Model Reduction of Dynamical Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

Model Reduction of Dynamical Systems

Description:

Rokko Island P&G, Kobe (117m) 0.1, 0.5Hz, 220t. Passive Tuned Pendulum. Sydney Tower (305m) ... to the one supporting the Pentagon building using LS-Dyna ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:168
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: sam45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Model Reduction of Dynamical Systems


1
Model Reduction of Dynamical Systems Real-Time
Control
  • Ahmed Sameh
  • Department of Computer Science
  • Purdue University

2
Model Reduction
  • Collaborative Research (Medium ITR)
  • Purdue University
  • A. Grama, C. Hoffmann, A. Sameh (CS), Sozen (CE)
  • Rice University
  • A. Antoulas (ECE), D. Sorensen (CAAM)
  • Florida State University
  • K. Gallivan (CS)
  • Catholic University of Louvain (Belgium)
  • P. Van Dooren (ME)

3
Outline
  • Mathematical modeling and simulation
  • Model reduction
  • Research goals
  • Examples of existing structure control mechanisms
  • Future directions
  • Structural simulations two case studies of
    structure-fluid interaction.
  • Conclusion

4
Physical Process
Mathematical Modeling
Simulation
understanding process behavior
prediction modification
feasibility of process control
5
Examples of applications in science engineering
  • Flex model of the space station.
  • Structure response of high-rise buildings to
    earthquakes and wind.
  • Simulation and control of MEMS.
  • Electronic circuit simulation.
  • Climate modeling.

6
Model reduction an example replace a
large-scale system of differential equations,
.
x(t) Ax(t) Bu(t) y(t) Cx(t)
x(t) ? RN u(t) ? Rm y(t) ? Rp
by one of substantially lower dimension that
has nearly the same response characteristics



A WTAV ? Rn C CV B WTB
WTV In n
7
Research Goals
  • Development and implementation of a library of
    parallel algorithms for those sparse matrix
    computations that arise in model reduction
    schemes for large-scale dynamical systems.

8
Example Obtain the dominant invariant subspace
of (PQ), where P and Q are given by the
Lyapunov eqns
AP PAT BBT 0 ATQ QA CTC 0
without explicitly obtaining P Q.
9
  • Development of robust algorithms for open
    problems in
  • model reduction of structured dynamical systems.

Example
M, C, K are symmetric
10
  • 3. Development and validation of control
    algorithms based on reduced models.
  • 4. Implementation of real-time control algorithms
    on sensor-actuator microgrids (as distributed
    computational platforms).
  • 5. Development of an environment for validation
    of large-scale structural simulations and control.

11
Examples of Control Mechanisms
Engineering Structures, Vol. 17, No. 9, Nov. 1995.
12
Multistep Pendulum Dampers
The Yokohama Landmark Tower, one of the tallest
buildings in Japan relies on multistep pendulum
dampers (2) to damp dominant vibration mode of
0.185 Hz. Pictured on the right is a model of the
pendulum (Picture credits Steven Williams). .
13
Examples Active Mass Damper in the Kyobashi
Seiwa Building
An Active Mass Damper consists of a mass whose
motion (displacement, velocity, acceleration) is
controlled, in this case, by a turn-screw
actuator. Eigenvalue analysis of the structure
shows that the dominant vibration mode is in
transverse direction with a period of 1.13 s. and
second eigenvalue in the torsional direction with
a period of 0.97s. This two-mass active damper
damps these two modes (Picture courtesy Bologna
Fiere).
14
Passive Control Base Isolation
Base isolation is a mature technology, commonly
used in bridges. Pictured left is a base isolator
in use on a building at the Kajima Research
Facility. Pictured on the right are base
isolators used in a viaduct in Nagoya. These
structures rely on (passive) base isolation to
control the structure in the event of ground
motion (Picture credits Steven Williams).
15
Passive / Semi-Active Fluid Dampers
Pictured left is a passive fluid damper with
bottom casing containing the bearings and oil
used to absorb seismic energy. Pictured right is
a semiactive damper with variable orifice damping
(Picture credits Steven Williams).
16
The Future Fine-Grained Semi-Active Control.
A new class of dampers based on
Magnetorheological Fluids (fluids capable of
changing their viscosity characteristics in
milliseconds, when exposed to magnetic fields,
courtesy Lord Corp.), coupled with considerable
advances in sensing and networking technology,
present great potential for fine-grained
real-time control for robust structures. These
control mechanisms enhance resilience of
structures subjected to traditional hazards such
as high winds and earthquakes, in addition to
man-made hazards.
17
Emerging Frontiers
The Dongting Lake Bridge is being retrofitted
with MR dampers to control wind-induced vibration
(picture source Prof. Y. L. Xu, Hong Kong Poly.)
18
Structural Simulations case study-I (C.
Hoffmann, S. Kilic, M. Sozen)
  • Simulate the effects of crashing an air frame
    loaded with fuel (simulating a Boeing 757) into a
    reinforced concrete frame similar to the one
    supporting the Pentagon building using LS-Dyna
  • Model the columns to reproduce the behavior of
    spirally reinforced columns including the
    difference in material response of the concrete
    within and outside the spiral reinforcement.
  • Exclude effects of fuel explosion and subsequent
    fire damage

19
Aircraft Meshing
  • Needed structural elements
  • Ribs, stringers,
  • Floor,
  • Tank enclosure.
  • Shell and beam elements.
  • Fluid modeled by (partial) filling of elements in
    a (moving) Eulerian grid of air.

20
Acquired Model
21
Check Against Public Data
22
Resulting Mesh (Partial View)
23
Column Model
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
Dual Wing Impact with Wing Skin and Fuel
  • IBM Regatta Power4 platform with 8 processors
  • Model size 1.2M elements
  • Run time 20 hours

29
(No Transcript)
30
  • Detail study of wing impacting 4 rows of columns

31
Full Impact with Fuselage, Wing Structure, and
Fuel
  • Fuselage model includes the floor system and
    stringer beams
  • Wing structure includes spars, fuel compartments,
    and fuel

32
Full Impact with Fuselage, Wing Structure, and
Fuel .
  • Coarse model 300K elements, 0.20 sec. real time,
    IBM Regatta Power4 platform with 8 processors, 24
    hours run time.
  • Detailed model 1.2M elements, 0.25 sec. real
    time, IBM Regatta Power4 platform with 8
    processors, 68 hours run time.

33
(No Transcript)
34
Results from Simulations (1)
  • The simulation demonstrates that the number of
    columns destroyed in the facade of the building
    does not have to correspond to the full wing
    span.
  • The tips of the wings, having less mass, are cut
    by the columns rather than the wing cutting the
    columns.

35
Results from Simulation (2)
  • The simulation suggests that the reinforced
    concrete column core will cut into the fuselage
    until the fuel tanks reach it, at which time the
    column is destroyed.

36
Results from Simulation (3)
  • The simulation shows the deceleration of the
    plane after impact as witnessed by the buckling
    of the fuselage near the tail structure.

37
Structural Simulations case study-II
(comparison with experiments)
  • Investigate the fluid (water)-reinforced concrete
    interaction at high speed impact.

38
Experimental Verification
39
Impact Experiment
40
Impact Experiment
41
Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics(SPH)
42
Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics(SPH)
43
Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics(SPH)
44
Simulation Web Site
http//www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation
45
Conclusions
  • Work has been initiated on several fronts
  • Acquiring actual high-rise structural models
    (Sozen)
  • Developing novel model reduction techniques and
    application on the above acquired full models
    (Antoulas, Gallivan, Sorensen, Van Dooren)
  • Development of sparse matrix parallel algorithms
    needed for model reduction (Grama, Sameh)

46
Conclusions.
  • Development of simulation environment using both
    the full and reduced models (Hoffmann, Sameh,
    Sozen).
  • Development of control algorithms for full and
    reduced model (Gallivan, Van Dooren)
  • Implementation of the real-time control
    algorithms on the sensor-actuator microgrid
    (Grama, Sameh).
  • Dense sensor-actuator instrumentation of model
    structures, and validation by scale experiments
    (Grama, Sameh, Sozen).

47
Conclusions.
  • Year-1 Targets
  • Develop simulation methodology and demonstrate
    its use as a validation tool.
  • Demonstrate viability of model reduction for
    real-time control.
  • Instrument test structures and develop
    infrastructure for data gathering and
    assimilation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com