Partnerships in the early years: past, present and future - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Partnerships in the early years: past, present and future

Description:

A statutory/voluntary sector partnership: Thomas Coram Children's Centre. Partnership between Camden and Coram. Education and care, all day, all year for 120 children ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Gillia59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Partnerships in the early years: past, present and future


1
Partnerships in the early yearspast, present
and future
  • Dame Gillian Pugh
  • Early Childhood Forum
  • 12th May 2008

2
Partnerships
  • Between parents and professionals
  • Across all early years services
  • The early work of Under Fives Unit/Early
    Childhood Unit
  • Vouchers and the pre 1997 vision
  • Early Years Development and Childcare
    Partnerships
  • Between early childhood organisations ECEF,
    LAEYN
  • Between the voluntary and statutory sectors
  • Every Child Matters, 2004 Children Act and the
    Childrens Plan
  • Challenges and opportunities

3
(No Transcript)
4
A Framework for Parent Involvement
  • Non-participation - parents using a childrens
    centre or a school as a consumer, who either lack
    the confidence to become involved, or decide they
    do not wish to be involved
  • Support parents support for the centre or
    school from the outside, through practical help
    or by endorsing the schools philosophy-
    attending open evenings, fund raising, supporting
    childrens activities at home
  • Participation parents physically involved in or
    contributing to the work of the centre/school,
    under the supervision of teachers-
  • - parents as helpers, helping in the classroom,
    going on outings with staff and children,
    supporting home work
  • - parents as learners sharing in childrens
    activities and family workshops, adult education
    classes

5
A Framework for Parent Involvement
  • Partnership a working relationship that is
    characterised by a shared sense of purpose,
    mutual respect, and the willingness to negotiate.
    This implies a sharing of information,
    responsibility, skills, decision making and
    accountability
  • - parents as co-educators and co-workers,
    jointly planning and implementing a programme
    for their child
  • - open access to information and records
  • - sharing in diagnosis and assessment
  • - participation in management
  • - parents as workers, visiting homes, running
    groups, counselling other parents
  • - wider involvement in the community
  • - parents as researchers
  • Control parents wholly responsible for running
    the group, selecting and employing staff and
    children, budgeting etc.
  • Working Towards Partnership in the Early Years
    Pugh and DeAth, NCB (1989)

6
Definitions of partnership
  • A working relationship that is characterised
    by a shared sense of purpose, mutual respect, and
    the willingness to negotiate. This implies a
    sharing of information, responsibility, skills,
    decision making and accountability
  • (G Pugh E DeAth Working Towards Partnership in
    the Early Years1989)
  • The elements of a successful partnership model
    are
  • a common aim, mutual respect, open
    communication, sharing power, negotiation,
    working together and complementary expertise
  • (H Davis et al Working in Partnership with
    Parents 2002)

7
What other words do we use?
  • Networking
  • Cooperation
  • Collaboration
  • Coordination
  • Integration
  • Sharing information
  • Services work together towards consistent goals,
    but maintain independence
  • Services plan and work together and avoid overlap
    and duplication
  • Services work together in planned and systematic
    manner towards shared and agreed goals
  • Different services become one organisation.
    Pooled budgets, common management systems

8
Early years services pre 1997
  • Patchwork of fragmented and uncoordinated
    services, a low national commitment to developing
    and resourcing pre-school services and the
    absence of a national policy on what services
    should be provided, for whom and by whom
  • Services discretionary, with no coordination
    between services run by education, social
    services, health, leisure, employers, private and
    voluntary organisations
  • (G Pugh Services for Under Fives developing a
    coordinated approach NCB1988)

9
(No Transcript)
10
Early Childhood Education Forum
  • Set up in 1993, bringing together the 40 major
    national organisations working with and for young
    children
  • To work on policy, curriculum, training,
    inspection and funding of services
  • and to speak with one voice for young children
  • Today, as the Early Childhood Forum, still the
    main partnership organisation with 53 members
  • And Local Authority Early Years Network

11
Partnerships post 1997
  • Post vouchers setting up Early Years
    Development and Childcare Partnerships
  • Early excellence centres
  • Sure Start local programmes
  • Childrens centres

12
Every Child Matters and 2004 Children Act
  • Every Child Matters is about improving outcomes
    for all children and reducing the gap between
    those who do well and those who do not.
  • Integration of services is a means to this end,
    not an end in itself.

13
Childrens trusts as catalysts for local change
Inter-Agency Governance strategic direction,
partnership and accountability
Integrated Strategy planning, commissioning,
pooled resources
Integrated Processes information sharing, common
assessment
Integrated People common core,
multi- disciplinary teams co-location
Children Young People
Families Community
Leadership at every level
Involvement of children young people
Shared Vision
Source DfES
14
Childrens trusts as catalysts for local change
  • Children and young people at the centre, within
    communities

15
Integrated people
  • Integrated qualifications framework across whole
    workforce
  • New professional roles pedagogue, early years
    professional
  • Staff trained with a common core
  • Effective communication and engagement with
    children, young people and their families and
    carers
  • Child and young person development
  • Safeguarding and promoting the welfare of the
    child
  • Supporting transitions
  • Multi-agency working
  • Sharing information
  • Multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams
  • Children and Young Peoples Partnership Board
  • Multi-agency panels
  • Multi-agency teams
  • Co-location
  • A lead professional

16
Integrated processes
  • Information sharing
  • A single database containing core information
    about all children
  • Common assessment framework
  • A single tool for initial assessment and referral
  • Joint training

17
Integrated systems
  • Strategic planning, through the Children and
    Young Peoples Partnership Board which produces a
    single Children and Young People Plan
  • Joint commissioning with pooled resources needs
    assessment, resource mapping, service mapping and
    service redesign

18
Inter-agency governance strategic direction,
partnership and accountability
  • Director of childrens services
  • Lead member (elected councillor) for childrens
    services
  • Plus
  • Minister for children, young people and families
    within Department for Children, Schools and
    Families
  • Joint inspection framework

19
The long term vision
  • Developing integrated education, childcare,
    health and social care, including family support
    services 0 19 through
  • Childrens centres
  • Extended schools
  • Improved services for young people
  • With better support for parents
  • Provided by a better qualified workforce
  • And more effective interplay between universal
    and specialist services

20
Partnerships between the voluntary and statutory
sectors
  • Strengths of the voluntary sector
  • Able to reach the most vulnerable and
    marginalized children, young people and families
  • Works with and in communities
  • Underpinned by strong values of equality and
    empowerment
  • Innovative, entrepreneurial and resourceful
  • Flexible, unbureaucratic and responsive to local
    needs
  • Involves service users, with many becoming
    volunteers and paid workers
  • Provide joined up responses to individual needs
  • Independent from government
  • Has proved that it can provide high quality
    services

21
Barriers to voluntary sector involvement in
service provision
  • Capacity
  • Many voluntary organisations do not have the
    skills, knowledge, structure or resources,
    including staff capacity, to realise their full
    potential (HM Treasury 2002)
  • Contractual
  • The uneven playing field in relation to local
    authorities, lack of recognition of the Compact,
    and inability to charge for full costs, short
    term contracts (92 for one year), unwillingness
    to share risk
  • Legislative and financial
  • Inability to recover VAT, high cost of tendering
    (time, legal costs, complexity of contracts),
    burden of reporting and compliance
  • Cultural
  • The sector seen as well meaning but
    unprofessional

22
Implications of voluntary sector involvement
  • The voluntary and community sector should be
    involved in all layers of the ECM onion in
    strategic planning, commissioning and service
    delivery
  • But some organisations may require support to
    participate on an equal footing eg. VCS Engage

23
A statutory/voluntary sector partnership Thomas
Coram Childrens Centre
  • Partnership between Camden and Coram
  • Education and care, all day, all year for 120
    children
  • Parents centre
  • Drop-ins, open access and targetted
  • Adult education
  • CAMHS and health input
  • Music therapy
  • Parenting groups
  • Outreach work and family support
  • Work with fathers and young parent
  • After school club

24
Working in early years partnerships (Childrens
Plan 2007)
  • DCSF piloting partnership working between
    schools, childrens centres, early years and
    childcare providers and health services
  • To look at benefits and challenges of different
    models of collaboration
  • To create a more coherent 0-7 phase
  • To encourage smoother transitions between
    providers, and into school

25
Barriers to integrated working and working in
partnership
  • Unequal power bases and lack of respect
  • Different entry requirements, rates of pay and
    conditions of service between professions
  • Different beliefs and value systems
  • Different levels of autonomy and accountability
    frameworks
  • Different training and professional codes of
    conduct
  • Different language and poor communication
  • Focus on different priorities and outcomes

26
Positive strategies in working in
multi-professional teams in integrated childrens
services
  • Respecting specialist expertise (rethinking what
    I know, who I am and what I do)
  • Maintaining good personal relationships with team
    members
  • Exploring diverse perspectives of team members
  • Working towards a shared language
  • Effective leadership
  • Sustained preparatory work, and time for
    developing shared values and common protocols,
    and exchanging skills and knowledge
  • A flexible approach to changes in roles and
    responsibilities
  • Co-location
  • Clear lines of communication
  • Ongoing support and training for all staff
  • Developing Multi-professional Teamwork for
    Integrated Childrens Services Angela Anning,
    David Cottrell, Nick Frost, Josephine Green, Mark
    Robinson. Open University Press 2006

27
Taking partnerships forward
  • Partnerships are about relationships whether at
    individual or strategic level
  • Working in partnership is complex and difficult
    and it takes time to build trust and develop
    respect between partners
  • Some partners may need additional support to
    participate on an equal footing
  • Shared vision and aims are essential
  • So are protocols for working together, joint
    training, co-location, clarity over
    accountability, and supportive management and
    funding
  • Integrated/joined up structures on their own
    wont improve outcomes for children. Change
    should be based on evidence of need and
    evaluation of what works. Best practice can be
    shared, but it cant be bottled.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com