Title: Cyberpsychology
1Cyberpsychology B.Sc. Psychology
PSY30116 Â Time Slot Thursday 1115am-1.05
pm Room 6E2.2 Â Lecturers MB Mark Brosnan
M.J.Brosnan_at_Bath.ac.uk tel 386 081 room 2 S
1.12 JG Jeff Gavin J.Gavin_at_Bath.ac.uk tel 386
591 room 2 S 1.04A
2- All notes on Mark Brosnans home page
- http//staff.bath.ac.uk/pssmjb/
3What is Cyberpsychology?Ask Wikipedia
- Cyberpsychology is the study of the human mind
and behavior in the context of human-technology
interaction. However, mainstream research studies
seem to focus on the impact of the Internet and
cyberspace on the psychology of individuals and
groups. Some hot topics include online identity
management, personality types in cyberspace,
transference to computers, addiction to computers
and Internet, regressive behavior in cyberspace,
online gender-switching, etc.
4Structure of the course
Week 1 MB Introduction Week 2 MB
Technophobia Week 3 JG Theories of Computer
Mediated Communication (CMC) Week 4 JG Cross
cultural aspects of computer-mediated
communication (CMC) Week 5 MB Artificial
Consciousness and affective computing Week 6 MB
Neurocyberpsychology Week 7 JG Identity
construction in online settings Week 8 JG
Technofeminism Week 9 Small group activity
Group portfolios Easter Break! Week 10 Small
group activity Presentation planning Week 11
Small group activity Presentations Â
5Assessment
- There is one piece of assessment with two parts
- 20 - Oral presentation - Weeks 10 - 11
- 80 - 2250 word maximum (excluding references,
excluding appendices) essay based on presentation
topic.
6Portfolio
- During Weeks 1 to 8, all students must keep a
portfolio detailing their online activities. - These portfolios will be used to evidence
theories covered in lectures. The portfolio
should be reflective, upon how you felt - such as
feelings of anxiety or other emotional responses
to your interaction, providing examples of
miscommunications etc. Also, what factors
influenced your choice of communication media
whether to text, call, email, etc.
7Group presentation of portfolio (20)
- Students need to form into groups for
presentations. Presentations will evidence
pertinent examples from the portfolios that are
consistent or inconsistent with the theories
covered in the cyberpsychology lectures. - Choose a positive and negative experience and
discuss how cyberpsychology can explain these
experiences.
8Individual write up of portfolio (80)
- For the write-up, any aspect of the presentation
can be focused upon and can incorporate
additional examples and counter examples, as
appropriate from the group portfolios.
9Portfolio structure
- Today you will be given a questionnaire that has
been used before to assess internet use. This can
inform the structure of your portfolio. - In addition we will (attempt to!) facilitate a
Second Life cyberpsychology experience. This
should be recorded in your portfolio but does not
have to be used for the presentation or write up.
10Todays lecture
- Cyberpsychology
- Technophobia
- Technophilia
11Clarke (2003)
- E-learning has the power to transform the way we
learn and bring high-quality, accessible learning
to everyone so that everyone cab achieve his or
her potential. - Gender always emerges as a salient variable and
this difference can be useful for understanding
why people use or dont use the Internet.
12Gender differences in use
- USA 73 males, 69 females
- UK 64, 55 females
- Italy 42 males, 22 females
13Gender differences in online activity
- Males information searching and entertainment
- Females interpersonal communication
- (e.g. Jackson et al., 2001)
- Cross cultural (USA, UK, Hong Kong, Singapore)
14More gender differences
- Females have less positive attitudes towards the
Internet than males, reporting greater
disorientation and disenchantment. - Females are less confident in their
internet-related abilities - Females are more anxious using the Internet than
males
15Cooper and Weaver (2003)
- Anxiety
- Doubt ability
- Disidentify
- Negative attitudes
- Avoidance
16Internet anxiety
- The irrational anticipation or fear evoked by the
thought of using (or actually using) computers,
the effects of which result in avoiding or
minimising usage. - Brosnan (1998)
- Negatively correlates with use
- Cross-cultural
17Internet Identification
- Social identity within the domain of the Internet
- Self-esteem bound with ability in that domain
- To what extent is an individuals self-concept
related to their perceived ability to use the
Internet? - Defining in groups and out groups
18Holloway and Valentine (2003)
- 14 year old boys whose social network was based
upon their identification with computers - Defined as geeks or boffins by peers
- Girls actively avoid using the Internet in school.
19Facer et al. (2003)
- Identified three types of relationship between
identity and technology in school children - 1) Interested They lived through the computer
- 2) Disinterested They were technologically
literate, but computers were marginal in their
lives - 3) Uninterested Computers were seen as
irrelevant or actively in opposition to identity - But could change between ages 13-16
20Joiner, Gavin, Brosnan et al. (2005)
- Internet identification and anxiety in 608
psychology undergraduates - Males used the Internet more than females
- What predicted Internet use
- Internet identification, Internet anxiety and
gender, accounting for around 40 of the variance
of current use
21Joiner, Gavin, Brosnan et al., (2006)
- Do these factors predict future use?
- 216 Psychology undergraduate students monitored
over one academic year - Replicated internet identification correlating
with current use - Internet identity very consistent over the
academic year, i.e. stable - Internet identity at the beginning of the year
predicted internet use at the end of the year
22Joiner, Brosnan, Gavin et al. (2007)
- Do these factors extend beyond the UK?
- 446 undergraduates from the UK and Australia
- 8 reported being highly anxious
- Again Internet anxiety and identity predicted
Internet use
23Subcomponents of Internet Identity
- Being part of an Internet community (34)
- Similarity to other Internet users (20)
- Importance of Internet for studies (10)
- Sex difference only in first factor
- Sex difference in anxiety
- Internet community perceived as a masculine
domain?
24Gavin, Brosnan, Joiner et al. (2007)
- Draw an Internet user task and Identity
- 371 undergraduates
- Males used the Internet more and had stronger
Internet identity and these variables correlated - 59 of males drew males
- 30 of females drew females
- Females who drew males disidentified with the
Internet and had least use. Not the case for
males (but few drew females, many undetermined)
25In summary
- Identification and anxiety are important
variables in determining Internet use - Consistent gender differences in these variables
- A masculinised image of the Internet can have
negative consequences for some females - No single hegemonic stereotype of an Internet user
26Technophobia
- Computer-related anxieties
- Technophobia An irrational anticipation of fear
evoked by the thought of using (or actually
using) computers, the effects of which result in
avoiding, or minimising, computer usage (Brosnan,
1998 17)
27Three types (Rosen et al., 1993)
- Uncomfortable users Slightly anxious as they
lack enough information to use computers
efficiently - Cognitive technophobes Seem OK but are
undergoing critical internal dialogues (Im
going to loose all my work, everyone else seems
to know what theyre doing except me) - Anxious technophobes Classic anxiety symptoms
(sweaty palms, heart palpitations)
28Prevalence
- 50 of most populations Office workers, Police,
Teachers, School children - 5 anxious technophobes
- 4.2billion per annum lost in the US through
inefficiency and absenteeism directly related to
IT
29Anxiety
- Speilbergers (1966) Trait and state anxiety
- Computer anxiety is a real phenomenon (Moldafsky
and kwon, 1994 301) - Not arousal
- Anxiety leads to off-task cognitions
- Reducing capacity in a limited working memory
system - Impedes learning and achievement (Marcoulides,
1988)
30Thorpe and Brosnan (2007)
- Is technophobia a phobia?
31Brosnan and Thorpe (2008)
32Flow
- Csikszentmihalyi introduced the concept of flow,
which he defined as the holistic experience that
people feel when they act with total
involvement' (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, p. 36). - The term flow represents optimal experience
that is events in which a person enters a mental
state of complete absorption or engagement in an
activity (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975).
33Flow and Cyberpsychology
- Several authors have since suggested that the
concept of flow is useful for understanding
several areas of Cyberpsychology such as web use
and navigation, web marketing, technology use in
information systems and HCI generally.
34- A flow activity is one in which the mind
becomes effortlessly focussed and engaged on an
activity, rather than getting distracted. - Flow is not an all-or-nothing state
- 9 elements of flow
351/9 elements of flow
- a clear set of goals that require appropriate
responses
362/9 elements of flow
- feedback that is immediate and relevant
373/9 elements of flow
- skills required for the task that are fully
involved in overcoming a challenge that is just
about manageable
384/9 elements of flow
- the activity involves merging of action and
awareness
395/9 elements of flow
- distracting thoughts or irrelevant feelings are
excluded
406/9 elements of flow
- the person has a sense of control
417/9 elements of flow
- the activity becomes worth doing for its own sake
(autotelic)
428/9 elements of flow
- there is no self-consciousness
439/9 elements of flow
- awareness of time might become distorted
44Summary
- A key feature of flow is that an activity
features an appropriate balance of challenge and
skills for a person. - If the challenge of an activity is too great for
the persons skills then they will become
frustrated, lose interest and discontinue from
being in flow. - Flow will also cease if the challenge of the
activity is too low so it stops being interesting
and boredom results.
45Challenge vs. skill
46Novak Hoffman (2000)
47Identify and describe 4 HCI-related flow states
48Computer addiction
- 5 of users (Shotton, 1989)
- Case studies (Griffiths, 2000)
- Clinical? (Charlton, 2002)
- Coping strategy for the inadequate (Shotton,
1991) - Gender differences mostly males
49Are computers boys toys?
- The introduction of IT in schools is leading to
the establishment of yet another high status
subject with a strongly masculine bias (Chivers,
1987 17) - Sex roles developmentally important (Kagan 1964,
Kohlberg, 1966) - Masculinity and femininity as assessed by the Bem
Sex Role Inventory (BSRI Bem, 1974, 1981, 1993) - Femininity correlates with computer anxiety for
males and females - Masculinity negatively correlates with computer
anxiety - Controlling for these factors removes sex
differences - Games
50More readings
- Key text
- Brosnan, M. (1998) Technophobia. (Routledge).
Chapters 1 and 2. - Norman, D. (1998) The Design of Everyday Things.
London MIT press. - Technophobia
- Brosnan, M. (1999) The 'Draw-A-Computer-User'
test A new methodology, an old story? European
Journal of Psychology of Education, 3, 375-385. - Brosnan, M. (1999) Modelling Technophobia A Case
for Word Processing. Computers in Human
Behavior,15, 105-121. - Brosnan, M. (1998) The salience of surface
features upon task performance. The British
Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 203-215 - Brosnan, M. (1998) The impact of psychological
gender, gender-related perceptions, significant
others and the introducer of technology upon
computer anxiety in students. Journal of
Educational Computing Research, 18(1), 63-78. - Brosnan, M. (1998) The impact of computer
anxiety and self efficacy upon computer
performance. The Journal of Computer Aided
Learning, 14, 223-234 - Brosnan, M. (1998) The role of psychological
gender in the computer-related attitudes and
attainments of primary school children (aged
6-11). Computers and Education, 30(3/4), 203-208. - Brosnan, M. and Lee, W. (1998) A cross-cultural
comparison of sex differences in computer
attitudes and anxieties The United Kingdom and
Hong Kong. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(4),
559-577. - Computer addiction
- Charlton, J. (2002) A factor analytic
investigation of computer addiction and
engagement. British Journal of Psychology, 93(3),
329-344. - Griffiths, M. (2000) Does Internet and computer
addiction exist? Some case study evidence.
Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, 3(2) 211-218. - Shotton, M. (1989) Computer addiction? A study of
computer dependency. London Taylor and Francis. - Shotton, M. (1991) The costs and benefits of
computer addiction. Behaviour and Information
Technology, 10, 219-230. - Psychological gender
- Bem, S. (1974) The measurement of psychological
androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 42(2), 155-162. - Bem, S. (1975) Sex role adaptability One
consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4),
634-643.