
  • 5. Prioritize solutions 1st - Starting
    inventory 2nd - Line 2
  • 3rd - Line 1
  • 6. Choose a solution either low cost or least
    cost

29
Constraint Based Scheduling
  • Pros
  • Can model large complex manufacturing systems
  • Fastest of APS solutions
  • Detail schedules
  • Cons
  • Schedule solution can be sub-optimal
  • Difficult to debug schedule
  • Complex

30
Constraint Based Scheduling
  • Industries
  • Discrete Manufacturing
  • High Tech
  • Engineer to Order
  • Manufacture to Order
  • Assemble to Order

31
Linear Programming Based Scheduling
  • Uses Linear Programming to optimize production
    schedule
  • Generally used for Master Scheduling

32
Mathematical Optimization
  • Using Mathematical optimization
  • Problems are modeled as mathematical equations
    (gt, lt, )
  • Examples of problems modeled through optimization
  • Profitability
  • Capacity limitations
  • Crewing Requirements
  • X Y lt 40

33
Linear Programming Based Scheduling
  • Pros
  • Offers optimal solution
  • Easy to implement if you stay within predefined
    templates
  • Cons
  • Difficult in complex environments
  • Does not produce detailed schedules
  • Difficult to debug schedule

34
Linear Programming Based Scheduling
  • Industries
  • Logistics
  • Process
  • CPG
  • Build to Stock

35
Simulation Based Scheduling
  • Uses statistical and mathematical models to model
    factory
  • Queuing Theory
  • Actually steps through each operation in
    manufacturing to model plant
  • Used for production, but commonly used for
    process improvement and capital decisions.

36
SimulateCalculate
  • As an algorithm proceeds through a series of
    solutions, it must evaluate each solution it
    tries
  • When the software determines the quality of a
    potential solution, it is performing a
    simulation or calculation of the appropriate
    costs or penalties
  • In general, lower cost better solution

37
Simulation Based Scheduling
  • Pros
  • Accurately models the stochastic nature of a
    manufacturing plant
  • Extremely accurate representation of production
  • Detailed schedules
  • Cons
  • Schedule solution can be sub-optimal
  • Difficult to implement
  • Difficult to debug schedule
  • Complex

38
What APS doesnt do...
  • APS systems can not execute your business
  • APS systems will recommend a course of action -
    it is up to the user to commit to a plan or
    schedule and then to publish it
  • Once the plan or schedule is published, the rest
    of the world can act on it by ordering raw
    materials, and manufacturing the products.

39
APS and the Future
  • As APS tools become more advanced, the number of
    decisions requiring human intervention will
    continue to decrease.
  • APS will improve ability to display and
    communicate information to planners and factory
    floor.
  • Think of this Manufacturing could evolve into a
    completely automated process where an order gets
    entered by the customer and the factory will know
    how, where and when to make the order.

40
Should you go with APS
  • Are you focused on Capacity or Material?
  • Many operations
  • Constrained Operations
  • Do you have accurate BOM, inventory, routing, and
    costing information?
  • Are you in a highly variable environment?
  • New Products
  • Volatile Demand
  • Supply Volatility

41
Should you go with APS
  • In most cases, APS will improve your planning.
  • Training is essential!

42
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com