Level 4 Emotion Option' Louise Phillips' Emotion and Cognition' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Level 4 Emotion Option' Louise Phillips' Emotion and Cognition'

Description:

Martin et al. (1991) report GAD patients increased stroop effect on happy words ... cognitive behavioural therapy for GAD. after therapy no emotion bias in Stroop ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: louisep4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Level 4 Emotion Option' Louise Phillips' Emotion and Cognition'


1
Level 4 Emotion Option.Louise Phillips.Emotion
and Cognition.
  • Lecture 3
  • Cognitive theories of emotional dysfunction.
  • Anxiety disorders and cognition.

2
Cognitive theories of emotion dysfunction.
3
Early cognitive theories of emotional disorders
  • Beck memory schemas
  • dysfunctional schema of self
  • cognitive biases in information processing
  • anxiety - thoughts of danger
  • depression - thoughts of loss/failure
  • Bower network model of affective processes.
  • When experiencing emotion,
  • primed to mood-congruent stimuli.

4
Effects of anxiety on cognitive performance
5
Distressing intrusive thoughts
  • Beck anxiety and depression
  • negative automatic thoughts
  • Intrusive thoughts
  • repetitive thoughts - unwanted uncomfortable
  • interrupt ongoing activity
  • difficult to control
  • Eysenck intrusive thoughts in anxiety disorders
    impair working memory capacity.

6
Anxiety and cognitive capacity
  • Eysenck
  • Poorer working memory (WM) capacity in anxiety
  • Worry
  • Resource-consuming
  • Task-irrelevant
  • Depletes WM capacity
  • Anxious individuals
  • Poorer on WM-demanding tasks
  • More susceptible to memory interference

7
Williams et al information processing models of
attentional bias
  • anxiety effects are preconscious
  • anxiety should influence preattentive processes
  • depression influences processing only after
    stimulus identification
  • depression should influence explicit memory,
    conscious processing

8
Attention and preconscious processing
Conscious processing
9
Methods of studying attention bias in mood
disorders
  • Emotional Stroop
  • compare time to name colour of neutral versus
    emotionally salient words
  • e.g. CARPET versus CANCER
  • Dot probe tasks
  • compare time to respond to presence of dot in
    neutral versus emotionally salient stimuli

10
Dot probe task
?

CANCER CARPET
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Left or right?
11
Anxiety disorders and attentional processing.
12
Anxiety
  • Individual differences
  • Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)
  • hypervigilance for threat stimuli
  • distractibility
  • Specific phobias
  • preattentive analysis of biologically-prepotent
    aversive stimuli
  • automatically shifts attention to stimuli

13
Trait anxiety and stressors
  • MacLeod and Mathews (1988) dot probe
  • in unthreatening situation
  • no difference high/low trait anxiety students in
    bias to threatening stimuli
  • threatening situation (exam)
  • high trait anxiety, more attendance to threat
    stimuli
  • low trait anxiety, avoid threat stimuli
  • attendance to threat stimuli predispose to later
    anxiety disorders?

14
Preattentive versus conscious processing
  • Mogg et al. (1993) emotional Stroop
  • e.g. CARPET versus CANCER
  • 14ms presentation plus mask
  • no objective awareness of word content
  • GAD patients slower colour naming of threat words
  • Mogg et al. (1995) emotional dot probe
  • 14ms presentation of words plus mask
  • no objective awareness of word content
  • GAD patients quicker on dot probe to threat
    words.
  • i.e. preattentive processing in GAD.

15
Attention to nonverbal stimuli
  • Faces are more salient social stimuli.
  • angry face clear threat
  • Bradley, Mogg et al.
  • faces as stimuli in dot probe task
  • increased vigilance to angry faces associated
    with
  • high trait anxiety
  • GAD
  • even when faces presented 14ms

16
Face dot probe task
Probe left or right?
O

17
Spider phobia and duration of attention
  • Mogg Bradley
  • spider phobics given dot probe task
  • pictures of spiders 200, 500, 2000 ms
  • phobics greater vigilance at 200ms

18
Inducing anxiety
  • MacLeod (1999) chapter in Handbook.
  • non-anxious participants
  • 684 dot probe training trials
  • half in threat bias condition induced
    attentional bias towards attending threat words
    through frequency manipulations in dot probe task
  • half in non-threat bias condition dot probe
    occurred in non-threatening word.
  • Threat bias group
  • did show attentional bias to threat
  • more vulnerable to anxiety in subsequent
    stressful task.

19
Criticisms of anxiety-attention findings
  • Results could be explained as expertise bias
  • e.g. Dalgleish ornithologists study
  • but this could not apply to extinction of
    attentional bias following treatment
  • Abnormal attention to any emotional stimuli
  • Martin et al. (1991) report GAD patients
    increased stroop effect on happy words
  • but most replication attempts failed

20
Anxiety and memory
21
Anxiety and memory for emotional material
  • No tendency for anxious patients to show recall
    bias for threatening material
  • GAD
  • agoraphobics and social phobics
  • spider phobics
  • Watts impaired recognition of feared stimuli
  • Results do not support schema model suggesting
    that anxiety results in heightened activation of
    all threat stimuli.

22
Explicit and implicit memory
  • Mathews et al. (1989) GAD patients/controls
  • explicit or implicit (stem completion) task
  • no effect GAD on explicit memory
  • GAD greater implicit memory threat words
  • Replicated on GAD, panic disorder, trait anxious
    students.
  • However, some failures to replicate

23
Clinical implications of attentional theories of
anxiety
24
Implications for predicting anxiety proneness
  • MacLeod Hagan (1992)
  • women screened cervical cancer
  • emotion Stroop task
  • 8 weeks later, those diagnosed cancer assessed
    for anxiety responses
  • Stroop response predicted anxiety
  • better predictor than self-ratings

25
Treatment implications
  • Difficult to change preattentive biases?
  • MacLeod, Rutherford Campbell (1997)
  • 30 anxious students
  • 6000 dot-probe trials, 3 weeks
  • 15 students - dots biased to non-threat words
  • 15 students - no bias in dot probe position
  • non-threat bias condition
  • attentional bias away from threat
  • decline in anxiety self-ratings

26
Effects of treatment on attentional biases
  • Mogg et al. (1995) GAD patients
  • showed emotion Stroop bias
  • cognitive behavioural therapy for GAD
  • after therapy no emotion bias in Stroop
  • Mattia et al. (1993) social phobics
  • only patients showing good recovery show decline
    in magnitude attentional bias
  • Attentional measures as good index of recovery
    from anxiety disorders?

27
Next lecture depression
  • Effects of depression on attention
  • Effects of depression on effortful processing.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com