Title: History of Astronomical Instruments
1History of Astronomical Instruments
- The early history
- From the unaided eye to telescopes
2The Human Eye
- Anatomy and
- Detection Characteristics
3Anatomy of the Human Eye
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14Visual Observations
- Navigation
- Calendars
- Unusual Objects (comets etc.)
15(No Transcript)
16Hawaiian Navigation From Tahiti to Hawaii Using
the North direction, Knowledge of the
lattitude, And the predominant direction of the
Trade Winds
17Tycho Quadrant
18(No Transcript)
19Hevelius Sextant
20Hevelius Quadrant
21Pre-Telescopic Observations
- Navigation
- Calendar
- Astrology
- Planetary Motion
- Copernican System
- Keplers Laws
22(No Transcript)
23Why build telescopes?
- Larger aperture means more light gathering power
- sensitivity goes like D2, where D is diameter of
main light collecting element (e.g., primary
mirror) - Larger aperture means better angular resolution
- resolution goes like lambda/D, where lambda is
wavelength and D is diameter of mirror
24Collection Telescopes
- Refractor telescopes
- exclusively use lenses to collect light
- have big disadvantages aberrations sheer
weight of lenses - Reflector telescopes
- use mirrors to collect light
- relatively free of aberrations
- mirror fabrication techniques steadily improving
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28William Herschel
Caroline Herschel
29Herschel 40 ft Telescope
30Optical Reflecting Telescopes
- Basic optical designs
- Prime focus light is brought to focus by primary
mirror, without further deflection - Newtonian use flat, diagonal secondary mirror to
deflect light out side of tube - Cassegrain use convex secondary mirror to
reflect light back through hole in primary - Nasmyth focus use tertiary mirror to redirect
light to external instruments
31Optical Reflecting Telescopes
- Use parabolic, concave primary mirror to collect
light from source - modern mirrors for large telescopes are
lightweight deformable, to optimize image
quality
3.5 meter WIYN telescope mirror, Kitt Peak,
Arizona
32Mirror Grinding Tool
33Mirror Polishing Machine
34Fine Ground Mirror
35Mirror Polishing
36Figuring the Asphere
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42Crossley 36 Reflector
43Yerkes 40-inch Refractor
44Drawing of the Moon (1865)
45First Photograph of the Moon (1865)
46The Limitations of Ground-based Observations
- Diffraction
- Seeing
- Sky Backgrounds
47Diffraction
48Wavefront Description of Optical System
49Wavefronts of Two Well Separated Stars
50When are Two Wavefront Distinguishable ?
51Atmospheric Turbulence
52Characteristics of Good Sites
- Geographic latitude 15 - 35
- Near the coast or isolated mountain
- Away from large cities
- High mountain
- Reasonable logistics
53Modern Observatories
The VLT Observatory at Paranal, Chile
54Modern Observatories
The ESO-VLT Observatory at Paranal, Chile
55(No Transcript)
56Puu Poliahu
UH 0.6-m
UH 2.2-m
UH 0.6-m
The first telescopes on Mauna Kea (1964-1970)
57Local SeeingFlow Pattern Around a Building
- Incoming neutral flow should enter the building
to contribute to flushing, the height of the
turbulent ground layer determines the minimum
height of the apertures. - Thermal exchanges with the ground by
re-circulation inside the cavity zone is the main
source of thermal turbulence in the wake.
58Mirror Seeing
- When a mirror is warmer that the air in an
undisturbed enclosure, a convective equilibrium
(full cascade) is reached after 10-15mn. The
limit on the convective cell size is set by the
mirror diameter
59LOCAL TURBULENCEMirror Seeing
The contribution to seeing due to turbulence over
the mirror is given by
- The warm mirror seeing varies slowly with the
thickness of the convective layer reduce height
by 3 orders of magnitude to divide mirror seeing
by 4, from 0.5 to 0.12 arcsec/K
60Mirror Seeing
The thickness of the boundary layer over a flat
plate increases with the distance to the edge in
the and with the flow velocity.
- When a mirror is warmer that the air in a flushed
enclosure, the convective cells cannot reach
equilibrium. The flushing velocity must be large
enough so as to decrease significantly (down to
10-30cm) the thickness turbulence over the whole
diameter of the mirror.
61Thermal Emission AnalysisVLT Unit Telescope
- UT3 Enclosure
- 19 Feb. 1999
- 0h34 Local Time
- Wind summit ENE, 4m/s
- Air Temp summit 13.8C
62(No Transcript)
63Gemini South Dome
64(No Transcript)
65Coating- thermal properties
66Enclosure coatings
- UKIRT - reflective bare aluminum
- UH - TiO2-based white paint
- GEMINI - Al-based Lo-Mit paint
- CFHT - TiO2-based white paint
- IRTF - reflective aluminum foil
- KECK - TiO2-based white paint
- SUBARU - - reflective Alclad siding
67CFHT
Keck
UKIRT
IfA
Gemini
IRTF
Subaru
68Coatings tested
- red metal primer ACE
- CFHT white paint Triangle Paint Co.
- Gemini aluminum paint Lo-Mit
- IRTF Al foil 3.1mil 3M product 439
- light blue acrylic latex ACE color 24-D
- dark blue acrylic latex ACE color 24-B
69White
Al foil
Lo-Mit
Primer
70Solar spectrum
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73Coatings - conclusions
- Paints
- all paints supercool at night by radiating to the
sky - white paint heats the least in sunlight
- pigmented paints heat more than white during the
day - Reflective coatings
- ideal thermal properties
- heat very little during the day
- hardly supercool at all at night
74(No Transcript)
75Conclusions
- Curved surfaces remain visible over wide areas
regardless of whether they are painted or
reflective, and are therefore difficult to hide. - Flat panels CAN produce very bright glares, but
only in very specific directions. Outside these
directions a panel will reflects blue sky. - The reflection of sunlight from cylindrical
reflecting surfaces is much brighter than from
spherical surfaces of similar size. - White domes and reflective domes in direct
sunlight are equally bright, but reflective domes
are visible much longer
76Sunset on Mauna Kea
Keck I and Subaru September 20, 1999
77Conclusions
- Telescope enclosures with both low visibility and
excellent thermal properties are possible - A promising approach
- highly reflective siding
- vertical flat walls
- active control of glare geometries
- Domes - painted or reflective are hard to hide
- Reflective domes remain highly visible longer
than painted domes
78(No Transcript)
79(No Transcript)
80(No Transcript)
81(No Transcript)
82(No Transcript)
83(No Transcript)
84(No Transcript)
85(No Transcript)
86(No Transcript)
87(No Transcript)
88(No Transcript)
89(No Transcript)
90(No Transcript)
91(No Transcript)
92Night Sky Emission Lines at Optical Wavelengths
93Sky Background in J, H, and K Bands
94Sky Background in L and M Band
95V-band sky brightness variations
96J-band OH Emission Lines
97H-band OH Emission Lines
98K-band OH Emission Lines
99(No Transcript)
100(No Transcript)
101(No Transcript)
102(No Transcript)
103Uncorrected
104ADC Conceptual Design
- Linear ADC design
- Variable prism separation provides correction
- UV-to-near IR transmission requires fused silica
optics -
Nulled
Fully Open, Z60?
105(No Transcript)
106Corrector for 4m prime focus telescope (parabolic
mirror)
This corrector includes an atmospheric dispersion
compensator consisting of 2 counter-rotating
lenses (doublet)