Description of some multimedia ontologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Description of some multimedia ontologies

Description:

Cover also (partially) the CSs. adapted to TV Anytime (and ProgramGuideML) ... upper part, visual, audio, CSs. requires breaking some existing relationships ! ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: cwiu9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Description of some multimedia ontologies


1
Description of some multimedia ontologies
Raphaël Troncy
Thursday 1st of December, 2005
Raphael.Troncy_at_cwi.nl
2
Multimedia Ontologies
  • Multimedia ontologies can be related to many
    works, standards, communities
  • Focus here on MPEG-7 ... as a whole
  • ISO Standard composed of 11 parts but it is still
    growing
  • DDL XML Schema small extensions
  • Descriptors and Description Schemes
  • 1182 elements, 417 attributes, 377 complex types
    in the schema (MDS Visual Audio parts)
  • 40 Classification Schemes

3
Agenda
  • DSTC's Proposal
  • Jane Hunter Suzanne Little (ABC model)
  • TUC's Proposal
  • Chrisa Tsinaraki (DELOS)
  • INA's Proposal
  • Antoine Isaac Raphaël Troncy
  • DMAG/MTG's Proposal
  • Roberto Garcia Oscar Celma

4
DSTC's Proposal (summary)
  • 1st proposal chronologically
  • MPEG-7 ontology developed in RDFS, then converted
    into DAMLOIL and now OWL
  • Contains 60 classes and 40 properties
  • OWL Full ontology
  • Cover the upper level of the MDS
  • segments and decomposition
  • agent, role, place, time and instrument
  • basic visual descriptors
  • Available at http//maenad.dstc.edu.au/slittle/mp
    eg7.owl

5
TUC's Proposal
  • Software Engineering Framework aiming to
    facilitate Knowledge-based MPEG-7 Multimedia
    Application Development
  • Being developed in TUC/MUSIC
  • Consists of
  • An Ontological Infrastructure
  • Methodologies for Interoperability between MPEG-7
    and OWL
  • An underlying MPEG-7 Repository
  • Tools implementing the DS-MIRF approach

6
DS-MIRF Ontological Infrastructure
7
DS-MIRF Ontological Infrastructure
  • An Upper Ontology that fully captures the MPEG-7
    MDS and a part of the MPEG-7 Visual
  • Being extended to capture the MPEG-21 DIA
    Architecture
  • Transformation Rules to transform OWL Ontologies
    and OWL/RDF metadata into MPEG-7 documents
  • Implemented in the GraphOnto Ontology and
    Metadata Editor

8
TUC's Ontology Definition Methodology
  • Manual definition based on the following rules
  • MPEG-7 Simple Datatype Representation
    Integration of the XML Schema simple datatypes
    (rdfsDatatype)
  • MPEG-7 Complex Type Representation Homonym OWL
    Classes
  • Attributes Simple Type Elements Datatype
    Properties
  • Complex Type Elements Object Properties
  • Subclassing
  • Simple Types Datatype property with rdfID
    type_nameContent where type_name is the type
    of the supertype
  • Complex Types rdfssubclassOf
  • Constraints OWL Restrictions
  • MPEG-7 Classification Scheme Representation
    Individuals of the MDS type ClassificationSchemeT
    ype

9
TUC's Proposal (summary)
  • Cover the full standard
  • Contains 420 classes and 175 properties for the
    MDS part
  • OWL DL
  • Cover also the CSs
  • The 40 CSs have been translated into simple OWL
    hierarchy
  • Available at http//elikonas.ced.tuc.gr/ontologie
    s/av_semantics.zip

10
INA's Proposal
  • Different uses of AV Document Descriptions
  • Archival and description of documents from a
    cultural heritage point of view INA
  • Exchanging program identification and
    characterization for interactive TV TV-Anytime
  • Diffusion of program information (news agencies)
    ProgramGuideML
  • Storing and sharing AV content descriptions
    (automatic extraction results) MPEG-7 standard

11
Can we find an AV core ontology?
  • There are many common needs amongst observed
    applications
  • Characterization of programs and sequences
  • Decomposition of programs and sequences
  • Ability to introduce description of the
    activities that constitute the context of AV
    documents (roles of people involved, ways
    production and broadcast are achieved)
  • These concepts are close to a "neutral" archival
    viewpoint

12
C.O. content
  • Concerning AV objects
  • distinction sequence/program
  • decomposition and qualification of those objects
  • link to external world themes and entities
    (content description)
  • Underlying use patterns for elicited categories

13
ExampleUpper-level categorization of sequences
14
ExampleUpper-level categorization of program
15
INA's Proposal (summary)
  • Cover the MDS upper part, and partially the audio
    and visual parts
  • Contains 610 classes
  • OWL DL
  • Cover also (partially) the CSs
  • adapted to TV Anytime (and ProgramGuideML)
  • adapted to INA's needs
  • Linked to the DOLCE ontology
  • Available at http//www.cwi.nl/troncy/MPEG-7/

16
DMAG/MTG's Proposal
  • Reuse MPEG-7 implicit semantics.
  • XML ? Semantic Web
  • XSD2OWL schema to ontology.
  • XML2RDF XML instance data to RDF instances.
  • Tested as integration base forMusicBrainz,
    Simac, Music Vocabulary, etc.

17
XMLSchema to OWL Mappings
18
DMAG/MTG's Proposal (summary)
  • Cover the whole MPEG-7 the upper level of the
    Classification Schemes
  • Contains 2372 classes and 975 properties
  • OWL Full
  • Available at http//dmag.upf.edu/ontologies/mpeg7
    ontos/

19
Questions ?
20
Towards an harmonization of these multimedia
ontologies
Raphaël Troncy
Thursday 1st of December, 2005
Raphael.Troncy_at_cwi.nl
21
Preliminary results
  • Current state
  • Proposals are made individually, for specific
    research project
  • The OWL files contains some errors
  • Corrected versions available for DSTC and
    DMAG/MTG ontologies
  • Different conceptualizations have been obtained
    even if they start from the same MPEG-7 schema
  • No MPEG-7 endorsement

22
(Personal) Idea Three step process
  • Aligning pair-wise ontologies
  • Visual part of aceMedia vs DMAG vs TUC
  • MDS part of Hunter vs DMAG vs TUC vs INA
  • CSs part of DMAG vs TUC vs INA
  • Merging and fusing
  • Re-engineering (manually) !
  • Current proposals are based on automatic
    translation rules from XSD to OWL (except INA)
  • Does NOT go beyond what XML Schema can express

23
Open Issues
  • OWL DL vs OWL Full
  • Real modularization of MPEG-7
  • upper part, visual, audio, CSs
  • requires breaking some existing relationships !
  • Do we have to capture all MPEG-7 ?
  • people, agent, role, place are not
    multimedia-specific
  • Are there more multimedia ontologies currently
    developed ?
  • Proton http//proton.semanticweb.org/
  • Boemie re-use the aceMedia ontologies (MDO, VDO)

24
Questions ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com