Optimized Fast-handoff Scheme for Application Layer Mobility Management - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Optimized Fast-handoff Scheme for Application Layer Mobility Management

Description:

Optimized Fast-handoff Scheme for Application Layer Mobility Management ... Columbia University. Onur Altintas. Toyota InfoTechnology Center ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: adu54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Optimized Fast-handoff Scheme for Application Layer Mobility Management


1
Optimized Fast-handoff Scheme for Application
Layer Mobility Management
  • Authors Ashutosh Dutta, Sunil Madhani, Wai Chen
  • Telcordia Technologies
  • Henning Schulzrinne
  • Columbia University
  • Onur Altintas
  • Toyota InfoTechnology Center
  • First author is also a student at Columbia
    University

2
Outline
  • Motivation
  • Intra-domain Mobility Management
  • SIP based Mobility Management
  • SIP and Mobile IP
  • Fast-handoff for SIP Mobility
  • Test-bed Realization
  • Experimental results

3
IETF Multimedia Protocol Stack
Media Transport
media encap (H.261. MPEG)
Signaling
SAP
SDP
MGCP
DHCPP
Application Daemon
SIP
H.323
RTSP
RSVP
RTCP
RTP
DNS
LDAP
TCP
UDP
CIP
MIPv6
IDMP
Network
MIP
ICMP
IGMP
MIP-LR
IPv4, IPv6, IP Multicast
Kernel
PPP
AAL3/4
AAL5
PPP
Physical
CDMA 1XRTT /GPRS
SONET
ATM
Ethernet
802.11b
Heterogeneous Access
4
Motivation
  • Objective Design and evaluate optimized
    techniques based on Application Layer Mobility
    Management Scheme
  • Several Network Layer Scheme provide optimized
    handoff techniques for Intra-domain mobility
  • Application Layer Mobility Management Scheme
    rules out the need for networking components
    such as Home Agent/Foreign Agent
  • SIP based mobility is an application layer scheme
    supporting Real-Time traffic for Mobile Wireless
    Internet
  • It is essential to reduce transient real-time
    traffic during frequent handoffs

5
Network Layer fast-handoff approaches
  • Intra-domain Mobility Management Protocol
  • Use of Mobility Agent to limit the Intra-domain
    updates to within a domain
  • Hierarchical Mobile IPv4/v6 Fast Hand-offs
  • Foreign Agent Assisted Handoffs
  • Intra-domain Mobility with buffering Agents

6
SIP Background
  • SIP allows two or more participants to establish
    a session including multiple media streams
  • audio, video, distributed games, shared
    applications, white boards, or any other
    Internet-based communication mechanism
  • Standardized by the IETF RFC 2543
  • Is being implemented by several vendors,
    primarily for Internet telephony
  • e.g. Microsoft XP operating system includes SIP
    as part of its built-in protocol stack
  • Recently being extended to provide presence,
    instant messaging and event notification
  • Endpoints addressed by SIP URLs
  • siponur_at_toyota-itc.com

7
Why SIP Mobility ?
  • SIP is an application layer signaling protocol
  • it can keep mobility support independent of the
    underlying wireless technology and network layer
    elements
  • 3GPP, 3GPP2, and MWIF have agreed upon SIP as the
    basis of the session management of the mobile
    Internet
  • SIP will eventually be part of the mobile
    Internet so why not use its inherently present
    mobility support functions
  • SIP can provide personal mobility, terminal
    mobility, session mobility and service mobility
  • No requirement to modify (or add) capabilities to
    existing terminals operating system

8
Types of SIP mobility
  • SIP provides variety of mobility techniques
  • Personal Mobility
  • Allows users to be reachable in multiple
    locations using a unique URI
  • Service Mobility
  • Allows users to maintain access to their services
    while moving between service providers
  • Session Mobility
  • Allows a user to maintain a media session while
    changing between terminals
  • Mid-session (terminal) mobility
  • Allows a user to maintain a session while moving
    (support for real-time streaming applications for
    mobiles)

9
SIP mobility Performance snapshot in 802.11
Environment
  • Byte Sizes of SIP signaling Timing for Signaling
    messages
  • INVITE - 455 bytes 100 msec processing time
    between msgs (OS dependent)
  • Ringing - 223 bytes 5 msec for Invite to traverse
  • OK - 381 bytes 70 msec for Re-Invite to traverse
    (mostly queuing delays)
  • ACK - 261 bytes 150 msec for complete
    re-registration
  • Bye - 150 bytes 300-400 msec for address
    acquisition without (SIP,MIP)
  • De-Register - 370 bytes 3-4 sec for address
    acquisition with ARP (SIP,MIP)
  • Re-Invite - 450 bytes
  • Re-register - 425 bytes

10
Handoff Delay Analysis (SIP-Mobility)
MH (IP1)
CH
MH (IP0)
Base Station
DHCP/PPP Server
SIP Signaling
Beacon
Beacon Interval
RTP Session
MH moves
Beacon
Binds
L2
Discover/Request
L3
Offer/IP address
Configuration Time
Re-Invite
L2 Layer 2
Media Redirection
RTP Session
L3 Layer 3
11
SIPMM-MIP BW and Latency experimental evaluation
12
Cellular IP
MIP registration
CIP update
Media
Home Agent
Correspondent Host
Internet (with Mobile IP)
Domain B
Domain A
13
Hierarchical Foreign Agent
14
HAWAII
Internet
Domain 2
Domain 1
Domain Root Router
Domain Root Router
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
BS
BS
BS
15
TeleMIPs Architecture Layout
IDMP/TeleMIP Architecture
16
Initial Domain-Based Registration Procedure
17
Subsequent Intra-Domain Registration
18
Mobility Proxy
19
SIP fast-handoff mechanism -RTPtrans
Intra- Domain fast-handoff
Domain -D1
RT1,RT2,RT3 - RTP Translators
Mapping Database
IP2 -gt IPR1
Delay
IP3 -gt IPR2
Simulator
.
SIP
.
Server
.
(Media)
R
1
2 (Re-invite)
(Media in flight)
3
Register
2
IPR2
IPR3
IPR1
4
RT2
RT3
RT1
IP1p1
IP2p1
4
(Transient media)
IP1
IP2
IP3
20
SIP fast-handoff RTPtrans - Protocol flow
21
SIP fast-handoff with B2B SIP UA approach 1
Router
Delay
CH
Simulator
IPch
SIP MA (B2B)
Media
Invite B2B SDP
SIP
SIP
UAC
UAS
SIP
SIP
Media
UAS
UAC
Media
Media
Media
Invite
Re-Invite
Invite
IP3
IP1(Initial position before move)
IP2
Move
22
Flow diagram B2B approach 1(Limits Re-invite to
B2B UA within a domain)
B2BUA
IP1
IP0
UA1
UA2
MH
MH
CH
Invite
Invite
ok
ok
ack
ack
RTP1
RTP2
Media Transl- ator
Re-Invite
RTP1 after the move
RTP2
23
SIP fast-handoff with B2B SIP UA approach 2
Router
Delay
CH
Simulator
IPch
SIP MA (B2B)
Invite MH SDP
SIP
SIP
UAC
UAS
SIP
SIP
Media
UAS
UAC
Media
Media
Invite
Invite no SDP
Invite
IP3
IP1(Initial position before move)
IP2
Move
24
Fast handoff with B2B UA approach 2 flow
diagram Re-invite from MH activates the
interceptor at B2BUA
B2BUA
IP0
IP1
UA1
UA2
MH
CH
MH
Invite (no SDP)
OK (MH SDP)
Invite MH SDP
OK
ACK
ACK CH SDP
RTP
Re-Invite
RTP1
(Interceptor)
25
B2BUA- fast-handoff approach 3 multicast agent
26
B2BUA- fast-handoff approach 3 multicast agent
-flow
B2BUA
IP0
IP1
CH
UA1
UA2
MH
MH
Invite (no SDP)
OK (MH SDP)
Invite MH SDP
OK
ACK
ACK CH SDP
RTP
Re-Invite
Re-Invite with Maddr
Transient data at M addr
RTP1
RTP
27
SIP based Mobility in a Test-bed
Outer sphere CDMA/CDPD network
DMZ Network
Company Intranet
DomainSN1
DHCP
HUB
IGW
Ciscos NAT
DNS
Internet
CH
sun80
SIP Client
cisco80
PPP Server/ Wireless ISP
.21
DomainSN2
SIP Proxy
802.11b
DHCP
SIP Proxy
Private Subnet 2
MH
CH
sun90
CDMA
CDPD
cisco90
DHCP
DomainSN3
802.11b
Private Subnet 1
Private Subnet 3
802.11b
Outdoor
DMZ Network 802.11
MH
SIP Client
28
Sample Packet Trace for Fast Handoff (see notes
page)
29
Sample Packet Trace for Mobility Proxy-based
Handoff (see notes page)
30
Issues
  • Duplicate Packets Detection
  • Aging of RTP translator
  • Scalability
  • Number of subnets is large
  • Mobile is moving too rapidly between the subnets
  • Mechanism to remove the virtual Interface
  • Mapping of subnets and RTPtranslators

31
Conclusions
  • Application Layer fast-handoff mechanism
    discussed
  • Test-bed Realization presented
  • Results of the experiments analyzed
  • RTP aging, scalability, effect of mobility rate
    are future
  • Comparison with other network layer approaches is
    helpful.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com