Title: Level 4 Emotion Option' Louise Phillips' Emotion and Cognition'
1Level 4 Emotion Option.Louise Phillips.Emotion
and Cognition.
- Lecture 3
- Cognitive theories of emotional dysfunction.
- Anxiety disorders and cognition.
2Cognitive theories of emotion dysfunction.
3Early cognitive theories of emotional disorders
- Beck memory schemas
- dysfunctional schema of self
- cognitive biases in information processing
- anxiety - thoughts of danger
- depression - thoughts of loss/failure
- Bower network model of affective processes.
- When experiencing emotion,
- primed to mood-congruent stimuli.
4Effects of anxiety on cognitive performance
5Distressing intrusive thoughts
- Beck anxiety and depression
- negative automatic thoughts
- Intrusive thoughts
- repetitive thoughts - unwanted uncomfortable
- interrupt ongoing activity
- difficult to control
- Eysenck intrusive thoughts in anxiety disorders
impair working memory capacity.
6Anxiety and cognitive capacity
- Eysenck
- Poorer working memory (WM) capacity in anxiety
- Worry
- Resource-consuming
- Task-irrelevant
- Depletes WM capacity
- Anxious individuals
- Poorer on WM-demanding tasks
- More susceptible to memory interference
7Williams et al information processing models of
attentional bias
- anxiety effects are preconscious
- anxiety should influence preattentive processes
- depression influences processing only after
stimulus identification - depression should influence explicit memory,
conscious processing
8Attention and preconscious processing
Conscious processing
9Methods of studying attention bias in mood
disorders
- Emotional Stroop
- compare time to name colour of neutral versus
emotionally salient words - e.g. CARPET versus CANCER
- Dot probe tasks
- compare time to respond to presence of dot in
neutral versus emotionally salient stimuli
10Dot probe task
?
CANCER CARPET
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Left or right?
11Anxiety disorders and attentional processing.
12Anxiety
- Individual differences
- Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)
- hypervigilance for threat stimuli
- distractibility
- Specific phobias
- preattentive analysis of biologically-prepotent
aversive stimuli - automatically shifts attention to stimuli
13Trait anxiety and stressors
- MacLeod and Mathews (1988) dot probe
- in unthreatening situation
- no difference high/low trait anxiety students in
bias to threatening stimuli - threatening situation (exam)
- high trait anxiety, more attendance to threat
stimuli - low trait anxiety, avoid threat stimuli
- attendance to threat stimuli predispose to later
anxiety disorders?
14Preattentive versus conscious processing
- Mogg et al. (1993) emotional Stroop
- e.g. CARPET versus CANCER
- 14ms presentation plus mask
- no objective awareness of word content
- GAD patients slower colour naming of threat words
- Mogg et al. (1995) emotional dot probe
- 14ms presentation of words plus mask
- no objective awareness of word content
- GAD patients quicker on dot probe to threat
words. - i.e. preattentive processing in GAD.
15Attention to nonverbal stimuli
- Faces are more salient social stimuli.
- angry face clear threat
- Bradley, Mogg et al.
- faces as stimuli in dot probe task
- increased vigilance to angry faces associated
with - high trait anxiety
- GAD
- even when faces presented 14ms
16Face dot probe task
Probe left or right?
O
17Spider phobia and duration of attention
- Mogg Bradley
- spider phobics given dot probe task
- pictures of spiders 200, 500, 2000 ms
- phobics greater vigilance at 200ms
18Inducing anxiety
- MacLeod (1999) chapter in Handbook.
- non-anxious participants
- 684 dot probe training trials
- half in threat bias condition induced
attentional bias towards attending threat words
through frequency manipulations in dot probe task - half in non-threat bias condition dot probe
occurred in non-threatening word. - Threat bias group
- did show attentional bias to threat
- more vulnerable to anxiety in subsequent
stressful task.
19Criticisms of anxiety-attention findings
- Results could be explained as expertise bias
- e.g. Dalgleish ornithologists study
- but this could not apply to extinction of
attentional bias following treatment - Abnormal attention to any emotional stimuli
- Martin et al. (1991) report GAD patients
increased stroop effect on happy words - but most replication attempts failed
20Anxiety and memory
21Anxiety and memory for emotional material
- No tendency for anxious patients to show recall
bias for threatening material - GAD
- agoraphobics and social phobics
- spider phobics
- Watts impaired recognition of feared stimuli
- Results do not support schema model suggesting
that anxiety results in heightened activation of
all threat stimuli.
22Explicit and implicit memory
- Mathews et al. (1989) GAD patients/controls
- explicit or implicit (stem completion) task
- no effect GAD on explicit memory
- GAD greater implicit memory threat words
- Replicated on GAD, panic disorder, trait anxious
students. - However, some failures to replicate
23Clinical implications of attentional theories of
anxiety
24Implications for predicting anxiety proneness
- MacLeod Hagan (1992)
- women screened cervical cancer
- emotion Stroop task
- 8 weeks later, those diagnosed cancer assessed
for anxiety responses - Stroop response predicted anxiety
- better predictor than self-ratings
25Treatment implications
- Difficult to change preattentive biases?
- MacLeod, Rutherford Campbell (1997)
- 30 anxious students
- 6000 dot-probe trials, 3 weeks
- 15 students - dots biased to non-threat words
- 15 students - no bias in dot probe position
- non-threat bias condition
- attentional bias away from threat
- decline in anxiety self-ratings
26Effects of treatment on attentional biases
- Mogg et al. (1995) GAD patients
- showed emotion Stroop bias
- cognitive behavioural therapy for GAD
- after therapy no emotion bias in Stroop
- Mattia et al. (1993) social phobics
- only patients showing good recovery show decline
in magnitude attentional bias - Attentional measures as good index of recovery
from anxiety disorders?
27Next lecture depression
- Effects of depression on attention
- Effects of depression on effortful processing.