Rights Theories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Rights Theories

Description:

Regan says both humans and animals have inherent value in themselves and not ... Regan concludes that the quality of being 'experiencing subjects of life' is the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Relst
Category:
Tags: regan | rights | theories

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rights Theories


1
Rights Theories
2
Rights
  • American culture has been heavily influenced by
    the philosophical notion of rights
  • We speak of both legal and moral rights
  • Legal We have a right to public education
  • Moral We have a right to know if a spouse is
    cheating on us

3
Rights
  • None of the early philosophers spoke of rights
  • The idea of rights did not surface until the
    seventeenth century

4
What is a right?
  • There is no general agreement as to what rights
    people actually have
  • It is often difficult to distinguish legal rights
    from moral rights pornography example
  • Ronald Dworkin defines a right as a sphere of
    activity or an area of ones life protected from
    outside interference
  • You should be able to do what you want with your
    money without outside interference

5
Rights
  • However, many westerners claim to have rights
    that do not fit this definition
  • Dworkins definition is too narrow
  • An additional definition of rights entails the
    idea that a burden is placed on society
  • Right to affordable housing
  • Right to vote
  • In the above examples, the rights of individuals
    depend upon some action of others, not just the
    lack of interference

6
John Locke
  • British philosopher who lived from 1632-1704
  • Locke had a profound influence on American
    society
  • Locke maintains that our natural rights are
    God-given
  • Locke claimed that all people are endowed by God
    with a number of basic rights, most notably the
    right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
    property

7
John Locke
  • Locke equates human reason to natural law
  • He claims that if we follow our reason we will
    see that roughly all humans have the same basic
    capacities (five senses, memory, reason,
    imagination, etc.)
  • If this is the case than no person can naturally
    be the property of another and no one is
    authorized to take the life of another
  • So, all humans have a right to life and liberty
  • For Locke, God is the owner of all human life so
    anyone who murders or enslaves another is taking
    Gods property and defying Gods wishes
  • So human rights are founded in the authority of
    God and the laws of nature He has instilled in
    human beings

8
John Locke
  • Private property
  • God gave everything in the natural world to
    humanity in general no tree, cow, land, etc.
    was given to a specific individual
  • When someone adds his labor to something in the
    natural world, that something becomes his
    property
  • Locke argues that prior to the addition of human
    labor, most things in the natural world are
    useless

9
Tom Regan
  • Regan believes people (and animals) have rights
    not because they are given by God, but because of
    some capacity they possess
  • Humans and animals are experiencing subjects of
    life. This is the foundation for rights.
  • Regan says both humans and animals have inherent
    value in themselves and not necessarily because
    of their usefulness to others

10
Tom Regan
  • Regan asks what quality all humans have in common
    that makes them valuable and worthy of having
    rights
  • He says if we were to ground our rights in the
    ability to reason or make informed choices, etc.,
    then we would have to conclude that humans who
    cannot perform those functions (infants,
    disabled) would not have the same rights as
    others.
  • Regan concludes that the quality of being
    experiencing subjects of life is the
    characteristic that connects humanity
  • This Characteristic also relates to animals and
    thus animals have rights as well as humans

11
John Rawls
  • Rawls was a Harvard professor of philosophy and
    lived from 1921-2003
  • Rawls claimed that our rights are grounded in a
    social contract agreement among the people in
    a community about what rights they have
  • Rawls suggested that if a society were to be
    truly just, the free and rational citizens of the
    society would formulate their principles from
    behind a Veil of Ignorance

12
John Rawls
  • Rawls claimed that if people formed their
    principles from behind a Veil of Ignorance then
    they would come up with two principles
  • First Principle Each person is to have an equal
    right to the most extensive total system of basic
    liberty compatible with a similar system of
    liberty for all
  • Second Principle Social and economic
    inequalities are arranged so that they are both
  • A. to the greatest benefit of the least
    advantaged
  • B. attached to offices and positions open to all
    under conditions of fair equality of opportunity

13
John Rawls
  • The first principle is familiar to American
    people should be able to do whatever they choose
    provided it does not interfere with other
    peoples ability to do whatever they choose
  • The second principle asserts that equal
    opportunities should be available to all, but it
    acknowledges that some people will achieve more
    than others, and this is acceptable as long as it
    benefits society as a whole (for example it
    benefits society as a whole to value medical
    doctors because it improves healthcare for
    everybody)

14
Rights and Catholic Christianity
  • Catholic Christianity recognizes that the Church
    does not confer rights to people rights are
    given by God (prior to society)
  • Catholic Christianity asserts that human rights
    belong to human nature and are inherent in the
    person

15
Differences
  • Too much attention on rights can diminish the
    idea of responsibility Good Samaritan Laws
  • The language of rights cannot capture the
    richness and complexity of human relationships
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com