Title: Sociocultural Level of Analysis: Sociocultural Cognition
1Sociocultural Level of AnalysisSociocultural
Cognition
2Principles of the Sociocultural Level of Analysis
- 1. Human beings are social animals and we have a
basic need to belong. - The biological and cognitive systems that makeup
the individual are embedded in an even larger
system of interrelationships with other
individuals. - The relationship between the individual is
affected by being part of a group is
bidirectional as an individual is affected by
being part of a group, the individual can also
effect behavior in the group.
3Principles of the Sociocultural Level of Analysis
- 2. Culture influences behavior.
- Culture can be defined as the norms and values
that define a society. - In a multicultural society there is a need to
understand the effect of culture on a persons
behavior, because the study of culture may help
people better understand and appreciate cultural
differences.
4Principles of the Sociocultural Level of Analysis
- 3. Humans are social animals, they have a social
self. - People not only have an individual identity, but
also a collective or social one as well. - Social identities are very important to the
definition of who we are, and many behaviors are
determined by membership of groups such as
family, community, club, or nationality.
5Principles of the Sociocultural Level of Analysis
- 4. Peoples views of the world are resistant to
change. - A world view can be defined as the way the world
is understood how it is supposed to work, why it
works the way it does, and what values are
essential in the world community. - According to psychologists the sense of self is
developed within social and cultural contexts.
6Research Methods at the Sociocultural Level of
Analysis
- In sociocultural research, the goal is to see how
people interact with each other. nature. - Behavior of participants needs to be as realistic
as possible. - A significant amount of the research is
naturalistic- as it really is. - Research is done in the environments in which the
behavior is most likely to take place.
7Research Methods at the Sociocultural Level of
Analysis
- Participant observation researchers immerses
themselves in a social setting for an extended
period of time and observe behavior. - Overt observation when the participants of a
group know that they are being observed. - Researcher must obtain trust of the group being
observed. - Covert observation when the participants of a
group do NOT know they are being observed. - Sometimes used with groups that would be hostile
to an outsider observing or would not want to be
open and honest, or the activity is illegal (e.g.
drug use). - Interviews
- Focus groups
8When Prophecy FailsLeon Festinger et al.s (1956)
- When Prophecy Fails is a 1956 classic book in
social psychology by Leon Festinger, Henry
Riecken, and Stanley Schachter about a UFO cult
that believes the end of the world is at hand. - Festinger and his associates read an interesting
item in their local newspaper headlined "Prophecy
from planet Clarion call to city flee that
flood." A housewife from Chicago, named Dorothy
Martin, had mysteriously been given messages in
her house in the form of "automatic writing" from
alien beings on the planet Clarion. - These messages revealed that the world would end
in a great flood before dawn on December 21,
1954. Martins cult incorporated ideas from what
was to become Scientology. - The group of believers, headed by Martin, had
taken strong behavioral steps to indicate their
degree of commitment to the belief. They had left
jobs, college, and spouses, and had given away
money and possessions to prepare for their
departure on the flying saucer, which was to
rescue the group of true believers.
9When Prophecy FailsLeon Festinger et al.s (1956)
- Festinger and his colleagues infiltrated Martins
group and reported the following sequence of
events - Prior to December 20. The group shuns publicity.
Interviews are given only grudgingly. Access to
Martins house is only provided to those who can
convince the group that they are true believers.
The group evolves a belief systemprovided by the
automatic writing from the planet Clarionto
explain the details of the cataclysm, the reason
for its occurrence, and the manner in which the
group would be saved from the disaster. - December 20. The group expects a visitor from
outer space to call upon them at midnight and to
escort them to a waiting spacecraft. As
instructed, the group goes to great lengths to
remove all metallic items from their persons. As
midnight approaches, zippers, bra straps, and
other objects are discarded. The group waits. - 1205 A.M., December 21. No visitor. Someone in
the group notices that another clock in the room
shows 1155. The group agrees that it is not yet
midnight.
10When Prophecy FailsLeon Festinger et al.s (1956)
- Festinger and his colleagues infiltrated Martins
group and reported the following sequence of
events - 1210 A.M. The second clock strikes midnight.
Still no visitor. The group sits in stunned
silence. The cataclysm itself is no more than
seven hours away. - 400 A.M. The group has been sitting in stunned
silence. A few attempts at finding explanations
have failed. Martin begins to cry. - 445 A.M. Another message by automatic writing is
sent to Martin. It states, in effect, that the
God of Earth has decided to spare the planet from
destruction. The cataclysm has been called off
"The little group, sitting all night long, had
spread so much light that God had saved the world
from destruction." - Afternoon, December 21. Newspapers are called
interviews are sought. In a reversal of its
previous distaste for publicity, the group begins
an urgent campaign to spread its message to as
broad an audience as possible.
11(No Transcript)
12Attribution Theory
- Attribution theory is defined as how people
interpret and explain causal relationships in the
social world. - People may have different ways of attributing
causes to events. - When people try to understand behavior, they
observe other peoples reactions, and make
inferences about intention and responsibility.
13Attribution Theory
- Actor-observer effect people tend to make an
attribution about a behavior depending whether
they are performing it themselves or observing
somebody else doing it. - Situational factors something to do with
external factors. - Dispositional factors something to do with
personal (internal) factors.
14Errors in Attribution
- Fundamental attribution error when people
overestimate the role of dispositional factors in
an individuals behavior and underestimate the
situational factors. - Self-serving bias (SSB) people take their
successes, attribute them to dispositional
factors, and dissociate themselves from their
failures, attributing them to situational factors.
15Errors in AttributionGreenberg
- Greenberg et. al (1982) argue that the reason we
do this is to protect our self-esteem. - If we can attribute our success to dispositional
factors, it boosts our self-esteem, and if we can
attribute our failures to factors beyond our
control, we can protect our self-esteem. - Miller and Ross (1975) argued that cognitive
factors play a role in SSB, we usually expect to
succeed at a task. - If we expect to succeed and we do, we attribute
it to our skill and ability. - If we expect to succeed and fail, we feel that it
was bad luck or external factors - If we expect to fail and we dont so well, we
attribute it to dispositional factors. - If we expect to fail and we succeed, we attribute
it to external factors and luck.
16Errors in AttributionMiller and Ross
- Miller and Ross (1975) argued that cognitive
factors play a role in SSB, we usually expect to
succeed at a task. - If we expect to succeed and we do, we attribute
it to our skill and ability. - If we expect to succeed and fail, we feel that it
was bad luck or external factors - If we expect to fail and we dont so well, we
attribute it to dispositional factors. - If we expect to fail and we succeed, we attribute
it to external factors and luck. - There is an exception people who are severely
depressed tend to make more dispositional
attribution thus blaming themselves for feeling
miserable.
17Errors in AttributionKashima and Triandis
- Kashima and Triandis (1986) found there were
significant cultural differences between US and
Japanese students. - In the experiment participants were asked to
remember details of slides of scenes from
unfamiliar countries. - When asked to explain their performance, the
Americans tended to attribute their success to
ability while the Japanese tended to explain
their failures in terms of lack of ability. This
is called the modesty bias.
18Errors in AttributionModesty Bias
- Chandler et al. (1990) also observed this bias in
Japanese students, and Watkins and Regmi (1990)
found the same in Nepalese students. - The role of culture is pivotal in understanding
the modesty bias. - Bond, Leung, and Wan (1982) found that Chinese
students who exhibited the modesty bias indtead
of the SSB were more popular with their peers. - Kashima and Triandis argue that because of the
more collective nature of many Asian societies
if people derive their self-esteem not from
individual accomplishment but from group
identity, they are less likely to use the SSB