HIGHWAY PPP

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

HIGHWAY PPP

Description:

and Member of the Board of ... Developer must adhere to future safety specs ... but in a fair and non discriminatory manner ... Truck / car differentials ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: sistemasde

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HIGHWAY PPP


1
HIGHWAY PPPS, WHY AND HOWEnrique Fuentes,
Development Director Ferrovialand Member of the
Board of European International
ContractorsSeminar on legal, economic
implementation issues on PPPsMinistry of
Economy, Poland, and World BankWarsaw, April
2007
2
About EIC PPP experience
  • European international contractors take a leading
    role in developing the worlds TRANSPORT
    infrastructure, such as toll roads, tunnels,
    railroads, ports and airports.
  • The 15 of the Top 35 Transportation Developers
    2006, which are associated to EIC, have
    implemented 269 PPP projects since the year
    1985, whilst in 2006 they had 228 projects under
    active proposal.

Warsaw, 18 June 2008
2
3
About EIC Statistics
With an aggregated international turnover in 2006
of almost 112 billion , European international
contractors are the most important players in the
international construction business.
3
4
WHO WE ARE FERROVIAL
MKT Cap US 8 bn
  • Heathrow
  • Gatwick
  • Stansted
  • Glasgow
  • Edimburgh
  • Southampton
  • Others

MKT Cap US 7 bn
  • Poland (59)
  • Texas
  • Spain
  • London underground
  • World largest handling

5
WHO WE ARE CINTRA
7 Bn market cap 22() concessions More than
2,500() Km of toll roads
65 of the value in North America Present in
7() countries 73() years average concession
life
Ireland Eurolink Motorway M-3
Canada 407 ETR
USA Chicago Skyway Indiana Toll Road Segments
56 SH130
Spain Ausol I M-203 R-4 M45 Ocaña-La
Roda Autema Ausol II
Chile Collipulli Temuco Santiago
Talca Temuco Rio Bueno Talca
Chillan Autopista del Bosque
Portugal E. Algarve Norte Litoral Scut Açores ()
Greece Ionian Roads Central Greece
( ) Including the Scut Açores stake via
Ferrovial Infraestructuras. There are also three
projects pending final award Mantua-Cremona
(Italy), Central Greece (Greece) and SH-121
(USA) () Based on internal valuation released
to the market in December 2006 () Projects
pending final award.
6
PPP FORMULAS RISK TRANSFER
  • Risks transferred to concessionaire under
    different PPP formulas
  • After Eurostat ruling 11/2004, all of them are
    off balance sheet for Governments
  • but key criteria should be who pays for the
    infrastructure

Formula Demand risk OM risk Construction Land Acquisition Financing
Classic Concession User paid toll Yes mitigation possible if risk too high (ie new mkts or no toll culture) Yes Yes Depends on country. Normally no except Spain and, partially, Portugal Yes mitigation in emerging markets)
Shadow tolls Partial Yes Yes Depends on country. Normally no except Spain and, partially, Portugal Yes mitigation in emerging markets)
Availability schemes No Yes Affects not only costs but revenues Yes Depends on country. Normally no except Spain and, partially, Portugal Yes mitigation in emerging markets)
7
WHY PPPS SERVICE (CUSTOMER RATHER THAN USER)
  • Incentives in a PPP are fully focused on
    providing a public service in the most possible
    efficient way, especially if traffic risk (and
    upside) is transferred
  • Torontos 407
  • Better and proactive winter maintenance in
    Torontos 407 increases capture rate in bad
    weather periods
  • Capacity is increased well ahead of contract
    obligations in Torontos 407, improving driving
    conditions and attracting more customers
  • Chicago Skyway
  • Electronic tolling implemented in six months
    (after 30 years of city ownerhip)
  • Queues reduced from hours to minutes
  • Madrid Levante Highway (Spain) incentives
  • 4 year extension in the original concession term
    depending of its performance in certain criteria
    capture rate of heavy traffic, accident rate,
    congestion levels, and traffic flow, queues at
    toll plazas, pavement surface conditions
  • Awarding criteria linked to discounts offered to
    customers
  • BUT THIS ONLY WORKS IF THE PRIVATE DEVELOPER
    HAS MONEY INVESTED AND RISK AND UPSIDE TRANSFERRED

8
WHY PPPS EFFICIENCY INNOVATION
  • Deliver the most efficient infrastructure that
    serves public needs
  • Construction focus on value engineering and early
    delivery
  • Stop to cost and delay overruns
  • Focus on Life Cycle costs, rather than initial
    construction costs
  • Optimisation of opex / capex balance
  • Management of ongoing capex
  • Development of new technologies for better
    service / enhanced revenue
  • Free-flow tolling
  • Congestion / accident detection systems
  • Toll plaza queues Toll Flow technology
  • Automatic anti - icing

9
WHY PPPS DELIVERABILITY
  • Boosting economic development, relieving
    congestion, and reducing greenhouse emissions
  • Spanish highways in the 60s and 70s
  • Chilean highways in the 90s
  • Portuguese highways
  • Irish highway programme
  • De- bottlenecking the system and providing
    mobility in congested areas
  • 407ETR highway in Toronto was developed 20 years
    ahead of the expected horizon for public funding
    development thanks to the involvement of private
    developers
  • Providing crucial future infrastructure for the
    long term development
  • Trans Texas Corridor

10
WHY PPPS RATIONALITY OF DECISION MAKING AND
RESOURCE ALLOCATION
  • Private involvement in the development of
    transport infrastructure brings discipline and
    rationality to the political decision process
  • PPP projects solving actual, critical traffic
    problems are the most financially feasible
  • Private funding used in projects capable of
    generating predictable revenue
    government funding focused on pure development
    projects
  • Natural tendency to invest where investment is
    more needed
  • Contract with a 3rd party allows to avoid
    political review of tariff setting
  • Where Government retains control of tariffs, they
    seldom end up reflecting real cost of service US
    turnpikes
  • Ensures accountable development of
    infrastructure, not subject to budgetary
    constraints
  • Ongoing maintenance and future capex

11
WHY PPPS COMPARISON WITH TELECOMS
12
PPP FORMULAS BIDDING SCHEMES
13
PPP FORMULAS WHERE
Risk transfer
USA
Germany
Ireland
Canada (privatizations)
France
Classic concession
Greece
Italy
Spain (ENA)
Spain (Central Govt)
GBR (new?)
Portugal
Spain (OM)
Shadow tolls
Finland
Spain (Regions)
GBR
Holland
Availability schemes
Canada (Quebec)
Bidding scheme
PFI
Auction
Tender
14
PPP FORMULAS CONCLUSIONS
  • Governments with more PPP experience moving
    towards user paid schemes demand risk transfer
    and towards simpler bidding schemes
  • Governments with less experience moving the
    opposite way availability and PFI bidding
    schemes
  • Drivers
  • Risk cost reduction as long as it is off
    balance sheet
  • Ensure acceptability of the contractual framework
  • Beware experience and government structure are
    key for the dialogue process being efficient and
    objective (not every Government or legal system
    is like the UK)
  • A balance should exist between the formulas
  • The key should be
  • Risk transfer efficiency brought in by the
    Private sector rather than Government budget
    constraints
  • Bidding scheme if there is no track record,
    efficiency (cost) and comparability of the
    offers, rather than extensive negotiation
  • . BUT, WHATEVER YOU DO, DO IT NOW!,
    INFRASTRUCTURE IS NEEDED

15
PPP FORMULAS LIKELY EVOLUTION
  • Short / Medium term
  • Surge of PFI schemes for off balance sheet
    reasons
  • Minimum risk transfer minimum cost
  • Limitation of concessionaire upside
  • Initially developed by contractors, later sale to
    financial investors
  • PFI main limitation government future payment
    commitments
  • Budgetary constraint today is accounting,
    tomorrow will be financial
  • Key risk transfer trade off in the long term
    efficiency vs cost
  • Long Term
  • Classic user paid concessions for low medium
    risk projects
  • Funds raised or saved are then devoted to higher
    risk projects
  • Possible transformation of PFIs in user paid
    schemes
  • Driver for PFIs efficiency of private sector
  • Likely bias towards projects with a significant
    recurrent cost component

16
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS BALANCED DEAL?
  • How can an Administration attract investors?
  • Long term deal goes through different
    legislation sessions, politicians, economical and
    social environments, economic cycles.
  • All equity and debt are invested upfront and are
    unmovable. Assets belong to the State. Private
    sector is left there to rely on a piece of paper
    relies on its enforceability.
  • Private sector control on the investment is very
    limited. Service can not be interrupted, toll
    setting mechanism is stipulated, most service
    levels are fixed.
  • Penalty for default is normally the loss of the
    investment for the shareholders and all or most
    of the debt for the lenders.
  • Odds are that future legislators will support the
    Admin side rather than the private views.
  • Can an Administration behave and promise to
    behave as an equal partner in a (very) long term
    Agreement?

17
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS ADEQUATE STABLE
LEGISLATION
  • Adequate legislation not only for the concession
    in itself, but also for ancillary (but key)
    agreements
  • Financing no limits to foreign lending or to
    step in rights for lenders
  • Land acquisition has to be predictable in cost
    time adequate title to land
  • Ownership of the asset / contract no limits to
    nationality or nature
  • Types of legislative changes with effects that
    should be protected or compensated
  • discriminatory legislation
  • Tax legislation that alters the financial balance
  • legislation that affects an essential right in
    the Agreement
  • Compensation should be calculated based on
    effective damage (loss of future value)
  • Compensation based on forecasts
  • Present value
  • Possibility Independent calculation

18
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS COMPETING INFRASTRUCTURE
  • Admin should be able to implement virtually
    anything but must compensate for certain
    damages
  • Fair and balanced provisions relating to
    competing facilities the private sector assumes
    a reasonable and defined amount of risk, but it
    is not unfairly burdened by an unanticipated
    source of competition
  • Examples of competing facilities that would not
    generate compensation
  • Those specifically planned in the concession date
  • Improvements in nearby facilities due to reaching
    certain congestion levels
  • New or improved facilities that do not cause
    material negative impact to Developer

19
HOW TO ATRACT INVESTORS ROAD STANDARDS
  • Safety and design
  • Specify clear design rules and standards and
    let private sector to optimize
  • Developer must adhere to future safety specs
    but in a fair and non discriminatory manner
  • Substantial changes that affect the nature of the
    asset should be negotiated
  • Policing and rules as in any other similar
    road.
  • Signs, lights, speed, Traffic Code
  • Patrolling, fines, surveillance
  • Traffic Management

20
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS ELECTRONIC TOLLS
  • Need for State authority to define and enforce
    interoperability rules
  • For State Agencies and Private Operators
  • Recognize different agents issuers and operators
  • Technical standards for transponder issuers
  • Technical standards for road operators
  • Basic interoperability rules (interfaces,
    transponder lists )
  • Enforceability and costs
  • It is invented but seldom applied

21
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS ENFORCEABILITY
  • Of the Agreement
  • Are both parties subject to the Law and the
    Courts? (Sovereign Immunity?)
  • Appropriations to pay compensations
  • Independent dispute resolution method third
    party valuation
  • Recourse to Justice by any party
  • Effectiveness of decision
  • Independent justice system (local or foreign)
  • Of the tolls
  • Legal standing of the Concessionaire
  • Access to data (plate owner, address )
  • Enforceability within state or region

22
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS TOLL RATES
  • Method to be established at time of agreement
  • Negotiated approach works were concessionaire is
    public or semi public (France, Italy), or were
    there is a long track record (UK)
  • Objective method must not be subject to
    legislative or administrative decisions
  • May consider CPI or per capita GDP to keep up
    with long term cost of goods
  • Can be related to congestion levels
  • Many possible parameters can help achieve
    transportation objectives
  • Peak hour tolls, night time rates, congestion
    tolls
  • Truck / car differentials
  • Premiums / deterrents to specific customers high
    occupancy, extra heavy, local residents (but
    beware of fraud!)
  • If tolls want to be kept low, it can be specified
    in the agreement upfront

23
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS TERMINATION
  • Termination for Default
  • Administration Default must compensate the
    investors, ensure payments, get control when
    paid.
  • Developers Default first right of lenders to
    cure, then step-in of Administration.
  • Termination for convenience (of the Admin)
  • Investors should be compensated as per
    Termination for Administrations Default
  • Formula to calculate compensation must be fixed
    in Contract. Should compensate for loss of value.
    Third party valuation under fixed set of rules
  • Beware of situations where it limits upside
    without covering downside

24
HOW TO ATTRACT INVESTORS DOS AND DONTS
  • Main decisions taken and in force by the time of
    the tender and politically supported
  • Be aware of political timing concessions and
    even tenders can outdate election periods
  • Be aware of hurdles in your legislation is it
    ready for the deal?
  • If not, implement the necessary changes
    beforehand
  • Understand cost for the taxpayer of each
    condition you feel you have to ask for
  • Be as flexible as your environment allows to hear
    proposed improvements from prospective bidders
  • Avoid subjective decisions will scare
    competition and certainly devaluate the deal
  • In lack of proven track record, extra care on
    legislative / enforcement framework
  • Get ready ahead of time and have a dedicated team
  • Feasible projects take time to develop before
    they can be tendered

25
EIC White Book on BOT/PPP Recommendations
  • 3 TENDER PROCESS
  • Use Pre-qualification of bidders
  • Ensure Transparency Confidentiality throughout
    process
  • Present clear award criteria
  • Reimburse Bidding Costs
  • Unsolicited Bids ??? (outside EU )
  • 4 RISK MITIGATION
  • Provide for optimal risk identification
    allocation
  • Invite financial risk mitigation through IFIs,
    ECAs, etc.
  • 1 GENERAL PRECONDITIONS
  • Ensure true Government Support
  • Create a PPP Task Force
  • Enhance Country Legal Framework(Accounting,
    Taxes, Procurement)
  • 2 PROJECT PREPARATION
  • Put in place sound procurement strategy
  • Present comprehensive, reliable project
    documentation
  • Provide for a steady and secure payment mechanism
  • Agree on affordable level of tariffs

25
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)