Government on the Internet: The Citizens Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Government on the Internet: The Citizens Perspective

Description:

What New Zealand government information (national and local) they sought and ... Access to legislation (gratis) Rowena Cullen and Peter Hernon. 19. Some Dislikes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: hern9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Government on the Internet: The Citizens Perspective


1
Government on the Internet The Citizens
Perspective
  • Rowena Cullen
  • Peter Hernon

2
Study Purpose
  • Obtain the views of citizens from different
    socio-economic groups and from different sectors
    about
  • What New Zealand government information (national
    and local) they sought and what government
    services they used
  • Their use of government on the Internet in
    comparison to other channels for information
    gathering
  • Their experiences in dealing with government,
    especially through the Internet

3
Those Experiences Related to
  • How they locate the information they needed
  • What barriers they encountered
  • Their views on whether e-government advanced
    democratic processes
  • Their level of trust and confidence in government
    information and services on the Internet

4
Data Collection
  • Focus group interviews
  • Questionnaires for focus group participants to
    complete
  • Walk-through observations involving completion of
    set tasks

5
Data Collection
  • Focus group interviews (2 related to trust and 10
    with specific groups)
  • Wellington
  • Auckland
  • Morrinsville
  • Hawera
  • Disabled citizens
  • Maori
  • Pacific peoples
  • New immigrants
  • 5-6. Business community (Auckland/Wellington)
  • Rural residents
  • Senior citizens
  • Students
  • Working professionals

6
General Findings
  • 72 percent of the participants (not counting the
    new immigrants) used government on the Internet,
    mostly on an infrequent basis

7
Characteristics and Preferences of Key Groups
  • Disabled - activists, keen to be informed,seek
    policies, legislation, info for personal use.
    Needs re web site accessibility
  • Maori - range of uses course info, student
    allowances,contract/tendering, routine personal
    use. Use TPK, but want more Maori presence on all
    sites
  • Pacific peoples - wide range of access, skills,
    usage. E-mail and web sites used to share Pacific
    information. Lack of credit cards for transactions

8
  • 5. New immigrants - prefer minimal contact with
    government, use public libraries. Ongoing
    immigration needs. Language a barrier
  • 6. Rural - 24/7 access important despite
    connections. Focus on business of farming
  • 7. Business communities. Highest use, regular
    contact with government agencies, and ministers.
    Project driven
  • 8. Students - loans/allowances, normal contact
    regarding licences, etc. Study purposes

9
(No Transcript)
10
Some Topics within Education
  • Finding out about entitlements (as a returning
    student)
  • Seeking information about NZCEA
  • Looking at a new school (e.g., ERO reports)
  • Seeking research grant applications
  • Wanting to know about the status of (a) a
    tertiary project OR (b) peer support programmes
  • Seeking information about teacher registration

11
Another Example (Tax/Finance)
  • Taxes
  • Information about paying taxes
  • Tax code
  • Tax regulations (for personal income tax)
  • Tax return
  • Tax refund
  • Seeking IRD number
  • Seeking information about GST
  • Information and services

12
Contact with Government
  • For many the preferred method is the phone
  • Like to interact with a person
  • May want to develop/maintain a relationship so
    rely on phone
  • May go to web to obtain contact information (then
    call)

13
(No Transcript)
14
Method of Contacting Government
  • New Zealand (our studyn65)
  • Phone (49)
  • Web site (39)
  • In person (29)
  • E-mail (26)
  • Letter (15)
  • Other (4)
  • 89.4 multiple means
  • U.S. (Pew Research Centern2,925 Americans, July
    2003)
  • Phone (42)
  • Web site (29)
  • In person (20)
  • E-mail (18)
  • Letter (17)
  • 22 multiple means

15
(No Transcript)
16
Government Portalhttp//www.govt.nz
  • Few familiar with it
  • Those familiar did not rely on it

17
Publics View of Portal
  • Find it slow and ineffective
  • Lists departments and agencies without telling
    you about them
  • Presumes some knowledge of (and familiarity with)
    government
  • Conclusion
  • Prefer to google
  • Portal not integral to their information
    gathering

18
Some Likes
  • Access is 24/7/365
  • Good source of base information
  • Web sites may provide contact information
  • Can browse at their leisure
  • Like web sites that are well laid out, easy to
    use, and have good search features
  • Access to legislation (gratis)

19
Some Dislikes
  • Functionality of web sites varies from department
    to department
  • Favoured some standardisation across web sites
  • Language used is confusing
  • Sites may appear crowdedpacked content
  • Number of clicks to retrieve information may be
    high
  • Cannot complete and return forms online (pdf
    documents may be hard to download)
  • Needed information may be at edge of screen and
    therefore missed

20
Taxonomy of Barriers
  • Physical (technical and infrastructure issues)
  • Skill-based (limited knowledge about how/where
    to search, relevant terminology, and how to
    navigate a web site
  • Attitudinal (no perceived need, preferences for
    other types of contact, comfortable with phone
    and other methods of contact, and issues of
    trust)
  • Content-based (quality and relationship to their
    need)
  • Information architecture (knowing what the web
    site should contain and how best to present the
    content for effective use)

21
Trust as an Issue
Aspects
In Government In Internet In Government on
Internet
Confidence Intrusion in Daily Life
Privacy Security
22
Confidence
  • Refers to the quality of the information
    provided, the currentness of information and the
    recency of the publication date of web sites
  • A factor may be the type of information
  • Such as press release (viewed as self-serving and
    less trustworthy) or policy document

23
Confidence
  • The working professionals questioned the version
    of the information
  • Is it in draft or final form
  • Which version has been archived?
  • Where is the authoritative version if the pdf
    version is not a faithful rendition of the actual
    document?
  • If I see typos and other errors in proofreading,
    I assume the document is half-finished and not
    the final report

24
Intrusion of Government in Daily Lives
  • Big Brother government watches the public a
    surveillance society
  • Working professionals
  • Pacific peoples
  • Maori

25
Privacy
  • Reluctant to provide personal information online
    to government
  • Belief that government has personal information
    on them
  • Would like government sites to indicate that they
    protect any information provided and how they
    protect that information

26
Security
  • Assume government sites block viruses, computer
    hacking, etc.
  • Assume any site ending in .govt is government and
    is protected (secure)
  • A number of respondents wondered How well would
    government protect email messages it receives?
  • Forward/edit messages --Archive
    messages
  • Delete messages (though still on hard drive)

27
Pockets of Distrust
  • Working professionals
  • Maori
  • Pacific peoples
  • Students
  • Distrust may relate to government and as a
    byproduct the information provided

28
Walk-Throughs (Five Tasks)
  • Spraying for painted apple moth in Auckland
  • Forms for tenancy agreement and bond
  • How much is the single pension and living alone
    allowance
  • Book a DOC camp site at Elaine Bay
  • Find a recent report on increase in Maori life
    expectancy

29
Codes for Previous Slide
  • NA Task not attempted
  • NCTask not completed
  • C Task essentially completed, although
    participant has not identified the information
    exactly
  • FCTask fully completed relevant information
    identified
  • ETask ended for other reasons
  • PParticipant would phone at this point

30
Walk-Throughs (Task Completion)
31
Recommendations (for Web sites)
Standardizing/improving design Link information
between sites Improve accessiblity of
content Provide date of last revision Compliance
with Web guidelines (government and
disability) Develop online assistance and more
contact informationencouraging e-mail
contact Acknowledge web sites for quality service
delivery Improve online forms (complete and
return them online)
32
More Recommendations
Promote multi-channel communication between
citizens and government, with the Internet (web
sites and e-mail as one channel) Provide free
access for those with their own computers and
those without (e.g., the equivalent of a 0800
number but for use of government on the
Internet) Offer incentives to encourage
businesses (e.g., small businesses) to engage in
e-compliance
33
Publics Perspective of E-Government
34
Performance Metrics
Outcomes
Inputs
Outcomes
Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Guidelines compliance
Service quality
Service Quality
Outputs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com