Title: Knowing health and wellbeing outcomes of regeneration
1Knowing health and wellbeing outcomes of
regeneration
- Chris Mitchell
- Corporate Research, Fife Council
2Knowing we are making the right difference
- Context to the issue and Fife
- three knowledge projects
- Fife Public Health Dataset
- Fife Social Justice Analysis System
- Fife Regeneration Health and Wellbeing Study
- some conclusions
3(No Transcript)
4The challenge
- No regeneration without social justice -
- health inequality for every one person who dies
before they are 65 in Dalgety Bay, 6 people die
in Mountfleurie, Levenmouth - Abbeyview - lost 3,000 of its 12,000 people in
last 5 years of regeneration activity - unequal people or places? SID03 work data
- Fife has 31,500 employment deprived people of
working age - 65 of employment deprived do NOT live in most
deprived 20 of wards
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7Fife Public Health Dataset
- Comprehensive web based dataset of social,
economic and health indicators to evidence public
policy - Jointly funded and managed by NHS Fife (Public
Health) and Fife Council Children Services and
Corporate Reseqrch - Full-time Co-ordinator plus support
8Fife Public Health Dataset Background
- PAT 18
- State of Fife Index
- PHIS PHDP Pilots
- Fife pilot phase May2002 - May2004, now
mainstreamed FifeNHS and Fife Council Childrens
Services - now a substantive Community Planning resource -
- aim to complement Scottish Neighbourhood
Statistics by adding local admin data - Data warehouse for other tools analysis
9Aim of the dataset
To build and promote the use of a broad range of
social, economic and health indicators in order
to evidence healthy public policy decision-making.
10(No Transcript)
11Whats included?
- Over 250 indicators
- Presented at Ward, LHCC, Fife and Scotland,
- Presented as Excel spreadsheets
- Dataset website also includes project papers,
discussion documents etc. - Converting now to Datazones, Access and GIS
capability
12Hows the information organised?
- Arranged in 9 domains
- population
- social environment
- physical and biological environment
- education, skills and training
- lifestyle and behaviour
- income
- economic indicators
- services
- disease, wellbeing, health and function
13Indicator within a domain
141
Hows the information used?
- Informing Strategic Partnerships eg. Joint
Health Improvement Plan, Childrens Services
Group, Older peoples Framework - Monitoring ROA
- Sourcing needs and outcomes data for Fife Social
Justice Analysis System - Long-term monitoring of regeneration areas
Regeneration Health and Wellbeing study
15Whose indicators?
- Are Public Health Dataset (or SNS, ROA etc)
indicators what disadvantaged people would use to
measure their wellbeing? - SHS proofing study - focus groups
- Health Wellbeing complex and understood its
more than absence of ill health - add relationships, friendships, exercise
- PHDP domains reflect what people think
- Lifestyle, health and function ranked high
- age more than gender explained different
perspectives
16Fife Social Justice Analysis System (FSJAS)
- Longstanding question - do we bend main
programmes to follow social justice, community
plan policy and urban aid etc? - ROA in Fife 2004-5 1.8 million
- Local mainstream public expenditure in Fife in
2004-5 1.5 billion - Do we put our money where our mouth is?
- Fife Partnership engaged Prof, Glen Bramley,
Heriot Watt Univ. to help us find out
17Tanshall Community Budgeting Pilot
- Small Stitch in time regeneration area in
Glenrothes - what do we spend on children? - Joined up picture of spending from finance and
case records (unit costs and modelling),
alongside needs analysis - per capita health spend gt Fife average, lt
Glenrothes - primary education gt Fife
- nursery and secondary education lt Fife
- Social work 3.7 times Fife average
- Area Resource Analysis CAN be done
18(No Transcript)
19FSJAS Main Study
- Analysis of spending by service, client group
geographical area - Create shared database to provide routine,
flexible access to this information - Integrate with data on needs, performance and
outcomes - In the process, - review concepts framework-
review applications elsewhere- comment on
initial findings on spend patterns- advise
partners on development of info systems
20(No Transcript)
21Estimating Local Spending
- Mainly interested in spend by place of residence
of service recipient- sometimes by facility -
on the ground - Budget accounting systems dont record this
- They go down to cost centre level (e.g. school,
area team, local office) - Need to use client records (postcodes)
- Unit cost (adj for client characteristics) is
link - Environmental etc. services more difficult- on
the ground sample surveys - modelling
22CD Based Tool with 2 modes
- Profile - particular geographical area(s) of
interest- preselected indicators- Fife
Scottish benchmarks- thematic pages- printed
reports - Analyse- many or all areas of a given type-
select any combination of measures- counts
ratios- maps- download to Excel for further
analysis
23Primary Education Spend
- Reasonable expenditure estimates possible based
on school budgets, pupil data on characteristics
and postcodes - Model makes assumptions about costs associated
with particular pupil characteristics e.g. FSM,
RON, out of mainstream provision - Considerable variation in spend per pupil
- Spend generally higher in rural areas (small
schools) - ROAs only get 10 more spend than average
24(No Transcript)
25Primary spend by policy intervention
26Health and Social Care
- Focus on particular client age group (elderly)
- Expenditure estimates for acute healthcare and
homecare - Compare with a variety of needs indicators-
Census LTI, aged 75, living alone- specific
health admissions (alcohol related)- SIMD
general income deprivation- (mortality) - Compare broader areas (LMUs)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Fife Regeneration Health and Wellbeing Study
- Abbeyview predicament - who would benefit?
- Social Exclusion Unit Some groups are last to
benefit from polices designed to tackle social
exclusion. - 2003-04 150m of routine, remedial and
regenerative local public spend on areas 1.5m
SIP - Fife Regeneration Health and Wellbeing Study
- Phase 1 Literature review and research design -
St Andrews University and Fife Partnership - Phase 2 10 year action research study in
regeneration areas 3 components - Aggregated quantitative analysis
- Aggregated qualitative analysis
- person centred tracking
30Ph. 1 Literature Review Findings
- Overall, research limited and generally
inconclusive is evidence to link damp, cold
housing with respiratory disease but not much
else - Can associate depression, anxiety with
overcrowding and deprived neighbourhoods - Nature of these relationships, influence of other
socio-economic factors make identification and
direction of causation not straightforward. - Process of regeneration can worsen mental health
and resilience - Need more research!
31Phase 2 Fife Regeneration Study
- Began March 2005 - Hexagon consultants for first
3 years - Funding Communities Scotland, Fife Council, CRF
- Focus on five areas, all with ROA Datazones plus
others to make coherent focus of regeneration - West Fife Villages
- Abbeyview, Dunfermline
- Benarty and Lochgelly
- Dysart, Smeaton,
- Buckhaven and Methil
- Small project steering group
- Study will provide action research and monitoring
for new Sustainable Communities Partnership Group
32Phase 2 Objectives
- Baseline information about the key determinants
of health and wellbeing for use over 10 years - ME framework for policies, programmes and
actions in regeneration areas - Track experience of a structured sample of
individuals and families, mainly most excluded or
at risk assess risk/opportunities for action
effectiveness of outcomes person centred - Deliver guidance for regeneration activity to
particularly maximise health and wellbeing
benefits for most excluded or at risk - Draw lessons for improving health and wellbeing
and disseminate widely - Inform and influence regularly the policy and
practice of regeneration process at local and
strategic levels - whole system action research
33Where at now
- Constructing Baseline
- Quantitative indicators from Public Health
Dataset and existing evidence base for ROA and
wider datazone groupings - Focus groups held to determine community derived
measures of health and wellbeing - Preparation of questionnaire for survey based and
qualitative evidence of health and wellbeing
includes panel recruitment linked to new Peoples
Panel for Fife - Monitoring and evaluation framework
- Drafting for consideration by Sustainable
Communities Group
34Tracking Study - First year pilot
- Qualitative, person focused, potentially action
research and person centred planning - recruiting 15 front-line workers across range of
local services (health, education social work,
employment, housing et al), preparatory workshops - Each worker to recruit one or two local people to
meet with 12 times in year one for semi
structured interview or activity working through - Understanding of study
- Developing a picture of health and wellbeing
- Imagining community
- Reflecting on services that impact on health and
wellbeing - Evaluation and whats next
- Ethics Committee submission underway
35Conclusions
- Fife Partnership - building our evidence base on
needs, spend, activity and outcomes to show - comprehensive wellbeing data set
- resource data to inform priorities
- if we are making a difference to the people and
communities with greatest needs now and in the
long term.
36- Systems do break some new ground
- Support analysis at wide range of geographies
from data zone building block- but precision is
variable - All three systems are still developinge.g. more
activity spend data for FSJAS - Are starting to build longitudinal capacity so
important for ensuring sustainable outcomes
37More information
- www.fifedirect.org.uk - search on research and
knowledge - contact chris.mitchell_at_fife.gov.uk or tel 01592
413267 - Know Fife Findings