tusharanand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

tusharanand

Description:

An experimental investigation into the Specific Heat of Nanofluid – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Slides: 18
Provided by: tusharanand
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: tusharanand


1
THE EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE SPECIFIC
HEAT OF NANOFLUID
  • Tushar Anand (801183021)
  • Supervisior Dr. S.S.Mallick
  • Thapar university
  • patiala

2
Introduction
  • Nanofluids suspension of metals/metal oxide/
    carbon nanotubes in base fluids (water/EG)
  • Advantage superior specific heat, long time
    stability, minimum clogging/abrasion of flow
    passages
  • Potential benefits engine cooling, micro fluids,
    micro electronics, refrigerators, solar-thermal
  • In spite of such merits/wide spread potential
    application, this technology is still limited for
    commercial use
  • Difficult to model size/distribution, shape,
    conc., temp., material/base-fluid, sonication,
    surfactant etc..
  • Overall lack of fundamental understanding
    research scope

3
Methods For Producing Nanoparticles/Nanofluids
  • Methods for synthesis of nanoparticles
  • Chemical reduction method
  • Suspensions of nanoparticles in conventional
    heat transfer fluids
  • are produced by two methods
  • The two-step technique
  • The single-step technique
  • The two-step method first synthesizes
    nanoparticles and then disperses
  • them into base fluids.
  • The single-step method simultaneously makes and
    disperses
  • nanoparticles directly into base fluids.

4
Literature review
Reference Nano particle Base fluid Method to measure Vol. conc. (?) Temp (C) Studied parameter Result
Zhou et al. (2009) CuO 25nm, 50nm Ethylene Glycol Differential Scanning Calorimeter (0-25) 25 Volume fraction Particle size Increase in volume fraction specific heat decreases. Solid liquid interface can change phonon vibration mode near surface area of nanoparticle which result in change of Cp.
Buongiorno et al (2011) Silica(32nm) ,alumina(50nm), copper oxide(30nm) Water Heat flux-type differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments Q2000) (0-1) 35,45, 55 Volume fraction Particle size Decreases with increase in volume fraction. There appear to be small discrepancies between the data and predictions decreases with every different size.
5
Reference Nano particle Base fluid Method to measure Vol. conc. (?) Temp (C) Studied parameter Result
wang et al. (2006) CuO 50nm water Differential scanning calorimeter (0-25) 0-300 Volume fraction In high-temperature region, the specific heat capacity of a CuO crystal higher than the bulk value while in the low-temperature region, the specific heat capacity of nanoparticle is lower than the bulk value.
Donghyun et al. (2011) Alkali metal chloride salt Water differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments Q2000) (0-1) 35,45, 55 Volume fraction Higher cp of nanoparticles than the bulk value of silica.
6
Reference Nano particle Base fluid Method to measure Vol. conc. (?) Temp (C) Studied parameter Result
Sheng et al. (2008) Al2O3 50nm water Differential scanning calorimeter(DSC)(PerkinElmer DSC7) (0-21.7) 25-40 Volume fraction Sonicated for 10-24hr Specific heat of Al2O3 nanoparticle enhanced up to 25 incomparison with that of the bulk case. The predictions of models I and II are larger than those based on the specific heat of bulk Al2O3.
7
Existing model
  • Model I ( Murshed et al., 2006)
  • Model II (Murshed et al., 2006 and Venerus et
    al., 2006)

8
Evaluation of Existing Model
Al2O3 nanoparticles, d 50 nm, T 55oC
  • With increase in nanoparticle concentration, the
    predicted value decreases for all the
    models.
  • Both models are overpredicted.
  • Model 1 seems to be more overpredicted than
    model 2.

9
Al2O3 nanoparticles, d 50 nm, T 45oC
Al2O3 nanoparticles, d 50 nm, T 35oC

10
Problem Formulation and Objectives
  • Existing models for specific heat have
    limitations
  • Not tested/validated for accuracy under wide
    range of experimental conditions
  • Models were either for mm or µm sized particles
    or limited nm size data
  • Hence, objectives of this work
  • To evaluate the accuracy of existing models of
    specific heat
  • Develop new validated model for specific heat of
    nanofluids

11
Volumetric specific heat as a function of
temperature for water ZnO nanofluids
Set-up for measuring volumetric specific heat
Sensor needle
12
Methodology and Work Plan
  • Carry out extensive experimental work to find out
    the effect of different particle size, volumetric
    concentration on specific heat of different
    nanofluid.
  • Develop improved model for specific heat using
    the above experimental data and theory .
  • Validation of model.
  • Design/develop tester for measuring specific
    heat.

13
SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 2013
Time Activity January February March April May June July
Literature Review x x x x x x x
Experimental testing of cp for metal, metal oxide, carbon nanotube x x x x x
Model for cp Development x x
Cp Model Validation x
Communication of Result x
Thesis Writting x x
14
  • REFERENCES
  • Chon C.H, Kihm K.D., Lee S.P. and Choi S.U.S.,
    2005 Empirical Correlation Finding The Role of
    Temperature and Particle Size for Nanofluid
    (Al2O3) Thermal Conductivity Enhancement, Physics
    Letter, Vol. 87, Issue. 153107, PP. 1-3.
  • Choi U.S Stephen, Wang H.P., 1995 Enhancing
    thermal conductivity of fluids with
    nanoparticles, Siginer D.A., Developments and
    Applications of Non-Newtonian Flows, FED-vol.
    231/MD-vol. 66, ASME, New York, pp. 99105.
  • Chandrasekar M, Suresh S and Bose A.C, 2010
    Experimental investigations and theoretical
    determination of thermal conductivity and
    viscosity of al2o3/water nanofluid, J.
    Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 34 (2010)
    210-216.
  • Cristina Buzea, Ivan Pacheco and Kevin Robbie,
    2007 Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles Sources
    and Toxicity, Biointerphases, Vol 2, pp. 17-71.
  • Das S.K., Putra N., Thiesen P. and Roetzel W.,
    2003 Temperature Dependence of Thermal
    Conductivity Enhancement for Nanofluids, Heat
    Transfer, Vol. 125, PP. 567-574.

15
D. Zhu, X. Li, N. Wang, X. Wang, J. Gao and H.
Li, 2009 Dispersion behavior and thermal
conductivity characteristics of Al2O3H2O
nanofluids, Applied Physics, 9 131139. Das
S.K, Choi S.U.S., W. Yu and K. Pradeep, 2008
Nanofluids Science and Technology, Wiley
Interscience. Vol 2, pp. 17-71. Echlin .P,
Handbook of sample preparation for scanning
electron microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, DOI
10.1007/978-0-387-85731-2_12. Eastman J.A., Choi
U.S Stephen, Li S., Thompson L.J., (1997),
Enhanced thermal conductivity through the
development of nanofluids, Proceedings of the
Symposium on Nanophase and Nanocomposite
Materials II, vol. 457, Materials Research
Society, USA, pp. 311. Buongiorno .J,
(2006)Convective transport in nanofluids,
Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 128, no. 3, p p.
240250, 2006. Khanafer. K and Vafai.K A
critical synthesis of thermophysical
characteristics of nanofluids, Int. J. Heat and
Mass Transfer 54 (2011) 4410-4428.
Bhattacharya.P , A.N. Samanta and S.
Chakraborty(2009), Numerical study of conjugate
heat transfer in rectangular microchannel heat
sink with Al2O3/H2O nanofluids, J. Heat Mass
Transfer 45 13231333.
16
.
Gallego M.J.P, Lugo L, Legido J.L and Pineiro M.M
Thermal conductivity and viscosity measurements
of ethylene glycol-based Al2O3 nanofluids,
Nanoscale Research Letters 6 (211) (2008)
1-11. Murshed S.M.S., Leong K.C. and Yang C.,
2005 Enhanced thermal conductivity of
TiO2water based nanofluids, International
Journal of Thermal Sciences, Vol. 44, PP.
367373. S. Q. Zhou and R. Ni, Measurement
of the specific heat capacity of water-based
Al2O3 nanofluid, Applied Physics Letters, vol.
92, Article ID 093123, 3 pages, 2008. Swanson
E.J., Tavares J, Coulombe.S Improved
dual-plasma process for the synthesis of coated
or functionalized metal nanoparticles, IEEE
Trans. Plasma Sci. 36 (4) (2008)
886887. Timofeeva E.V., Gavrilov A.N.,
McCloskey J.M., Tolmachev Y.V., Sprunt S.,
Lopatina L.M. and Selinger J.V., 2007 Thermal
Conductivity and Particle Agglomeration In
Alumina Nanofluids Experiment And Theory,
Physical Review E, Vol. 76, Issue. 061703, PP.
1-16. U. Rea, M. McKrell, L.W. Hu and J.
Buongiorno(2009) Laminar convective heat
transfer and viscous pressure loss of
aluminawater and zirconiawater nanofluids, Int.
J. Heat and Mass Transfer 52 20422048. Wang Z.
L., Tang D.W., Liu S., Zheng X. H., Araki N.,
2007 Thermal-Conductivity and
Thermal-Diffusivity Measurements of Nanofluids by
3? Method and Mechanism Analysis of Heat
Transport, Thermophys, Vol. 28, PP.
12551268. Xie H.Q, Wang J.C, Xi T.G, Liu Y , Ai
F and Wu Q.R, Thermal conductivity enhancement of
suspensions containing nanosized alumia
particles, Applied Physics 91 (7) (2002)
4568-4572.
17
  • Thank You
  • Acknowledgement Thapar University-Seed
    Money Grant

  • (Financial Assistance)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com